Adémar, de Chabannes. Opera liturgica et poetica: Musica cum textibus, ed. Grier, James. 2 vols. Ademari Cabanensis Opera Omnia Pars II. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis, 245, 245A. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.Google Scholar

Ammerbach, Elias Nikolaus. Orgel oder Instrument Tabulaturbuch. Nürnberg: Gerlach, 1583 (reproduced at books.google.ca/books?id=7 K-PGwXyKR8 C&printsec=frontcover& source=gbs_ViewAPI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false).Google Scholar

Ammerbach, Elias Nikolaus Orgel oder Instrument Tabulaturbuch (1571/83), ed. Jacobs, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gordon A., ed. Compositions of the Bamberg Manuscript: Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek, Lit. 115 (olim Ed. IV. 6). Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 75. Neuhausen-Stuttgart: American Institute of Musicology, 1977.Google Scholar

Apel, Willi, and Rosenberg, Samuel N., eds. French Secular Compositions of the Fourteenth Century. 3 vols. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 53. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1970–72.Google Scholar

Attaingnant, Pierre. Tres breue et familiere introduction. Paris: Pierre Attaingnant, 1529 (facsimile ed. François Lesure [Geneva: Éditions Minkoff, 1988]).Google Scholar

Aubry, Pierre, ed. Cent motets du XIIIe siècle. 3 vols. Publications de la Société Internationale de Musique, Section de Paris. Paris: U. Rouart, Lerolle & Co. and Paul Geuthner, 1908.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian. Klavierbüchlein für Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, ed. Plath, Wolfgang. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, ser. 5, 5. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1962.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Messe in H-moll, BWV 232: Faksimile-Lichtdruck des Autographs mit einem Nachwort, ed. Dürr, Alfred. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1965; repr. in Documenta Musicologica, ser. 2: Handschriften-Faksimiles, 12 (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1983).Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Messe in H-moll, BWV 232 mit Sanctus in D-Dur (1724), BWV 232¹¹¹, ed. Musicologica, Christoph Wolff. Documenta, ser. 2: Handschriften-Faksimiles, 35. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2007.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Sei solo a violino senza basso accompagnato. 2nd ed. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1958.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Sei solo a violino senza basso accompagnato. Revocata, Monumenta Musicae, 2. Florence: Studio per Edizioni Scelte, 1985.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Sei solo a violino senza basso accompagnato, ed. Dadelsen, Georg von. Faksimile-Reihe Bachscher Werke und Schriftstücke, 22. Leipzig: Deutscher Verlag für Musik, 1988.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Sei solo a violino senza basso accompagnato, ed. Hiemke, Sven. Meisterwerke der Musik im Faksimile, 8. Laaber: Laaber-Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann SebastianToccata and Fugue in D minor, in Präludien, Toccaten, Fantasien und Fugen I, ed. Kilian, Dietrich. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, ser. 4, 5. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1972, pp. 76–89.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Verschiedene Kammermusikwerke, ed. Hofmann, Klaus. Werke, Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher, ser. 6, 5. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2006.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Werke für Flöte, ed. Schmitz, Hans-Peter. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, ser. 6, 3. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1963.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian Das Wohltemperierte Klavier, 2 vols., ed. Alfred, Dürr. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, ser. 5, 6.1 and 6.2. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1989–95.Google Scholar

Banchieri, Adriano. L’organo suonarino. Venice: Ricciardo Amadino, 1611; partial repr. ed. Giulio Cattin, Bibliotheca Organologica, 27 (Amsterdam: Frits Knuf, 1969); also in Bibliotheca Musica Bononiensis, sezione 2, no. 31 (Bologna: Forni Editore, 1969).Google Scholar

Bartók, Béla. Mikrokosmos. 6 vols. London: Boosey & Hawkes, 1987.Google Scholar

Baxter, J. H., ed. An Old St. Andrews Music Book (Cod. Helmst. 628). St. Andrews University Publications, 30. London: Oxford University Press, 1931; repr. New York, 1973.Google Scholar

Beatles, The. Complete Scores, ed. Fujita, Tetsuya, Hagino, Yuji, Kubo, Hajime and Sato, Goro. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard, 1993.Google Scholar

Beck, Jean, ed. Le manuscrit du roi: Fond français de la Bibliothèque nationale. 2 vols. Corpus Cantilenarum Medii Aevi, 1: Les Chansonniers des Troubadours et des Trouvères, 2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1938; repr. New York, 1970.Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig van. Grande sonate pour le piano-forte. Vienna: Artaria et Compag, 1819 (reproduced at https://bit.ly/2DtST02).Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig van Klaviersonaten, 1, ed. Schmidt, Hans. Werke, Beethoven, ser. 7, vol. 2. Munich-Duisburg: G. Henle Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig vanSinfonie mit Schluß-Chor über Schillers Ode “An die Freude”. Mainz: B. Schotts Sohnen, n.d. (reproduced at https://bit.ly/2Xmn14J).Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig van Sinfonie no. 9, Op. 125: Autograph, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Beethoven-Haus Bonn, Bibliothèque nationale de France, ed. Lockwood, Lewis, Del Mar, Jonathan and Rebmann, Martina. Musicologica, Documenta, ser. 2: Handschriften-Faksimiles, 42. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2010.Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig van Symphony no. 3 Opus 55 Eroica, ed. Churgin, Bathia. Werke, Beethoven, ser. 1, vol. 2. Munich: G. Henle Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar

Beethoven, Ludwig van Trois Sonates pour le Clavecin ou Piano-Forte. Vienna: Artaria, n.d.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret, ed. Bologna Q15, The Making and Remaking of a Musical Manuscript: Introductory Study and Facsimile Edition. 2 vols. Ars Nova, nuova serie, 2. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 2008.Google Scholar

Berio, Luciano. Sequenza III per voce femminile. London: Universal Edition, 1968.Google Scholar

Berio, Luciano. Sequenza VII per oboe solo. London: Universal Edition, 1971.Google Scholar

Brahms, Johannes. Concert für das Pianoforte mit Begleitung des Orchesters, Op. 15. Leipzig: J. Rieter-Bidermann, 1875.Google Scholar

Brahms, Johannes. Concert für das Pianoforte mit Begleitung des Orchesters, Op. 83. Berlin: Simrock, 1882.Google Scholar

Brown, Earle. Available Forms 1. New York: Associated Music Publishers, 1962.Google Scholar

Brown, Howard, ed. See Cavalli, Francesco.Google Scholar

Brumel, Antoine. Opera omnia, ed. Hudson, Barton. 6 vols. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 5. N. p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1969–72.Google Scholar

Cabezón, Antonio de. Collected Works, 3: Versos & Fugas, ed. Jacobs, Charles. Gesamtausgaben, 4/3. Brooklyn: Institute of Medieval Music, 1976.Google Scholar

Cabezón, Antonio de Obras de música para tecla arpa y vihuela. Madrid: Francisco Sanchez, 1578 (reproduced at bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?id=0000037786).Google Scholar

Cabezón, Antonio de Obras de música para tecla arpa y vihuela, ed. Higinio, Anglés. 3 vols. Monumentos de la Música Española, 27–29. Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1966.Google Scholar

Cabezón, Antonio de Obras de música para tecla arpa y vihuela, ed. Pina, Javier Artigas, Parra, Gustavo Delgado, Esteban, Antonio Ezquerro, Marín, Luis Antonio González, Uriol, José Luis González and Valle, José Vicente González. 4 vols. Zaragoza: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituición «Fernando el Católico», 2010.Google Scholar

Caccini, Giulio. L’Euridice. Florence: G. Marescotti, 1600; repr. ed. Piero Mioli, Archivum Musicum, Musica Drammatica, 5 (Florence, 2000).Google Scholar

Carapetyan, Armen, ed. An Early Fifteenth-Century Italian Source of Keyboard Music: The Codex Faenza Biblioteca comunale, 117. Musicological Studies and Documents, 10. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1961.Google Scholar

Carter, Elliott. Eight Pieces for Four Timpani (one player). New York: Associated Music Publishers, 1968.Google Scholar

Cavalieri, Emilio del. Rappresentatione di Anima e di Corpo. Rome: Nicolo Mutii, 1600; repr. Fransborough, 1967; and in Bibliotheca Musica Bononiensis, sezione 4, 1 (Bologna, 1987).Google Scholar

Cavalli, Francesco. Il novello Giasone, ed. Usula, Nicola. 2 vols. Drammaturgia Musicale Veneta, 3. Milan: Ricordi, 2013.Google Scholar

Cavalli, Francesco. Scipione Africano, ed. Brown, Howard Mayer. Italian Opera 1640–1770. New York: Garland, 1978.Google Scholar

Compere, Loyset. Opera omnia, ed. Finscher, Ludwig. 5 vols. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 15. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1958–72.Google Scholar

Corelli, Arcangelo. Sonate a violino e violone o cimbalo opera quinta. [Rome]: Incisa da Gasparo Pietra Santa, [1700] (facsimile London: Schott, 1987; reproduced at stimmbuecher.digitale-sammlungen.de/view?id=bsb00087066).Google Scholar

Corelli, Arcangelo. Sonate da chiesa, Opus I und III, ed. Lütolf, Max. Corelli, Arcangelo, Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe der musikalischen Werke, 1. Laaber: Laaber-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar

Debussy, Claude. La demoiselle élue. Paris: Librairie de l’Art Indépendant, 1893 (reproduced at gallica.bnf.fr).Google Scholar

Debussy, Claude. La demoiselle élue. Paris: A. Durand & Fils, 1902 (reproduced at gallica.bnf.fr).Google Scholar

des Prez, Josquin. Missa De beata virgine, in The Collected Works of Josquin des Prez, 3: Masses Based on Gregorian Chants, 1, ed. Elders, Willem. Utrecht: Koninklije Vereniging voor Nederlandse Muziekgeschiednis, 2003, pp. 32–83.Google Scholar

Dittmer, Luther, ed. Firenze, Biblioteca Mediceo-Laurenziana, Pluteo 29,1. 2 vols. Veröffentlichung Mittelalterlicher Musikhandschriften, 10–11. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, n.d.Google Scholar

Dittmer, Luthered. Wolfenbüttel 1099 Helmst. Veröffentlichung Mittelalterlicher Musikhandschriften, 2. Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1960.Google Scholar

Du Fay, Guillaume. Opera Omnia, ed. Besseler, Heinrich. 6 vols. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 1. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1951–66.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark, ed. Le Magnus liber organi de Notre-Dame de Paris, 2: Les organa à deux voix pour l’office du manuscrit de Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, plut. 29.1. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 2003.Google Scholar

Feldman, Morton. Intersection 2 for Piano Solo. New York: C. F. Peters, 1962.Google Scholar

Frottole intabulate da sonare organi libro primo. Rome: Andrea Antico, 1517 (facsimile ed. Giuseppe Radole, Bibliotheca Musica Bononiensis, sezione 4, 51B [Bologna: Forni Editore, 1970]).Google Scholar

Gabrieli, Giovanni. Opera Omnia, 10: Instrumental Ensemble Works in ‘Sacrae symphoniae’ (Venice, 1597), Printed Anthologies and Manuscript Sources, ed. Charteris, Richard. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 12, no. 10. Neuhausen: Hänssler-Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, Giovanni. Sacrae symphoniae. 12 vols. Venice: Angelus Gardanus, 1597 (reproduced at http://data.onb.ac.at/rec/A09917003).Google Scholar

Gaultier, Denis. La rhétorique des dieux, ed. Lesure, François. Geneva: Éditions Minkoff, 1991.Google Scholar

Gaultier, Denis. La rhétorique des dieux, ed. Buch, David J.. Recent Researches in the Music of the Baroque Era, 62. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990.Google Scholar

