Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:26:10.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2021

Edited by
Henrik Jepsen ,
Magnus Lundgren ,
Kai Monheim  and
Hayley Walker
Henrik Jepsen
Affiliation:
Centre for Multilateral Negotiations
Magnus Lundgren
Affiliation:
Centre for Multilateral Negotiations
Kai Monheim
Affiliation:
Centre for Multilateral Negotiations
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Negotiating the Paris Agreement
The Insider Stories
 , pp. 365 - 382
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Barrett, S. (2005). Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2016). The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative, and International Environmental Law, 25(2), 142–150.Google Scholar
Brun, A. (2016). Conference Diplomacy: The Making of the Paris Agreement. Politics and Governance, 4(3), 115–123.Google Scholar
Clémençon, R. (2016). The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough? The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Depledge, J. (2005). The Organization of Global Negotiations: Constructing the Climate Change Regime. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Depledge, J. (2007). A Special Relationship: Chairpersons and the Secretariat in the Climate Change Negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 7(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, R. S. (2016). The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
Fabius, L. (2016). 37 Quai D’Orsay: Diplomatie francaise 2012–2016, digital ed. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.Google Scholar
Jepsen, H. (2013). Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed: Issue linkage in the international climate change negotiations. Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus University, Politica.Google Scholar
Kinley, R. , et al. (2016). Profiles of Paris, https://profilesofparis.com/Google Scholar
Klein, D., Carazo, M. P., Doelle, M., Bulmer, J. and Higham, A. (eds.) (2017). The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L. L. (1992). Interests, Power and Multilateralism. International Organization, 46(4), 765–792.Google Scholar
Mintzer, I. M. and Leonard, J. A. (eds.) (1994). Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monheim, K. (2016). The ‘Power of Process’: How Negotiation Management Influences Multilateral Cooperation. International Negotiation, 21(3), 345–80.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2009). Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle, and Doha. International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), 273–299.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. and Ott, H .E. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. and Bodle, R. (2016). Legal Form and Nature of the Paris Outcome. Climate Law, 6(1–2), 40–57.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. and Groen, L. (2018). Explaining Goal Achievement in International Negotiations: The EU and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 708–727.Google Scholar
Ourbak, T. (2017). Analyse Rétrospective de la COP21 et de L’Accord de Paris; un exemple de diplomatie multilatérale exportable? Rapport D’Expertise. Paris: Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et du Développement International, France. www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/photos-videos-publications-infographies/publications/enjeux-planetaires-cooperation-internationale/rapports/Google Scholar
Ourbak, T. and Magnan, A. K. (2018). The Paris Agreement and Climate Change Negotiations: Small Islands, Big Players. Regional Environmental Change, 18(8), 2201–2207.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. (1996). Global Warming and Global Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savaresi, A. (2016). The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning? (March 14, 2016). Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper, 2016/08. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2747629Google Scholar
Streck, C., Keenlyside, P. and Von Unger, M. (2016). The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 13(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, J. (2004). The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(5), 999–1022.Google Scholar
Victor, D. G. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, H. and Biedenkopf, K. (2020). Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 440–452.Google Scholar
Yamin, F. and Depledge, J. (2004). The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aguilar, S., Appleton, A., Dafoe, J., et al. (2011). Summary of the Durban Climate Change Conference: 28 November–11 December 2011. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(534). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12534e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle, T., Appleton, A., Bushey, D., Kulovesi, K., Spence, C. and Yamineva, Y. (2008). Summary of the Fourteenth Conference of Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Fourth Meeting of Parties to the Kyoto Protocol: 1–12 December 2008. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(395). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12395e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle, T., et al. (2009a). Summary of the Bangkok Climate Change Talks: 28 September–9 October 2009. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(439). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12439e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle, T., et al. (2009b). Summary of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: 7–19 December 2009. