Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:05:25.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Downside and Risks of Digital Distractions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

Andrew B. Leibowitz
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Suzan Uysal
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Get access

Summary

Our workplace has changed so dramatically that a new term for this chapter was created to describe it, electronicized. This chapter will focus on the associated issues of distraction due to personal electronic devices (PEDs), electronic medical records (EMRs), EMR’s OR equivalent, anesthesia information management systems (AIMS), and alarms. The digital distraction due to the combination of these devices will be described. Specific concerns will be raised regarding PED’s ubiquity as a distinct threat to vigilance that has the potential to be significantly disruptive and potentially injurious. Alarm fatigue due to the quantity and large number of false alarms will also be reviewed in detail

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertman, S. Hyperculture: The Human Cost of Speed, Westport: Greenwood, 1998, p. 267.Google Scholar
Farooqui, IA, Pore, P, Gothankar, J. Nomophobia: an emerging issue in medical institutions? J Ment Health 2017;22:14.Google Scholar
Bragazzi, NL, Del Puente, G. A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2014;7:155–60.Google Scholar
Deb, A. Phantom vibration and phantom ringing among mobile phone users: a systematic review of literature. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2015;7(3):231–9.Google Scholar
Dossey, L. FOMO, digital dementia and our dangerous experiment. Explore 2015;10(2):6973.Google Scholar
Roberts, J, Pullig, C, Manolis, C. I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personal Individ Differ 2015;79:1319.Google Scholar
Richtel, M. As doctors use more devices, potential for distraction grows. New York Times 2011 December 15:A1,4. Available from www.NYtimes.comGoogle Scholar
Katz-Sidlow, RJ, Ludwig, A, Miller, S, Sidlow, R. Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction. J Hosp Med 2012;7(8):595–9.Google Scholar
Papadakos, PJ. Electronic etiquette: a curriculum for health professionals. In: Papadakos, PJ, Bertman, S., eds. Distracted Doctoring: Returning to Patient-Centered Care in the Digital Age. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017;219–27.Google Scholar
Wax, DB, Lin, HM, Reich, DL. Intraoperative non-record-keeping usage of anesthesia information management system workstations and associated hemodynamic variability and aberrancies. Anesthesiology 2012;117:1184–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalisch, BJ, Aebersold, M. Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36(3):126–32.Google Scholar
Broom, MA, Capek, AL, Carachi, P, Akeroyd, MA, Hildutch, G. Critical phase distractions in anesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 2011;66:175–9.Google Scholar
Attri, J, Kheptarpal, R, Chatrath, V, Kaur, J. Concerns about usage of smartphones in the operating room and critical care scenario. Saudi J Anesth 2016;10(1):8794.Google Scholar
Piscotty, R, Voepel-Lewis, T, Lee, SH, et al. To tweet or not to tweet? Nurses, social media, and patient care. Nurs Manag 2013;44(5):52–3.Google Scholar
Cohn, TA, Shappell, SA, Reeves, ST, Boquet, AJ. Distracted doctoring: the role of personal electronic devices in the operating room. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management 2018;10:1013.Google Scholar
Papadakos, PJ. Electronic distractions of the respiratory therapist and their impact on patient safety. Respir Care 2014;59(8):1306–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paine, CW, Goel, VV, Ely, E, et al. Systematic review of physiologic monitor alarm characteristics and pragmatic interventions to reduce alarm frequency. J Hosp Med 2016;11(2):136–44.Google Scholar
Winters, BD, Cvach, MM, Bonafide, CP. Technologic distractions (part 2): a summary of approaches to manage clinical alarms with intent to reduce alarm fatigue. Crit Care Med 2018;46(1):130–7.Google Scholar
The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert. Medical device alarm safety in hospitals.Google Scholar
Ruskin, KJ, Hueske-Kraus, D. Alarm fatigue: impacts on patient safety. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015;28(6):685–90.Google Scholar
Manzey, D, Gerals, N, Wiczorek, R. Decision-making and response strategies interaction with alarms: the impact of alarm reliability, availability of alarm validity information and workload. Ergonomics 2014;57(12):1833–55.Google Scholar
Bonafide, CP, Lin, R, Zander, M, et al. Association between exposure to nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms and response times in a children’s hospital. J Hosp Med 2015;10(6):981–5.Google Scholar
Bliss, JP, Dunn, MC. Behavioral implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload. Ergonomics 2002;43(9):1283–300.Google Scholar
Edworthy, J, Hellier, E. Alarms and human behavior: implications for medical alarms. Br J Anaesth 2006;97(1):1217.Google Scholar
Westbrook, JI, Coiera, E, Dundmuir, WE. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. Qual Saf Healthcare 2010;19:284–9.Google Scholar
Graham, KC, Cvach, M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiologic monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. Am J Crit Care 2010;19:2834.Google Scholar
Paine, CW, Goel, VV, Ely, E, et al. Systematic review of physiologic monitor alarm characteristics and pragmatic interventions to reduce alarm frequency. J Hosp Med 2016;11(2):136–44.Google Scholar
Lawless, ST. Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1994;22(6):981–5.Google Scholar
Rheineck-Leyssius, AT, Kalkman, CJ. Influence of pulse oximeter lower limit on the incidence of hypoxemia in the recovery room. Br J Anaesth 1997;79(4):460–4.Google Scholar
Tanaka, PP, Tanaka, M, Drover, DR. Detection of respiratory compromise by acoustic monitoring, capnography and brain function monitoring during monitored anesthesia care. J Clin Monit Comput 2014;28:561–6.Google Scholar
Albert, NM, Murry, T, Bena, JF, et al. Differences in alarm events between disposable and reusable electrocardiography lead wires. Am J Crit Care 2015;24(1):6774.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×