Gautier [sic], Denis. Oeuvres de Denis Gautier, ed. Rollin, Monique and Goy, François-Pierre. Français, Corpus des Luthistes. Paris: CNRS-Éditions, 1996.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan, ed. Paris Bibliothèque Nationale, fonds latin 1139. Veröffentlichungen Mittelalterlicher Musikhandschriften, 14. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1987.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan ed. Paris Bibliothèque Nationale, fonds latin 3719. Veröffentlichungen Mittelalterlicher Musikhandschriften, 15. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1987.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan ed. Paris Bibliothèque Nationale, fonds latin 3549 and London, B.L. Add. 36,881. Veröffentlichungen Mittelalterlicher Musikhandschriften, 16. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1987.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan ed. Saint-Martial Mehrstimmigkeit. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 44. Henryville, Ottawa and Binningen: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1984.Google Scholar

Greene, Gordon K., ed. French Secular Music: Manuscript Chantilly, Musée Condé 564. 2 vols. Polyphonic Music of the Fourteenth Century, 18–19. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1981–82.Google Scholar

Händel, Georg Friedrich. Elf Sonaten für Flöte und bezifferten Bass, ed. Schmitz, Hans-Peter. Hallische Händel-Ausgabe, ser. IV, vol. 3. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2007.Google Scholar

Händel, Georg Friedrich Water Music, ed. Best, Terence and Hogwood, Christopher. Händel-Ausgabe, Hallische, ser. IV, vol. 13. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2007, pp. 3–62.Google Scholar

Harmonice musices odhecaton. Venice: Ottaviano Petrucci, 1501 (facsimile of 1504 edition in Collezione di Trattati e Musiche Edite in Fac-Simile [Milan: Bollettino Bibliografico Musicale, 1932]; 1504 edition reproduced at gallica.bnf.fr).Google Scholar

Heartz, Daniel, ed. Preludes, Chansons and Dances Published by Pierre Attaingnant, Paris (1529–1530). Publications de la Société de Musique d’Autrefois, Textes Musicaux, 2. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Société de Musique d’Autrefois, 1964.Google Scholar

Hesbert, René-Jean, ed. Le graduel de Saint-Denis: Manuscrit 384 de la Bibliothèque Mazarine de Paris. Monumenta Musica Sacrae, 5. Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Latines, 1981.Google Scholar

Hewitt, Helen, ed. Harmonice musices odhecaton A. Medieval Academy of America Publications, 42. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America, 1942; repr. New York, 1978.Google Scholar

Husmann, Heinrich, ed. Die drei- und vierstimmigen Notre-Dame-Organa. Publikationen Älterer Musik, 11. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1940.Google Scholar

Intabulatura de lauto libro primo. Venice: Ottaviano Petrucci, 1507 (facsimile ed. François Lesure [Geneva and Paris: Éditions Minkoff, 1978]; reproduced at https://bit.ly/3a8lXGM).Google Scholar

Intabulatura de lauto libro secondo. Venice: Ottaviano Petrucci, 1507 (facsimile ed. François Lesure [Geneva and Paris: Éditions Minkoff, 1978]; and ed. Albert Reyerman, 2 vols. [n.p.: Tree Edition, 2011]; reproduced at https://bit.ly/2XEB0my).Google Scholar

Ives, Charles. Symphony no. 4. New York: Associated Music Publishers, 1965.Google Scholar

Karp, Theodore. The Polyphony of Saint Martial and Santiago de Compostela. 2 vols. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelly, Thomas Forrest, and Peattie, Matthew, eds. The Music of the Beneventan Rite. Monumenta Monodica Medii Aevi, 9. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2016.Google Scholar

Lesure, François, ed. See Gaultier, Denis.Google Scholar

Machaut, Guillaume de. The Works of Guillaume de Machaut, ed. Schrade, Leo. 2 vols. Polyphonic Music of the Fourteenth Century, 2–3. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1956.Google Scholar

Maître, Claire, ed. Graduel de l’abbaye royale de Saint-Denis, début XIe siècle: Paris, Bibliothèque Mazarine, ms. 384. Manuscrits notés, 3. N.p.: Éditions Actes Sud, 2005.Google Scholar

McGee, Timothy J., ed. Medieval Instrumental Dances. Music: Scholarship and Performance. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Memelsdorff, Pedro, ed. The Codex Faenza 117: Instrumental Polyphony in Late Medieval Italy. 2 vols. Ars Nova, nuova ser., 3. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 2013.Google Scholar

Milán, Luis de. Libro de musica de vihuela de mano, intitulado El maestro. Valencia: Francisco Diaz Romano, 1536 (facsimile ed. Francisco Roa [Madrid: Sociedad de la Vihuela, 2008]; reproduced at http://bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?id=0000022795).Google Scholar

Milán, Luis de El maestro, ed. Jacobs, Charles. University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Monteverdi, Claudio. Madrigali guerrieri, et amorosi. 9 vols. Venice: Alessandro Vincenti, 1638 (facsimile, Monteverdi, Madrigali guerrieri, et amorosi libro ottavo, ed. Vacchelli, 1: 107–91).Google Scholar

Monteverdi, Claudio. Madrigali guerrieri, et amorosi libro ottavo, ed. Vacchelli, Anna Maria. 2 vols. Claudio Monteverdi Opera Omnia, 14. Cremona: Fondazione Claudio Monteverdi, 2004.Google Scholar

Monteverdi, Claudio. L’Orfeo. Venice: Ricciardo Amadino, 1609 (facsimile, Monteverdi, L’Orfeo, ed. Vacchelli, 1: 329–55; ed. Piero Mioli, Archivum Musicum, Musica Drammatica, 1 [Florence: Studio per Edizioni Scelte, 1993]; and ed. Elisabeth Schmierer, Meisterwerke der Musik im Faksimile, 1 [Laaber: Laaber-Verlag, 1998]).Google Scholar

Monteverdi, Claudio. L’Orfeo, ed. Vacchelli, Anna Maria. 2 vols. Claudio Monteverdi Opera Omnia, 8. Cremona: Fondazione Claudio Monteverdi, 2014–16.Google Scholar

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus. Don Giovanni, ed. Richard, Albert, Jourdin, Guy Mollat du, Lesure, François, Jacques Duron, René Dumesnil. 9 vols. Paris: La Revue Musicale, 1967.Google Scholar

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus. Klaviersonaten, ed. Plath, Wolfgang and Rehm, Wolfgang. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, ser. 9, 25/2. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1986 (reproduced at http://dme.mozarteum.at/DME/nma/nmapub_srch.php?l=1).Google Scholar

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus. Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Major, K. 467: The Autograph Score, ed. Jan, LaRue. The Pierpont Morgan Library Music Manuscript Reprint Series. New York: Dover, 1985.Google Scholar

MPG 3 Die Handschrift St. Gallen Stiftsbibliothek 359 Cantatorium. Monumenta Palaeographica Gregoriana, 3. Münsterschwarzach: Studien des Gregorianischen Chorals, n.d.Google Scholar

MPG 4, 1 Die Handschrift St. Gallen Stiftsbibliothek 390 Antiphonarium Hartkeri. Monumenta Palaeographica Gregoriana, 4, 1. Münsterschwarzach: Studien des Gregorianischen Chorals, n.d.Google Scholar

MPG 4, 2 Die Handschrift St. Gallen Stiftsbibliothek 391 Antiphonarium Hartkeri. Monumenta Palaeographica Gregoriana, 4, 2. Münsterschwarzach: Studien des Gregorianischen Chorals, n.d.Google Scholar

Mudarra, Alonso. Tres libros de musica en cifra para vihuela. Seville: Juan de León, 1546 (facsimile ed. James Tyler [Monaco: Éditions Chanterelle, 1980]; reproduced at http://bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?id=0000108275&page=1).Google Scholar

Mudarra, Alonso. Tres libros de musica en cifra para vihuela (Sevilla, 1546), ed. Pujol, Emilio. Monumentos de la Música Española, 7. Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1949.Google Scholar

Newsidler, Hans. Ein newgeordent küntslich Lautenbuch. Nürnberg: Johannes Petreius, 1536 (facsimile ed. Peter Päffgen, 2 vols., Institutio pro arte testudinis, ser. A, 1 and 3 [Neuss: Junghänel-Päffgen-Schäffer, 1974–76]; and in Faksimile-Edition Laute, 6 [Stuttgart: Cornetto, 2004]; reproduced at https://bit.ly/3i2zJgK; and at https://bit.ly/33hjUib). English translation of preface, Marc Southard and Suzana Cooper, trans., “A Translation of Hans Newsidler’s Ein newgeordent kunstlich Lautenbuch… (1536),” Journal of the Lute Society of America 11 (1978): 5–25.Google Scholar

PalMus 8 Antiphonarium tonale missarum XI siècle: Codex H. 159 de la Bibliothèque de l’École de Médecine de Montpellier. Paléographie Musicale, 8. Tournai: Desclée, Lefebvre et Cie, 1901–5; repr. Bern, 1972.Google Scholar

PalMus 10 Antiphonale missarum sancti Gregorii IXe–Xe siècle: Codex 239 de la Bibliothèque de Laon. Paléographie Musicale, 10. Tournai: Desclée, 1909–12; repr. Bern, 1971.Google Scholar

PalMus 11 Antiphonale missarum sancti Gregorii (Xe siècle): Codex 47 de la Bibliothèque de Chartres. Paléographie Musicale, 11. Tournai: Desclée, 1912–21; repr. Bern, 1972.Google Scholar

PalMus ser. 2, 1 Antiphonale officii monastici écrit par le B. Hartker: No 390–391 de la Bibliothèque de Saint-Gall. 2nd ed., ed. Froger, Jacques. Paléographie Musicale, ser. 2, 1. Bern: Lang, 1970.Google Scholar

PalMus ser. 2, 2 Cantatorium (IXe siècle): No 359 de la Bibliothèque de Saint-Gall. Paléographie Musicale, ser. 2, 2. Tournai: Société de Saint-Jean l’Évangeliste and Desclée, 1924; repr. Bern, 1968.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas B., ed. Le Magnus liber organi de Notre-Dame de Paris, 6a: Les organa à deux voix du manuscrit de Wolfenbüttel, Hertzog August Bibliothek, cod. guelf. 1099 Helmst. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1996.Google Scholar

Penderecki, Krzysztof. For the Victims of Hiroshima, Threnody for 52 Stringed Instruments. Kraków: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne, 1960.Google Scholar

Peri, Jacopo. Le musiche sopra l’Euridice. Florence: G. Marescotti, 1600; repr. in Bibliotheca Musica Bononiensis, sezione 4, 2 (Bologna, 1969); and in Monuments of Music and Music Literature in Facsimile, Second Series, Music, 28 (New York, 1973).Google Scholar

Plumley, Yolanda, and Stone, Anne, eds. Codex Chantilly: Chantilly, Bibliothèque du château de Chantilly, MS 564, facsimilé. 2 vols. Épitome Musical. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar

Poulenc, Francis. Sonata, Flute and Piano. London: J. and W. Chester, 1958.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan, ed. The Winchester Troper: Facsimile Edition and Introduction. Early English Church Music, 50. London: Stainer & Bell for the British Academy, 2007.Google Scholar

Reaney, Gilbert, ed. The Manuscript London, British Museum, Additional 29987. Musicological Studies and Documents, 13. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1965.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H., ed. Antiphonarium, seu, Magnus liber organi de gradali et antiphonario: Color Microfiche Edition of the Manuscript, Firenze, Biblioteca medicea laurenziana, Pluteus 29.1. Munich: H. Lengenfelder, 1996.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. ed. Le Magnus liber organi de Notre-Dame de Paris, 1: Les quadrupla et tripla de Paris. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1993.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. ed. Le Magnus liber organi de Notre-Dame de Paris, 7: Les organa et les clausules à deux voix du manuscrit de Wolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibliothek, cod. guelf. 628 Helmst. Les Remparts, Monaco: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 2009.Google Scholar

Rokseth, Yvonne, ed. Polyphonies du XIIIe siècle: Le manuscrit H 196 de la Faculté de médecine de Montpellier. 4 vols. Paris: Éditions de l’Oiseau-Lyre, 1935–39.Google Scholar