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(459). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12459e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle, T., et al. (2010a). Summary of the Bonn Climate Change Talks: 9–11 April 2010. Earth Negotiation Bulletin, 12(460). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12460e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle, T., et al. (2010b). Summary of the Cancun Climate Change Conference: 29 November–11 December 2010. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(498). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12498e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Akanle Eni-ibukun, T., et al. (2012). Summary of the Doha Climate Change Conference: 26 November–8 December 2012. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(567). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12567e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allan, J., et al. (2013). Summary of the Warsaw Climate Change Conference: 11–23 November 2013. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(594). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12594e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allan, J., et al. (2015). Summary of the Paris Climate Change Conference: 29 November–13 December 2015. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(663). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12663e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allan, J., et al. (2017). From Bali to Marrakech: A Decade of International Climate Negotiations. Winnipeg, MB: IISD.Google Scholar
Antholis, W. J. (2014). The U.S. and China’s Great Leap Forward… For Climate Protection. Brookings Institution Planet Policy Blog, web log post, 12 November. www.brookings.edu/blogs/planetpolicy/posts/2014/11/12-us-china-great-leap-forward-climate-protection-antholisGoogle Scholar
Antonich, B., et al. (2014). Summary of the Lima Climate Change Conference: 1–14 December 2014. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(619). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12619e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Antonich, B., et al. (2015). Summary of the Bonn Climate Change Conference: 19–23 October 2015. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(651). http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb12651e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground. Philosophical Magazine, 41, 237–276.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2015). Legal Options for U.S. Acceptance of a New Climate Change Agreement. Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.Google Scholar
Callendar, G. S. (1938). The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and Its Influence on Climate. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 64, 223–240.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. and Downie, D. (2021). Global Environmental Politics, 8th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christoff, P. (2016). The Promissory Note: COP 21 and the Paris Climate Agreement. Environmental Politics, 25(5), 765–787.Google Scholar
Climate Group. (2010). The Copenhagen Climate Conference: A Climate Group Assessment (January). www.theclimategroup.org/_assets/files/TCG-Copenhagen-Assessment-Report-Jan10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Davenport, C. (2015). Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris. New York Times, 12 December. www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/world/europe/climate-change-accord-paris.htmlGoogle Scholar
European Parliament. (2014). Resolution of 26 November 2014 on the 2014 UN Climate Change Conference – COP 20 in Lima, Peru (1–12 December 2014). 2014/2777(RSP). www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2014-0063_EN.html?redirectGoogle Scholar
GCF. (2014a). ‘First Pledging Conference of Green Climate Fund Yields Unprecedented US$ 9.3 billion.’ Press Release. 20 November. www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/38417/2014_11_20_-_First_Pledging_Conference_of_Green_Climate_Fund_Yields_unprecedented_US__9.3_billion .pdfGoogle Scholar
GCF. (2014b). ‘Green Climate Fund Hits USD 10 Billion Threshold.’ Press Release. 9 December. www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/38417/2014_12_05_-_Green_Climate_Fund_hits_USD_10_billion_threshold.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hultman, N. (2010). The Cancun Agreements on Climate Change. Brookings Institution (14 December) www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-cancun-agreements-on-climate-change/Google Scholar
Obergassel, W. (2015). Phoenix from the Ashes: An Analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – Part I. Environmental Law and Management, 27(6), 243–262.Google Scholar
Paton Walsh, N. (2004). Putin Throws Lifeline to Kyoto as EU Backs Russia Joining WTO. The Guardian, 21 May. www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/22/environment.russiaGoogle Scholar
Revkin, A. C. and Broder, J. M. (2009). A Grudging Accord in Climate Talks. New York Times, 19 December. www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/science/earth/20accord.htmlGoogle Scholar
UN. (1998). ‘Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.’ https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdfGoogle Scholar
