Victory in defeat?

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139540964.018

13 - Victory in defeat?

National identity after civil war in Finland and Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013

Bill Kissane

Edited by

John A. Hall and

Siniša Malešević

Show author details

John A. Hall: Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Siniša Malešević: Affiliation:
University College Dublin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

War can accelerate state building, and so too can civil war. Following independence Finland and Ireland saw a sharp reduction of their territories coincide with a rapid assertion of central authority during civil war. These civil war victories – by Finnish “Whites” and Irish “Free Staters” – provided the bases for their evolution as the two “successor states” which emerged during and after the First World War to retain their independence throughout the twentieth century. The victories resolved fundamental issues to do with statehood and also strengthened the respective states. Yet both also needed to reconstruct a common sense of national identity afterwards. This was problematic. International wars often lead to unifying narratives of conflict, but those of civil wars are divisive. Such was the case in Finland and Ireland, despite the integration of the losers into the systems afterwards. In Finland, the Social Democrats’ participation in the political system saw no lessening of the dominance of the White interpretation of the civil war as “a war of liberation” before the 1960s. In Ireland, the losers had nationalism on their side, and came to monopolize the definition of what was national. Success at nation building did not automatically follow success at state building.

National identity has often been strengthened by the experience of solidarity during interstate wars. Ideological resources and bureaucratic control of coercion by the state are two critical variables (Malešević 2011: 141–61). This chapter explores the connection between state strength and national identity after civil wars. While in Finland there was a connection between the assertion of state strength in 1918 and the molding of national identity afterwards, in Ireland the combination of strong coercive state power and the moral support of the Catholic Church were insufficient. The victors monopolized state power and the losers, the definition of what was national. Yet the losers had played no role in state building before 1932, and were marginalized during reconstruction.

Type: Chapter
Information: Nationalism and War , pp. 321 - 340

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540964.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alapuro, R. 1988. State and Revolution in Finland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Alapuro, R. 2002. “Coping with the Civil War of 1918 in Twentieth Century Finland.” Pp. 169–84 in Historical Injustice and Democratic Transition in Eastern Asia and Northern Europe: Ghosts at the Table of Democracy, edited by Christie, K. and Cribb, R.. London: New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alapuro, R. 2010. “Violence in the Finnish Civil War in Today's Perspective.” Paper presented to the History, Memory, Politics Seminar. Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, 19 May 2010.

Alapuro, R. In press. “The Reconstruction of National Identity in Finland after the Civil War of 1918.” In Reconstructing National Identity after Europe's Internal Wars, edited by Kissane, B.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Allen, N. 2009. Modernism, Ireland and Civil War. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, J.B. 1972. “Societal Patterns and Lessons: The Irish Case.” Pp. 217–29 in Civil Wars in the Twentieth Century, edited by Higham, R.. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar

Coakley, J. 1986. “Political Succession and Regime Change in New States in Interwar Europe: Ireland, Finland, Czechoslovakia, and the Baltic Republics.”European Journal of Political Research 14(1–2): 187–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dolan, A. 2003. Commemorating the Irish Civil War: History and Memory, 1923–2000. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Forsberg, T. 2007. “Post-Conflict Justice and the Finnish Civil War 1918: Reconciliation without Truth?” Pp. 137–54 in Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 18, edited by Klabbers, J.. The Hague: Brill.Google Scholar

Foster, G. 2009. “The Social Structures and Cultural Politics of the Irish Civil War.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN.

Gallagher, F. 1965. The Anglo-Irish Treaty. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Garvin, T. 1981. The Evolution of Irish Nationalist Politics. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar

Greaves, D.C. 1971. Liam Mellowes and the Irish Revolution. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar

Haapala, P. 2008. “The Legacy of the Civil War 1918 in Finnish Historiography.” Paper presented to the Joint Conference between Finnish and Estonian Historians 2008: The Difficult Past No. 2.

Hämäläinen, P. 1979. In Time of Storm: Revolution, Civil War, and the Ethnolinguistic Issue in Finland. Albany: StateUniversity of New York Press.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, M. 1988. Green Against Green: The Irish Civil War 1922–23. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. 1987. The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism: The Gaelic Revival and the Creation of the Irish Nation State. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Jussila, O., Hentila, S., and Nevakivi, J.. 1999. From Grand Duchy to Modern State: A Political History of Finland since 1809. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar

Karvonen, L. 2000. “Finland: From Conflict to Compromise.” Pp. 129–57 in Conditions of Democracy in Europe, 1919–1939: Systematic Case Studies, edited by Berg-Schlosser, D. and Mitchell, J.. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kirby, D. 1979. Finland in the Twentieth Century. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar

Kissane, B. 2002. Explaining Irish Democracy. University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar

Kissane, B.“Democratization, State Formation and Civil War in Finland and Ireland: A Comment on the Democratic Peace Hypothesis.”Comparative Political Studies 37(8): 969–85.CrossRef

Kissane, B. 2005. The Politics of the Irish Civil War. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kissane, B. 2011. New Beginnings: Constitutionalism and Democracy in Modern Ireland. University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar

Kostick, C. 2009. Revolution in Ireland: Popular Militancy 1917–1923. Cork University Press.Google Scholar

Kurunmäki, J. 2008. “The Breakthrough of Universal Suffrage in Finland, 1905–06.” Pp. 355–71 in The Ashgate Companion to the Politics of Democratization in Europe: Concepts and Histories, edited by Palonen, K., Pulkkinen, T., and Rosales, J.M.. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Liikanen, I. 1995. Fennoman ja kansa. Joukkojarjestaytymsen lapimurto ja Suomalaisen puoleen synty. Hesinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.Google Scholar

MacArdle, D. 1951. The Irish Republic, 3rd edn. Dublin: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Malešević, S. 2011. “Nationalism, War and Social Cohesion.”Ethnic and Racial Studies 34(1): 141–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.P. 2006. Kevin O'Higgins: Builder of the Irish State. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar

Meehan, C. 2010. The Cosgrave Party. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moss, W. 1933. Political Parties in the Irish Free State. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

O'Callaghan, M. 1984. “Language, Nationality and Cultural Identity in the Irish Free State, 1922–7: The ‘Irish Statesman’ and ‘Catholic Bulletin’ reappraised.”Irish Historical Studies (94): 226–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Hegarty, P.S. 1998[1924]. The Victory of Sinn Fein. University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar

Pyne, P. 1969–70. “The Third Sinn Fein Party: 1923–26.”Economic and Social Review 1: 29–50, 129–57.Google Scholar

Regan, J. 1999. The Irish Counter-revolution 1921–1936. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rintala, M. 1962. Three Generations: The Extreme Right Wing in Finnish Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Soikkanen, T. 1987. “The Development of Political Parties: An Introduction and Overview.” Pp. 28–34 in Political Parties in Finland, edited by Mylly, J. and Berry, M.R.. University of Turku.Google Scholar

Valiulis, M. 1986. “The Man They Could Never Forgive: The View of the Opposition. Eamon De Valera and the Civil War.” Pp. 92–100 in Eamon de Valera and His Times, edited by Murphy, J.A. and O'Carroll, J.P.. Cork University Press.Google Scholar