Rore, Cipriano de. Il primo libro de madrigali a quattro voci. 4 vols. Ferrara: Giovanni de Buglhat et Antonio Hocher, 1550. (1569 edition [Venice: Gardano]; reproduced at https://bit.ly/2PxHmzK).Google Scholar

Rore, Cipriano de Opera omnia. 8 vols., ed. Meier, Bernhard. Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae, 14. N. p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1959–77.Google Scholar

Schönberg, Arnold. Das Buch der hängenden Gärten, Op. 15, in Lieder mit Klavierbegleitung, ed. Rufer, Josef. Arnold Schönberg Sämtliche Werke, riehe A, 1. Mainz and Vienna: B. Schott’s Söhne and Universal Edition, 1966, pp. 113–49.Google Scholar

Schönberg, Arnold. Five Pieces for Orchestra, Opus 16. New York: C. F. Peters, 1952.Google Scholar

Schönberg, Arnold. Fünf Orchesterstücke, Opus 16. Leipzig: C. F. Peters, 1912.Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. Carnaval, Op. 9. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1837 (reproduced at brahms-institut.de).Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. Concert für das Pianoforte mit Begleitung des Orchesters. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, n.d.Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. Fantasiestücke, Op. 12. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1838 (reproduced at brahms-institut.de).Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. Humoreske, Op. 20. Vienna: Petro Mechetti quondam Carlo, 1839 (reproduced at brahms-institut.de).Google Scholar

Schumann, Robert. Kinderscenen, Op. 15, in Robert Schumann’s Werke, ed. Schumann, Clara, ser. VII, vol. 3. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1880, pp. 64–73.Google Scholar

Staehelin, Martin, ed. Die mittelalterliche Musikhandschrift, W₁: Vollständige Reproduktion des “Notre Dame”-Manuskripts der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel Cod. Guelf. 628 Hemst. Wiesbaden: Harrosowitz, 1995.Google Scholar

Stockhausen, Karlheinz. Nr. 14: Plus Minus. N.p.: Universal Edition, 1963.Google Scholar

Stockhausen, Karlheinz. Nr. 27: Spiral für einen Solisten. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1973.Google Scholar

Strawinsky, Igor. Pétrouchka. Berlin: Édition Russe de Musique, n.d.Google Scholar

Strawinsky, Igor. Variations, Aldous Huxley in Memoriam. London: Boosey & Hawkes, 1965.Google Scholar

Tischler, Hans, ed. The Montpellier Codex. 7 vols. in 4. Recent Researches in the Music of the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance, 2–8. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1978.Google Scholar

Tischler, Hans ed. The Parisian Two-Part Organa: The Complete Comparative Edition. 2 vols. Stuyvesant NY: Pendragon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Usula, Nicola, ed. See Cavalli, Francesco.Google Scholar

Valente, Antonio. Intavolatura de cimbalo recercate fantasie et canzoni francese desminuite con alcuni enori balli et vare sorte de contraponti, libro primo. Naples: Gioseppe Caccio dall’Aquila, 1576 (partially reproduced at https://bit.ly/2DB6frZ).Google Scholar

Valente, Antonio. Intavolatura de cimbalo (Naples 1576), ed. Jacobs, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

van der Werf, Hendrik. The Oldest Extant Part Music and the Origin of Western Polyphony. 2 vols. Rochester NY: The author, 1993.Google Scholar

Wallner, Bertha Antonia, ed. Das Buxheimer Orgelbuch: Handschrift mus. 3725 der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, München. Documenta Musicologica, ser. 2: Handschriften-Faksimiles, 1. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1955.Google Scholar

Wallner, Bertha Antonia ed. Das Buxheimer Orgelbuch. 3 vols. Das Erbe Deutscher Music, 37–39. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1958–59.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, H. E., and Hughes, H. E., eds. Early English Harmony from the 10th to the 15th Century. 2 vols. London: Bernard Quaritch and the Plainsong and Mediaeval Music Society, 1897–1913; repr. New York, 1976.Google Scholar

Agricola, Mart. Musica instrumentalis deudsch. Wittemberg: Georg Rhau, 1529; repr. ed. Rob. Eitner, Publikation Älterer Praktischer und Theoretischer Musik-Werke, 20 (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1896). English translation: The ‘Musica instrumentalis deudsch’ of Martin Agricola: A Treatise on Musical Instruments, 1529 and 1545, trans. William E. Hettrick, Cambridge Musical Texts and Monographs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Magnus, Albertus. De causis proprietatum elementorum, ed. Hossfeld, Paul. Alberti Magni Opera Omnia, 5, 2. Aschendorf: Monasterii Westfalorum, 1980, pp. 47–104. English translation: On the Causes of the Properties of the Elements = (Liber de causis proprietatum elementorum), trans. Irwen M. Resnick (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Alexander, de Villa-Dei. Das Doctrinale des Alexander de Villa-Dei: Kritisch-exegetische Ausgabe, ed. Reichling, Dietrich. Monumenta Germaniae Paedagogica, 12. Berlin: A. Hofmann & Comp., 1893.Google Scholar

Anonymous of St. Emmeram. De musica mensurata, ed. and trans. Jeremy Yudkin. Music: Scholarship and Performance. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Antico, Andrea. Frottole intabulate da sonare organi, ed. Sterzinger, Peter. Musicale, Diletto, 891. Vienna: Doblinger, 1987.Google Scholar

Apel, Willi. The Notation of Polyphonic Music 900–1600. 5th ed. Medieval Academy of America Publications, 38. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America, 1961.Google Scholar

Apel, Willi. “The Partial Signatures in the Sources up to 1450.” Acta Musicologica 10 (1938): 1–13.Google Scholar

Aribo, . De musica, ed. Waesberghe, Jos. Smits van. de Musica, Corpus Scriptorum, 2. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1951.Google Scholar

Arlt, Wulf. “A propos de la notation ‘paléofranque’: Observations spécifiques et generales extraites de mon carnet d’atelier,” in Actes du Colloque de Royaumont, ed. Colette and Massip, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar

Arnold, Denis. Giovanni Gabrieli and the Music of the Venetian High Renaissance. London: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Arnold, F. T. The Art of Accompaniment from a Thorough-Bass as Practised in the 17th and 18th Centuries. London: Oxford University Press, 1931; repr. London, 1961.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. “The Anonymous Vaticanus in speculo,” in Actes du Colloque d’Auxerre, ed. Aubert and Rankin, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. The Critical Nexus: Tone-System, Mode, and Notation in Early Medieval Music. AMS Studies in Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. “De Accentibus Toni Oritur Nota Quae Dicitur Neuma: Prosodic Accents, the Accent Theory, and the Paleofrankish Script,” in Essays on Medieval Music in Honor of David G. Hughes, ed. Boone, Graeme M.. Isham Library Papers, 4. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1995, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M. “Franco of Cologne on the Rhythm of Organum Purum.” Early Music History 9 (1990): 1–26.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Charles M.“Glosses on Music and Grammar and the Advent of Music Writing in the West,” in Western Plainchant in the First Millennium, ed. Gallagher et al., pp. 199–215.Google Scholar

Aubert, Eduardo Henrik, and Rankin, Susan, eds. Actes du Colloque d’Auxerre: Notarum figura: L’écriture musicale et le monde des signes au 9e siècle Auxerre, Centre d’études médiévales, 17–18 juin 2011 = Études Grégoriennes 40 (2013).Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo. De musica, ed. and trans. Maria Bettetini. Testi a Fronte, 55. Milan: Rusconi, 1997. English translation: On Music, trans. Robert Catesby Taliaferro, The Fathers of the Church: Saint Augustine, 4 (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1947), pp. 151–379.Google Scholar

Aurelian of Réôme. Musica disciplina, ed. Gushee, Lawrence. Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, 21. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1975. English translation: The Discipline of Music (Musica Disciplina), trans. Joseph Ponte, Colorado College Music Press Translations, 3 (Colorado Springs: Colorado College Music Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Babb, Warren, trans. Hucbald, Guido, and John on Music: Three Medieval Treatises, ed. Palisca, Claude V.. Music Theory Translation Series, 3. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Bach, Johann Sebastian. Precepts and Principles for Playing the Thorough-Bass or Accompanying in Four Parts, Leipzig, 1738, ed. and trans. Pamela L. Poulin. Early Music Series, 16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bailey, Derek. Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music. London: The British Library National Sound Archive, 1992.Google Scholar

Bain, Jennifer. “‘Messy Structure’? Multiple Tonal Centers in the Music of Machaut.” Music Theory Spectrum 20 (2008): 195–237.Google Scholar

Bain, Jennifer. “Tonal Structure and the Melodic Role of Chromatic Inflections in the Music of Machaut.” Plainsong & Medieval Music 14 (2005): 59–88.Google Scholar

Baltzer, Rebecca A. “How Long was Notre-Dame Organum Performed?” in Beyond the Moon, ed. Gillingham and Merkley, pp. 118–43.Google Scholar

Baltzer, Rebecca A.“The Decoration of Montpellier 8: Its Place in the Continuum of Parisian Manuscript Illumination,” in The Montpellier Codex, ed. Bradley and Desmond, pp. 78–89.Google Scholar

Bank, J. A. Tactus, Tempo and Notation in Mensural Music from the 13th to the 17th Century. Amsterdam: Annie Bank, 1972.Google Scholar

Barker, Andrew. Scientific Method in Ptolemy’s ‘Harmonics’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baroffio, Giacomo. “Music Writing Styles in Medieval Italy,” trans. Giovanni Varelli, in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, pp. 101–24.Google Scholar

Anglicus, Bartholomaeus. De genuinis rerum coelestium, terrestrium et inferarum proprietatibus. Frankfurt: Wolfgang Richertum, 1601; repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1964.Google Scholar

Anglicus, Bartholomaeus De proprietatibus rerum, ed. Meier, Christel, Meyer, Heinz, Van den Abeele, Baudouin and Ventura, Iolanda. Vol. 1. De Diversis Artibus, 78 (n.s. 41). Turnhout: Brepols, 2007.Google Scholar

Bean, Kenneth L. “An Experimental Approach to the Reading of Music.” Psychological Monographs 50 no. 6 (1938): 1–80.Google Scholar

Bent, Margaret. Magister Jacobus de Ispania, Author of the Speculum musicae. Royal Musical Association Monographs, 28. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Berger, Anna Maria Busse. Medieval Music and the Art of Memory. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Berger, Anna Maria Busse Mensuration and Proportion Signs: Origins and Evolution. Oxford Monographs on Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian. Hexachord, Mensur und Textstruktur: Studien zum französischen Lied des 14. Jahrhunderts. Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 35. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1992.Google Scholar

Berger, Karol. “Musica ficta”: Theories of Accidental Inflections in Vocal Polyphony from Marchetto da Padova to Gioseffo Zarlino. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Bernard, Jonathan W. “The Evolution of Elliott Carter’s Rhythmic Practice.” Perspectives of New Music 26 no. 2 (Summer, 1988): 164–203.Google Scholar

Bernard, Philippe. Du chant romain au chant grégorien (IVe–XIIIe siècle). Patrimoines Christianisme. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. “Die Überlieferung der Neumennamen im lateinischen Mittelalter,” in Quellen und Studien zur Musiktheorie des Mittelalters, 2, ed. Michael Bernhard, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission, 13. Munich: Verlag der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997, pp. 13–91.Google Scholar

Betteray, Dirk van. Quomodo cantabimus canticum Domini in terra aliena: Liqueszenzen als Schlüssel zur Textinterpretation, eine semiologische Untersuchung an Sankt Galler Quellen. Studien und Materialien zur Musikwissenschaft, 45. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2007.Google Scholar

Białkowski, Mariusz. “Alcune osservazioni sulla notazione sangallese nei contesti liquescenti e melodicamente unisonici.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 59–60 (2015): 111–21.Google Scholar

