Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:11:31.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Comparative genomic hybridization

from Part 1.1 - Analytical techniques: analysis of DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Donna G. Albertson
Affiliation:
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Daniel Pinkel
Affiliation:
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Cells progress to cancer by the acquisition of genetic and epigenetic alterations that promote growth and survival. The genomic alterations range from mutations in individual nucleotides to rearrangements and changes in the copy number of chromosomal segments or whole chromosomes. The former result in point mutations that inactivate tumor suppressor genes or activate oncogenes, and the latter produce novel fusion genes and/or alter the expression of one or more genes that may individually or co-operatively modify cell behavior.

The technique of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was first introduced in 1992 as a means to assess copy number changes in genomes (1). In the original implementation of CGH, a test genomic DNA, such as DNA extracted from a tumor, and a reference DNA, typically genomic DNA from normal cells, were differentially labeled and then hybridized to normal metaphase chromosomes. The chromosomes provided a readily available physical map of the genome. For mammalian genomes it is important to suppress the hybridization of the large number of repetitive sequences. This is typically done by including an excess of unlabeled repetitive DNA (Cot-1 DNA) in the hybridization reaction. Measurement of the relative intensities of the hybridization of the test and reference genomes along the metaphase chromosomes provides a profile of the relative copy number of sequences in the test and reference genomes. Chromosome CGH provided genomic resolution on the order of 10 Mb. Starting in the late 1990s, the physical map provided by metaphase chromosomes was superseded by arrays of mapped genomic clones (2,3), cDNAs, and more recently oligonucleotides, and the technique became known as “array CGH” to distinguish it from CGH using metaphase chromosomes (Figure 3.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 21 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kallioniemi, A, Kallioniemi, OP, Sudar, D, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992;258:818–21.CrossRef
Pinkel, D, Segraves, R, Sudar, D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics 1998;20:207–11.CrossRef
Solinas-Toldo, S, Lampel, S, Stilgenbauer, S, et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 1997;20:399–407.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRef
Zhang, F, Gu, W, Hurles, ME, Lupski, JR. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2009;10:451–81.CrossRef
Edelmann, L, Hirschhorn, K. Clinical utility of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal imbalances associated with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 2009;1151:157–66.CrossRef
Pinkel, D, Albertson, DG. Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nature Genetics 2005;37 Suppl:S11–17.
Baudis, M. Genomic imbalances in 5918 malignant epithelial tumors: an explorative meta-analysis of chromosomal CGH data. BMC Cancer 2007;7:226.CrossRef
Snijders, AM, Schmidt, BL, Fridlyand, J, et al. Rare amplicons implicate frequent deregulation of cell fate specification pathways in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2005;24:4232–42.CrossRef
Kwei, KA, Kim, YH, Girard, L, et al. Genomic profiling identifies TITF1 as a lineage-specific oncogene amplified in lung cancer. Oncogene 2008;27:3635–40.CrossRef
Weir, BA, Woo, MS, Getz, G, et al. Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2007;450:893–8.CrossRef
Kendall, J, Liu, Q, Bakleh, A, et al. Oncogenic cooperation and coamplification of developmental transcription factor genes in lung cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007;104:16 663–8.
Sauter, G, Lee, J, Bartlett, JM, Slamon, DJ, Press MF. Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:1323–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijders, AM, Fridlyand, J, Mans, DA, et al. Shaping of tumor and drug-resistant genomes by instability and selection. Oncogene 2003;22:4370–9.CrossRef
Murphy, DJ, Junttila, MR, Pouyet, L, et al. Distinct thresholds govern Myc's biological output in vivo. Cancer Cell 2008;14:447–57.CrossRef
Yen, CC, Chen, YJ, Pan, CC, et al. Copy number changes of target genes in chromosome 3q25.3-qter of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: TP63 is amplified in early carcinogenesis but down-regulated as disease progressed. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2005;11:1267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heselmeyer, K, Schrock, E, du Manoir, S, et al. Gain of chromosome 3q defines the transition from severe dysplasia to invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1996;93:479–84.CrossRef
Senoo, M, Pinto, F, Crum, CP, McKeon, F. p63 is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. Cell 2007;129:523–36.CrossRef
Adorno, M, Cordenonsi, M, Montagner, M, et al. A Mutant-p53/Smad complex opposes p63 to empower TGFbeta-induced metastasis. Cell 2009;137:87–98.CrossRef
Fridlyand, J, Snijders, AM, Ylstra, B, et al. Breast tumor copy number aberration phenotypes and genomic instability. BMC Cancer 2006;6:96.CrossRef
Chin, K, DeVries, S, Fridlyand, J, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell 2006;10:529–41.CrossRef
Bastian, BC, Wesselmann, U, Pinkel, D, Leboit, PE. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Spitz nevi shows clear differences to melanoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1999;113:1065–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvell, JD, Kohler, S, Zhu, S, et al. High-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization for distinguishing paraffin-embedded Spitz nevi and melanomas. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology 2004;13:22–5.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×