UN. (2014). ‘Secretary-General, Closing Climate Summit, Says “Let Us Look Back on Today as the Day We Decided to Put Our House in Order for Future Generations.”’ Press Release. SG/SM/16190-ENV/DEV/1463 (23 September). www.un.org/press/en/2014/sgsm16190.doc.htmGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2005a). ‘Dialogue on Long-Term Cooperative Action to Address Climate Change by Enhancing Implementation of the Convention.’ Decision 1/CP.11 in Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eleventh session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh session. FCCC/CP/2005/5/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2005/cop11/eng/05.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2005b). ‘Consideration of Commitments for Subsequent Periods for Parties included in Annex I to the Convention under Article 3, paragraph 9, of the Kyoto Protocol.’ Decision 1/CMP.1 in Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1. https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/COPMOP/08a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2008a). Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its resumed fourth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/5. https://cop23.unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/2007/awg4/eng/05.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010, Addendum Part Two. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2012). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Addendum Part Two. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, https://unfccc.int/documents/7109Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2014). Lima Call for Climate Action. Decision 1/CP.20. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/10a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNGA. (1988). ‘Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind.’ Resolution 43/53. (6 December). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/43/53Google Scholar
UNGA. (1990). ‘Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind.’ Resolution 45/212 (21 December). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/45/212Google Scholar
White House. (2014). ‘U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change.’ Press Release. 11 November. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/us-china-joint-announcement-climate-changeGoogle Scholar
WMO. (1979). Proceedings of the World Climate Conference: A Conference of Experts on Climate. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
1.5 to Stay Alive. Homepage. https://1point5.info/en/Google Scholar
Biniaz, S. (2016). Comma but Differentiated Responsibilities: Punctuation and 30 Other Ways Negotiators Have Resolved Issues in the International Climate Change Regime. Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 6(1), 38–63.Google Scholar
Boucher, O., et al. (2016). Opinion: In the Wake of Paris Agreement Scientists Must Embrace New Directions for Climate Change Research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7287–7290.Google Scholar
Burke, I. (2018). The Impact of Laudato Si’ on the Paris Climate Agreement. LISD White Paper. https://lisd.princeton.edu/publications/impact-laudato-si%E2%80%99-paris-climate-agreementGoogle Scholar
C2ES. History of UN Climate Talks. www.c2es.org/content/history-of-un-climate-talks/Google Scholar
C40. (2015). ‘Ten Global Cities Present Climate Action Plan Ahead of Paris COP21.’ Press Release: 24 September. www.c40.org/press_releases/press-release-ten-global-cities-present-climate-action-plans-ahead-of-paris-cop21Google Scholar
Cameron, E. (2012). ‘What Is Equity in the Context of Climate Negotiations?’ World Resources Institute, 14 December. www.wri.org/blog/2012/12/what-equity-context-climate-negotiationsGoogle Scholar
Carbon Tracker. (n.d.). Terms List: Carbon Budget. https://carbontracker.org/resources/terms-list/#carbon-budgetsGoogle Scholar
Carney, M. (2015). ‘Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon: Climate Change and Financial Stability.’ Speech. 29 September. www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Climate Analytics. (2016). 10 Key Messages from the Structured & Expert Dialogue (SED). https://climateanalytics.org/media/10_key_messages_sed.pdfGoogle Scholar
Climate Group. (n.d.). RE100. www.theclimategroup.org/RE100Google Scholar
Climate Policy Info Hub. (n.d.). International Climate Policy Architectures: Top-Down and Bottom-Up. https://climatepolicyinfohub.eu/international-climate-policy-architectures-%E2%80%93-top-down-and-bottomGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. (2015). Explainer: The Long-Term Goal of the Paris Climate Deal. CarbonBrief. 12 April. www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-the-long-term-goal-of-the-paris-climate-dealGoogle Scholar
Falkner, R., Stephan, H. and Vogler, J. (2010). International Climate Policy after Copenhagen: Towards a ‘Building Blocks’ Approach. Global Policy, 1(3), 252–262.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (2010). G2 in G20: China, the United States and the World after the Global Financial Crisis. Global Policy, 1(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, S., et al. (2015). Paris Climate Deal: Nearly 200 Nations Sign in End of Fossil Fuel Era. The Guardian. 12 December. www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/12/paris-climate-deal-200-nations-sign-finish-fossil-fuel-eraGoogle Scholar
Hale, T. (2018). The Role of Sub-state and Non-state Actors in International Climate Processes. Research Paper. Oxford: Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford. www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-11-28-non-state-sctors-climate-synthesis-hale-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