Bielitz, Mathias. Zum Bezeichneten der Neumen, insbesondere der Liqueszenz: Ein Hypothesenansatz zum Verhältnis von Musik und Sprache, zur diatonischen Rationalität, zur Bewegungs- und Raum-Analogie, zur Enstehung der Neumenschrift und zur Rezeption des Gregorianischen Chorals in Benevent. Neckargemünd: Männeles Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Billecocq, Marie-Claire. “Lettres ajoutées à la notation neumatique du codex 239 de Laon.” Études Grégoriennes 17 (1978): 7–144.Google Scholar

Bischoff, Bernhard. Paläographie des römischen Altertums und des abendländischen Mittelalters. Grundlagen der Germanistik, 24. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Bonnie J. “The Lascivious Career of B-Flat,” in Eroticism in Early Modern Music, ed. Blackburn, Bonnie J. and Stras, Laurie. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar

Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. De institutione musica, ed. Friedlein, Gottfried, in De institutione arithmetica libri duo, De institutione musica libri quinque, accedit Geometria quae fertur Boetii. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Leipzig: Teubner, 1867; repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1966, pp. 175–371. English translation: Fundamentals of Music, trans. Calvin M. Bower, ed. Claude V. Palisca, Music Theory Translation Series (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Bohlman, Philip V. “Musicology as a Political Act.” Journal of Musicology 11 (1993): 411–36.Google Scholar

Bonderup, Jens. The Saint Martial Polyphony–Texture and Tonality: A Contribution to Research in the Development of Polyphonic Style in the Middle Ages, trans. Stephanie Olsen and Jean McVeigh. Studier og publikationer fra Musikvidenskabeligt Institut Aarhus Universitet, 4. Copenhagen: Dan Fog Musikforlag, 1982.Google Scholar

Boorman, Stanley. Ottaviano Petrucci: Catalogue Raisonné. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Boretz, Benjamin, and Cone, Edward T., eds. Perspectives on Notation and Performance. Perspectives of New Music. New York: W. W. Norton, 1976.Google Scholar

Boulez, Pierre. “L’écriture du musicien: Le regard du sourd?” Critique 36 (1981): 443–64; repr. Pierre Boulez, Jalons (pour une décennie): Dix ans d’enseignement au Collège de France (1978–1988), ed. Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Musique/Passé/Présent (n.p.: Christian Bourgois, 1989), pp. 293–315; and Pierre Boulez, Points de repère, 2: Regards sur autrui, ed. Jean-Jacques Nattiez and Sophie Galaise, Musique/Passé/Présent (n.p.: Christian Bourgois, 2005), pp. 268–92.Google Scholar

Bradley, Catherine A., and Desmond, Karen, eds. The Montpellier Codex, the Final Fascicle: Contents, Contexts, Chronologies. Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Music. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Bragard, Roger. “Le Speculum musicae du compilateur Jacques de Liège.” Musica Disciplina 7 (1953): 59–105; ibid. 8 (1954): 1–17.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, Reinhold, ed., Improvisation und neue Musik. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Neue Musik und Musikerziehung, 20. Mainz: B. Schott’s Söhne, 1979.Google Scholar

Brodsky, Warren, Henik, Avishai, Bat-Sheva Rubinstein and Moshe Zorman. “Auditory Imagery from Musical Notation in Expert Musicians.” Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003): 602–12.Google Scholar

Brodsky, Warren, Kessler, Yoav, Rubinstein, Bat-Sheva, Ginsborg, Jane and Henik, Avishai. “The Mental Representation of Music Notation: Notational Audiation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (2008): 427–45.Google Scholar

Brothers, Thomas. Chromatic Beauty in the Late Medieval Chanson: An Interpretation of Manuscript Accidentals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brown, Earle. “Notation und Ausführung neuer Musik.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 64–86.Google Scholar

Bukofzer, Manfred F. Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Music. New York: W. W. Norton, 1950.Google Scholar

Byo, James L. “Effects of Barlines, Pitch, and Meter on Musicians’ Rhythmn [sic] Reading Performance.” Journal of Band Research 27 (1991–92): 34–44.Google Scholar

Cahn, Peter, and Heimer, Ann-Katrin, eds. De musica et cantu: Studien zur Geschichte der Kirchenmusik und der Oper. Helmut Hucke zum 60. Geburtstag. Musikwissenschaftliche Publikationen, Hochschule für Darstellende Kunst, 2. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Campagne, Augusta. Simone Verovio: Music Printing, Intabulations and Basso Continuo in Rome around 1600. Wiener Veröffentlichungen zur Musikgeschichte, 13. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar

CANTUS. An Aquitanian Antiphoner: Toledo, Biblioteca capitular, 44.2. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 55, no. 1. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1992.Google Scholar

Caplin, William E. “Theories of Musical Rhythm in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” in The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, ed. Christensen, pp. 657–94.Google Scholar

Cardine, Eugène. Semiologia gregoriana. Rome: Pontificio Istituto di Musica Sacra, 1968. English translation: Gregorian Semiology, trans. Robert M. Fowels (Solesmes: Abbaye Saint Pierre de Solesmes, 1983).Google Scholar

Carter, Elliott. “Music and the Time Screen,” in Current Thought in Musicology, ed. Grubbs, John W.. Symposia in the Arts and the Humanities, 4. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976, pp. 63–88; repr. in Elliott Carter, The Writings of Elliott Carter: An American Composer Looks at Modern Music, ed. Else Stone and Kurt Stone (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977), pp. 343–67.Google Scholar

Carter, Elliott. “The Time Dimension in Music.” Music Journal 23 no. 8 (November 1965): 29–30; repr. in Elliott Carter, The Writings of Elliott Carter: An American Composer Looks at Modern Music, ed. Else Stone and Kurt Stone (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977), pp. 243–47.Google Scholar

Caskel, Christoph. “Notation für Schlagzeug.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 110–16.Google Scholar

Charteris, Richard. Giovanni Gabrieli (ca. 1555–1612): A Thematic Catalogue of His Music with a Guide to the Source Materials and Translations of His Vocal Texts. Thematic Catalogues, 20. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Chartier, Yves. “Hucbald de Saint-Amand et la notation musicale,” in Musicologie médiévale, ed. Huglo, pp. 145–55.Google Scholar

Charru, Philippe. “Temps et musique dans la pensée d’Augustin.” Revue d’Études Augustiniennes et Patristiques 55 (2009): 171–88.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas, ed. The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Cambridge History of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Claussen, M. A. The Reform of the Frankish Church: Chrodegang of Metz and the Regula canonicorum in the Eighth Century. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, ser. 4, 61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Coelho, Victor. The Manuscript Sources of Seventeenth-Century Italian Lute Music. New York: Garland Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar

Coelho, Victor Anand, ed. Performance on Lute, Guitar, and Vihuela: Historical Practice and Modern Interpretation. Cambridge Studies in Performance Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Coelho, Victor, and Polk, Keith. Instrumentalists and Renaissance Culture, 1420–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Cole, Hugo. Sounds and Signs: Aspects of Musical Notation. London: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Colette, Marie-Noël, and Massip, Catherine, eds. Actes du Colloque de Royaumont: Manuscrits notés en neumes en Occident Abbaye de Royaumont 29–31 octobre 2010 = Études Grégoriennes 39 (2012).Google Scholar

Collamore, Lila Diane. “Aquitanian Collections of Office Chants: A Comparative Survey.” Ph.D. diss., Catholic University of America, 2000.Google Scholar

Collins, Michael. “The Performance of Triplets in the 17th and 18th Centuries.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 19 (1966): 281–328.Google Scholar

Commentarius anonymus in Micrologum Guidonis Aretini, in Expositiones in Micrologum Guidonis Aretini, ed. Waesberghe, Jos. Smits van. Musicologica Medii Aevi, 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1957, pp. 95–172.Google Scholar

Compendium musicae mensurabilis artis antiquae, ed. Alberto Gallo, F, de Musica, Corpus Scriptorum, 15. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1971, pp. 59–73.Google Scholar

Corbin, Solange. Die Neumen. Palaeographie der Musik 1, fasc. 3. Cologne: Arno Volk-Verlag, Hans Gerig KG, 1977.Google Scholar

Coussemaker, Edmond de, ed. Scriptorum de musica medii aevi. 4 vols. Paris: A. Durand, 1864–76; repr. Hildesheim, 1963.Google Scholar

Cowell, Henry. “Our Inadequate Notation.” Modern Music 4 no. 3 (March–April 1927): 29–33.Google Scholar

Craft, Robert. “‘Dear Bob[sky]’ (Stravinsky’s Letters to Robert Craft, 1944–1949).” The Musical Quarterly 65 (1979): 392–439.Google Scholar

Crocker, Richard. “Two Recent Editions of Aquitanian Polyphony.” Plainsong & Medieval Music 3 (1994): 57–101.Google Scholar

Cullin, Olivier. “Notations in Carthusian Liturgical Books: Preliminary Remarks,” in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, pp. 175–94.Google Scholar

Curran, Sean. “A Palaeographical Analysis of the Verbal Text in Montpellier 8: Problems, Implications, Opportunities,” in The Montpellier Codex, ed. Bradley and Desmond, pp. 32–65.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl. “Notenschrift heute.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 9–34.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl. “Die Tactus- und Proportionenlehre des 15. bis 17. Jahrhunderts,” in Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 6: Hören, Messen und Rechnen in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1987, pp. 335–61.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl. “Zur Geschichte der Synkope.” Die Musikforschung 12 (1959): 385–91.Google Scholar

Dal Maso, Vania. Teoria e pratica della musica italiana del rinascimento. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 2017.Google Scholar

Danckwardt, Marianne. “Zur Notierung, klanglichen Anlage und Rhythmisierung der Mehrstimmigkeit in den Saint-Martial-Handschriften.” Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch 68 (1984): 31–88.Google Scholar

Davis, Lisa Fagin. The Gottschalk Antiphonary: Music and Liturgy in Twelfth-Century Lambach. Cambridge Studies in Palaeography and Codicology, 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Debrock, Mark, and Mannaerts, Pieter. “Liquescence et force articulatoire: Une approche phonétique du chant grégorien.” Études Grégoriennes 45 (2018): 71–106.Google Scholar

Desmond, Karen. “Did Vitry Write an Ars vetus et nova?” Journal of Musicology 32 (2015): 441–93.Google Scholar

Desmond, Karen. Music and the moderni, 1300–1350: The ars nova in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Desmond, Karen. “Texts in Play: The Ars nova and Its Hypertexts.” Musica Disciplina 57 (2012): 81–153.Google Scholar

Dorfmüller, Kurt. Studien zur Lautenmusik in der ersten Hälfte des 16. Jahrhunderts. Münchner Veröffentlichungen zur Musikgeschichte, 11. Tutzing: Hans Schneider, 1967.Google Scholar

Dorfmüller, Kurt.“La tablature de luth allemande et les problèmes d’édition,” in Le luth et sa musique, ed. Jacquot, pp. 245–57.Google Scholar

Drai-Zerbib, Véronique, and Baccino, Thierry. “L’expertise dans la lecture musicale: Intégration intermodale.” L’année psychologique 105 (2005): 387–422.Google Scholar

Drai-Zerbib, Véronique, Baccino, Thierry and Bigand, Emmanuel. “Sight-Reading Expertise: Cross-Modality Integration Investigated Using Eye Tracking.” Psychology of Music 40 (2012): 216–35.Google Scholar

Dry, François. “Instructions allemandes pour le luth et instructions espagnoles pour la vihuela: Esquisse d’une comparaison,” in “… La musique, de tous les passetemps le plus beau …”: Hommage à Jean-Michel Vaccaro, ed. Lesure, François and Vanhulst, Henri. Domaine Musicologique, 19. N.p.: Klincksieck, 1998, pp. 109–19.Google Scholar

