Almaty Guidelines on Promoting the Application of the Principles of the Aarhus Convention in International Forums, May 27, 2005, Decision II/4 of MOP, doc. ECE/MP.PP/2005/2/Add.5Google Scholar

Central America-Dominican Republic-United States Free Trade Agreement, August 5, 2004, ch. 17.Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, “Commission Communication to the European Parliament and the European Ombudsman on Relations with the Complainant in Respect of Infringements of Community Law,” Brussels, March 20, 2002, 141 at 4.Google Scholar

Convention on International Civil Aviation, December 7, 1944, 15 UNTS 295. 2000 revision is available online: <www.icao.int/icaonet/dcs/1300.html>..>Google Scholar

EC Treaty (Treaty of Rome), European (Economic) Community, March 25, 1957. (Entered into force January 1, 1958.)Google Scholar

European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, European Communities, September 6, 2001.Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, IBRD 93–10, Resolution No. IDA 96–6, “The Inspection Panel,” September 22, 1993, online: <www.inspectionpanel.org>..>Google Scholar

North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, September 14, 1993, 32 I.L.M. 1480. (Entered into force January 1, 1994.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Session of the ICAO Council. Review of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating to the conduct of safety oversight audits under the comprehensive systems approach, 179th Sess., 12th Mtg., Subject No. 14.5: Safety Oversight, ICAO Doc. C-MIN 179/12 (2006) §49.Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 22, 1969, 155 U.N.T.S. 331.Google Scholar

World Bank Inspection Panel, Operating Procedures (1994). Online: WB <http://www.worldbank.org/inspectionpanel>..>Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas. Law-Making in the International Civil Aviation Organization. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. 1969.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul P. EU Administrative Law. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Vierucci, Luisa. NGO's in International Law, Efficiency in Flexibility? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2008.Google Scholar

French, Duncan and Saul, Matthew. International Law and Dispute Settlement. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing. 2010.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene, and Krueger, Alan. “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” in The US – Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Ed. Garber, Peter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Conway W. Understanding International Law. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publication. 2010.Google Scholar

Kirton, John J. and Trebilcock, Michael J.. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing. 2004.Google Scholar

Flood, Colleen and Sossin, Lorne. Administrative Law in Context: A New Casebook. Emond-Montgomery Publishing. 2008.Google Scholar

Antweiler, Werner, et al. “Is Free Trade Good for the Environment.” (2001) 91 4 The American Economic Review 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgeman, Natalie. “World Bank Reform in the ‘Post-Policy’ Era.” (2001) 13 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 1013.Google Scholar

Casey-Lefkowitz, Susan, Futrell, William J., Austin, Jay, and Bass, Susan. “The Evolving Role of Citizens in Environmental Enforcement.” Paper delivered at the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement in Chiang Mai, Thailand, April 22, 1996, unpublished.Google Scholar

Currie, Duncan. “United States Unilateralism and the Kyoto Protocol, CTBT and ABM Treaties: The Implications Under International Law.” Greenpeace publication (R. v Bush), June 9, 2001. <http://archive.greenpeace.org/climate/climatecountdown/legalsum.htm>..>Google Scholar

Clark, Dana L. “The World Bank and Human Rights: The Need for Greater Accountability.” (2002) 15 Harv Hum Rts J 218.Google Scholar

DiMento, Joseph F. & Doughman, Pamela M.. “Soft Teeth in the Back of the Mouth: the NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement Implemented.” (1998) 10 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 651, 658–81.Google Scholar

Garver, Geoff. “Tooth Decay: Examining NAFTA's ‘Environmental Teeth.’” (2008) 25(3) The Environmental Forum 34–39.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, Mark R. “The Role of Transparency and Public Participation in International Environmental Agreements: The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation.” (2001–2002) 29 Environmental Affairs L Rev 343–398.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol. “Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values.” (2006) 17(1) Eur J Int Law 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, John H. “A New Approach to Compliance with International Environmental Law: The Submissions Procedure of the NAFTA Environmental Commission.” (2001) 28 Ecology LQ.Google Scholar

Knox, John H. “Separated at Birth: The North American Agreements on Labor and the Environment.” (2004) 26 Loy LA Int'l & Comp LJ at 359–387.Google Scholar

Lewis, Bradley N. “Biting Without Teeth: The Citizen Submission Process and Environmental Protection.” (2007) 155 U Penn LR 1229–1268.Google Scholar

Markell, David L. “Governance of International Institutions: A Review of North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation's Citizen Submissions Process.” (2005) 30 NCJ Int'l L & Com Reg at 759–794.Google Scholar

Markell, David L. “The Role of Spotlighting Procedures in Promoting Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Accountability.” (2010) 45 Wake Forest L Rev 425–467.Google Scholar

Markell, David L. and Tyler, Tom R.. “Using Empirical Research to Design Government Citizen Participation Process: A Case Study of Citizens’ Roles in Environmental Compliance and Enforcement.” (2008) 57 Kan L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Markell, David L. “The Commission for Environmental Cooperation's Citizen Submission Process.” (1999) 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev at 545–574.Google Scholar

Markell, David L. “Understanding Citizen Perspectives on Government Decision Makin Processes as a Way to Improve the Administrative State.” (2006) 36 Environmental Law 683.Google Scholar

Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg and Jørgensen, Torben Beck. “Accountability as a Differentiated Value in Supranational Governance.” (2010) 40(6) The American Review of Public Administration 742–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wold, Chris. “Evaluating NAFTA and the Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Lessons for Integrating Trade and Environment in Free Trade Agreements.” (2008) 28 St Louis U Pub L Rev 201–252.Google Scholar

