Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:42:19.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Evolution of the Systems Ecology Paradigm in Managing Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2021

By
Robert G. Woodmansee ,
Michael B. Coughenour ,
Keith Paustian ,
William J. Parton ,
Thomas J. Stohlgren ,
William H. Romme ,
Paul H. Evangelista ,
Cameron Aldridge ,
Dennis S. Ojima  and
William Lauenroth
...Show all authors
Edited by
Robert G. Woodmansee ,
John C. Moore ,
Dennis S. Ojima  and
Laurie Richards
Robert G. Woodmansee
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
John C. Moore
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Dennis S. Ojima
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Laurie Richards
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Get access

Summary

The systems ecology paradigm (SEP) emerged in the late 1960s at a time when societies throughout the world were beginning to recognize that our environment and natural resources were being threatened by their activities. Management practices in rangelands, forests, agricultural lands, wetlands, and waterways were inadequate to meet the challenges of deteriorating environments, many of which were caused by the practices themselves. Scientists recognized an immediate need was developing a knowledge base about how ecosystems function. That effort took nearly two decades (1980s) and concluded with the acceptance that humans were components of ecosystems, not just controllers and manipulators of lands and waters. While ecosystem science was being developed, management options based on ecosystem science were shifting dramatically toward practices supporting sustainability, resilience, ecosystem services, biodiversity, and local to global interconnections of ecosystems. Emerging from the new knowledge about how ecosystems function and the application of the systems ecology approach was the collaboration of scientists, managers, decision-makers, and stakeholders locally and globally. Today’s concepts of ecosystem management and related ideas, such as sustainable agriculture, ecosystem health and restoration, consequences of and adaptation to climate change, and many other important local to global challenges are a direct result of the SEP.

Keywords

grazingland/forestland managementagro-ecosystem managementland management policiesecosystem managementhumans as components of ecosystemslong-term ecological researchsustainability and resilience in ecosystemsecosystem servicesbiodiversitysustainable agriculture
Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Resource Management Reimagined
Using the Systems Ecology Paradigm
 , pp. 202 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D., Heil, R. C., Cole, C. V., and Deutsch, P. (1983). Identification and characterization of ecosystems at different integrative levels. In Nutrient Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems, ed. Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., Asmussen, L. E., and Leonard, R. A.. Special Publication No. 23. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations.Google Scholar
Baker, B. W., Peinetti, H. R., Coughenour, M. B., and Johnson, T. L. (2012). Competition favors elk over beaver in a riparian willow ecosystem. Ecosphere, 3(11), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BANR (2018). Bioenergy Alliance Network of the Rockies. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. http://banr.nrel.colostate.edu/ (accessed June, 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Baron, J. S., ed. (1992). Biogeochemistry of a Subalpine Ecosystem: Loch Vale Watershed. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Baron, J. S., ed. (2002). Rocky Mountain Futures: An Ecological Perspective. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Baron, J. S., Hartman, M. D., Band, L. E., et al. (2000). Sensitivity of a high-elevation rocky mountain watershed to altered climate and CO2. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. S., Ojima, D. S., Holland, E. A., et al. (1994). Analysis of nitrogen saturation potential in Rocky Mountain tundra and forest: Implications for aquatic systems. Biogeochemistry, 27(1), 61–82.Google Scholar
Baron, J. S., Rueth, H. M., Wolfe, A. M., et al. (2000). Ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition in the Colorado Front Range, ed. Baron, J.. Ecosystems, 3(4), 352–68 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. S., Schmidt, T. W., and Hartman, M. D. (2009). Climate-Induced Changes in High Elevation Stream Nitrate Dynamics. Global Change Biology, 15: 1777–1789.Google Scholar
BLM. (2016). Little Snake Resource Management Plan. USDI Bureau of Land Management. https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=dispatchToPatternPage&currentPageId=93686 (accessed June, 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Boone, R. B. (2007). Effects of fragmentation on cattle in African savannas under variable precipitation. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, R. B., Coughenour, M. B., Galvin, K. A., and Ellis, J. E. (2002). Addressing management questions for Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania, Using the Savanna Modeling System. African Journal of Ecology, 40, 138–58.Google Scholar
Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., BurnSilver, S. B., Thornton, P. K., Ojima, D. S., and Jawson, J. R. (2011). Using coupled simulation models to link pastoral decision making and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 16(2), 6. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art6/.Google Scholar