Duchez, Marie-Elisabeth. “Des neumes à la portée: Élaboration et organisation rationnelles de la discontinuité musicale et de sa représentation graphique, et la formule mélodique à l’échelle monocordale.” Canadian University Music Review 4 (1983): 22–65.Google Scholar

Duchez, Marie-Elisabeth. “La representation spatio-verticale du caractère musical grave-aigu et l’élaboration de la notion de hauteur de son dans la conscience musicale occidentale.” Acta Musicologica 51 (1979): 54–73.Google Scholar

Dufourt, Hugues. “L’artifice de l’écriture dans la musique occidentale.” Critique 37, no. 408 (May 1981): 465–77; repr. in Hugues Dufourt, Musique, pouvoir, écriture, Musique/Passé/Présent (n.p.: Christian Bourgois, 1991), pp. 177–89; and ibid., Collection Musique & Philosophie (n.p.: Éditions Delatour France, 2014), pp. 209–23.Google Scholar

Duhamel, Pascale. “L’enseignement de la musique à l’Université de Paris d’après le manuscrit BnF lat.7378A.” Acta Musicologica 79 (2007): 263–89.Google Scholar

Dunford, Dawn. “Optometry and Music: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Optometric Vision Development 31 no. 2 (Summer 2000): 76–82.Google Scholar

Earp, Lawrence. Guillaume de Machaut: A Guide to Research. Garland Composer Resource Manuals, 36. New York: Garland, 1995.Google Scholar

Earp, Lawrence. “Machaut’s Role in the Production of Manuscripts of His Works.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 42 (1989): 461–503.Google Scholar

Emerson, John A. Albi, Bibliothèque Municipale Rochegude, Manuscript 44: A Complete Ninth-Century Gradual and Antiphoner from Southern France, ed. Collamore, Lila. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 77. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2002.Google Scholar

Eppelsheim, Jürgen. “Buchstaben-Notation, Tabulatur und Klaviatur.” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 31 (1974): 57–72.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark. “From Paris to St. Andrews: The Origins of W₁.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 43 (1990): 1–42.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark.“Montpellier 8: Anatomy of…,” in The Montpellier Codex, ed. Bradley and Desmond, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar

Everist, Mark. “The Polyphonic Rondeau c. 1300: Repertory and Context.” Early Music History 15 (1996): 59–96.Google Scholar

Fabris, Dinko. “Lute Tablature Instructions in Italy: A Survey of the Regole from 1507 to 1759,” trans. Paul Beier, in Performance on Lute, Guitar, and Vihuela, ed. Coelho, pp. 16–46.Google Scholar

Feisst, Sabine. Der Begriff “Improvisation” in der neuen Musik. Berliner Musik Studien, 14. Sinzig: Studio, 1997.Google Scholar

Feisst, Sabine. “Negotiating Freedom and Control in Composition: Improvisation and Its Offshoots 1950–1980,” in The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, ed. Piekut, Benjamin and Lewis, George E.. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 2:206–29.Google Scholar

Fellin, Eugene C. “The Notation Types of Trecento Music,” in L’ars nova italiana del trecento, 4, ed. Ziino, Agostino. Certaldo: Centro di studi sull’Ars Nova Italiana del Trecento, 1978, pp. 211–23.Google Scholar

Fenlon, Iain. Music, Print and Culture in Early Sixteenth-Century Italy. Panizzi Lectures, 1994. London: British Library, 1994.Google Scholar

Ferretti, Bernardino. “Molti dialetti, un’unica lingua.” Studi Gregoriani 11 (1995): 155–88.Google Scholar

Ferretti, Bernardino. Una notazione neumatica della Francia del nord: Saggio critico sulla notazione paleofranca. Novalesa: Comunità Benedettina dei SS. Pietro e Andrea, 2003.Google Scholar

Fine, Philip, Anna Berry and Burton Rosner. “The Effect of Pattern Recognition and Tonal Predictability on Sight-Singing Ability.” Psychology of Music 34 (2006): 431–47.Google Scholar

Fischer, Kurt von. Studien zur italienischen Musik des Trecento und frühen Quattrocento. Publikationen der Schweizerischen Musikforschenden Gesellschaft, ser. 2, 5. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt, 1956.Google Scholar

Fischer, Kurt von “Zur Entwicklung der italienischen Trecento-Notation.” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 16 (1959): 87–99.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rupert. “Chartres, Bibliothèque Municipale, cod. 47.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 28 (1999): 73–89.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rupert. “Einführung in Handschriften des Gregorianischen Chorals, I: St. Gallen, Stiftsbibliothek, Codex 359: Das Cantatorium von St. Gallen.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 19 (1995): 61–70.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rupert. “Epiphonus oder Cephalicus?” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 8 (1989): 5–28.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rupert. “Laon, Bibl. de la ville, 239.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 21 (1996): 75–91.Google Scholar

Floros, Constantin. Universale Neumenkunde. 3 vols. Kassel: Bärenreiter-Antiquariat, 1970.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, Rudolf. “Johannes de Garlandia und Anonymus IV: Zu ihrem Umfeld, ihren Persönlichkeiten und Traktaten,” in Gedenkschrift für Walter Pass, ed. Czernin, Martin. Tutzing: Hans Schneider, 2002, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar

Flotzinger, Rudolf. “Zur Frage der Modalrhythmik als Antike-Rezeption.” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 29 (1972): 203–8.Google Scholar

Formarier, Marie. Entre rhétorique et musique: Essai sur le rythme latin antique et médiéval. Latinitates, 9. Turnhout: Brepols, 2014.Google Scholar

Fox, Christopher. “Opening Offer or Contractual Obligation? On the Prescriptive Function of Notation in Music Today.” Tempo 68 no. 269 (July 2014): 6–19.Google Scholar

Franco of Cologne. Ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. and trans. Jean-Philippe Navarre. AMICVS, Moyen Age, 1. Paris: Cerf, 1997.Google Scholar

Franco of Cologne Ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. Reaney, Gilbert and Gilles, André. Musica, Corpus Scriptorum de, 18. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1974. English translation: “Ars cantus mensurabilis,” trans. Oliver Strunk, rev. James McKinnon, in Source Readings in Music History, ed. Strunk., rev. ed., ed. Treitler, pp. 226–45.Google Scholar

Froger, Jacques. “L’épitre de Notker sur les ‘lettres significatives’: Édition critique.” Études Grégoriennes 5 (1962): 23–71.Google Scholar

Frutiger, Adrian. Der Mensch und seine Zeichen. 2 vols. Echzell: Horst Heiderhoff Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah Ann. “Aquitanian Polyphony of the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries.” 3 vols. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1969.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah Ann “Defending the Dodecachordon: Ideological Currents in Glarean’s Modal Theory.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 49 (1996): 191–224.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah Ann “Hidden Polyphony—A Reappraisal.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 24 (1971): 169–92.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah Ann “The Myth of ‘Saint Martial’ Polyphony: A Study of the Sources.” Musica Disciplina 33 (1979): 5–26.Google Scholar

Fuller, Sarah Ann “A Phantom Treatise of the Fourteenth Century? The Ars nova.” Journal of Musicology 4 (1985–86): 23–50.Google Scholar

Gaffurius, Franchinus. Practica musice. Milan: Guillermus le Signerre, 1496; repr. Farnborough, 1967; reproduced at gallica.bnf.fr. English translation: Practica musicae, trans. Clement A. Miller, Musicological Studies and Documents, 20 (n.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1968).Google Scholar

Gallagher, Sean, Haar, James, Nádas, John and Striplin, Timothy, eds. Western Plainchant in the First Millennium: Studies in the Medieval Liturgy and Its Music. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar

Gallo, F. Alberto. “Die Notationslehre im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,” in Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 5: Die mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984, pp. 257–356.Google Scholar

Gallo, F. Alberto. La teoria della notazione in Italia dalla fine del XII all’inizio del XV secolo. Antiquae Musicae Italicae, Subsidia Theorica. Bologna: Tamari Editori, 1966.Google Scholar

Garlandia, Johannes de. De mensurabili musica, ed. Reimer, Erich. 2 vols. Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 10–11. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1972. English translation: Concerning Measured Music (De Mensurabili Musica), trans. Stanley H. Birnbaum, Colorado College Music Press Translations, 9 (Colorado Springs: Colorado College Music Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Gasparini, Francesco. L’armonico pratico al cimbalo. Venice: Antonio Bortoli, 1708; repr. in Monuments of Music and Music Literature in Facsimile, Second Series, Music Literature, 14 (New York: Broude Bros., 1967). English translation: The Practical Harmonist at the Harpsichord, trans. Frank S. Stillings, ed. David L. Burrows, Music Theory Translation Series, 1 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963; repr. New York 1980).Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan. Modal Rhythm. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 46. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1986.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan. “Saint-Martial Polyphony: A Catalogue Raisonné,” in Gordon Athol Anderson (1929–1981): In Memoriam. 2 vols. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 39. Henryville, Ottawa and Binningen: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1984, 1:211–62.Google Scholar

Gillingham, Bryan, and Merkley, Paul, eds. Beyond the Moon: Festschrift Luther Dittmer. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 53. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1990.Google Scholar

Gillman [sic], Elizabeth, Underwood, Geoffrey and Morehen, John. “Recognition of Visually Presented Musical Intervals.” Psychology of Music 30 (2002): 48–57.Google Scholar

Gilman, Elizabeth, and Underwood, Geoffrey. “Restricting the Field of View to Investigate the Perceptual Spans of Pianists.” Visual Cognition 10 (2003): 201–32.Google Scholar

Glareanus, Henricus. Dodecachordon. Basel: n.p., 1547; repr. in Monuments of Music and Music Literature in Facsimile, Second Series, Music Literature, 65 (New York, 1967). English translation by Clement A. Miller, 2 vols., Musicological Studies and Documents, 6 (n.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1965).Google Scholar

Glover, Jane. “A List of Monteverdi’s Instrumental Specifications,” in Claudio Monteverdi Orfeo, ed. Whenham, John. Cambridge Opera Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 182–84.Google Scholar

Goldman, Richard F. “Current Chronicle.” The Musical Quarterly (1951): 83–89.Google Scholar

Goolsby, Thomas W. “Eye Movement in Music Reading: Effects of Reading Ability, Notational Complexity, and Encounters.” Music Perception 12 (1994): 77–96.Google Scholar

Goolsby, Thomas W. “Profiles of Processing: Eye Movements during Sightreading.” Music Perception 12 (1994), 97–123.Google Scholar

Gordon, Edwin E. Learning Sequences in Music: A Contemporary Music Learning Theory. Chicago: GIA Publications, 2007.Google Scholar

Grainger, Percy. “The Impress of Personality in Unwritten Music.” The Musical Quarterly 1 (1915): 416–35.Google Scholar

Grant, Roger Mathew. “Epistemologies of Time and Metre in the Long Eighteenth Century.” Eighteenth-Century Music 6 (2009): 59–75.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “Adémar de Chabannes (989–1034) and Musical Literacy.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 66 (2013): 605–38.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “Adémar de Chabannes, Carolingian Musical Practices, and Nota Romana.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 56 (2003): 43–98.Google Scholar

Grier, James. Ademarus Cabanennsis monachus et musicus. Corpus Christianorum, Autographa Medii Aevi, 7. Turnhout: Brepols, 2018.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “Authority of the Composer, Authority of the Editor,” in Nordic Music Editions: Symposium 1–2 September 2005, ed. Krabbe, Niels. Copenhagen: The Royal Library, 2006, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar

Grier, James. The Critical Editing of Music: History, Method, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “The Musical Autographs of Adémar de Chabannes (989–1034).” Early Music History 24 (2005): 125–68.Google Scholar

Grier, James. The Musical World of a Medieval Monk: Adémar de Chabannes in Eleventh-Century Aquitaine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “Scribal Practices in the Aquitanian Versaria of the Twelfth Century: Towards a Typology of Error and Variant.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 45 (1992): 373–427.Google Scholar