IPSL. (2015). Climate Modelling Center Scientific Note No. 32. Working Paper. https://cmc.ipsl.fr/images/publications/scientific_notes/GICN_working_paper2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753.Google Scholar
Klein, D., Carazo, M. P., Doelle, M., Bulmer, J. and Higham, A. (eds.) (2017). The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacAskill, A. (2015). Dalai Lama Says Climate Change Destroying Tibet’s ‘Roof of the World.’ Reuters. 20 October. www.reuters.com/article/us-tibet-climatechange/dalai-lama-says-climate-change-destroying-tibets-roof-of-the-world-idUSKCN0SE0J820151020Google Scholar
Navarra, A. (2015). The Role of Science and the Paris Climate Agreement. Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici. 12 December. www.cmcc.it/article/the-role-of-scientific-research-to-achieve-the-objective-of-paris-climate-dealGoogle Scholar
NDC Partnership. (n.d.). Facilitating Global Transition: The Role of Nationally Determined Contributions in Meeting the Long-Term Temperature Goal of the Paris Agreement. https://ndcpartnership.org/facilitating-global-transition-role-nationally-determined-contributions-meeting-long-termGoogle Scholar
Ourbak, T. and Tubiana, L. (2017). Changing the Game: The Paris Agreement and the role of scientific communities. Climate Policy, 17(7), 819–824.Google Scholar
Pope Francis, . (2015). Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on Care for our Common Home. www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.htmlGoogle Scholar
Science Based Targets. (n.d.) Homepage. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/Google Scholar
The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. (2015). Seizing the Global Opportunity: Partnerships for Better Growth and a Better Climate. http://newclimateeconomy.report/2015/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/08/NCE-2015_Seizing-the-Global-Opportunity_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
The Washington Post. (2015). Transcript: Pope Francis’s speech to the U.N. General Assembly. The Washington Post, 25 September. www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/transcript-pope-franciss-speech-to-the-un-general-assembly/2015/09/25/3dea72e8-6382-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
UN. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdfGoogle Scholar
UN. (n.d.). About Major Groups and Other Stakeholders. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/aboutmajorgroups.htmlGoogle Scholar
UNEP. (2015). The Emissions Gap Report 2015. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/32070/EGR15.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015a). Report on the Structured Expert Dialogue on the 2013–2015 Review: Note by the Co-facilitators of the Structured Expert Dialogue. FCCC/SB/2015/INF.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/sb/eng/inf01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015b). Adoption of the Paris Agreement – Proposal by the President. Draft decision -/CP.21. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. https://undocs.org/FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015c). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015d). The Summit of Conscience. https://unfccc.int/news/the-summit-of-conscienceGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (n.d.). Global Climate Action – NAZCA. https://climateaction.unfccc.int/Google Scholar
White House. (2015). FACT SHEET: White House Launches American Business Act on Climate Pledge. Statements & Releases. 27 July. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/07/27/fact-sheet-white-house-launches-american-business-act-climate-pledgeGoogle Scholar
Chasek, P. (2021). The Paris Negotiations: Background and Context. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/INFORMAL/84. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (1996). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – Draft Rules of Procedure of the Conference of the Parties and Its Subsidiary Bodies. FCCC/CP/1996/2. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/02_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its sixteenth session. FCCC/CP/2010/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2012). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015a). Provisional Agenda and Annotations. FCCC/CP/2015/1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015b). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Decision 1/CP.21. http://unfccc.int/files/home/application/pdf/decision1cp21.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015c). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/FCCC_CP_2015_10_Add.1.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015d). Draft Paris Outcome – Revised Draft Conclusions Proposed by the Co-Chairs. FCCC/ADP/2015/L.6/Rev.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/adp2/eng/l06r01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015e). Adoption of the Paris Agreement – Proposal by the President. Draft Decision -/CP.21. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. https://undocs.org/FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015f). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Part One: Proceedings. FCCC/CP/2015/10. www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/FCCC_CP_2015_10_Add.1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Klöck, C., et al. (eds.) (2016). Coalitions in the Climate Change Negotiations, 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meenakshi, R. (2016). Climate Change Battle in Paris. Economic & Political Weekly, 51 (02), 9 January. www.epw.in/journal/2016/2/insight/climate-change-battle-paris.htmlGoogle Scholar
