Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:59:00.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Can monkey behavior be used as an indicator for poaching pressure? A case study of the Diana guenon (Cercopithecus diana) and the western red colobus (Procolobus badius) in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

W. Scott McGraw
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Klaus Zuberbühler
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Ronald Noë
Affiliation:
Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Market and subsistence hunting often result in the unsustainable exploitation of game in tropical forests, even when these forests are still intact (Oates et al. 2000). Poaching of wild animals is currently the major threat to the long-term conservation of the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire (Hoppe-Dominik 1995, 1997, P.A.C.P.N.T. 1997). Previous studies of the effects of poaching in the Taï National Park have focused on differences in animal density and abundance between poached areas and non-poached areas (Hoppe-Dominik 1995, 1997, Refisch & Koné 2005) and on the harvest of game species within and around the park (Caspary et al. 2001). However, hunting not only affects number but also behavior (Verdade 1996). Knowledge of the impact of poaching on wildlife behavior can provide reliable indicators for the spatial and temporal development of poaching.

In addition to human hunters there are three major predators of monkeys in the Taï National Park: crowned hawk eagles (Stephanoaetus coronatus), leopards (Panthera pardus), and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). Leopards and crowned hawk eagles are typical ambush predators whose hunting success is considerably reduced if they are detected before the final strike (Hoppe-Dominik 1984, Klump & Shalter 1984, Zuberbühler et al. 1999b). In contrast, chimpanzees and humans are pursuit hunters and search for prey using acoustic cues (Gautier-Hion & Tutin 1988, Boesch & Boesch 1989). Once they have located a group, both chimpanzee and human predators reach prey in the canopy by co-operative hunting or with shotguns, respectively.

Type
Chapter
Information
Monkeys of the Taï Forest
An African Primate Community
, pp. 257 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, K. (1995). A workshop on “polyspecific associations of rain forest primates” – an introduction to a research project in the Taï National Park. Primate Research, 11, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior, 49, 227–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. (1994). Chimpanzees-red colobus monkeys: a predator-prey system. Behavior, 47, 1135–48.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. and Boesch, H. (1989). Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78, 547–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bshary, R. (2001). Diana monkeys, Cercopithecus diana, adapt their anti-predator response behaviour to human hunting strategies. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bshary, R. and Noë, R. (1997a). Anti-predation behaviour of red colobus monkeys in the presence of chimpanzees. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 321–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bshary, R. and Noë, R. (1997b). Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1461–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspary, H. U. (1999). Utilisation de la faune sauvage en Côte-d'Ivoire et Afrique de l'Ouest – potentiels et contraintes pour la coopération au développement. Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
Caspary, H. U., Koné, I., Prouot, C. and De Pauw, M. (2001). La chasse et la filière viande de brousse dans l'espace Taï, Côte d'Ivoire. Tropenbos Côte d'Ivoire séries 2, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Chapman, C. A., Balcomb, S. R., Gillespie, T. R., Skorupa, J. P. and Struhsaker, T. T. (1999). Long term effects of logging on African primate communities: A 28-year comparison from Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinet, J., Monteny, B. and Poutaud, B. (1984). Le milieu physique. In Recherche et Aménagement en Milieu Forestier Tropical Humide, ed. Guillaumet, J., Couturier, G. and Dosso, H.. le Projet Taï de Côte d'Ivoire. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Dind, F. (1995). Etude d'une population cible de leopards (Panthera pardus) en forêt tropicale humide (Parc National de Taï, Côte d'Ivoire). Mémoire de Diplôme, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Galat-Luong, A. and Galat, G. (1982). Abondance relative et associations plurispécifiques des primates diurnes du P.N.T., Côte d'Ivoire. Rapport du centre O.R.S.T.O.M. d'Adiopodoumé, Abidjan.
Gautier-Hion, A. and Tutin, C. E. G. (1988). Simultaneous attack by adult males of a polyspecific troop of monkeys against a crowned hawk eagle. Folia Primatologica, 51, 149–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godin, J-G. J. (1990). Diet selection under the risk of predation. In Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection, ed. Hughues, R. N.. NATO ASI series 20. Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 739–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hames, R. B. (1979). A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting. Human Ecology, 7, 219–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höner, O., Leumann, L. and Noë, R. (1997). Polyspecific associations of red colobus (Colobus badius) and Diana monkey (Cercopithecus diana) groups in the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Primates, 38, 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe-Dominik, B. (1984). Etude du spectre des proies de la panthère, Panthera pardus, dans le Parc National de Taï en Côte d'Ivoire. Mammalia, 48 (4), 477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe-Dominik, B. (1995). L'état actuel des effectifs de grands mammifères dans l'ensemble du Parc National de Taï. Direction de la Protection de la Nature, Abidjan.
Hoppe-Dominik, B. (1997). Suivi et analyse des résultats du travail de la cellule suivi faune sur l'état actuel des effectifs des grands mammifères dans l'ensemble du Parc National de Taï: proposition et mise en œuvre d'un système plus efficace de surveillance. Rapport établi pour GTZ, Abidjan, San Pédro.
James, F. C. and McCulloch, C. E. (1990). Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: panacea or pandora's box. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics, 21, 129–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1997). The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klump, G. M. and Shalter, M. D. (1984). Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context; I. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals, II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals. Zeitschrift Tierpsychology, 66, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummer, H. and Noë, R. (1994). The influence of predation by chimpanzees on the behaviour and the social structure of red colobus monkeys. Project Report – CSRS, Abidjan.Google Scholar
Leroux-Scribe, C. (1989). Les statistiques. Tome 1: L'analyse des données. Paris: Série les Guides SAS, Edition Europstat.
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (1985). Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGraw, W. S. (1998). Comparative locomotion and habitat use of six monkeys in the Taï Forest, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 493–510.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGraw, W. S. and Noë, R. (1995). The Taï Forest monkey project. African Primates, 1 (1), 17–19.Google Scholar
Noë, R. and Bshary, R. (1997). The formation of red colobus-Diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Britain, 264, 253–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oates, J. F., Abedi-Lartey, M., McGraw, W. S., Struhsaker, T. T. and Whitesides, G. H. (2000). Extinction of a West African red colobus monkey. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1526–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P.A.C.P.N.T. (1997). Rapport d'évaluation des activités du PACPNT d'Octobre 96 à Juillet 97. San Pédro: PACPNT.
Phillipeau, G. (1986). Comment interpréter les résultats d'une analyse en composantes principales. Paris: SESI-ITCF.Google Scholar
Refisch, J. and Koné, I. (2001). Influence du braconnage sur les populations simiennes et effets secondaires sur la végétation: un exemple tiré d'une région forestière de régime pluvieux en Côte d'Ivoire. TÖB série F-IV/4f, Eschborn, Netherlands.
Refisch, J. and Koné, I. (2005). Impact of commercial hunting on monkey populations in the Taï region, Côte d'Ivoire. Biotropica, 37(1), 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, S. (2001). Notes on interactions between monkeys and African crowned eagles in the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Folia Primatologica, 72, 248–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdade, L. M. (1996). The influence of hunting pressure on the social behavior of vertebrates. Revista Brasileria de Biologia, 56(1), 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Wachter, B., Schabel, M. and Noë, R. (1997). Diet overlap and polyspecific associations of red colobus and Diana monkeys in the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Ethology, 103, 514–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K. (2000a). Interspecies semantic communication between two forest monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Britain, 267, 713–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K. (2000b). Causal knowledge of predators' behaviour in wild Diana monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 59, 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K., Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1999a). Conceptual semantics in a non-human primate. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K., Jenny, D. and Bshary, R. (1999b). The predator deterrence function of primate alarm calls. Ethology, 105, 477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K., Noë, R. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1997). Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators. Animal Behaviour, 53, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×