Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:30:05.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Hunting and Trapping in the Americas: The Assessment and Projection of Harvest on Wildlife Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

By
Taal Levi ,
Carlos A. Peres  and
Glenn H. Shepard
Edited by
Edward A. Johnson  and
Susan M. Arlidge
Edward A. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Susan M. Arlidge
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

Indigenous people in the Americas disproportionately depend on wild meat. Many approaches have been applied to assess the impact of hunting on wildlife populations by determining whether or not it can be defined as “sustainable.” Proper understanding of sustainability requires specification of what is being sustained, the spatial extent under consideration, the duration over which the resource is being sustained, and how the impact of a particular use compares with realistic forms of alternative uses. The sustainability of hunting is species specific with harvest-sensitive species often succumbing to depletion, while others persist indefinitely. Prey profiles of Amazonian hunters rapidly shift from low-fecundity and harvest-sensitive to high-fecundity and harvest-insensitive species as local human population density increases. This is a consequence of the life history of each hunted species, which dictates age at first birth, fecundity, and survivorship, and its “catchability,” which is a measure of the effectiveness of hunting effort. Here we review density-dependent population growth in wildlife and the implementation of harvest models typical to human central-place foragers to project wildlife populations in space and time rather than a binary assessment of whether hunting is “sustainable.”

Keywords

population dynamcisIndigenous hunting strategiesshamanic beliefsincentivized sustainability
Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Science and Indigenous Knowledge
The Americas Experience
 , pp. 176 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, B. and Le Tourneau, F.-M. (2007). Ethnogeography and resource use among the Yanomami: Toward a model of “reticular space.” Current Anthropology, 48(4), 584–92.Google Scholar
Alroy, J. (2001). A multispecies overkill simulation of the end-Pleistocene megafaunal mass extinction. Science, 292(5523), 1893–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvard, M. (1995). Shotguns and sustainable hunting in the neotropics. Oryx, 29(1), 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvard, M. and Kaplan, H. (1991). Procurement Technology and Prey Mortality among Indigenous Neotropical Hunters. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. S., Robinson, J. G., Redford, K. H., and Kaplan, H. (1997). The sustainability of subsistence hunting in the neotropics. Conservation Biology, 11(4), 977–82.Google Scholar
Antunes, A. P., Rebêlo, G. H., Pezzuti, J. C. B., et al. (2019). A conspiracy of silence: Subsistence hunting rights in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 84, 1–11.Google Scholar
Begotti, R. A. and Peres, C. A. (2020). Rapidly escalating threats to the biodiversity and ethnocultural capital of Brazilian Indigenous Lands. Land Use Policy, 96, 104694.Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E. (1995). Managing Amazonian wildlife: biological correlates of game choice by detribalized hunters. Ecological Applications, 5(4), 872–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodmer, R. E., Eisenberg, J. F., and Redford, K. H. (1997). Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals: Caza y Probabilidad de Extinción de Mamiferos Amazónicos. Conservation Biology, 11(2), 460–6.Google Scholar
Bodmer, R. E., Fang, T. G., Moya, L., and Gill, R. (1994). Managing wildlife to conserve Amazonian forests: population biology and economic considerations of game hunting. Biological Conservation, 67(1), 29–35.Google Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L. (1993). Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bugir, C. K., Peres, C. A., White, K. S., et al. (2021). Prey preferences of modern human hunter-gatherers. Food Webs, 26, e00183.Google Scholar
Campos-Silva, J. V. and Peres, C. A. (2016). Community-based management induces rapid recovery of a high-value tropical freshwater fishery. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Castro, S., Yebra, L., Cortegoso, V., et al. (2021). The introduction of the bow and arrow across South America’s southern threshold between food-producing societies and hunter-gatherers. In Belardi, J. B., Bozzuto, D. L., Fernández, P. M., Moreno, E. A., and Neme, G. A. (eds.), Ancient Hunting Strategies in Southern South America. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 137–58.Google Scholar
Chacon, R. J. (2001). Testing the Energy Maximization and Time Minimization Hypotheses: The Effects of Shotgun Technology on Achuar Indian Hunting. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
de Marques, A. A. B., Schneider, M., and Peres, C. A. (2016). Human population and socioeconomic modulators of conservation performance in 788 Amazonian and Atlantic Forest reserves. PeerJ, 4, e2206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Mattos Vieira, M. A., de Castro, F., and Shepard, G. H. (2019). Who sets the rules? Institutional misfits and bricolage in hunting management in Brazil. Human Ecology, 47(3), 369–80.Google Scholar