Grier, James. “Some Codicological Observations on the Aquitanian Versaria.” Musica Disciplina 44 (1990): 5–56.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. “‘¿Fantasía o realidad?’ La vihuela en las Obras de Cabezón.” Anuario Musical 69 (2014): 193–213.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. “La producción de libros de cifra musical en España durante el siglo XVI.” Hispánica Lyra 12 (2010): 10–27.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John.“The Vihuela: Performance Practice, Style, and Context,” in Performance on Lute, Guitar, and Vihuela, ed. Coelho, pp. 158–79.Google Scholar

d’Arezzo, Guido. Epistola ad Michahelem, in Guido d’Arezzo’s Regule rithmice, ed. and trans. Pesce, pp. 437–531.Google Scholar

d’Arezzo, Guido Micrologus, ed. Waesberghe, Jos. Smits van. Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, 4. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1955. English translation in Hucbald, Guido, and John, trans. Babb, pp. 57–83.Google Scholar

d’Arezzo, Guido Prologus in Antiphonarium, ed. Waesberghe, Joseph Smits van. Divitiae Musicae Artis, ser. A, 3. Buren: F. Knuf, 1975. Also in Guido d’Arezzo’s Regule rithmice, ed. and trans. Pesce, pp. 405–35.Google Scholar

d’Arezzo, Guido Regulae rhythmicae, ed. Waesberghe, Joseph Smits van and Vetter, Eduard. Divitiae Musicae Artis, ser. A, 4. Buren: Knuf, 1985. Also in Guido d’Arezzo’s Regule rithmice, ed. and trans. Pesce, pp. 327–403.Google Scholar

Gunter, Thomas C., Schmidt, Björn-Helmer and Besson, Mireille. “Let’s Face the Music: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Exploration of Score Reading.” Psychophysiology 40 (2003): 742–51.Google Scholar

Günther, Ursula. “Die Mensuralnotation der Ars nova in Theorie und Praxis.” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 19–20 (1962–63): 9–28.Google Scholar

Gushee, Lawrence. “Jehan des Murs and His Milieu,” in Musik und die Geschichte der Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften im Mittelalter: Fragen zur Wechselwirkung von “Musica” und “Philosophia” im Mittelalter, ed. Hentschel, Frank. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 62. Leiden: Brill, 1998, pp. 339–71.Google Scholar

Haggh, Barbara, and Huglo, Michel. “Magnus liber—Maius munus: Origine et destinée du manuscrit F.” Revue de Musicologie 90 (2004): 193–230.Google Scholar

Haines, John. “Anonymous IV as an Informant on the Craft of Music Writing.” Journal of Musicology 23 (2006): 375–425.Google Scholar

Haines, John. “From Point to Square: Graphic Change in Medieval Music Script.” Textual Cultures 3 no. 2 (Autumn, 2008): 30–53.Google Scholar

Haines, John. “The Origins of the Musical Staff.” The Musical Quarterly 91 (2008): 327–78.Google Scholar

Haines, John. “Proprietas and Perfectio in Thirteenth-Century Music Theory.” Theoria 15 (2008): 5–29.Google Scholar

Haines, John, ed. The Calligraphy of Medieval Music. Musicalia Medii Aevi, 1. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar

Halpern, Andrea R., and Bower, Gordon H.. “Musical Expertise and Melodic Structure in Memory for Musical Notation.” American Journal of Psychology 95 (1982): 31–50.Google Scholar

Halporn, James W., Ostwald, Martin and Rosenmeyer, Thomas G.. The Meters of Greek and Latin Poetry, rev. ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Ham, Martin. “A Sense of Proportion: The Performance of Sesquialtera ca. 1515-ca. 1565.” Musica Disciplina 56 (2011): 79–274.Google Scholar

Hamilton, David. “Igor Stravinsky: A Discography of the Composer’s Performances,” in Perspectives on Schoenberg and Stravinsky, rev. ed., ed. Boretz, Benjamin and Cone, Edward T.. New York: W. W. Norton, 1972, pp. 268–84.Google Scholar

Handlo, Robertus de. Regule, ed. and trans. Peter M. Lefferts, in Regule = The Rules, Robertus de Handlo, and Summa = The Summa, Johannes Hanboys. Greek and Latin Music Theory, 7. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1991, pp. 80–179.Google Scholar

Handschin, Jacques. “Eine alte Neumenschrift.” Acta Musicologica 22 (1950): 69–97; and 25 (1953): 87–88.Google Scholar

Harding, Rosamond E. M. The Metronome and It’s [sic] Precursors. Henley-on-Thames: Gresham Books, 1938.Google Scholar

Haubenstock-Ramati, Roman. “Notation—Material und Form.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 51–54.Google Scholar

Haug, Andreas. “Zur Interpretation der Liqueszenzneumen.” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 50 (1993): 85–100.Google Scholar

Heartz, Daniel. Pierre Attaingnant Royal Printer of Music: A Historical Study and Bibliographical Catalogue. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Heartz, Daniel.“Les premières ‘Instructions’ pour le luth (jusque vers 1550),” in Le luth et sa musique, ed. Jacquot, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar

Hebborn, Barbara. Die Dasia-Notation. Orpheus Schriftenreihe zu Grundfragen der Musik, 79. Bonn: Orpheus-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Heinichen, Johann David. Neu erfundene und gründliche Anweisung. Hamburg: Benjamin Schillers, 1711; repr. ed. Wolfgang Horn, Documenta Musicologica, ser. 1: Druckschriften-Faksimiles, 40 (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2000). English translation by Benedikt Brilmayer and Casey Mongoven, Harmonologia, 17 (Hillsdale NY: Pendragon Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Helsen, Kate. “The Evolution of Neumes into Square Notation in Chant Manuscripts.” Journal of the Alamire Foundation 5 (2013): 143–74.Google Scholar

Hemming, Rudolf. “German Lute Tablature and Conrad Paumann,” trans. Uta Henning. Lute Society Journal 15 (1973): 7–10.Google Scholar

Hen, Yitzhak. The Royal Patronage of Liturgy in Frankish Gaul to the Death of Charles the Bald (877). Henry Bradshaw Society, Subsidia, 3. London: Boydell Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Hentschel, Frank. “The Sensuous Music Aesthetics of the Middle Ages: The Cases of Augustine, Jacques de Liège and Guido of Arezzo.” Plainsong & Medieval Music 20 (2011): 1–29.Google Scholar

Herbst, Johann-Andreas. Musica moderna prattica, ouero maniera del buon canto. Frankfurt: Georg Mullers Verlag, 1658; repr. ed. Florian Grampp, in Deutsche Gesangstraktate des 17. Jahrhunderts, Documenta Musicologica, ser. 1: Druckschriften-Faksimiles, 43 (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2006).Google Scholar

Hieronymus, de Moravia. Tractatus de musica, ed. Meyer, Christian and Lobrichon, Guy. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis, 250. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012. English translation of Discantus positio uulgaris: “Discantus positio vulgaris,” in “Two XIII Century Treatises on Modal Rhythm and the Discant: Discantus positio vulgaris, De musica libellus (Anonymous VII),” trans. Janet Knapp, Journal of Music Theory 6 (1962): 200–15 at 203–7. Also trans. James McKinnon, in Source Readings in Music History, ed. Strunk, rev. ed., ed. Treitler, pp. 218–22.Google Scholar

Highben, Zebulon, and Palmer, Caroline. “Effects of Auditory and Motor Mental Practice in Memorized Piano Performance.” Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 159 (Winter 2004): 58–65.Google Scholar

Hiley, David, and Szendrei, Janka. “Notation, §III, 1: History of Western Notation: Plainchant,” in Grove Music Online, www.oxfordmusiconline.com.Google Scholar

Hindemith, Paul. Elementary Training for Musicians, 2nd ed. New York: Schott Music, 1949.Google Scholar

Holschneider, Andreas. Die Organa von Winchester: Studien zum ältesten Repertoire polyphoner Musik. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1968.Google Scholar

Hoppin, Richard H. “Conflicting Signatures Reviewed.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 9 (1956): 97–117.Google Scholar

Hoppin, Richard H. “Partial Signatures and Musica Ficta in Some Early 15th-Century Sources.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 6 (1953): 197–215.Google Scholar

Hourlier, J. “Le domaine de la notation messine.” Revue Grégorienne 30 (1951): 96–113, 150–58.Google Scholar

Hucbald of Saint Amand. Musica, ed. Chartier, Yves, in L’oeuvre musicale d’Hucbald de Saint-Amand: Les compositions et le traité de musique. Cahiers d’Études Médiévales, Cahier spécial, 5. Montreal: Bellarmin, 1995, pp. 136–213. English translation in Hucbald, Guido, and John, trans. Babb, pp. 13–44.Google Scholar

Huck, Oliver. “Double Motet Layouts in the Montpellier Codex and Contemporaneous Libri motetorum,” in The Montpellier Codex, ed. Bradley and Desmond, pp. 90–99.Google Scholar

Hucke, Helmut. “Toward a New Historical View of Gregorian Chant.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 33 (1980): 437–67.Google Scholar

Hughes, Andrew. Manuscript Accidentals: Ficta in Focus 1350–1450. Musicological Studies and Documents, 27. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1972.Google Scholar

Hughes, David G. “Evidence for the Traditional View of the Transmission of Gregorian Chant.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 40 (1987): 377–404.Google Scholar

Hughes, David G.“From the Advent Project to the Late Middle Ages: Some Issues of Transmission,” in Western Plainchant in the First Millennium, ed. Gallagher et al., pp. 181–98.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel. “The Earliest Developments in Square Notation: Twelfth-Century Aquitaine,” trans. Barbara Haggh, in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, pp. 163–71.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel.“Observations codicologiques sur l’antiphonaire de Compiègne (Paris, B.N. lat. 17436),” in De musica et cantu, ed. Cahn and Heimer, pp. 117–30.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel.“Toward a Scientific Palaeography of Music,” trans. John Haines, in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel. “La tradition musicale aquitaine: Répertoire et notation,” in Liturgie et musique (IXe – XIVe s.). Cahiers de Fanjeaux, 17. Toulouse: E. Privat, 1982, pp. 253–68.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel, ed. Musicologie médiévale: Notations et séquences. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, 1987.Google Scholar

Huglo, Michel, and Haggh-Huglo, Barbara. “Des lettres de la passion aux lettres significatives notkériennes,” in “Quod ore cantas corde credas”: Studi in onore di Giacomo Baroffio Dahnk, ed. Scappaticci, Leandra. Monumenta Studia Instrumenta Liturgica, 70. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2013, pp. 427–36.Google Scholar

“Interview with Stravinsky.” The Observer no. 6788 (3 July 1921): 9.Google Scholar

Jackson, Roland. “Guillaume de Machaut and Dissonance in Fourteenth Century French Music.” Musica Disciplina 53 (2003–8): 7–49.Google Scholar

Jacquot, Jean, ed. Le luth et sa musique: Neuilly-sur-Seine, 10–14 septembre 1957. Le Choeur des Muses. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1958.Google Scholar

Jacques of Liège. Speculum musicae, ed. Bragard, Roger. 7 vols. in 8. Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, 3. Rome: Institute of Musicology, 1955–73. Partial English translation: “From Speculum musicae,” trans. Oliver Strunk, rev. James McKinnon, in Source Readings in Music History, ed. Strunk., rev. ed., ed. Treitler, pp. 269–78.Google Scholar

Jammers, Ewald. “Die palaeofraenkische Neumenschrift.” Scriptorium 7 (1953): 235–59.Google Scholar

Jammers, Ewald. “Studien zu Neumenschrift, Neumenhandschriften und neumierter Musik.” Bibliothek und Wissenschaft 2 (1965): 85–161.Google Scholar

Jammers, Ewald. Tafeln zur Neumenschrift. Tutzing: H. Schneider, 1965.Google Scholar

