Fundamental Level of Trust

doi:10.1017/9781108770880.002

Part I - Fundamental Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2021

Edited by

Frank Krueger

Show author details

Frank Krueger: Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Neurobiology of Trust , pp. 13 - 98

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770880.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Brion, S., Lount, R. B., & Doyle, S. P. (2015). Knowing if you are trusted: Does meta-accuracy promote trust development? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615590200 Google Scholar

Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511 Google Scholar

Buyukcan‐Tetik, A., Finkenauer, C., Siersema, M., Vander Heyden, K., & Krabbendam, L. (2015). Social relations model analyses of perceived self‐control and trust in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12154 Google Scholar

Campagna, R. L., Dirks, K. T., Knight, A. P., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2020). On the relation between felt trust and actual trust: Examining pathways to and implications of leader trust meta-accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(9), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000474 Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Rubin, H. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019714 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carter, N. L., & Weber, J. M. (2010). Not pollyannas: Higher generalized trust predicts lie detection ability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609360261 Google Scholar

Cortes, K., & Wood, J. V. (2019). How was your day? Conveying care, but under the radar, for people lower in trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.003 Google Scholar

De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110 Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations (pp. 88–114). John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255 Google Scholar

Eibach, R. P., & Mock, S. E. (2011). The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents’ risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 694–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.009 Google Scholar

Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. W. W Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Fonseca, M. A., & Peters, K. (2018). Will any gossip do? Gossip does not need to be perfectly accurate to promote trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.015 Google Scholar

Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002 Google Scholar

Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2019). Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: A cross country panel analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0021-0 CrossRef Google Scholar

Greiner, B., & Zednik, A. (2019). Trust and age: An experiment with current and former students. Economics Letters, 181, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.004 Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2003). Gaming trust. In Ostrom, E. & Walker, J. (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 80–101). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In Lerner, M. J. & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 261–284). Plenum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Sage.Google Scholar

Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007 Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.Google Scholar

Kille, D. R., Eibach, R. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Who can’t take a compliment? The role of construal level and self-esteem in accepting positive feedback from close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.003 Google Scholar

Kim, J. S., Weisberg, Y. J., Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., Farrell, A. K., & Johnson, W. F. (2015). Ruining it for both of us: The disruptive role of low-trust partners on conflict resolution in romantic relationships. Social Cognition, 33(5), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.520 Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (2001). Trust and intergroup negotiation. In Brown, R. & Gaertner, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 431–450). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self‐evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1861 CrossRef Google Scholar

Luchies, L. B., Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., et al. (2013). Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031054 Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. H., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Dispositional pathways to trust: Self-esteem and agreeableness interact to predict trust and negative emotional disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000093 Google Scholar

Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002 Google Scholar

Molden, D. C., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.014 Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641 Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Pinkus, R. T., Holmes, J. G., et al. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023233 Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies of interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464 Google Scholar

Saef, R. M., Porter, C. M., Woo, S. E., & Wiese, C. (2019). Getting off on the right foot: The role of openness to experience in fostering initial trust between culturally dissimilar partners. Journal of Research in Psychology, 79, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.003 Google Scholar

Shallcross, S. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2012). Trust and responsiveness in strain-test situations: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026829 Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587–607). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2016). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 91–116). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Stamos, A., Altsitsiadis, E., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust: Lower childhood socioeconomic status predict lower levels of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.011 Google Scholar

Ter Kuile, H., Kluwer, E. S., Finkenauer, C., & Van der Lippe, T. (2017). Predicting adaptation to parenthood: The role of responsiveness, gratitude, and trust. Personal Relationship, 24, 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12202 Google Scholar

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.Google Scholar

Uysal, A., Lin, H. L., & Bush, A. L. (2012). The reciprocal cycle of self‐concealment and trust in romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1904 Google Scholar

Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414552473 Google Scholar

Van Lange, P. A. M., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., & Posthuma, D. (2014). Genetic influences are virtually absent for trust. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93880. https://10.1371/journal.pone.0093880 Google Scholar

Yucel, D. (2013). Number of siblings and generalized trust. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(8), 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1399 Google Scholar

Zlatev, J. J. (2019). I may not agree with you, but I trust you: Caring about social issues signals integrity. Psychological Science, 30(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619837948 Google Scholar

References

Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2000). The moonlighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167–2681(00)00089-5 Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047–2727(01)00084-6 Google Scholar

Alós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust games and beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anderhub, V., Engelmann, D., & Güth, W. (2002). An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167–2681(01)00216-5 Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(4), 343–362.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627541700157 Google Scholar

