Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T23:28:03.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The structure of social relationships among sooty mangabeys in Taï

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

By
F. Range ,
T. Förderer ,
Y. Storrer-Meystre ,
C. Benetton  and
C. Fruteau
Edited by
W. Scott McGraw ,
Klaus Zuberbühler  and
Ronald Noë
W. Scott McGraw
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Klaus Zuberbühler
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Ronald Noë
Affiliation:
Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Living in groups has both advantages and disadvantages. Being in a social group may decrease vulnerability to predation or increase acquisition of certain resources, but it may also increase intra-group competition for food, mates, and sleeping sites and lead to a higher risk of disease or infanticide (reviewed in Krebs & Davies 1993). The optimal size and structure of social groups is generally thought to be a balance between the costs and benefits associated with sociality.

The evolution of sociality may be directly relevant to the evolution of cognitive skills. Recent research suggests that the primate brain evolved as an adaptation to cope with the social complexity that results from competition within a framework of kinship networks, friendships, dominance hierarchies, and triadic alliances (the “social brain hypothesis”). As group size increases, the number of triadic relations explodes and the need for triadic knowledge to choose the best behavioral strategies places high demands on individuals, which could in itself offer an explanation for the large primate brain (Seyfarth & Cheney 2001).

Sooty mangabeys live in large groups (over 100 animals), are terrestrial and forest dwelling and form-differentiated relationships among group members. All of these features make them ideal subjects with which to test the “social brain” hypothesis. However, before we consider the social intelligence of sooty mangabeys, we need to understand how dominance rank, competition, affiliation, and migration shape the pattern of interactions among females and males.

Type
Chapter
Information
Monkeys of the Taï Forest
An African Primate Community
 , pp. 109 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altmann, S. A. (1962). A field study of the sociobiology of the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 102, 338–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aureli, F. and Schaik, C. P. V. (1991a). Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). I. The social events. Ethology, 89, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmüller, R. (1998). Feeding ecology of the sooty mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus atys). A key for its social organization? Dipl. Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany.
Cairns, S. J. and Schwager, S. J. (1987). A comparison of association indexes. Animal Behaviour, 35, 1454–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1980). Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 28, 362–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1986). The recognition of social alliances among vervet monkeys. Animal behaviour, 34, 1722–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1989). Redirected aggression and reconciliation among vervet monkeys, Cercopithecus aethiops. Behaviour, 110, 258–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1999). Recognition of other individuals' social relationships by female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 58, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M. and Silk, J. B. (1995). The responses of female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) to anomalous social interactions – evidence for causal reasoning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 134–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasser, V. (1988a). Mapping social concepts in monkeys. In Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans, ed. Byrne, R. and Whiten, A., Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 85–93.Google Scholar
Dasser, V. (1988b). A social concept in Java monkeys. Animal Behavior, 36, 225–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. and Rowell, T. E. (1962). Communication by postures and facial expressions in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Procedures of the Zoological Society of London, 138, 1–21.Google Scholar
Homewood, K. M. (1976). Ecology and behavior of the Tana Mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus), Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, UK.
Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (1993). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Mitani, M. (1989). Cercocebus torquatus: Adaptive feeding and ranging behaviors related to seasonal fluctuations of food resources in the tropical rain forest of south-western Cameroon. Primates, 30(3), 307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Range, F. and Noë, R. (2002). Familiarity and dominance relations in female sooty mangabeys in the Taï National Park. American Journal of Primatology, 56, 137–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ron, T., Henzi, S. P. and Motro, U. (1996). Do female chacma baboons compete for safe spatial position in a southern woodland habitat. Behaviour, 133, 475–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. (2001). Cognitive strategies and the representation of social relations by monkeys. In Evolutionary Psychology and Motivation, ed. French, J. A., Kamil, A. C. and Leger, D. W., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 145–78.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1992). Patterns of intervention in agonistic contests among bonnet macaques. In Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, ed. Harcourt, A. H. and deWaal, F. B. M., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar
Silk, J. (1999a). Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies. Animal Behaviour, 58, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1999b). Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies. Animal Behaviour, 58, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. and Wensing, J. A. B. (1987). Dominance and its behavioural measures in a captive wolf pack. In Man and Wolf, ed. Frank, H., Dordrecht: Junk Publishers, pp. 219–52.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed. Campbell, B., Chicago: Aldine, pp. 136–79.Google Scholar
Vries, H. (1995). An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown relationships. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1375–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. and Luttrell, L. M. (1986). The similarity principle underlying social bonding among female rhesus monkeys. Folia Primatology, 46, 215–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, H. and Dufault, S. (1999). Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: Review and recommendations. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 28, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×