Bradford, J. B., and Hobbs, N. T. (2008). Regulating overabundant ungulate populations: An example for elk in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 520–8.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (2018). Moving toward an ecosystem services and management framework among federal agencies. USDI Bureau of Land Management. https://nespguidebook.com/ecosystem-services-and-federal-agencies/introduction/.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Schimel, D. S., Yonker, C. M., et al. (1990). Regional modeling of grassland biogeochemistry using GIS. Landscape Ecology, 4(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
CDPHE. (2018). Rocky Mountain National Park Initiative. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/rocky-mountain-national-park-initiative (accessed June, 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Christensen, L., Burnsilver, S., and Coughenour, M. (2006). Integrated assessment of the dynamics, stability, and resilience of the Inner Mongolian grazing ecosystems. Nomadic Peoples, 9, 131–45.Google Scholar
Christensen, N. L., Bartuska, A. M., Brown, J. H., et al. (1996). The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 6(3), 665–91.Google Scholar
Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Publication No. 242. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington.Google Scholar
Cole, C. V., and Heil, R. D. (1981). Phosphorus effects on terrestrial nitrogen cycling. In Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles: Processes, Ecosystem, Strategies and Management Impacts, ed. Clark, F. E. and Rosswall, T.. Ecological Bulletin, 33. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council, 363–74.Google Scholar
Cole, C. V., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., et al. (1993). Analysis of agroecosystem carbon pools. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 357–71.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C., Cole, C. V., and Elliott, E. T. (1983). Decomposition, organic matter turnover, and nutrient dynamics in agroecosystems. In Nutrient Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems, ed. Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., Asmussen, L. E., and Leonard, R. A.. Special Publication No. 23. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. S. (1913). The climax forest of Isle Royale, Lake Superior, and its development. Botanical Gazette, 55, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1991). Grazing responses of upland steppe in Yellowstone’s Northern winter range. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 71–82.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1992). Spatial modeling and landscape characterization of an African pastoral ecosystem: A prototype model and its potential use for monitoring drought. In Ecological Indicators, vol. 1, ed. McKenzie, D. H., Hyatt, D. E., and McDonald, V. J.. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science, 787–810.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1994). Elk carrying capacity on Yellowstone’s northern elk winter range: Preliminary modeling to integrate climate, landscape, and elk nutritional requirements. In Plants and Their Environments: Proceedings of the First Biennial Scientific Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Mammoth Hot Springs, 1991, Technical Report NPS/NRYELL.NRTR-93/XX, ed. Despain, D.. Denver: USDI/NPS, 97–112.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1999). Ecosystem Modeling of the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range. Final Report to US Geological Survey. Fort Collins, CO: National Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management, Biological Resources Division.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2000). Ecosystem modeling of the PMWHR: Executive summary. In Managers’ Summary: Ecological Studies of the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, 1992–1997, ed. Singer, F. J. and. Schoenecker, K. A.. Fort Collins, CO: US Geological Survey, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, 125–31.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2002a). Ecosystem modeling in support of the conservation of wild equids: The example of the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range. In Equids: Zebras, Asses and Horses: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, ed. Moehlman, P. D.. IUCN/SSC Equid Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN, 174.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2002b). Elk in the Rocky Mountain National Park Ecosystem: A model-based assessment. Final Report to USGS Biological Resources Division, Fort Collins, CO, and US National Park Service, Rocky Mountain National Park.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2005a). Plant biomass and primary production on bison and elk ranges in Yellowstone National Park: Data synthesis and ecosystem modeling. Part 1: Final report to US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Bozeman, MT.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2005b). Interactions between grazing herbivores and herbaceous vegetation on a heterogeneous landscape: Yellowstone National Park. Part 2: Final report to US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Bozeman, MT.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M .B. (2005c). Bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park: Linking ecosystem, animal nutrition, and population processes. Part 3: Final report to US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Bozeman, MT.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2006). Ecosystem research and modeling in protected areas with large mammals: Yellowstone as a case study. In Wildlife in Shiretoko and Yellowstone National Parks: Lessons in Wildlife Conservation from Two World Heritage Sites, ed. McCullough, D. R., Kaji, K., and Yamanaka, M.. Hokkaido, Japan: Shiretoko Nature Foundation, 165–75.