Banerjee, R. (2018). On the interpretation of World Values Survey trust question: Global expectations vs. local beliefs. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.04.008 Google Scholar

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single‐response sequential method. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304 Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C., Xiao, E., & Muldoon, R. (2011). Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10387260 Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn004 Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294 Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., & Meier, S. (2012). Trust, distrust, and bargaining. In Croson, R. & Bolton, G. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730858.013.0017 Google Scholar

Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1996). Trust and third-party gossip. In Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 68–89). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857331 Google Scholar

Camerer, C., & Vepsalainen, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090712 Google Scholar

Camerer, C., & Weigelt, K. (1988). Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911840 Google Scholar

Chang, L. J., & Smith, A. (2015). Social emotions and psychological games. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.010 Google Scholar

Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Zünd, C. L. (2019). Civic honesty around the globe. Science, 365(6448), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1126/science.aau8712 Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 Google Scholar

Cook, K. S., & State, B. (2015). Trust and economic organization. In Scott, R. & Kosslyn, S. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–11). Wiley.Google Scholar

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organizational Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640 Google Scholar

Dufwenberg, M., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 Google Scholar

Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001 Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159 Google Scholar

Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D., & Stacchetti, E. (1989). Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games and Economic Behavior, 1(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-8256(89)90005-5 Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1973). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464498 Google Scholar

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557–2600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01408.x Google Scholar

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095–1131. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1095 Google Scholar

Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1998). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625497 Google Scholar

Ho, B. (2012). Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. Management Science, 58(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1410 Google Scholar

Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007 Google Scholar

King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321(5890), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156902 Google Scholar

Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475 Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. In Alt, J. & Shepsle, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90–143). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571657.006 Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1 Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990 Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075319 Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302.Google Scholar

Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36(3), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01255.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 Google Scholar

Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 58–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463195007001004 Google Scholar

Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sobel, J. (2002). Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051027001 Google Scholar

Solow, R. M. (1995). But verify. New Republic, 213(11), 36–39. [Review of Fukuyama, Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, The Free Press.]Google Scholar

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2011). Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. American Economic Review, 101(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.281 Google Scholar

Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person–situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000046 Google Scholar

References

Appel, J., von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N. C., & Gratch, J. (2012). Does humanity matter? Analyzing the importance of social cues and perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012, Article 324694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/324694 Google Scholar

Ba, S. L., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132332 Google Scholar

Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009 Google Scholar

Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017). Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23451 Google Scholar

Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social-history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 Google Scholar

Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. (2005). Computers that care: Investigating the effects or orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.002 Google Scholar

Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10), 3721–3726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710069105 Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., & Nagel, R. (2009). Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(23), 9163–9168. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807721106 Google Scholar

De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., et al. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092 Google Scholar

Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721433 Google Scholar

Fehr, E. (2009a). On the economics and biology of trust. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235 Google Scholar

Fehr, E. (2009b). Social preferences and the brain. In Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. A. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 215–232). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-12-374176-9.00015-4 Google Scholar

Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006 Google Scholar

Fogg, B. J., & Nass, C. (1997). How users reciprocate to computers: An experiment that demonstrates behavior change. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1997, 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120419 Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/355112.355120 Google Scholar

Friedman, B., & Millett, L. I. (1997). Reasoning about computers as moral agents: A research note. In Friedman, B. (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 201–205). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16(3), 814–821. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1117 Google Scholar

Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Striking a balance between trust anti control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal, 11(4), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00108.x Google Scholar

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254 Google Scholar

Hubert, M., Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2018). Trust me if you can: Neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0870 Google Scholar

ITU. (2019). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019. www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdf Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028 Google Scholar

Javor, A., Ransmayr, G., Struhal, W., & Riedl, R. (2016). Parkinson patients’ initial trust in avatars: Theory and evidence. PLoS ONE, 11(11), Article e0165998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165998 Google Scholar

Javor, A., Riedl, R., Kirchmayr, M., Reichenberger, M., & Ransmayr, G. (2015). Trust behavior in Parkinson’s disease: Results of a trust game experiment. BMC Neurology, 15(126), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883–015-0374-5 Google Scholar

Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007 Google Scholar

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.004 Google Scholar

Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., Steel, D. J., Abraham, C., & Loughlin, P. M. (2007). Identity formation, learning styles and trust in virtual worlds. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314234.1314251 Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997 Google Scholar

Kopton, I., Sommer, J., Winkelmann, A., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2013). Users’ trust building processes during their initial connecting behavior in social networks: behavioral and neural evidence. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 107.Google Scholar

Krach, S., Blümel, I., Marjoram, D., et al. (2009). Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-9 Google Scholar

Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., & Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS ONE, 3(7), Article e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597 Google Scholar

Krueger, F., McCabe, K., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 20084–20089. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710103104 Google Scholar

Krueger, F., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Toward a model of interpersonal trust drawn from neuroscience, psychology, and economics. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004 Google Scholar

Lankton, N. K., & McKnight, D. H. (2011). What does it mean to trust Facebook? Examining technology and interpersonal trust beliefs. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(2), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989098.1989101 Google Scholar

Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 880–918. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411 Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392 Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792 Google Scholar

McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11832–11835. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211415698 Google Scholar

McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353 Google Scholar

McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In Falcone, R., Singh, M., & Tan, Y. H. (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives (pp. 27–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3 Google Scholar

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 Google Scholar

Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(5–6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020–7373(87)80013-5 Google Scholar

Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Henriksen, L., & Dryer, D. C. (1994). Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to “self-” or “other-” evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(3), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1025 Google Scholar

Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Tauber, E., & Reeder, H. (1993). Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: Computers as social actors. Proceedings of the INTERCHI ‘93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1993, 111–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/259964.260137 Google Scholar

Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0103 Google Scholar

Paravastu, N., Gefen, D., & Creason, S. (2014). Understanding trust in IT artifacts: An evaluation of the impact of trustworthiness and trust on satisfaction with antiviral software. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 45(4), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691517.2691520 Google Scholar

Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 183–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148633 Google Scholar

Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015 Google Scholar

Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036538 Google Scholar

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press/CSLI.Google Scholar

Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721434 Google Scholar

Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026318 Google Scholar

Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F. D., & Heekeren, H. (2011). Trusting humans and avatars: Behavioral and neural evidence. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems, 2011, 1–23.Google Scholar

Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F. D., & Heekeren, H. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742–1222300404 Google Scholar

Rilling, J. K, Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896–6273(02)00755-9 Google Scholar

Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22(4), 1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.015 Google Scholar

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. F. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 Google Scholar

Seppänen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Sundqvist, S. (2007). Measuring inter-organizational trust: A critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003 Google Scholar

Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Wacker, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Understanding the formation of trust in IT artifacts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 2012.Google Scholar

Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.17 Google Scholar

Swan, J. E., Bowers, M. R., & Richardson, L. D. (1999). Customer trust in the salesperson: An integrative review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148–2963(97)00244-0 Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tzieropoulos, H. (2013). The trust game in neuroscience: A short review. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.832375 Google Scholar

Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065 Google Scholar

Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005 Google Scholar

Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn816 Google Scholar

Yanquing, D., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data: Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books.Google Scholar

References

Akash, K., Hu, W. L., Jain, N., & Reid, T. (2018). A classification model for sensing human trust in machines using EEG and GSR. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132743 Google Scholar

Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.003 Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, H. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men: Research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social-history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 Google Scholar

Biros, D. P., Daly, M., & Gunsch, G. (2004). The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57 Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.Google Scholar

Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: The five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2293 Google Scholar

Chen, J. Y. C., & Terrence, P. I. (2009). Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment. Ergonomics, 52(8), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802680773 Google Scholar

Chien, S. Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Liu, J. S., & Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 840–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601192 Google Scholar

Costa, A. C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32(5), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310488360 Google Scholar

De Visser, E. J., Beatty, P. J., Estepp, J. R., et al. (2018). Learning from the slips of others: Neural correlates of trust in automated agents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(309), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00309 Google Scholar

Desai, M., Kaniarasu, P., Medvedev, M., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2013). Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust. 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’13, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483596 Google Scholar

Dijkstra, J. (1995). The influence of an expert system on the user’s view: How to fool a lawyer. New Review of Applied Expert Systems, 1, 123–138.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, J. (1999). User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(6), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999118832 Google Scholar

Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., Tullis, T., & Dai, R. (2010). Efficiency, trust, and visual appeal: Usability testing through eye tracking. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.171 Google Scholar

Drnec, K., Marathe, A. R., Lukos, J. R., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2016). From trust in automation to decision neuroscience: Applying cognitive neuroscience methods to understand and improve interaction decisions involved in human automation interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(290), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00290 Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90046-5 Google Scholar

Ellis, L. U., Sims, V. K., Chin, M. G., et al. (2005). Those a-maze-ing robots: Attributions of ability are based on form, not behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900382 Google Scholar

Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), 462–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185595 Google Scholar

Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2019). Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognition, Technology and Work, 21(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111–018-0512-0 Google Scholar

Evers, V., Maldonado, H. C., Brodecki, T. L., & Hinds, P. J. (2008). Relational vs. group self-construal. 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’08, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349856 Google Scholar

Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796 Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 Google Scholar

Groom, V., Srinivasan, V., Bethel, C. L., Murphy, R., Dole, L., & Nass, C. (2011). Responses to robot social roles and social role framing. International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928687 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A. (1996). Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39(9), 1146–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964535 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. The American Psychologist, 68(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030214 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A. (2019). Some pitfalls in the promises of automated and autonomous vehicles. Ergonomics, 62(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1498136 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., & Schaefer, K. E. (2011). Can you trust your robot? Ergonomics in Design, 19(3), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804611415045 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254 Google Scholar

Hancock, P. A., Kessler, T. T., Kaplan, A. D., Brill, J. C., & Szalma, J. L. (2020). Evolving trust in robots: Specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Human Factors, 62(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820922080 Google Scholar

Haring, K. S., Matsumoto, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2013). How do people perceive and trust a lifelike robot. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 1, 425–430.Google Scholar

Heerink, M. (2011). Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’11, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957704 Google Scholar

Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2018). Under pressure: Examining social conformity with computer and robot groups. Human Factors, 60(8), 1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818788473 Google Scholar

Jenkins, Q., & Jiang, X. (2010). Measuring trust and application of eye tracking in human robotic interaction. IIE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1.Google Scholar

Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04 Google Scholar

Joosse, M., Lohse, M., Perez, J. G., & Evers, V. (2013). What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630863 Google Scholar

Kaplan, A. D., Kessler, T. T., Sanders, T. L., Cruit, J., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A. (2020). Time to trust: Trust as a function of time in human-robot interaction. In Nam, C. & Lyons, J. (Eds.), Trust in human-robot interaction (pp. 143–159). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kessler, T., Stowers, K., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A. (2017). Comparisons of human-human trust with other forms of human-technology trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601808 Google Scholar

Khawaji, A., Zhou, J., Chen, F., & Marcus, N. (2015). Using galvanic skin response (GSR) to measure trust and cognitive load in the text-chat environment. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA’15, 1989–1994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732766 Google Scholar

Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Routledge.Google Scholar

Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392 Google Scholar

Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007 Google Scholar

Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 Google Scholar

Li, D., Rau, P. L. P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369–010-0056-9 Google Scholar

Linderman, T. (2018). Using an orange to fool Tesla’s autopilot is probably a really bad ideas. Motherboard: Tech by Vice. www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3na9p/tesla-autosteer-orange-hack Google Scholar

Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Cnossen, F. (2010). Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007 Google Scholar

McBride, M., & Morgan, S. (2010). Trust calibration for automated decision aids. Research Brief, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar

Merritt, S. M. (2011). Affective processes in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 53(4), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811411912 Google Scholar

Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 Google Scholar

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2020). Driver assistance technologies. United States Department of Transportation. www.nhtsa.gov/equipment/driver-assistance-technologies Google Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board. (2017). Collision between a car operating with automated vehicle control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck. Highway Accident Report.Google Scholar

Natsoulas, T. (1967). What are perceptual reports about? Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024320 Google Scholar

Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nom Google Scholar

Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886 CrossRef Google Scholar

Phillips, E., Ullman, D., De Graaf, M. M. A., & Malle, B. F. (2017). What does a robot look like?: A multi-site examination of user expectations about robot appearance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601786 Google Scholar

Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61 Google Scholar

Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology, and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026318 Google Scholar

Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F., & Heekeren, H. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742–1222300404 Google Scholar

Sanders, T. L., Kaplan, A. P., Koch, R., Schwartz, M., & Hancock, P. A. (2019). The relationship between trust and use choice in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 61(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818816838 Google Scholar

Schaefer, K. E. (2013). The perception and measurement of human-robot trust [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Central Florida.Google Scholar

Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634228 Google Scholar

Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M. V., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209–005-0118-1 Google Scholar

Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation-induced “complacency”: Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0302_2 Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five-factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024170 Google Scholar

Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., & Yanco, H. A. (2010). Considering the bystander’s perspective for indirect human-robot interaction. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’10, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734506 Google Scholar

Volante, W. G., Sosna, J., Kessler, T., Sanders, T. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2019). Social conformity effects on trust in simulation-based human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 61(5), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818811190 Google Scholar

Wang, L., Rau, P. L. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & Hinds, P. (2010). When in Rome: The role of culture and context in adherence to robot recommendations. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’10, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734578 Google Scholar

Yagoda, R. E., & Gillan, D. J. (2012). You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human-robot interaction trust scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369–012-0144-0 Google Scholar

Book contents

Part I - Fundamental Level of Trust

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive