Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T10:07:44.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Positional behavior and habitat use of Taï forest monkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

W. Scott McGraw
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Klaus Zuberbühler
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Ronald Noë
Affiliation:
Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Locomotion and posture are important elements of behavioral ecology. Since primates are mobile and most are arboreal, knowing where, why, and how they position themselves in the forest canopy provides a better understanding of many aspects of primate life. Establishing predictive relationships between positional behavior and additional aspects of primate biology not only helps explain the behavior of living animals, but also allows us to infer the behavior of fossil taxa more reliably. Although there have been many studies of one or a few species at single sites, studies of positional behavior of whole (or nearly whole) primate communities are rare. Notable exceptions include the landmark study of Fleagle and Mittermeier (1980) on monkeys in Surinam and the study by Gebo and Chapman (1995a, 1995b) on monkeys in Uganda's Kibale Forest. In an effort to add to the body of comparative data, I began studies on the positional behavior of seven Taï Forest monkeys in 1993. The first study of Taï monkeys by Galat and Galat-Luong (1985) contained basic data on habitat use, however these authors were not primarily concerned with positional behavior.

The monkeys at Taï provide a potentially stringent test of what determines – or at least co-varies with – locomotion and posture. Unlike the Surinam monkeys studied by Fleagle and Mittermeier (1980), the Taï cercopithecids do not represent a great diversity of locomotor adaptations or as great a range of body size (Schultz 1970, Oates et al. 1990, Fleagle 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Monkeys of the Taï Forest
An African Primate Community
, pp. 223 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ankel-Simons, F. (2000). Primate Anatomy: An Introduction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bitty, E. A. and McGraw, W. S. (in press). Locomotion and habitat use of stampflii's putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans stampflii) in the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. (1994). Chimpanzees-red colobus monkeys: a predator-prey system. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1135–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzard, P. J. (2003). Ecological partitioning in Taï forest guenons: Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista, C. diana. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supp 36, 73.Google Scholar
Cannon, C. H. and Leighton, M. (1994). Comparative locomotor ecology of gibbons and macaques: selection of canopy elements for crossing gaps. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 93, 505–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cant, J. G. H. (1986). Locomotion and feeding postures of spider and howling monkeys: field study and evolutionary interpretations. Folia Primatologica, 46, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, J. G. H. (1987). Effects of sexual dimorphism in body size on feeding postural behavior of Sumatran orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 74, 143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, J. G. H. (1992). Positional behavior and body size of arboreal primates: a theoretical framework for field studies and an illustration of its application. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, 273–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagosto, M. (1994). Testing positional behavior of Malagasy lemurs: a randomization approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 94, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagosto, M. and Gebo, D. L. (1998). Methodological issues in studying positional behavior: meeting Ripley's challenge. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances, ed. Stasser, E., Fleagle, J., Rosenberger, A. and McHenry, H., New York: Plenum Press, pp. 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, D. M. (1992). The ontogeny of chimpanzee and pygmy chimpanzee locomotor behaviors: a case study of paedomorphism and its behavioral contexts. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, D. M. (1993). Sex differences in adult chimpanzee positional behavior: the influence of body size on locomotion and posture. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 91, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, D. M. and Hunt, K. D. (1994). Comparative locomotor behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: species and habitat differences. In Chimpanzee Cultures, ed. Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C. and Heltne, P., Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Fleagle, J. G. (1976). Locomotion and posture of the Malayan siamang and implications for hominoid evolution. Folia Primatologica, 26, 245–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleagle, J. G. (1979). Primate positional behavior and anatomy: naturalistic and experimental approaches. In Environment, Behavior, and Morphology: Dynamic Interactions in Primates, ed. Morbeck, M. E., Preuschoft, H., Gomberg, N.. New York: Gustav Fischer, pp. 313–25.Google Scholar
Fleagle, J. G. (1980). Locomotion and posture. In Malayan Forest Primates, ed. Chivers, D.. Plenum Pres: New York, pp. 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleagle, J. G. (1999). Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Fleagle, J. G. and McGraw, W. S. (2002). Skeletal and dental morphology of African papionins: unmasking a cryptic clade. Journal of Human Evolution, 42, 267–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleagle, J. G. and Mittermeier, R. A. (1980). Locomotor behavior, body size and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 52, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleagle, J. G., Mittermeier, R. A. and Skopec, A. (1981). Differential habitat use by Cebus apella and Saimiri sciureus in Central Surinam. Primates, 22, 361–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galat, G. and Galat Luong, A. (1985). La communuaté de primates diurnes de la forêt de Taï, Côte d'Ivoire. Revue de Ecologie (Terre Vie), 40, 3–32.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A. (1991). A comparative study of positional behavior in three species of tamarin monkeys. Primates, 32, 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, P. A. and Pruetz, J. D. (1995). Positional behavior in moustached tamarin monkeys; effects of habitat on locomotor variability and locomotor stability. Journal of Human Evolution, 28, 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebo, D. L. and Chapman, C. A. (1995a). Positional behavior in five sympatric Old World monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebo, D. L. and Chapman, C. A. (1995b). Habitat, annual, and seasonal effects on positional behavior in red colobus monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 96, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebo, D. L., Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J. and Lambert, J. (1994). Locomotor response to predator threat in red colobus monkeys. Primates, 35, 219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. D. (1992). Positional behavior of Pan troglodytes in the Mahale mountains and Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87, 83–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, K. D., Cant, J. G. H., Gebo, D. L., Rose, M. D., Walker, S. E. and Youlatos, D. (1996). Standardized descriptions of primate locomotor and postural modes. Primates, 37, 363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungers, W. L., Burr, D. B. and Cole, M. S. (1998). Body size and scaling of long bone geometry, bone strength, and positional behavior in cercopithecoid primates. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances, ed. Strasser, E., Fleagle, J., Rosenberger, A. and McHenry, H.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 309–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korstjens, A. H. (2001). The Mob, the Secret Sorority, and the Phantoms: An analysis of the socio-ecological strategies of the three colobines of Taï. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Korstjens, A. and Noe, R. (2004). Mating system of an exceptional primate, the olive colobus(Procolobus verus). American Journal of Primatology, 62, 261–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korstjens, A. H. and Schippers, E. P. (2003). Dispersal patterns among olive colobus in Taï National Park. International Journal of Primatology, 24(3), 515–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Alvarez, , C., Pereyra, , D., Violi, E. and Zunino, G. (2002). A preliminary study of positional behavior in Alouatta caraya in northern Argentina. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supp. 34, 97.Google Scholar
Larson, S. G. and Stern, J. T. (2002). Forearm rotation and the “Origin of the Hominoid Lifestyle:” response to Sarmiento. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 119, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1996a). The positional behavior and habitat use of six sympatric monkeys in the Taï forest, Ivory Coast. Ph.D. thesis. SUNY at Stony Brook, USA.Google Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1996b). Cercopithecid locomotion, support use, and support availability in the Taï Forest, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100, 507–22.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1998a). Comparative locomotion and habitat use of six monkeys in the Taï Forest, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 493–510.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1998b). Locomotion, support use, maintenance activities, and habitat structure: the case of the Taï Forest cercopithecids. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances, ed. Strasser, E., Fleagle, J., Rosenberger, A. and McHenry, H.. Plenum Press: New York, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1998c). Posture and support use of Old World monkeys (Cercopithecidae): the influence of foraging strategies, activity patterns, and the spatial distribution of preferred food items. American Journal of Primatology, 46, 229–50.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (2000). Positional behavior of Cercopithecus petaurista. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 157–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (2002). Positional diversity in the guenons. In The Guenons: Diversity and Adaptation in African Monkeys, ed. Glenn, M., Cords, M.. New York: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 113–31.Google Scholar
McGraw, W. S., Plavcan, J. M. and Adachi, K. (2002). Female adult Cercopithecus diana killed by other females: evidence for the use of canine teeth as weapons by females. International Journal of Primatology, 23(6), 1301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbeck, M. E. (1979). Forelimb use and positional adaptations in Colobus guereza: integration of behavioral, ecological, and anatomical data. In Environment, Behavior, and Morphology: Dynamic Interactions in Primates, ed. Morbeck, M. E., Preuschoft, H. and Gomberg, N.. New York: Gustav Fischer, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar
Napier, J. R. (1962). Monkeys and their habitats. New Scientist, 295, 88–92.Google Scholar
Napier, J. R. (1963). Brachiation and brachiators. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 10, 183–95.Google Scholar
Napier, J. R. (1976). Primate locomotion. In Oxford Biology Readers, ed. Head, J. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Noë, R. and Bshary, R. (1997). The formation of red colobus-Diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 64, 253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. F. and Whitesides, G. H. (1990). Association between olive colobus (Procolobus verus), Diana guenons (Cercopithecus diana), and other forest monkeys in Sierra Leone. American Journal of Primatology, 21, 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. F., Whitesides, G. H., Davies, A. G.et al. (1990). Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass: new evidence from West Africa. Ecology, 71, 328–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. D. (1974). Postural adaptations in New and Old World Monkeys. In Primate Locomotion, ed. Jenkins, F. A.. Academic Press: New York, pp. 201–22.Google Scholar
Rose, M. D. (1977). Interspecific play between free ranging guerezas (Colobus guereza) and vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Primates, 18, 957–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, A. H. (1970). The comparative uniformity of the cercopithecoidea. In Old World Monkeys, ed. Napier, J. R. and Napier, P. H.. Academic Press: New York, pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
Stern, J. T. and Larson, S. G. (2001). Telemetered electromyography of supinators and pronators of the forearm in gibbons and chimpanzees: implications for the fundamental positional adaptation of hominoids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115, 253–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struhsaker, T. T. (1975). The Red Colobus Monkey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Susman, R. L. (1984). The locomotor behavior of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest. In The Pygmy Chimpanzee, ed. Susman, R. L.. Plenum Press: New York, pp. 369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×