Øfjord Blaxekjær, L. and Nielsen, T. D. (2016). The Narrative Position of the Like-Minded Developing Countries in Global Climate Negotiations: A Policy-Oriented Narrative Approach to IR, 2016. https://core.ac.uk/reader/199413410Google Scholar
Sommerholt, L. (2017). People’s Republic of China’s Performance in the UNFCCC: A Comparison of China’s Position at COP15 Copenhagen to COP22 Marrakech, masters thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala. www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1148056/FULLTEXT01.pdfGoogle Scholar
TWN. (2015a). Paris News Updates 3: No Surprises in Paris, Assures French Presidency. 30 November. https://twnetwork.org/sites/default/files/TWN_update3_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
TWN. (2015b). Paris News Updates 6: Party-Driven Process Must Be Ensured, Say Developing Countries. 3 December. https://twnetwork.org/sites/default/files/TWN_update6_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
TWN. (2015c). Paris News Updates 9: G77 Frustrated at Refusal of Developed Countries to Negotiate Key Issues. 4 December. https://twnetwork.org/sites/default/files/TWN_update9.pdfGoogle Scholar
TWN. (2015d). Paris News Updates 10: Differentiation between Developed and Developing Countries Still Relevant, Say Developing Countries. 4 December. https://twnetwork.org/climate-change/differentiation-under-paris-agreement-%E2%80%93-tough-fightGoogle Scholar
Associated Press. (2016). NGO Stunt Urges Delegates to Reach Climate Deal, online video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp53yB4rhq0Google Scholar
Avaaz. (n.d.). Largest Climate Mobilisation in History. https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/climate_march_report_back_loc/Google Scholar
CAN Europe. (2015). ‘Former Champion of Climate Action Wins Fossil of the Day Award at COP21.’ Press Release. 3 December. www.caneurope.org/publications/press-releases/931-former-champion-of-climate-action-wins-fossil-of-the-day-award-at-cop21Google Scholar
CBC News. (2015). Prime Minister Stephen Harper Agrees to G7 ‘Decarbonization’ by 2100. CBC News, 9 June. www.cbc.ca/news/politics/prime-minister-stephen-harper-agrees-to-g7-decarbonization-by-2100-1.3104459Google Scholar
Clark, P. and Wagstyl, S. (2015). Turkey Push for Climate Funds Adds to Concerns about Paris Accord. Financial Times, 9 June. www.ft.com/content/bbef9a42-64c0-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614Google Scholar
Darby, M. (2019). Net Zero: The Story of the Target that Will Shape Our Future and the ‘Lionesses’ Who Changed the Way We Measure Climate Ambition. Climate Home News. 16 September. www.climatechangenews.com/2019/09/16/net-zero-story-target-will-shape-future/Google Scholar
Evans, S. (2015). Explainer: The Long-Term Goal of the Paris Climate Deal. CarbonBrief. 12 April. www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-the-long-term-goal-of-the-paris-climate-dealGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, S. (2015). Saudi Arabia Accused of Trying to Wreck Paris Climate Deal. The Guardian, 8 December. www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/08/saudi-arabia-accused-of-trying-to-wreck-the-paris-climate-dealGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace. (2015). Collection: COP 21: Arc de triomphe Sun Action in Paris (Photo & Video). https://media.greenpeace.org/collection/27MZIFJ6T1R3FGoogle Scholar
G7. (2015). Leader’s Declaration G7 Summit 7–8 June 2015. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/7320LEADERS%20STATEMENT_FINAL_CLEAN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hare, W. L., et al. (2011). Climate Hotspots: Key Vulnerable Regions, Climate Change and Limits to Warming. Regional Environmental Change, 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2018). Summary for Policymakers: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mooney, C. and Warrick, J. (2015). How Tiny Islands Drove Huge Ambition at the Paris Climate Talks. The Washington Post, 11 December. www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/12/11/how-tiny-islands-drove-huge-ambition-at-the-paris-climate-talks/Google Scholar
Morgan, J., Dagnet, Y. and Tirpak, D. (2015). Elements and Ideas for the 2015 Paris Agreement. Working Paper. World Resources Institute. https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/uploads/ACT_Elements_Ideas_final_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Quinn, B. (2015). COP 21 Climate Marches in Paris Not Authorised Following Attacks. The Guardian, 19 November. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/18/cop21-climate-marches-paris-attacksGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. (2015). For The Marshall Islands, The Climate Goal Is ‘1.5 To Stay Alive’. NPR, 9 December. www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/12/09/459053208/for-the-marshall-islands-the-climate-goal-is-1-5-to-stay-aliveGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015a). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015b). The Lima-Paris Action Agenda: Promoting Transformational Climate Action. Lima Paris Action agenda. 21 October. https://unfccc.int/news/the-lima-paris-action-agenda-promoting-transformational-climate-actionGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (n.d.). Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcsGoogle Scholar
