Book contents
- Network Origins of the Global Economy
- Network Origins of the Global Economy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Overview
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Political Economy and Complex Systems
- Part II An Analysis of Historical Regimes
- 4 Network Assemblage of Regime Stability and Resilience in Europe and China
- 5 Network Formation and the Emergence of Law: From Feudalism to Small-World Connectivity
- 6 The Network Foundations of the Great Divergence
- Part III The Coming Instability
- References
- Index
5 - Network Formation and the Emergence of Law: From Feudalism to Small-World Connectivity
from Part II - An Analysis of Historical Regimes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 March 2020
- Network Origins of the Global Economy
- Network Origins of the Global Economy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Overview
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Political Economy and Complex Systems
- Part II An Analysis of Historical Regimes
- 4 Network Assemblage of Regime Stability and Resilience in Europe and China
- 5 Network Formation and the Emergence of Law: From Feudalism to Small-World Connectivity
- 6 The Network Foundations of the Great Divergence
- Part III The Coming Instability
- References
- Index
Summary
The second great transition is the organic development of the Western legal system – from legal frameworks for succession and transmitting landed property to the oaths of fealty, on into a macroscopic nexus of institutions, practices, and beliefs that formed a hypernetwork within the wider society. The evolution of the legal tradition, forging a system of strong but limited states, is a story of increasing returns. No legal document or pact like the Magna Carta exists in China. Its aristocracies never gained sufficient military, political, or ideological strength to demand rights that could constrain the sovereign via institutions. Imperial officialdom did not intend to negotiate with a corporate body in possession of its own resources and rights. Nor did the bureaucratic clans have any incentive to stem the centralization of authority. They acted as representatives of the state’s interests, not those of civil society. The legalist/Confucian state exercised authority over economic resources to an extent that no European monarch could hope to accomplish. It also counterbalanced power with a code of ethical responsibilities to ensure the basic needs of the population.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Network Origins of the Global EconomyEast vs. West in a Complex Systems Perspective, pp. 112 - 147Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020