de Mattos Vieira, M. A. R., von Muhlen, E. M., and ShepardJr, G. H. (2015). Participatory monitoring and management of subsistence hunting in the Piagaçu-Purus reserve, Brazil. Conservation and Society, 13(3), 254–64.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. D., Milner-Gulland, E., Ingram, D. J., and Keane, A. (2019). A framework for assessing impacts of wild meat hunting practices in the tropics. Human Ecology, 47(3), 449–64.Google Scholar
Endo, W., Peres, C. A., Salas, E., et al. (2010). Game vertebrate densities in hunted and nonhunted forest sites in Manu National Park, Peru. Biotropica, 42(2), 251–61.Google Scholar
Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Gouveia, S., et al. (2022). Global importance of Indigenous Peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world’s primates from extinction. Science Advances, 8(31), eabn2927.Google Scholar
Fausto, C. (2007). Feasting on people: eating animals and humans in Amazonia. Current Anthropology, 48(4), 497–530.Google Scholar
Fernández-Llamazares, Á. and Virtanen, P. K. (2020). Game masters and Amazonian Indigenous views on sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 21–27.Google Scholar
Freitas, C. T., Lopes, P. F., Campos-Silva, J. V., et al. (2020). Co-management of culturally important species: a tool to promote biodiversity conservation and human well-being. People and Nature, 2(1), 61–81.Google Scholar
Hames, R. (1980). Game depletion and hunting zone rotation among the Ye’kwana and Yanomamo of Amazonas, Venezuela. In Hames, R., ed., Working Papers on South American Indians, No. 2. Bennington, Vermont: Bennington College, pp. 31–66.Google Scholar
Hickerson, H. (1965). The Virginia deer and intertribal buffer zones in the upper Mississippi Valley. In Leeds, A. and Vayda, A., eds., Man, Culture, and Animals: The Role of Animals in Human Ecological Adjustments. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication 78, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Hill, E. (2011). Animals as agents: hunting ritual and relational ontologies in prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21(3), 407–26.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. J., Coad, L., Milner-Gulland, E., et al. (2021). Wild meat is still on the menu: progress in wild meat research, policy, and practice from 2002 to 2020. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 221–54.Google Scholar
Janson, C. H. and Emmons, L. H. (1990). Ecological Structure of the Nonflying Mammal Community at Cocha Cashu Biological Station, Manu National Park, Peru. Four Neotropical Rainforests. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 314–38.Google Scholar
Levi, T., Lu, F., Yu, D. W., and Mangel, M. (2011). The behavior and diet breadth of central-place foragers: an application to human hunters and Neotropical game management. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 13, 171–85.Google Scholar
Levi, T., Shepard, G. H., Ohl-Schacherer, J., Peres, C. A., and Yu, D. W. (2009). Modelling the long-term sustainability of indigenous hunting in Manu National Park, Peru: landscape-scale management implications for Amazonia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(4), 804–14.Google Scholar
Lu, F. and Winterhalder, B. (1997). A forager-resource population ecology model and implications for indigenous conservation. Conservation Biology, 11(6), 1354–64.Google Scholar
Luzar, J. B., Silvius, K. M. and Fragoso, J. (2012). Church affiliation and meat taboos in indigenous communities of Guyanese Amazonia. Human Ecology, 40(6), 833–45.Google Scholar
Messier, F. (1994). Ungulate population models with predation: a case study with the North American moose. Ecology, 75(2), 478–88.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E. J. and Akçakaya, H. R. (2001). Sustainability indices for exploited populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(12), 686–92.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1997). Real men don’t eat deer. Discover-New York, 18, 46–53.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. L. and Raéz-Luna, E. F. (1991). The Impact of Human Hunting on Primate and Game Bird Populations in the Manu Biosphere Reserve in Southeastern Peru. New York: Wildlife Conservation International. New York Zoological Society New York, p33.Google Scholar
Mwaura, A. (2022). Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) – media release. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3680771/intergovernmental-science-policy-platform-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-services-ipbes/4486613/ (accessed November 20, 2023).Google Scholar
Norris, D., Peres, C. A., Michalski, F., and Gibbs, J. P. (2019). Prospects for freshwater turtle population recovery are catalyzed by pan-Amazonian community-based management. Biological Conservation, 233, 51–60.Google Scholar
Novaro, A. J., Redford, K. H., and Bodmer, R. E. (2000). Effect of hunting in source-sink systems in the neotropics. Conservation Biology, 14(3), 713–721.Google Scholar
