Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:32:55.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The neural systems processing tool and action semantics

from Part IV - Representations of Nouns and Verbs vs. Objects and Actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

Uta Noppeney
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics
John Hart
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Dallas
Michael A. Kraut
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the contributions of functional imaging to our understanding of how action and tool concepts are represented and processed in the human brain. Section 7.1 introduces cognitive models of semantic organization. Section 7.2 provides a brief overview of functional imaging approaches to identify brain regions that have specialized for processing action and tool representations. Section 7.3 discusses the relationship between the visuomotor system and semantic processing of actions. Section 7.4 investigates the effects of action type and visual experience on action-selective responses. Section 7.5 characterizes the neural systems engaged in tool processing and how they are modulated by task and stimulus modality. Section 7.6 delineates future directions that may enable us to characterize the neural mechanisms that mediate tool and action-selective brain responses.

Cognitive models of semantic organization

Since the seminal work of Warrington and Shallice (1984), double dissociations of semantic deficits have been established between tools and animals (for review, see Gainotti et al., 1995; Warrington & Shallice, 1984; Capitani et al., 2003; Gainotti & Silveri, 1996; Farah et al., 1996; Hillis & Caramazza, 1991; Sacchett & Humphreys, 1992; Warrington & McCarthy, 1987). These double dissociations persist even when attempts are made to control general processing differences due to confounding variables such as familiarity, visual complexity, or word frequency (Farah et al., 1996; Sartori et al., 1993). They appear, therefore, to reflect some sort of semantic organization at the neuronal level.