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (2012). The use of ecosystem simulation modeling to assess feed availabilities for large herbivores in heterogeneous landscapes. In Conducting National Feed Assessments, ed. Coughenour, M. B. and Makkar, H. P. S.. Animal Production and Health Manual No. 15. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., McNaughton, S. J., and Wallace, L. L. (1984). Simulation study of Serengeti perennial graminoid responses to defoliation. Ecological Modeling, 26, 177–201.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., and Singer, F. J. (1996a). Elk population processes in Yellowstone National Park under the policy of natural regulation. Ecological Applications, 6, 573–93.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., and Singer, F. J. (1996b). Yellowstone elk population responses to fire: A comparison of landscape carrying capacity and spatial-dynamic ecosystem modeling approaches. In The Ecological Implications of Fire in Greater Yellowstone, ed. Greenlee, J.. Fairfield, WA: International Association of Wildland Fire, 169–80Google Scholar
Cowles, H. C. (1899). The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. F. (1968). Plants Communities: A Textbook of Plant Synecology. New York, Evanston, London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Despain, D., Houston, D., Meagher, M., and Schullery, P. (1986). Wildlife in Transition: Man and Nature on Yellowstone’s Northern Range. Boulder, CO: Roberts Rinehart.Google Scholar
Detling, J. K. (1998). Mammalian herbivores: Ecosystem level effects in two national parks. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 438–48.Google Scholar
Dyksterhuis, E. J. (1951). Use of ecology on range land. Journal of Range Management, 4, 319–22.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The Population Bomb. New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine.Google Scholar
Elser, J. J., Andersen, T., Baron, J. S., et al. (2009). Shifts in lake N: P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation driven by atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Science, 326(5954), 835–7.Google Scholar
Enders, S. K., Pagani, M., Pantoja, S., et al. (2008). Compound‐specific stable isotopes of organic compounds from lake sediments track recent environmental changes in an alpine ecosystem, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Limnology and Oceanography, 53(4), 1468–78.Google Scholar
Evangelista, P. H., Kumar, S., Stohlgren, T. J., et al. (2008). Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 808–17.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. T., and Detling, J. K. (1999a). The influence of herbivory on plant cover and species composition in the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, USA. Plant Ecology, 144, 145–57.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. T., and Detling, J. K. (1999b). Plant responses to defoliation and resource supplementation in the Pryor Mountains. Journal of Range Management, 52, 263–70.Google Scholar
Forest Restoration. (2018). Forest restoration. USDA Forest Service. www.fs.fed.us/restoration/index.shtml (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of Systems. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.Google Scholar
Frank, D., and McNaughton, S. J. (1992). The ecology of plants, large mammalian herbivores, and drought in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 73, 2043–58.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F. (1989). Toward a new forestry. American Forests, 95, 11–12.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F. (2017). Understanding and managing forests as ecosystems: A reflection on 60 years of change, and a view to the Anthropocene. The Pinchot Letter, 19(1), 24–9. www.pinchot.org/doc/612 (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F., Johnson, K. N., and Johnson, D. L. (2017). Ecological Forest Management. Chicago: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Fullman, T. J., Bunting, E. L., Kiker, G. A., and Southworth, J. (2017). Predicting shifts in large herbivore distributions under climate change and management using a spatially-explicit ecosystem model. Ecological Modeling, 352, 1–18.Google Scholar
Galvin, K. A., Reid, R. S., Behnke, R. H. Jr., and Hobbs, N. T., eds. (2008). Fragmentation in Semi-arid and Arid Landscapes: Consequences for Human and Natural Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Galvin, K. A., Thornton, P. K., de Pinho, J. R., Sunderland, J., and Boone, R. B. (2006). Integrated modeling and its potential for resolving conflicts between conservation and people in the rangelands of East Africa. Human Ecology, 34, 155–83.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, T., and Detling, J. K. (2000). Summary of vegetation dynamics at the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, 1992–1996. In Managers’ Summary-Ecological Studies of the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, 1992–1997, ed. Singer, F. J. and Schoenecker, K. A.. Fort Collins, CO: United States Geological Survey – USDI.Google Scholar
Harden, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–8.Google Scholar
Hartman, M. D., Baron, J. S., Ewing, H. A., et al. (2014). Combined global change effects on ecosystem processes in nine US topographically complex areas. Biogeochemistry, 119(1–3), 85–108.Google Scholar
Heady, H., and Child, R. D. (1999). Rangeland Ecology and Management. New York: Avalon Publishing.Google Scholar
Hilbers, J. P., Van Langevelde, F., Prins, H. H. T., et al. (2015). Modeling elephant-mediated cascading effects of water point closure. Ecological Applications, 25, 402–15.Google Scholar