Vidal, J., Stratton, A. and Goldenberg, S. (2009). Low Targets, Goals Dropped: Copenhagen Ends in Failure. The Guardian, 19 December. www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/dec/18/copenhagen-dealGoogle Scholar
White House. (2014). Remarks by the President at U.N. Climate Change Summit. Speeches & Remarks. 23 September. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/23/remarks-president-un-climate-change-summitGoogle Scholar
Willets, P. (1996). From Stockholm to Rio and Beyond: The Impact of the Environmental Movement to the United Nations Consultative Arrangements for NGOs. Review of International Studies, 22(1), 57–80.Google Scholar
WRI. (2015a). The Agreement for Climate Transformation (ACT 2015). www.wri.org/our-work/project/act-2015Google Scholar
WRI. (2015b). ACT 2015 Publications. www.wri.org/our-work/project/act-2015/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Betts, P. (2021). The EU’s Role in the Paris Agreement. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biniaz, S. and Pershing, J. (2021). The United States: Interesting Techniques Lined the Road to Paris. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon: Climate Change and Financial Stability. Speech. 29 September. www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
Dubash, N. K., et al. (2013). Developments in National Climate Change Mitigation Legislation and Strategy. Climate Policy, 13(6), 649–664.Google Scholar
Fabius, L. (2016). 37 Quai D’Orsay: Diplomatie francaise 2012–2016, digital edition. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (2021). The Battle for Small Island Developing States. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. (1995). Constructive Conflict. In Graham, P. (ed.), Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. (2014). Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report, The Global Report. https://newclimateeconomy.report/2016/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/08/NCE-Global-Report_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hale, T. (2018). The Role of Sub-state and Non-state Actors in International Climate Processes. Research Paper. Oxford: Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford. www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-11-28-non-state-sctors-climate-synthesis-hale-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Harrabin, R. (2012). UN Climate Talks Extend Kyoto Protocol, Promise Compensation. BBC News, 8 December. www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-20653018Google Scholar
Howard, S. (2021). Business: Creating the Context. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (2021) Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_All_Topics.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, H. (2013). Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed: Issue linkage in the international climate change negotiations. Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus University, Politica.Google Scholar
Kinley, R. (2021). Mission: Adoption with Ovations. The Contribution of the UNFCCC Secretariat to the Achievement of the Paris Agreement. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lax, D. A. and Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Monheim, K. (2016). The ‘Power of Process’: How Negotiation Management Influences Multilateral Cooperation. International Negotiation, 21(3), 345–380.Google Scholar
Morgan, J., et al. (2014). Race to the Top: Driving Ambition in the Post-2020 International Climate Agreement. www.wri.org/our-work/project/ act-2015/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. (2021). The Power of Civil Society. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2005). Chairing a WTO Negotiation. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), 425–448.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2009). Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle and Doha. International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), 273–299.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. and Tingley, D. H. (2016). Negotiating Agreements in International Relations. In Mansbridge, J. and Martin, C. J. (eds.), Political Negotiation: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 231–285.Google Scholar
Orellana, H. R. (2021). COP 21 – Complaints and Negotiation: The Role of the Likeminded Developing Countries Group (LMDC) and the Paris Accord. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ourbak, T. (2017). Analyse Rétrospective de la COP21 et de L’Accord de Paris; un exemple de diplomatie multilatérale exportable? Rapport D’Expertise. Paris: Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et du Développement International, France. www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/photos-videos-publications-infographies/publications/enjeux-planetaires-cooperation-internationale/rapports/Google Scholar
Sebenius, J. (1983). Negotiating Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization, 37(2), 281–316.Google Scholar
Sheng, A. (2015). Central Banks Can and Should Do Their Part in Funding Sustainability. Fixing Climate Governance Series, Paper No.1. Waterloo, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. (1994). Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tubiana, L. (2021). The French COP 21 Presidency. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2011). Decision 1/CP.17. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2012). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2013). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session. FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/10a01.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015). ‘Massive Mobilization by Nonstate Stakeholders Summarized at COP21.’ Press Release. 9 December. https://cop23.unfccc.int/news/massive-mobilization-by-non-state-stakeholders-summarized-at-cop21Google Scholar