Janovka, Tomáš Baltazar. Clavis ad thesaurum magnae artis musicae. Prague: Georgius Labaun, 1701; repr. in Dictionarium Musicum, 2 (Amsterdam: Frits Knuf, 1973). Partial English translation in Lester, Between Modes and Keys, pp. 163–77.Google Scholar

Jean, Georges. Langage de signes: L’écriture et son double. Découvertes Gallimard, Archéologie. N.p.: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar

Judd, Cristle Collins. Reading Renaissance Music Theory: Hearing with the Eyes. Cambridge Studies in Music Theory and Analysis, 14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Judd, Cristle“Renaissance Modal Theory: Theoretical, Compositional, and Editorial Perspectives,” in The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, ed. Christensen, pp. 364–406.Google Scholar

Kagel, Mauricio. “Komposition—Notation—Interpretation.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 55–63.Google Scholar

Karkoschka, Erhard. Das Schriftbild der neuen Musik: Bestandsaufnahme neuer Notationssymbole, Anleitung zu deren Deutung, Realisation und Kritik. Celle: Moeck, 1966. English translation: Notation in New Music: A Critical Guide to Interpretation and Realisation, trans. Ruth Koenig (New York: Praeger, 1972).Google Scholar

Kirnberger, Joh. Phil. Die Kunst des reinen Satzes in der Musik. 2 vols. in 4. Berlin: C. F. Voss (vol. 1); Berlin and Königsberg: G. J. Decker and G. L. Hartung (vol. 2), 1776–79; repr. ed. Gregor Herzfeld (Kassel, 2004). English translation: The Art of Strict Musical Composition, trans. David Beach and Jurgen Thym, Music Theory Translation Series, 4 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Klauser, Theodor. “Die liturgischen Austauschbeziehungen zwischen der römischen und der fränkischen Kirche vom achten bis zum elften Jahrhundert.” Historisches Jahrbuch 53 (1933): 169–89.Google Scholar

Klöckner, Stefan. “Cod. H 159 der Bibliothek der Medizinischen Fakultät von Montpellier (Tonar von Saint-Bénigne, Dijon).” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 30 (2000): 77–93.Google Scholar

Koehler, Laurie. Pythagoreisch-platonische Proportionen in Werken der ars nova und ars subtilior. 2 vols. Göttinger Musikwissenschaftliche Arbeiten, 12. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1990.Google Scholar

Kolisch, Rudolf. Tempo und Charakter in Beethovens Musik, ed. Busch, Regina and Satz, David. Musik-Konzepte, 76/77. Munich: Edition Text + Kritik, 1992. English translation: “Tempo and Character in Beethoven’s Music,” trans. Thomas Y. Levin and David Satz, The Musical Quarterly 77 (1993): 90–131, 268–342.Google Scholar

Kontarsky, Aloys. “Notationen für Klavier.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 92–109.Google Scholar

Kornicke, Eloise. “An Exploratory Study of Individual Difference Variables in Piano Sight-Reading Achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning 6 (1995): 56–79.Google Scholar

Kreitner, Kenneth, Jambou, Louis, Hunter, Desmond, Carter, Stewart A., Walls, Peter, Ng, Kah-Ming, Schulenberg, David and Brown, Clive. “Ornaments,” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. Sadie, Stanley. 2nd ed. 29 vols. London: Macmillan, 2001, 18:708a–746b.Google Scholar

Kügle, Karl. The Manuscript Ivrea, Biblioteca Capitolare 115: Studies in the Transmission and Composition of Ars Nova Polyphony. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 69. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1997.Google Scholar

Lambertus, . Musica mensurabilis, in The “Ars musica” Attributed to Magister Lambertus/Aristoteles, ed. Meyer, Christian, trans. Karen Desmond. Royal Musical Association Monographs, 27. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015, pp. 60–115.Google Scholar

Law, Vivien. “The Study of Grammar,” in Carolingian Culture: Emulation and Innovation, ed. McKitterick, Rosamond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 88–110.Google Scholar

Leach, Elizabeth Evas. “Machaut’s First Single-Author Compilation,” in Manuscripts and Medieval Song: Inscription, Performance, Context, ed. Deeming, Helen and Eva Leech, Elizabeth. Music in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 247–70.Google Scholar

Lee, Ji In. “The Role of Inner Hearing in Sight Reading Music as an Example of Inter-Modal Perception.” Musikpsychologie 18 (2006): 35–52.Google Scholar

Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel. “The Emergence of ars nova.” Journal of Musicology 13 (1995): 285–317.Google Scholar

Lersch, Irmgard. “Mensuralnotation zwischen Ars Antiqua und Ars Nova.” Musica Disciplina 54 (2009): 5–38.Google Scholar

Lester, Joel. Between Modes and Keys: German Theory 1592–1802. Harmonologia, 3. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lester, Joel. Compositional Theory in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Levy, Kenneth. “Abbot Helisachar’s Antiphoner.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 48 (1995): 171–86.Google Scholar

Levy, Kenneth. “Charlemagne’s Archetype of Gregorian Chant.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 40 (1987): 1–30.Google Scholar

Levy, Kenneth. Gregorian Chant and the Carolingians. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Levy, Kenneth. “On the Origins of Neumes.” Early Music History 7 (1987): 59–90.Google Scholar

Ligeti, György. “Neue Notation—Kommunikationsmittel oder Selbstzweck?” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 35–50.Google Scholar

Lipman, Samuel. “Stravinsky: Rerecording History,” in The House of Music: Art in an Era of Institutions. Boston: David R. Godine, 1984, pp. 120–32 (originally published in The New Criterion, 1982).Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Jeremy. “Grammar, Writing and Chant: Notker the Editor and the Epistola ad Lantbertum,” in Actes du Colloque d’Auxerre, ed. Aubert and Rankin, pp. 225–41.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Angela. “Ordering and Reordering in Cipriano de Rore’s 1542 and 1550 Madrigal Books.” Muziek & Wetenschap 6 (1997): 3–25.Google Scholar

Loesch, Heinz von. “Musica—Musica practica—Musica poetica,” in Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 8/1: Deutsche Musiktheorie des 15. bis 17. Jahrhunderts, erster Teil, Von Paumann bis Calvisius, ed. Ertelt, Thomas and Zaminer, Frieder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2003, pp. 99–264.Google Scholar

Lombardi, Daniele. Scrittura e suono: La notazione nella music contemporanea. Rome: Edipan, 1980.Google Scholar

Lowery, H. “On Reading Music.” The Dioptric Review and the British Journal of Physiological Optics new series, 1 (1940): 78–88.Google Scholar

Lowinsky, Edward E. “Conflicting Views on Conflicting Signatures.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 7 (1954): 181–204.Google Scholar

Lowinsky, Edward E. “Early Scores in Manuscript.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 13 (1960): 126–73.Google Scholar

Lowinsky, Edward E. “The Function of Conflicting Signatures in Early Polyphonic Music.” The Musical Quarterly 31 (1945): 227–60.Google Scholar

Lowinsky, Edward E. “On the Use of Scores by Sixteenth-Century Musicians.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 1 (1948): 17–23.Google Scholar

Madell, Jaime, and Sylvie, Hébert. “Eye Movements and Music Reading: Where Do We Look Next?” Music Perception 26 (2008): 157–70.Google Scholar

Marchetto of Padua. Pomerium in arte musicae mensuratae, ed. Vecchi, Joseph. Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, 6. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1961.Google Scholar

Marshall, Robert. L. “J. S. Bach’s Compositions for Solo Flute.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 32 (1979): 463–98.Google Scholar

Martin, Henri-Jean. Histoire et pouvoirs de l’écrit. Collection Histoire et Décadence. Paris: Librairie Académique Perrin, 1988. English translation: The History and Power of Writing, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Mathiesen, Thomas J. Apollo’s Lyre: Greek Music and Music Theory in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Publications of the Center for the History of Music Theory and Literature, 2. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mattheson, Johann. Das neu-eröffnete Orchestre. Hamburg: B. Schillers, 1713; repr. ed. Dietrich Bartel, Die drei Orchestre-Schriften, 1 (Laaber: Laaber-Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar

Maw, David. “Je le temoin en mon chant: The Art of Diminution in the Petronian Triplum,” in The Montpellier Codex, ed. Bradley and Desmond, pp. 161–83.Google Scholar

McClary, Susan. Modal Subjectivities: Self-Fashioning in the Italian Madrigal. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McGee, Timothy J. “Dança amorosa: A Newly-Discovered Medieval Dance Pair,” in Beyond the Moon, ed. Gillingham and Merkley, pp. 295–306.Google Scholar

McGee, Timothy J. “‘Ornamental’ Neumes and Early Notation.” Performance Practice Review 9 (1996): 39–65.Google Scholar

McGee, Timothy J. The Sound of Medieval Song: Ornamentation and Vocal Style According to the Treatises. Oxford Monographs on Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

McKitterick, Rosamond. The Carolingians and the Written Word. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

McKitterick, Rosamond. “Royal Patronage of Culture in the Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians: Motives and Consequences,” in Committenti e produzione artistico-letteraria nell’alto medioevo occidentale, 4–10 aprile 1991. 2 vols. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 39. Spoleto: Presso la Sede del Centro, 1992, 1:93–129.Google Scholar

Meier, Bernhard. Die Tonarten der klassischen Vokalpolyphonie. Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema, 1974. English translation: The Modes of Classical Vocal Polyphony Described According to the Sources, trans. Ellen S. Beebe (New York: Broude Brothers, 1988).Google Scholar

Meyer, Christian. “Zur ‘Konstruktion’ der antiken Musiktheorie bei Glarean,” in Heinrich Glarean, ed. Schwindt, pp. 147–59.Google Scholar

Michels, Ulrich. Die Musiktraktate des Johannes de Muris. Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 8. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1970.Google Scholar

Miller, Clement A. “Gaffurius’ Practica Musicae: Origin and Contents.” Musica Disciplina 22 (1968): 105–29.Google Scholar

Minamino, Hiroyuki. “Conrad Paumann and the Evolution of Solo Lute Practice in the Fifteenth Century.” Journal of Musicological Research 6 (1986): 291–310.Google Scholar

Minamino, Hiroyuki. “Production and Reception of Petrucci’s Lute Books.” Journal of the Lute Society of America 41 (2008): 37–55.Google Scholar

Mocquereau, André. Le nombre musical grégorien ou rythmique grégorienne: Théorie et pratique. 2 vols. Rome and Tournai: Société de Saint-Jean l’Évangéliste, 1908–27.Google Scholar

Morley, Thomas. A Plaine and Easie Introduction to Practicall Musicke. London: Peter Short, 1597 (facsimile in The English Experience, 207 [Amsterdam and New York: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum and Da Capo Press, 1969]).Google Scholar

Muris, Johannes de. Ars practica mensurabilis cantus secundum Iohannem de Muris: Die Recensio maior des sogenannten “Libellus practice cantus mensurabilis,” ed. Berktold, Christian. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission, 14. Munich: Verlag der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999.Google Scholar

Johannes, Muris Écrits sur la musique, trans. Christian Meyer. Collection Sciences de la Musique. N.p.: CNRS Editions, 2000.Google Scholar

Johannes, Muris Notitia artis musicae et Compendium musicae practicae, Petrus de Sancto Dionysio, Tractatus de musica, ed. Michels, Ulrich. Corpus Scriptorum de Musica, 17. N.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1972. Partial English translation: “From Notitia artis musicae,” trans. Oliver Strunk, rev. James McKinnon, in Source Readings in Music History, ed. Strunk., rev. ed., ed. Treitler, pp. 261–69.Google Scholar

Nakada, Tsutomu, Fujii, Yukihiko, Suzuki, Kiyotaka and Kwee, Ingrid L.. “‘Musical Brain’ Revealed by High-Field (3 Tesla) Functional MRI.” NeuroReport 9 (1998): 3853–56.Google Scholar

Nelson, Janet L. “Literacy in Carolingian Government,” in The Uses of Literacy in Early Medieval Europe, ed. McKitterick, Rosamond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 258–96.Google Scholar