Ohl-Schacherer, J., Shepard, G. H., Kaplan, H., et al. (2007). The sustainability of subsistence hunting by Matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conservation Biology, 21(5), 1174–85.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. (2000). Evaluating the impact and sustainability of subsistence hunting at multiple Amazonian forest sites. In Robinson, J. G. and Bennett, E. L., eds., Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. (2011). Conservation in sustainable-use tropical forest reserves. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1124–9.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. and Lake, I. R. (2003). Extent of nontimber resource extraction in tropical forests: Accessibility to game vertebrates by hunters in the Amazon basin. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 521–35.Google Scholar
Read, J. M., Fragoso, J. M., Silvius, K. M., et al. (2010). Space, place, and hunting patterns among indigenous peoples of the Guyanese Rupununi region. Journal of Latin American Geography, 9(3), 213–43.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G. and Redford, K. H. (1991). Sustainable harvest of Neotropical wildlife. In Robinson, J. G. and Redford, K. H., eds., Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 415–29.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, A. C. (1987). Chiefdoms in the Amazon and Orinoco. Chiefdoms in the Americas, 1987, 153–84.Google Scholar
Ross, E. B., Arnott, M. L., Basso, E. B., et al. (1978). Food taboos, diet, and hunting strategy: the adaptation to animals in amazon cultural ecology [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 19(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Sampaio, R., Morato, R. G., Abrahams, M. I., Peres, C. A., and Chiarello, A. G. (2022). Physical geography trumps legal protection in driving the perceived sustainability of game hunting in Amazonian local communities. Journal for Nature Conservation, 67, 126175.Google Scholar
Scheinsohn, V. (2003). Hunter-gatherer archaeology in South America. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 339–61.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A., and Nepstad, D. (2000). Rethinking tropical forest conservation: Perils in parks. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1351–7.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, S. and Zimmerman, B. (2005). Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 721–7.Google Scholar
Shaffer, C. A., Milstein, M. S., Suse, P., et al. (2018). Integrating ethnography and hunting sustainability modeling for primate conservation in an indigenous reserve in Guyana. International Journal of Primatology, 39(5), 945–68.Google Scholar
Shaffer, C., Yukuma, C., Marawanaru, E., and Suse, P. (2018). Assessing the sustainability of Waiwai subsistence hunting in Guyana by comparison of static indices and spatially explicit, biodemographic models. Animal Conservation, 21(2), 148–58.Google Scholar
Shepard, G. H. (2014). Hunting in Amazonia. In Selin, H., ed., Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Shepard, Jr., G. H., Levi, T., Neves, E. G., Peres, C. A., and Yu, D. W. (2012). Hunting in ancient and modern Amazonia: rethinking sustainability. American Anthropologist, 114(4), 652–67.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. (2003). Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1438), 1729–40.Google Scholar
Sirén, A., Hamback, P., and Machoa, E. (2004). Including spatial heterogeneity and animal dispersal when evaluating hunting: a model analysis and an empirical assessment in an Amazonian community. Conservation Biology, 18(5), 1315–29.Google Scholar
Smith, D. A. (2008). The spatial patterns of indigenous wildlife use in western Panama: implications for conservation management. Biological Conservation, 141, 925–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surovell, T. A., Pelton, S. R., Anderson-Sprecher, R., and Myers, A. D. (2016). Test of Martin’s overkill hypothesis using radiocarbon dates on extinct megafauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(4), 886–91.Google Scholar
Townsend, W. (1997). La participación comunal en el manejo de vida silvestre en el oriente de Bolivia. In Fang, T., Bodmer, R., Aquino, R., and Valqui, M., eds., Manejo de fauna silvestre en la Amazonía. La Paz, Bolivia: UNAP University of Florida, UNDP/GEF, Instituto de Ecología, pp. 105–10.Google Scholar
Tromeur, E. and Doyen, L. (2019). Optimal harvesting policies threaten biodiversity in mixed fisheries. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 24(4), 387–403.Google Scholar
Vieira, M. and Shepard, G. (2017). A anta tem muita ciência: racionalidade ecológica e ritual da caça entre ribeirinhos amazônicos. In Marchand, G. and Vander Velden, F. F., eds., Olhares cruzados sobre as relações entre seres humanos e animais silvestres na Amazônia (Brasil, Guiana Francesa). Manaus, Brazil: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (EDUA), 17–31.Google Scholar
Yu, D. W., Levi, T., and Shepard, G. H. (2010). Conservation in low-governance environments. Biotropica, 42, 569–71.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B., Peres, C. A., Malcolm, J. R., and Turner, T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 10–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×