Victor, D. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, H. and Biedenkopf, K. (2020). Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 440–452Google Scholar
World Bank Group. (2015). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing. www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Climate/State-and-Trend-Report-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Energy Council. (2015). World Energy Perspective. The road to resilience: managing and financing extreme weather risks. www.worldenergy.org/publications?year=2015Google Scholar
Xie, Z. (2021). The Paris Agreement and China’s Imprint. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. W. and Berman, M. R. (1982). The Practical Negotiator. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ahnlid, A. (2012). Improving the Effectiveness of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: A Practitioner’s Perspective on the 2008 WTO Ministerial Meeting. International Negotiation, 17(1), 65–89.Google Scholar
Betts, P. (2021). The EU’s Role in the Paris Agreement. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biniaz, S. and Pershing, J. (2021). The United States: Interesting Techniques Lined the Road to Paris. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blavoukos, S. and Bourantonis, D. (2011). Chairing Multilateral Negotiations: The Case of the United Nations. Routledge. London and New York.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. (2021). The Paris Negotiations: Background and Context. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. and Wagner, L. M. (2016). Breaking the Mold: A New Type of Multilateral Sustainable Development Negotiation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Environ Agreements, 16, 397–413.Google Scholar
Depledge, J. (2007). A Special Relationship: Chairpersons and the Secretariat in the Climate Change Negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 7(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (2021). The Battle for Small Island Developing States. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, S. (2021). Business: Creating the Context. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jepsen, H. (2013). Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed: Issue linkage in the international climate change negotiations. Ph.D. thesis. Aarhus, Denmark: Political Science and Government, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Monheim, K. (2015). How Effective Negotiation Management Promote Multilateral Cooperation: The Power of Process in Climate, Trade and Biosafety Negotiations. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mpanu-Mpanu, T. (2021). The Staircase of Paris. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, P. and Taylor, O. (2020). Fiddling While the Planet Burns? COP 25 in Perspective. Globalizations, 17(4),1474–7731.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2009). Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle and Doha. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 273–299.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2021). Why Did They Finally Reach Agreement? In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohler, F. (2020). Multilateral Negotiations and ‘Social Distancing’. German Development Institute. https://blogs.die-gdi.de/2020/05/06/multilateral-negotiations-and-social-distancing/Google Scholar
Orellana, H. R. (2021). COP 21 – Complaints and Negotiation: The Role of the Like-Minded Developing Countries Group (LMDC) and the Paris Accord. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2016). The Power of Presidency in UN Climate Change Negotiations: Comparison between Denmark and Mexico. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(6), 781–795.Google Scholar
Pfetsch, F. R. (2009). Chairing Negotiations in the World Trade Organization. Négociations, 11(1), 121–141.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. (2016). International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2), 493–514.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J. (2010). The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 241–265.Google Scholar
Tubiana, L. (2021). The French COP 21 Presidency. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vihma, A. (2015). Climate of Consensus: Managing Decision Making in the UN Climate Change Negotiations. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 24(1), 58–68.Google Scholar
Vihma, A. and Kulovesi, K. (2013). Can Attention to the Process Improve the Efficiency of the UNFCCC Negotiations? Law Review: CCLR; Berlin 7.4, (2012), 242–251.Google Scholar
Walker, H. and Biedenkopf, K. (2020). Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 440–452Google Scholar
Xie, Z. (2021). The Paris Agreement and China’s Imprint. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yamin, F. (2021). The High Ambition Coalition. In Jepsen, H., Lundgren, M., Walker, H. and Monheim, K. (eds.), Negotiating the Paris Agreement: The Inside Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. W. (1994). International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×