Odenkirchen, Andreas. “13 Neumentafeln in tabellarischer Übersicht,” in De musica et cantu, ed. Cahn and Heimer, pp. 257–62.Google Scholar

Oesch, Hans. Guido von Arezzo: Biographisches und Theoretisches unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der sogenannten odonischen Traktate. Publikationen der Schweizerischen Musikforschenden Gesellschaft, ser. 2, 4. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt, 1954.Google Scholar

Ongaro, Guilio M. “All Work and No Play? The Organization of Work among Musicians in Late Renaissance Venice.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 25 (1995): 55–72.Google Scholar

Ostheimer, Andreas. “Die Niederschrift von Musik mit Dasiazeichen: Untersuchungen zur praktischen Anwendung eines ‘theoretischen’ Schriftsystems.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 28 (1999): 51–72.Google Scholar

Owens, Jessie Ann. “The Milan Partbooks: Evidence of Cipriano de Rore’s Compositional Process.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 37 (1984): 270–98.Google Scholar

Owens, Jessie Ann “Mode in the Madrigals of Cipriano de Rore,” in Altro Polo: Essays on Italian Music in the Cinquecento, ed. Charteris, Richard. Sydney: Frederick May Foundation for Italian Studies, 1990, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Page, Christopher. The Christian West and Its Singers: The First Thousand Years. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Palisca, Claude V. “Die Jahrzehnte um 1600 in Italien,” trans. Horst Leuchtmann, in Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 7: Italiensche Musiktheorie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, ed. Zaminer, Frieder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1989, pp. 221–306.Google Scholar

Palm, Siegfried. “Zur Notation für Streichinstrumente.” Darmstadter Beiträge zur neuen Musik 9 (1965): 87–91.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., ed. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58.Google Scholar

Penttinen, Marjaana, and Huovinen, Erkki. “The Early Development of Sight-Reading Skills in Adulthood: A Study of Eye Movements.” Journal of Research in Music Education 59 (2011): 196–220.Google Scholar

Pesce, Dolores. The Affinities and Medieval Transposition. Music: Scholarship and Performance. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Pesce, Dolores, ed. and trans. Guido d’Arezzo’s Regule rithmice, Prologus in Antiphonarium, and Epistola ad Michahelem: A Critical Text and Translation. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 73. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1999.Google Scholar

Phillips, Nancy. “The Dasia Notation and Its Manuscript Tradition,” in Musicologie médiévale, ed. Huglo, pp. 157–73.Google Scholar

Phillips, Nancy. “Notationen und Notationslehren von Boethius bis zum 12. Jahrhundert,” trans. Gudrun Tillmann-Budde, in Geschichte der Musiktheorie, 4: Die Lehre von einstimmigen liturgischen Gesang, ed. Ertelt, Thomas and Zaminer, Frieder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2000, pp. 293–623.Google Scholar

Phillips, Nancy, and Huglo, Michel. “Le De musica de saint Augustin et l’organisation de la durée musicale du IXe au XIIe siècles.” Recherches Augustiniennes 20 (1985): 117–31.Google Scholar

Pierce, Todd. The International Pictograms Standard. Cincinnati: ST Publications, 1996.Google Scholar

Pinegar, Sandra. “On Rhythmic Modes.” Theoria 8 (1994): 73–112.Google Scholar

Planchart, Alejandro Enrique. The Repertory of Tropes at Winchester. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Powers, Harold. “From Psalmody to Tonality,” in Tonal Structures in Early Music, ed. Judd, Cristle Collins. Criticism and Analysis of Early Music, 1. New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1998, pp. 275–340.Google Scholar

Powers, Harold. “Monteverdi’s Model for a Multimodal Madrigal,” in In cantu et in sermone: For Nino Pirrotta on His 80th Birthday, ed. Seta, Fabrizio Della and Piperno, Franco. Italian Medieval and Renaissance Studies, The University of Western Australia, 2. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1989, pp. 185–219.Google Scholar

Prosdocimus, de Beldemandis. Tractatus practice de musica mensurabili, in Scriptorum de musica medii aevi, ed. Coussemaker, 3:200–28.Google Scholar

Prosdocimus, de Beldemandis.Tractatus practice de musica mensurabili ad modum ytalicorum, in Sartori, La notazione italiana, pp. 35–71.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Odo, Martin Gerbert, , in Scriptores ecclesiastici de musica. 3 vols. St. Blasien: Typis San-Blasianis, 1784; repr. Hildesheim, 1963, 1:251–64.Google Scholar

Ptolemy, Claudius. The Harmonics, trans. Andrew Barker, in Greek Musical Writings, 2: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge Readings in the Literature of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 270–391.Google Scholar

Quantz, Johann Joachim. Versuch einer Anweisung die Flute traversiere zu spielen. 3rd ed. Breslau: Johann Friedrich Korn der älter, 1789. English translation: On Playing the Flute, trans. Edward R. Reilly (New York: The Free Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Quintilian, . Institutio oratoria, ed. Winterbottom, M. 2 vols. Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. English translation: The Orator’s Education, ed. and trans. Donald A. Russell, 5 vols., Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Radke, Hans. “Zur Spieltechnik der deutschen Lautenisten des 16. Jahrhunderts.” Acta Musicologica 52 (1980): 134–47.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. “Calligraphy and the Study of Neumatic Notations,” in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. “Identity and Diversity: The Idea of Regional Musical Notations,” in Nationes, Gentes und die Musik im Mittelalter, ed. Hentschel, Frank and Winkelmüller, Marie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014, pp. 375–93.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan.“Neumatic Notations in Anglo-Saxon England,” in Musicologie médiévale, ed. Huglo, pp. 129–44.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. “On the Treatment of Pitch in Early Music Writing.” Early Music History 30 (2011): 105–75.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. “The Song School of St Gall in the Later Ninth Century,” in Sangallensia in Washington: The Arts and Letters in Medieval and Baroque St. Gall Viewed from the Late Twentieth Century, ed. King, James C.. New York: P. Lang, 1993, pp. 173–98.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan.“Typologies of Ninth-Century Music Notations,” in Actes du Colloque de Royaumont, ed. Colette and Massip, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. “Winchester Polyphony: The Early Theory and Practice of Organum,” in Music in the Medieval English Liturgy: Plainsong and Mediaeval Music Society Centennial Essays, ed. Rankin, Susan and Hiley, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 59–99.Google Scholar

Rankin, Susan. Writing Sounds in Carolingian Europe: The Invention of Musical Notation. Cambridge Studies in Palaeography and Codicology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Rastall, Richard. The Notation of Western Music: An Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Raven, D. S. Latin Metre. London: Faber and Faber, 1965; repr. London, 1998.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner. 20th-Century Microtonal Notation. Contributions to the Study of Music and Dance, 18. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner. Compendium of Modern Instrumental Techniques. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner. Contemporary Instrumental Techniques. New York: Schirmer Books, 1976.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner. Modern Rhythmic Notation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner. Pictographic Score Notation: A Compendium. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Read, Gardner.Source Book of Proposed Music Notation Reforms. Music Reference Collection, 11. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Reaney, Gilbert. “The Manuscript Chantilly, Musée Condé 1047.” Musica Disciplina 8 (1954): 59–113.Google Scholar

Reaney, Gilbert. Manuscripts of Polyphonic Music, 11th–Early 14th Century. Répertoire International des Sources Musicales, B/4, 1. Munich-Duisburg: Henle, 1966.Google Scholar

Reaney, Gilbert. “A Postscript to ‘The Manuscript Chantilly, Musée Condé 1047’.” Musica Disciplina 10 (1956): 55–59.Google Scholar

Reckow, Fritz. Die Copula: Über einige Zusammenhänge zwischen Setzweise, Formbildung, Rhythmus und Vortragsstil in der Mehrstimmigkeit von Notre-Dame. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jahrgang 1972, no. 13. Mainz and Wiesbaden: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, and F. Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

Reckow, Fritz. “Proprietas und perfectio: Zur Geschichte des Rhythmus, seiner Aufzeichnung und Terminologie im 13. Jahrhundert.” Acta Musicologica 39 (1967): 115–43.Google Scholar

Reckow, Fritz, ed. Der Musiktraktat des Anonymus 4. 2 vols. Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 4–5. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1967. English translation: The Music Treatise of Anonymous IV: A New Translation, trans. Jeremy Yudkin, Musicological Studies and Documents, 41 (Neuhausen-Stuttgart: American Institute of Musicology, Hänssler-Verlag, 1985).Google Scholar

Riché, Pierre. Les écoles et l’enseignement dans l’occident chrétien de la fin du Ve siècle au milieu du XIe siècle. 3rd ed. Paris: Picard, 1999.Google Scholar

Risatti, Howard. New Music Vocabulary: A Guide to Notational Signs for Contemporary Music. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Ristory, Heinz. Denkmodelle zur französischen Mensuraltheorie des 14. Jahrhunderts. 2 vols. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 81. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2004–16.Google Scholar

Ristory, Heinz. Post-franconische Theorie und Früh-Trecento: Die Petrus de Cruce-Neuerungen und ihre Bedeutung für die italienische Mensuralnotenschrift zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts. Europäische Hochschulschriften, ser. 36, Musikwissenschaft, 26. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1988.Google Scholar

Robertson, Anne Walters. The Service-Books of the Royal Abbey of Saint-Denis: Images of Ritual and Music in the Middle Ages. Oxford Monographs on Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “The Emergence of musica mensurabilis,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Styles: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue, ed. Wolf, Eugene K. and Rosener, Edward H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar

Roesner, Edward H. “Johannes de Garlandia on organum in speciali.” Early Music History 2 (1982): 129–60.Google Scholar

Rumphorst, Heinrich. “Verhältnis von St. Galler und Metzer Notation.” Beiträge zur Gregorianik 52 (2011): 61–87.Google Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H. “Consonance and Rhythm in the Organum of the 12th and 13th Centuries.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 33 (1980): 264–86.Google Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H. “The Early Motets of Philippe de Vitry.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 28 (1975): 24–45.Google Scholar

Sanders, Ernest H., and Lefferts, Peter M.. “Petrus de Cruce,” in Grove Music Online, www.oxfordmusiconline.com.Google Scholar

Santosuosso, Alma Colk. Letter Notations in the Middle Ages. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 52. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1989.Google Scholar

Sartori, Claudio. La notazione italiana del trecento in una redazione inedita del “Tractatus practice cantus mensurabilis ad modum ytalicorum” de Prosdocimo de Beldemandis. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1938.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert. Paris: Payot, 1972 (originally published Lausanne: Payot, 1916). English translation: Course in General Linguistics, trans. Wade Baskin (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959).Google Scholar

Sbordoni, Alessandro, and Rostagno, Antonio, eds. Free Improvisation: History and Perspectives. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 2018.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. “About Metronome Markings,” trans. Leo Black, in Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, ed. Stein, Leonard. Rev. ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984, pp. 342–43.Google Scholar

Schön, Daniele, and Besson, Mireille. “Visually Induced Auditory Expectancy in Music Reading: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005): 694–705.Google Scholar

Schürmann, Martin, Raij, Tommi, Fujiki, Nobuya and Hari, Riitta. “Mind’s Ear in a Musician: Where and When in the Brain.” NeuroImage 16 (2002): 434–40.Google Scholar

Schwindt, Nicole, ed. Heinrich Glarean oder: Die Rettung der Musik aus dem Geist der Antike? Trossinger Jahrbuch für Renaissancemusik, 5. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2005.Google Scholar

Scully, Terence. “French Songs in Aragon: The Place of Origin of the Chansonnier Chantilly, Musée Condé 564,” in Courtly Literature: Culture and Context, ed. Busby, Keith and Kooper, Erik. Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature, 25. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1990, pp. 509–21.Google Scholar

Seeger, Charles. “Prescriptive and Descriptive Music-Writing.” The Musical Quarterly 44 (1958): 184–95.Google Scholar