Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:04:01.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The application of high-throughput analyses to cancer diagnosis and prognosis

from Part 1.2 - Analytical techniques: analysis of RNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The advent of high-throughput technologies in the 1990s generated great anticipation that patterns of gene expression or of other molecular characteristics of tissues or tumors would allow refinements in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection to revolutionize the treatment of cancer. A voluminous literature was generated. Companies were formed. New statistical methods were developed to analyze the thousands of data elements that were analyzed in scores of samples. A large number of important discoveries have come from the ability to perform wholesale analyses of gene expression, gene methylation, and DNA alterations. However, application of high-throughput technologies to clinical practice and to decision-making that affects patient care has been slow to evolve from these findings. Thus early anticipation that macromolecular profiles of cancers would replace conventional diagnostics and provide prognostic insight has largely been unfulfilled. There are some important instances where the management of some cancers has incorporated information that was originally gleaned from high-throughput analyses. This chapter will summarize different approaches to high-throughput analysis and enumerate the instances where results from these approaches have impacted patient care.

The importance of biomarkers

Cancer treatment is characterized by the application of morbid and toxic therapies to all patients with a particular stage of a cancer to benefit a subset of those patients. We have long sought to discriminate between those patients who will benefit from a therapy and those who will not. In the age of molecular oncology, clinical discriminators have been sought among biomarkers. A “biomarker” is “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a[n]…intervention” (1). For example, the serum cholesterol level is a biomarker that indicates risk for cardiac disease and indicates the use of cholesterol-lowering drug therapy. Similarly, biomarkers in cancer treatment include expression of estrogen receptor (ER) to indicate the need for hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Other examples of useful biomarkers in cancer therapy are α-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotrophin, indicators of active and recurrent germ-cell tumor. In clinical oncology there are a limited number of individual biomarkers that are useful for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 46 - 51
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2001;69:89–95.CrossRef
Slamon, DJ, deKernion, JB, Verma, IM, Cline, MJ. Expression of cellular oncogenes in human malignancies. Science 1984;224:256–62.CrossRef
Slamon, DJ, Clark, GM, Wong, SG, et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987;235:177–82.CrossRef
Colomer, R, Lupu, R, Bacus, SS, Gelmann, EP. erbB-2 antisense oligonucleotides inhibit the proliferation of breast carcinoma cells with erbB-2 oncogene amplification. British Journal of Cancer 1994;70: 819–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witters, LM, Kumar, R, Chinchilli, VM, Lipton, A. Enhanced anti-proliferative activity of the combination of tamoxifen plus HER-2-neu antibody. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1997;42:1–5.CrossRef
Macconaill, LE, Garraway, LA. Clinical implications of the cancer genome. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010;28: 5219–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, MS, Stojanov, P, Polak, P, et al. Mutational heterogencity in cancer and the search for new cancer–associated genes. Nature 2013;499:214–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlinger, M, Rowan, AJ, Horswell, S, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366:883–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, MF, Hodis, E, Heffernan, TP, et al. Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations. Nature 2010;485:502–6.CrossRef
Kloosterman, WP, Hoogstraat, M, Paling, O, et al. Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic rearrangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer. Genome Biology 2011;12:R103.
Molenaar, JJ, Koster, J, Zwijnenburg, DA, et al. Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature 2012;483: 589–93.CrossRef
Paik, S, Shak, S, Tang, G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobleigh, MA, Tabesh, B, Bitterman, P, et al. Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes. Clinical Cancer Research. 2005;11: 8623–31.CrossRef
Kim, C, Paik, S. Gene-expression-based prognostic assays for breast cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2010;7:340–7.CrossRef
Esteva, FJ, Sahin, AA, Cristofanilli, M, et al. Prognostic role of a multigene reverse transcriptase-PCR assay in patients with node-negative breast cancer not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. Clinical Cancer Research. 2005;11:3315–19.CrossRef
Van de Vijver, MJ, He, YD, van't Veer, LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2002;347:1999–2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van't Veer, LJ, Dai, H, Van de Vijver, MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002;415:530–6.CrossRef
Weigelt, B, Hu, Z, He, X, et al. Molecular portraits and 70-gene prognosis signature are preserved throughout the metastatic process of breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2005;65:9155–8.CrossRef
Glas, AM, Floore, A, Delahaye, LJ, et al. Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC. Genomics 2006;7:278.
Buyse, M, Loi, S, Van't Veer, L, et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006;98:1183–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mook, S, Schmidt, MK, Viale, G, et al. The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2009;116:295–302.CrossRef