Hobbs, N. T., Galvin, K. A., Stokes, C. J., et al. (2008). Fragmentation of rangelands: Implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions, 18, 776–85.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Humphrey, H. B. (1961). Makers of North American Botany. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Humphrey, R. R. (1962). Range Ecology. New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Innis, G. S., ed. (1978). Grassland Simulation Model. Ecological Studies, 26. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lafrancois, B. M., Nydick, K. R., Johnson, B. M., et al. (2004). Cumulative effects of nutrients and pH on the plankton of two mountain lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61(7), 1153–65.Google Scholar
Lauenroth, W. K., and Burke, I. C., eds. (2008). Ecology of the Shortgrass Steppe: A Long-Term Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liedloff, A. C., Coughenour, M. B., Ludwig, J. A., and Dyer, R. (2001). Modelling the trade-off between fire and grazing in a tropical savanna landscape, northern Australia. Environment International, 27, 173–80.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J., and Margulis, L. (1974). Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1–2), 2–10.Google Scholar
Lowrance, R., Stinner, B. R., and House, G. J., eds. (1984). Agricultural Ecosystems. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J. A., Coughenour, M. B., Liedloff, A. C., and Dyer, R. (2001). Modelling the resilience of Australian savanna systems to grazing impacts. Environment International, 27, 167–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LVWSP (2018). The Loch Vale Watershed Program. USDI USGS and Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. www2.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/lvws/index.html (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Mast, M. A., Clow, D. W., Baron, J. S., et al. (2014). Links between N deposition and nitrate export from a high-elevation watershed in the Colorado Front Range. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(24), 14258–65.Google Scholar
McGill, W. B., Hunt, H. W., Woodmansee, R. G., and Reuss, J. O. (1981). Phoenix: A model of the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in grassland soils. In Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles: Processes, Ecosystem, Strategies and Management Impacts, ed. Clark, F. E. and Rosswall, T.. Ecological Bulletin, 33. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council, 49–115.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1976). Serengeti migratory wildebeest: Facilitation of energy flow by grazing. Science, 191, 92–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNaughton, S. J. (1979). Grassland–herbivore dynamics. In Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem, ed. Sinclair, A .R. E. and Norton-Griffiths, M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 46–81.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Benhrens, W. W. III (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Meixner, T., Bales, R. C., Williams, M. W., et al. (2000). Stream chemistry modeling of two watersheds in the Front Range, Colorado. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Metzger, K., Coughenour, M., Reich, R., and Boone, R. B. (2005). Effects of season of grazing on vegetation diversity, composition, and structure in a semi-arid ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments, 61, 147–60.Google Scholar
Milne, E., Williams, S., Bationo, A., et al. (2015). Grazing Lands, Livestock and Climate Resilient Mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. www.vivo.colostate.edu/lccrsp/reports/GrazingLandsLivestockClimateMitigation_Paper1_Final6Aug2015editedv4a.pdf (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Moir, W. H., and Block, W. M. (2001). Adaptive management on public lands in the United States: Commitment or rhetoric? Environmental Management, 28(2), 141–8.Google Scholar
Moir, W. H., Geils, B. W., Benoit, M. A., and Scurlock, D. (1997). Ecology of southwestern ponderosa pine forests: A literature. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-292. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
NAS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2017). Revisiting Brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24750. www.nap.edu/catalog/24750/revisiting-brucellosis-in-the-greater-yellowstone-area (accessed August 12, 2020).Google Scholar
NAS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) (2018). Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25259 (accessed August 12, 2020).Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1994). Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2010). Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (2013). Using Science to Improve the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Program: A Way Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. www.nap.edu/catalog/13511/using-science-to-improve-the-blm-wild-horse-and-burro-program (accessed August 12, 2020).Google Scholar
NCCASC. (2018). North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. http://nccsc.colostate.edu (accessed June 26, 2018).Google Scholar
NEON. (2018). Central Plains Experimental Range - CPER. www.neonscience.org/field-sites/field-sites-map/CPER (accessed June, 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., et al. (2012). The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298–304.Google Scholar
NFF. (2016). Collaborative Restoration Workshop. The 2016 Collaborative Restoration Workshop, Denver Colorado, National Forest Foundation. www.nationalforests.org/collaboration-resources/collaborative-restoration-workshop (accessed August 17, 2018).Google Scholar
