Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:15:27.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - From Fascination to Research

Progress and Problems in Creativity Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2018

By
Adrian Furnham
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
James C. Kaufman
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Nature of Human Creativity , pp. 77 - 93
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar, S., and Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341–350.Google Scholar
Acar, S., and Sen, S. (2013). A multilevel meta-analysis of the relationship between creativity and schizotypy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 214–228.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573–578.Google Scholar
Barron, F., and Welsh, G. S. (1952). Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality style: Its measurement by a figure preference test. Journal of Psychology, 33, 199–203.Google Scholar
Batey, M., and Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.Google Scholar
Batey, M., and Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–821.Google Scholar
Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., and Guilford, J. P. (1953). Consequences from A-1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. (1997). Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. (2009). Personality and psychosis. In Handbook of personality, edited by Corr, P. J. and Matthews, G., 631–648. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, G., and Blakey, S. (2009). Schizotypy and affective temperament: Relationships with divergent thinking and creativity styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 820–826.Google Scholar
Connelly, M. S., Gilbert, J. A., Zaccaro, S. J., Threlfall, K. V., Marks, M. A., and Mumford, M. D. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leader skills and knowledge to leader performance. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Explanation and the concept of personality. In Explanation in the behavioural sciences, edited by Borger, R. and Cioffi, F., 387–410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Castle, M. (1971). Comparative study of artists and non artists on the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 407–408.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2008). Personality and intelligence at work. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., and Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–617.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., and Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Batey, M., Booth, T., Patel, V., and Lozinskaya, D. (2011). Individual difference predictors of creativity in art and science students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality traits, psychometric intelligence, and art judgement. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 705–715.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Crump, J. (2013). The sensitive, imaginative, articulate art student and conservative, cool, numerate science student. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 150–155.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Crump, J. (2014). A bright side, facet analysis of Schizotypal Personality Disorder. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 42–47.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Crump, J. (2015). The creativity of people in different work sectors. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 1, 88–93.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “consequences” test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 536–540.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., and Rao, S. (2002). Personality and the aesthetics of composition: A study of Mondrian and Hirst. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 233–242.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Zhang, J., and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). The relationship between psychometric and self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality, and academic achievement. Cognition and Personality, 25, 119–145.Google Scholar
Gelade, G. (1995). Creative style and divergent production. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 29(1), 36–53.Google Scholar
Gotz, K. O., and Gotz, K. (1974). The Maitland Graves Design Judgment Test judged by 22 experts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 261–262.Google Scholar
Graves, M. (1948). Design Judgement Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haller, C., and Courvoisier, D. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 146–160.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, H. L. (1927). The “faculty” of imagination: An enquiry concerning the existence of a general “faculty,” or group factor, of imagination. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 3, 1–74.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., and Greggs, M. A. (1997). Divergent thinking in arts and science student: Contrary imaginations at Keele revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., and Amabile, T. M. (1988a). The conditions of creativity. In The nature of creativity, edited by Sternberg, R. J.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., and Amabile, T. M. (1988b). Storytelling: A method for assessing children's creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 235–246.Google Scholar
Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (1990). Critique of three tests of aesthetic judgement. Visual Arts Research, 16, 90–94.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D., and Costa, P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2, 130–136.Google Scholar
Meier, N. C. (1940). The Meier Art Tests: I, Art Judgment. Iowa City: Bureau of Educational Research and Service, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Meier, N. C., and Seashore, C. E. (1929). The Meier-Seashore Art Judgement Test. Iowa City: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Marks, M., Connelly, M., Zaccaro, S., and Johnson, J. (1998). Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151–163.Google Scholar
Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Seashore, C. E. (1929). Meier-Seashore Art Judgement Test. Science, 69, 380.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2005). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9, 342–357.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Historiometric studies of genius. In The Wiley handbook of genius, edited by Simonton, D. K., 87–106. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). The mad (creative) genius: What do we know after a century of historiometric research? In Creativity and mental illness, edited by Kaufman, J. C., 25–41. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014c). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy and highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–480.Google Scholar
Snow, C. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of creative thinking: Norms and technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.Google Scholar
Uduehi, J. (1996). A cross-cultural assessment of the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Test using IS and Nigerian subjects. Visual Arts Research, 21, 11–18.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., and Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Welsh, G. S. (1987). Manual for the Barron-Welsh Art Scale. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., and Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. F., Sternberg, R. J., and Rayner, S. G. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of intellectual styles. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×