Knauer, M, Mook, S, Rutgers, EJ, et al. The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2010;120: 655–61.CrossRef
Monzon, FA, Lyons-Weiler, M, Buturovic, LJ, et al. Multicenter validation of a 1,550-gene expression profile for identification of tumor tissue of origin. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:2503–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillai, R, Deeter, R, Rigl, CT, et al. Validation and reproducibility of a microarray-based gene expression test for tumor identification in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2011;13:48–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nature Reviews Genetics 2004;5:522–31.CrossRef
D’Andrade, PN, Fulmer-Smentek, S. Agilent microRNA microarray profiling system. Methods in Molecular Biology 2012;822:85–102.CrossRef
Liu, CG, Calin, GA, Volinia, S, Croce, CM. MicroRNA expression profiling using microarrays. Nature Protocols 2008;3:563–78.CrossRef
Zhang, L, Huang, J, Yang, N, et al. microRNAs exhibit high frequency genomic alterations in human cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2006;103:9136–41.CrossRef
Hua, Y, Duan, S, Murmann, AE, et al. miRConnect: identifying effector genes of miRNAs and miRNA families in cancer cells. PLoS One 2011;6:e26521.
le Sage, C, Agami, R. Immense promises for tiny molecules: uncovering miRNA functions. Cell Cycle 2006;5:1415–21.CrossRef
Moussay, E, Wang, K, Cho, JH, et al. MicroRNA as biomarkers and regulators in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2011;108:6573–8.CrossRef
Tan, X, Qin, W, Zhang, L, et al. A 5-microRNA signature for lung squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis and hsa-miR-31 for prognosis. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17:6802–11.CrossRef
Yu, SL, Chen, HY, Chang, GC, et al. MicroRNA signature predicts survival and relapse in lung cancer. Cancer Cell 2008;13:48–57.CrossRef
Wolf-Yadlin, A, Sevecka, M, MacBeath, G. Dissecting protein function and signaling using protein microarrays. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2009;13:398–405.CrossRef
Petricoin, EF, Ardekani, AM, Hitt, BA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 2002;359:572–7.CrossRef
Baggerly, KA, Morris, JS, Coombes, KR. Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics 2004;20:777–85.CrossRef
Moore, LE, Pfeiffer, RM, Zhang, Z, et al. Proteomic biomarkers in combination with CA 125 for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using prediagnostic serum samples from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Cancer 2012;118:91–100.CrossRef
Fung, ET. A recipe for proteomics diagnostic test development: the OVA1 test, from biomarker discovery to FDA clearance. Clinical Chemistry 2010;56:327–9.CrossRef
Zhang, Z, Chan, DW. The road from discovery to clinical diagnostics: lessons learned from the first FDA-cleared in vitro diagnostic multivariate index assay of proteomic biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2010;19:2995–9.CrossRef
Ueland, FR, Desimone, CP, Seamon, LG, et al. Effectiveness of a multivariate index assay in the preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; 117:1289–97.CrossRef
Picotti, P, Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nature Methods 2012;9: 555–66.CrossRef
Picotti, P, Rinner, O, Stallmach, R, et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nature Methods 2010;7:43–6.CrossRef
Ayoglu, B, Haggmark, A, Neiman, M, et al. Systematic antibody and antigen-based proteomic profiling with microarrays. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 2011;11:219–34.CrossRef
Fagerberg, L, Stromberg, S, El-Obeid, A, et al. Large-scale protein profiling in human cell lines using antibody-based proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research 2011;10:4066–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, L, Ayers, D, Bertino, J, et al. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS One 2010;5:e15004.
Ostroff, RM, Bigbee, WL, Franklin, W, et al. Unlocking biomarker discovery: large scale application of aptamer proteomic technology for early detection of lung cancer. PLoS One 2010;5:e15003.
Gonzalgo, ML, Liang, G, Spruck, CH, III, et al. Identification and characterization of differentially methylated regions of genomic DNA by methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed PCR. Cancer Research 1997;57:594–9.
Sharma, S, Kelly, TK, Jones, PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010;31:27–36.CrossRef
Whang, YE, Wu, X, Suzuki, H, et al. Inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN/MMAC1 in advanced human prostate cancer through loss of expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1998;95: 5246–50.CrossRef
Mulero-Navarro, S, Esteller, M. Epigenetic biomarkers for human cancer: the time is now. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2008;68:1–11.CrossRef
Richiardi, L, Fiano, V, Vizzini, L, et al. Promoter methylation in APC, RUNX3, and GSTP1 and mortality in prostate cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:3161–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, M, Tokumaru, Y, Sidransky, D, Epstein, JI. Quantitative GSTP1 methylation levels correlate with Gleason grade and tumor volume in prostate needle biopsies. Journal of Urology 2004;171:2195–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weckwerth, W. Metabolomics in systems biology. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2003;54:669–89.CrossRef
Zhang, GF, Sadhukhan, S, Tochtrop, GP, Brunengraber, H. Metabolomics, pathway regulation, and pathway discovery. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011;286:23 631–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppanen-Laakso, T, Oresic, M. How to study lipidomes. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 2009;42: 185–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sreekumar, A, Poisson, LM, Rajendiran, TM, et al. Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression. Nature 2009;457:910–14.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×