NREL. (2018a). Ecosystem management. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. www.nrel.colostate.edu/research/ecosystem-management/ (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
NREL. (2018b). Wildlife management. Natural Resource Ecology Labratory. www.nrel.colostate.edu/research/wildlife-management/ (accessed June 26, 2018).Google Scholar
NREL. (2018c). COMET-Farm. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and USDA. http://cometfarm.nrel.colostate.edu (accessed June 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Nydick, K. R., Lafrancois, B. M., Baron, J. S., et al. (2004). Nitrogen regulation of algal biomass, productivity, and composition in shallow mountain lakes, Snowy Range, Wyoming, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61(7), 1256–68.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P., and Odum, H. T. (1963). Fundamentals of Ecology, 2nd edn. E. P. Odum in collaboration with H. T. Odum. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. M., Sharma, S., Gray, D. K., et al. (2015). Rapid and highly variable warming of lake surface waters around the globe. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(24): 1–9.Google Scholar
Parton, W. J., Anderson, D. W., Cole, C. V., and Stewart, J. W. B. (1983). Simulation of soil organic matter formation and mineralization in semiarid agroecosystems. In Nutrient Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems, ed. Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., Asmussen, L. E., and Leonard, R. A.. Special Publication No. 23. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations.Google Scholar
Paul, E. A. (2015). Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry, 4th edn. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., and Killian, K. (1997). Modeling soil carbon in relation to management and climate change in some agroecosystems in central North America. In Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, ed. Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Stewart, B. A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 459–71.Google Scholar
Paustian, K. H., Ogle, Stephen M., and Conant, Rich T. (2010). Quantification and decision support tools for US agricultural soil carbon sequestration. In ICP Series on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation; Volume 1, Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation, ed. Hillel, D. and Rosenzweig, C.. London: Imperial College Press, 307–41.Google Scholar
Paustian, K., Schuler, J., Killian, K., et al. (2012). COMET 2.0: Decision support system for agricultural greenhouse gas accounting. In Managing Agricultural Greenhouse Gases: Coordinated Agricultural Research through GraceNet to Address Our Changing Climate, ed. Liebig, M., Franzluebbers, A., and Follett, R.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 251–70.Google Scholar
Peinetti, H. R., Baker, B. W., and Coughenour, M. B. (2009). Simulation modeling to understand how selective foraging by beaver can drive the structure and function of a willow community. Ecological Modeling, 220, 998–1012.Google Scholar
Plumb, G .E., White, P. J., Coughenour, M. B., and Wallen, R. L. (2009). Carrying capacity and migration of Yellowstone bison: Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142, 2377–87.Google Scholar
Potter, L. D. (1957). Phytosociological study of San Augustin Plains, New Mexico. Ecology, 27(2), 113–36.Google Scholar
Reid, R. S. (2012). Savanas of Our Birth. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Romme, W. H, Whitby, T. G., Tinker, D. B., and Turner, M. G. (2016). Deterministic and stochastic processes lead to divergence in plant communities 25 years after the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Ecological Monographs, 86, 327–51.Google Scholar
Rueth, H. M., Baron, J. S., and Allstott, E. J. (2003). Responses of Engelmann spruce forests to nitrogen fertilization in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Ecological Applications, 13(3), 664–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rykiel, E. (1999). Ecosystem science at the Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. BioScience, 49(1), 69–70.Google Scholar
Sampson, A. W. (1923). Range and Pasture Management. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Schimel, D. S., Stillwell, M. A., and Woodmansee, R. G. (1985). Biogeochemistry C, N, and P in a soil catena of the shortgrass steppe. Ecology, 66, 276–82.Google Scholar
Sears, P. B. (1935). Deserts on the March. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J., Johnson, T., Ziegenfuss, L. C., Coughenour, M., Bowden, D., and Moses, M. (1998b). Population estimation, plant interactions, forage biomass, and consumption and carrying capacity estimation of elk in the Estes Valley. Final report to US National Park Service, Rocky Mountain National Park. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University and US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J., Swift, D. M., Coughenour, M. B., and Varley, J. (1998a). Thunder on the Yellowstone revisited: An assessment of natural regulation management of native ungulates, 1968–93. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 375–90.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J., Zeigenfuss, L. C., Lubow, B., and Rock, M. J. (2002a). Ecological evaluation of the potential overabundance of ungulates in U.S. national parks: A case study. In Ecological Evaluation of the Abundance and Effects of Elk Herbivory in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, 1994–1999, ed. Singer, F. J. and Zeigenfuss, L. C., 205–48. Open-File Report 02-208. Fort Collins, CO: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J., and Zeigenfuss, L. C., eds. (2002b). Ecological Evaluation of the Abundance and Effects of Elk Herbivory in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, 1994–1999. Open-File Report 02-208. Fort Collins, CO: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., Chong, G. W., et al. (1999). Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs, 69, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttie, J. M., Reynolds, S. G., and Batello, C., eds. (2005). Grasslands of the World. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Plant Production and Protection Series No. 34. www.fao.org/docrep/008/y8344e/y8344e00.htm (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Teague, W. R., Kreuter, U. P., and Fox, W. E. (2009a). Economically efficient rangeland management to sustain ecosystem function and livelihoods. Range and Animal Sciences and Resources Management, vol. 2. www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-35-26.pdf (accessed July 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Teague, W. R., Kreuter, U. P., Grant, W. E., Diaz-Solis, H., and Kothmann, M. M. (2009b). Economic implications of maintaining rangeland ecosystem health in a semi-arid savanna. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, D. M., and Romme, W. H. (2007). Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(4), 340–54.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. K., BurnSilver, S. B., Boone, R. B., and Galvin, K. A. (2006). Modelling the impacts of group ranch subdivision on agro-pastoral households in Kajiado, Kenya. Agricultural Systems, 87, 331–56.Google Scholar
TNC. (2018). The Nature Conservancy. www.nature.org/en-us/. (accessed October, 18, 2018).Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) (2018). Rangeland Resources and Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO. www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/fort-collins-co/center-for-agricultural-resources-research/rangeland-resources-systems-research/docs/rrsr/central-plains-experimental-research-location/ (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
USDI (2007). Elk and vegetation management plan, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. www.nps.gov/romo/learn/management/elk-and-vegetation-management-plan.htm (accessed August 12, 2020).Google Scholar
USFS. (2016). Northwest forest plan. USDA Forest Service. www.fs.fed.us/r6/reo/ (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Van Dyne, G. (1969). The Ecosystem Concept in Natural Resource Management. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Warming, E. (1896). Lehrbuch der ökologischen Pflanzengeographie. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. E. (1968). Prairie Plants and Their Environment: A Fifty-Year Study in the Midwest. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. E., and Clements, F. E. (1938). Plant Ecology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weisberg, P., and Coughenour, M. (2003). Model-based assessment of aspen responses to elk herbivory in Rocky Mountain National Park, U.S.A. Environmental Management, 32, 152–69.Google Scholar
Weisberg, P., Coughenour, M., and Bugmann, H. (2006). Modelling of large herbivore–vegetation interactions in a landscape context. In Large Herbivore Ecology and Ecosystem Dynamics, ed. Danell, K., Bergstrom, R., Duncan, P., and Pastor, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, P., Hobbs, N. T., Ellis, J., and Coughenour, M. (2002). An ecosystem approach to population management of ungulates. Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 181–97.Google Scholar
Williams, B. K. (2011). Adaptive management of natural resources: Framework and issues. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1346–53.Google Scholar
Williams, B. K., and Brown, E. D. (2012). Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Applications Guide. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Adaptive Management Working Group.Google Scholar
Williams, B. K., Wingard, G. L., Brewer, G., et al. (2013). U.S. Geological Survey ecosystems science strategy – Advancing discovery and application through collaboration: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1383–C. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (2005). The USDA Forest Service: The First Century. FS-650. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. P., Van Gorp, A. C., and Baron, J. S. (2003). Recent ecological and biogeochemical changes in alpine lakes of Rocky Mountain National Park (Colorado, USA): A response to anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. Geobiology, 1(2), 153–68.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, R. (1990). Biogeochemical cycles and ecological hierarchies. In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective, ed. Zonneveld, I. S. and Forman, R. T. T.. New York: Springer, 57–71.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2018). Forest area (% of land area). World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS (accessed June 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Yellowstone National Park. (1997). Yellowstone’s Northern Range: Complexity and Change in a Wildland Ecosystem. Mammoth Hot Springs, WY: USDI, National Park Service.Google Scholar
Zeigenfuss, L. C., Singer, F. J., and Bowden, D. (2002a). Vegetation responses to natural regulation of elk in Rocky Mountain National Park. Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-1999-0003. Denver: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Zeigenfuss, L. C., Singer, F. J., Williams, S. A., and Johnson, T. L. (2002b). Influences of herbivory and water on willow in elk winter range. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 788–95.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×