Many cognitive models have been offered to explain these category-specific deficits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In Newman, S. K. and Epstein, R. (eds.), Current Perspectives in Dysphasia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, pp. 32–60.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. and Bota, M. (2003). Language evolution: neural homologies and neuroinformatics. Neural Networks, 16: 1237–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 84–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., and Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34: 149–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., and Martin, A. (2003). FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15: 991–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Argall, B. D., and Martin, A. (2004). Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41: 809–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., and Evans, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 16: 3737–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., et al. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 23: 361–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., et al. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13: 400–4.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., et al. (2004a). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16: 114–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., et al. (2004b). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42: 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxbaum, L., Veramonti, T., and Schwartz, M. (2000). Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing “what for” but not “how”. Neurocase, 6: 83–97.Google Scholar
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., and Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20: 213–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappa, S. F., Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., and Fazio, F. (1998). The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical–semantic access: a PET study. Neuroimage, 8: 350–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A. and Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate–inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, L. L. and Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12: 478–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., and Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2: 913–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, L. L., Weisberg, J., and Martin, A. (2002). Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex, 12: 545–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contreras, V. (2002). Category-specific effects: segregation of semantic knowledge and degree of feature processing in the brain. Thesis/Dissertation.
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., and Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380: 499–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlin, J. T., Moore, C. J., Mummery, C. J., et al. (2002). Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity. Neuroimage, 15: 675–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, F. and He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8: 1380–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, M. J., McMullen, P. A., and Meyer, M. M. (1996). The living–nonliving dissociation is not an artefact: giving an a priori implausible hypothesis a strong test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., and Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308: 662–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogassi, L. and Luppino, G. (2005). Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15: 626–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. J., Penny, W. D., and Glaser, D. E. (2005). Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage, 25: 661–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gainotti, G., Giustolisi, L., Daniele, A., and Silveri, M. C. (1995). Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: a critical survey. Memory, 3: 247–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gainotti, G. and Silveri, M. C. (1996). Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13: 357–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., and Paulson, O. B. (2000). Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition. A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 38: 1693–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., and Paulson, O. B. (2002a). The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artifacts – a PET study. Neuroimage, 15: 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, C., Law, I., and Paulson, O. B. (2002b). When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14: 1230–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, T. J., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. R. (1998). Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. Neuroimage, 7: 232–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., and Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6: 231–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grezes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J., and Passingham, R. E. (2003). Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18: 928–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grezes, J., Costes, N., and Decety, J. (1998). Top–down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15: 553–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., and Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41: 301–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, A. E. and Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. Brain, 114: 2081–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwitz, B. (2003). The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage, 19: 466–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. W. and Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral Brain Science, 24: 453–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., and Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. Public Library of Science Biology, 3: e79.Google ScholarPubMed
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., and Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286: 2526–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, T. W. and Gauthier, I. (2003). Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions. Current Biology, 13: 1792–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Frey, S. H., Maloof, F. R., Newman-Norlund, R., Farrer, C., Inati, S., and Grafton, S. T. (2003). Actions or hand–object interactions? Human inferior frontal cortex and action observation. Neuron, 39: 1053–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, J. E. (2001). Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellenbach, M., Brett, M., and Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions. The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15: 30–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297: 846–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtzi, Z. and Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraut, M. A., Moo, L. R., Segal, J. B., and Hart, J Jr. (2002). Neural activation during an explicit categorization task: category- or feature-specific effects?Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 13: 213–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, J. W., Brefczynski, J. A., Phinney, R. E.Janik, J. J., and DeYoe, E. A. (2005). Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 25: 5148–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. and Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L., and Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science, 270: 102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A, Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (2000). Category-specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1023–37.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379: 649–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, A. R. (2000). Towards a network theory of cognition. Neural Networks, 13: 861–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mechelli, A., Price, C. J., Noppeney, U., and Friston, K. J. (2003). A dynamic causal modeling study on category effects: bottom–up or top–down mediation?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15: 925–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Besson, M., Magnie, M. N., and Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12: 1115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Annals of Neurology, 28: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. J. and Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain, 122: 943–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J. R., and Price, C. J. (1998). Functional neuroanatomy of the semantic system: divisible by what?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10: 766–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J. R., and Wise, R. J. (1996). Generating “tiger” as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B: Biological Sciences, 263: 989–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., and Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83: 2580–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelissen, K., Luppino, G., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G., and Orban, G. A. (2005). Observing others: multiple action representation in the frontal lobe. Science, 310: 332–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, T., Brett, M., Andersson, J., Wager, T., and Poline, J. B. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage, 25: 653–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noppeney U. (2004). The feature-based model of semantic memory. In Frackowiak, R., Friston, K., Frith, C. D., et al. (eds.), Human Brain Function. London: Elsevier, pp. 533–47.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U. and Price, C. J. (2002). A PET study of stimulus- and task-induced semantic processing. Neuroimage, 15: 927–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noppeney, U., Friston, K., and Price, C. (2003). Effects of visual deprivation on the organisation of the semantic system. Brain, 126: 1620–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noppeney, U., Josephs, O., Kiebel, S., Friston, K., and Price, C. (2005). Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 25: 641–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Noppeney, U., Price, C. J., Penny, W. D., and Friston, K. J. (2006). Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex, 16: 437–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perani, D., Fazio, F., Borghese, N. A., et al. (2001). Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage, 14: 749–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Gorno-Tempini, M., Cappa, S. F., and Fazio, F. (1999). Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia, 37: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrides, M., Cadoret, G., and Mackey, S. (2005). Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca's area. Nature, 435: 1235–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. A., Humphreys, G. W., Noppeney, U., and Price, C. J. (2002a). The neural substrates of action retrieval: an examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Vision and Cognition, 9(4): 662–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. A., Noppeney, U., Humphreys, G. W., and Price, C. J. (2002b). Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits?Brain, 125: 2067–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, C. and Friston, K. (2002). Functional imaging studies of category specificity. In Forde, E. M. and Humphreys, G. W. (eds.), Category Specificity in Brain and Mind. Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press, pp. 427–45.Google Scholar
Price, C. J. and Friston, K. J. (1997). Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage, 5: 261–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6: 576–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21: 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., et al. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111: 246–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2002). Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12: 149–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G. and Luppino, G. (2001). The cortical motor system. Neuron, 31: 889–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruby, P. and Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4: 546–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushworth, M. F., Ellison, A., and Walsh, V. (2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4: 656–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushworth, M. F., Johansen-Berg, H., Gobel, S. M., and Devlin, J. T. (2003). The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. Neuroimage, 20 Suppl 1: S89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacchett, C. and Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a categry-specific deficit for artifactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5: 3–25.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Job, R., and Miozzo, M. (1993). Category-specific naming impairments? Yes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, C., Barnes, J., Giampietro, V., et al. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology, 10: 16–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., and Poncet, M. (1991). The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain, 114: 2555–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., et al. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Aguirre, G. K., D'Esposito, M., and Farah, M. J. (1999). A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 37: 671–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K. and Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cognitive Science, 5: 244–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., and Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75: 195–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). I know what you are doing. a neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Ostergaard, S., Ostergaard, L., and Roepstorff, A. (2005). Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. Neuroreport, 16: 649–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburton, E., Wise, R. J., Price, C. J., et al. (1996). Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects. Studies with PET. Brain, 119: 159–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. and McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110: 1273–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. and Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107: 829–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×