Yang, Tseming. “The Effectiveness of the NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement's Citizen Submission Process: A Cast Study of Metales y Derivados.” (2005) 76(2) U Colo L Rev 443–502.Google Scholar

Annan, S-G Kofi. “Address to the World Summit on Sustainable Development.” Secretary-General address delivered at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, September 2, 2002, unpublished, <http://www.un.org/events/wssd/statements/sgE.htm>..>Google Scholar

Clinton, Presidential Candidate Gov. Bill “Address.” Address delivered at University of North Carolina, October 4, 1992, unpublished.Google Scholar

Graham, Hon. Bill. “Notes For An Address by the Honourable Bill Graham, Minister of Foreign Affairs.” Address delivered at the United Nations Conference on Disarmament, Geneva, March 19, 2002, unpublished, <http://webapps.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/minpub/Publication.asp?publication_id=380961>..>Google Scholar

CEC, Joint Pub. Advisory Comm., Advice to Council No: 08–01: Submissions on Enforcement Matters: From Lessons Learned to Following Up Factual Records (Feb. 27, 2008). Available at: http://www.cec.org/files/pdf/ABOUTUS/JPACAdvice-0801_SEM_en.pdf.Google Scholar

CEC, Joint Pub. Advisory Comm., Advice to Council No: 12–01: Re: SEM Task Force Proposals for Changes to the Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters (SEM) (May 23, 2012). Available at: http://www.cec.org/Storage/137/16238_JPAC_Advice_12-01-Final-en.pdf.Google Scholar

Four-Year review of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation: Report of the independent Review Committee (June 1998), p. 5.Google Scholar

Gardner, Jane. “Emerging Conflict of Interest” JPAC Discussion Paper: Analysis Articles 14 and 15 of the NAAEC Council's (April 28, 2004), unpublished.Google Scholar

Opalka, Katia. “Inside the NAFTA Environmental Commission.” (2010) White Paper, unpublished.Google Scholar

Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters under Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2013. http://www.cec.org/Storage/152/17779_SEM_booklet_PDF_en_final.pdf.Google Scholar

Environmental Affairs Council. Working Procedures for Submissions on Environmental Law Enforcement Matters under Chapter 17 of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. Environmental Affairs Council, 2010. http://www.saa-sem.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=208&lang=us.Google Scholar

Case concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia) [1999] ICJ Rep 1045.Google Scholar

Case concerning the Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), [1994] ICJ Rep 6.Google Scholar

North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, September 14, 1993, in force January 1, 1994, (1993) 32 ILM 1480; Can TS 1994 No 3.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion (February 1, 2011).Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna, May 23, 1969, in force January 27, 1980, 1155 UNTS 331; (1969) 8 ILM 679.Google Scholar

Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Bringing the Facts to Light: A Guide to Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2000).Google Scholar

Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters under Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2013).Google Scholar

SEM-00–004 (BC Logging), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Council Resolution 03–04 pursuant to Article 15(2) (April 22, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 29, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Council Resolution 02–13 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 10, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 13, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 29, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Council Resolution 03–16 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 11, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 8, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-02–004 (El Boludo Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 17, 2004).Google Scholar

SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Council Resolution 08–01 pursuant to Article 15(2) (May 30, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 18, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Government of the United States of America Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 29, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 5, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-05–001 (Crushed Gravel in Puerto Peñasco), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 24, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (January 10, 2006).Google Scholar

SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (January 18, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-06–003 and SEM-06–004 (Ex Hacienda El Hospital II and Ex Hacienda El Hospital III), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 12, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Council Resolution 10–05 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (February 8, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (February 26, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (March 20, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (June 5, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 15, 2009).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (March 7, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (April 8, 2009).Google Scholar

SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 15, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 26, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 12, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 3, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–002 (Wetlands in Manzanillo), Notification pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 19, 2013).Google Scholar

SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2011).Google Scholar

SEM-95–001 (Spotted Owl), Submission pursuant to Article 14 (June 30, 1995).Google Scholar

SEM-96–003 (Oldman River I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 2, 1997).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Council Resolution 98–07 pursuant to Article 15(2) (June 24, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (July 21, 1997).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 27, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Council Resolution 01–11 pursuant to Article 15(2) (November 16, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 8, 1999).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (June 29, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-98–005 (Aquanova), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 4, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-98–005 (Cytrar I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 26, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 30, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Government of the United States of America Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 30, 2000).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary, 2nd ed.Google Scholar

Markell, David. “The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation After Ten Years: Lessons About Institutional Structure and Public Participation in Governance.” (2004) 26 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 341–57.Google Scholar

Markell, David. “The Role of Spotlighting Procedures in Promoting Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Accountability.” (2010) 45 Wake Forest Law Review, 425–67.Google Scholar

Pacheco-Vega, Raúl. “Las denuncias ciudadanas sobre cumplimiento ambiental en América del Norte (1996–2012): perspectivas sobre la sociedad civil ambientalista norteamericana.” (2013) 8 NORTEAMÉRICA, 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solano, Pablo. “Choosing the Right Whistle: The Development of the ‘Environmental Law’ Concept under the Citizen Submission Process,” Chapter 3 of this volume.Google Scholar

Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee. “Ten Years of North American Environmental Cooperation.” Report of the Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee to the Council of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (June 15, 2004).Google Scholar