Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T15:01:24.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - A model biological neural network: the cephalopod vestibular system

from Part IV - Methodological issues in the use of simple feedforward networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Roddy Williamson
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Abdul Chrachri
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Colin R. Tosh
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Graeme D. Ruxton
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

19.1 Introduction

Artificial neural networks (ANNs), inspired by the processing systems present in simple nervous systems, are now widely used for the extraction of patterns or meaning from complicated or imprecise data sets (Arbib, 2003; Enquist & Ghirlanda, 2005). Although modern ANNs have progressed considerably from the early, basic feedforward models to systems of significant sophistication, some with varying levels of feedback, modulation, adaptation, learning, etc. (Minsky & Papert, 1969; Gurney, 1997; Vogels et al., 2005), they rarely contain the full processing capabilities or adaptive power of real assemblies of nerve cells. Part of the problem in modelling such capabilities is that the detailed mechanisms underlying the operation of biological neural networks are not themselves fully identified or well understood, for there is a dearth of good biological model systems that possess a wide range of processing mechanisms but whose physiological processes and cellular interconnections can be fully investigated and characterised. One of the best biological model systems available is the vertebrate visual system, but even here the full range of cellular connections and interactions have not yet been characterised and hence cannot be developed into equivalent models (van Hemmen et al., 2001; Wassle, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbib, M. A. 2003. Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Bradford Book, 2nd Edn. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, B. & Budelmann, B. U. 1986. Evidence for acetylcholine as a neurotransmitter in the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res 243, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, V. C. 1966. The fine structure of the statocysts ofOctopus vulgaris. Z Zellforsch Mikroskop Anat 70, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. C. 2001. Memory-based expectations in electrosensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brichta, A. M. & Goldberg, J. M. 2000. Responses to efferent activation and excitatory response-intensity relations of turtle posterior-crista afferents. J Neurophysiol 83, 1224–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budelmann, B. U. 1977. Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor systems in the statocysts of cephalopods. Symp Zoo Soc Lond 38, 309–324.Google Scholar
Budelmann, B. U. & Bonn, U, 1982. Histochemical evidence for catecholamines as neurotransmitters in the statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res 227, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, B. U., Sache, M. & Staudigl, M. 1987a. The angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris: morphometry, ultrastructure, and neuronal and synaptic organization. Phil Trans R Soc B 315, 305–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, B. U., Williamson, R. & Auerbach, B. 1987b. Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of octopus with special reference to its efferent innervation. In The Vestibular System: Neurophysiologic and Clinical Research (ed. Graham, M. D. & Kemmink, J. L.), pp. 165–168. Raven Press.Google Scholar
Chanson, M., Mollard, P., Meda, P., Suter, S. & Jongsma, H. J. 1999. Modulation of pancreatic acinar cell to cell coupling during ACh-evoked changes in cytosolic Ca2+. J Biol Chem 274, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1993. Electrical coupling between primary hair cells in the statocyst of the squid, Alloteuthis subulata. Neurosci Lett 161, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1998. Synaptic interactions between crista hair cells in the statocyst of the squidAlloteuthis subulata. J Neurophysiol 80, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2001. cAMP modulates electrical coupling between sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst. J Physiol Lond 536S, 133–134.Google Scholar
Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2004. Cholinergic modulation of L-type calcium current in isolated sensory hair cells of the statocyst of octopus, Eledone cirrhosa. Neurosci Lett 360, 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colmers, W. F. 1982. The central afferent and efferent organization of the gravity receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Neuroscience 7, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demb, J. B., Sterling, P. & Freed, M. A. 2004. How retinal ganglion cells prevent synaptic noise from reaching the spike output. J Neurophysiol 92, 2510–2519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eatock, R. A., Fay, R. & Popper, A. (Ed.) 2005. Vertebrate Hair Cells. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 27. Springer.
Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. 2005. Neural Networks and Animal Behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fettiplace, R. 1999. Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Ann Rev Physiol 61, 809–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, J. M. & Fernandez, C. 1980. Efferent vestibular system in the squirrel monkey: anatomical location and influence on afferent activity. J Neurophysiol 43, 986–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurney, K. 1997. An Introduction to Neural Networks. UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, R. T. & Messenger, J. B. (Ed.) 1996. Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Häusser, M., Spruston, N. & Stuart, G. J. 2000. Diversity and dynamics of dendritic signaling. Science 290, 739–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Highstein, S. M., Fay, R. & Popper, A. N. (Ed.) 2004. The Vestibular System. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 19. Springer.
Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol Lond 117, 500–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, E. H. & Bloomfield, S. A. 2003. Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci 23, 6768–6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llinas, R. R.The Squid Giant Synapse: A Model for Chemical Transmission. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
McMahon, D. G. & Mattson, M. P. 1996. Horizontal cell electrical coupling in the giant danio: synaptic modulation by dopamine and synaptic maintenance by calcium. Brain Res 718, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddock, L & Young, J. Z. 1984. Some dimensions of the angular-acceleration receptor systems of cephalopods. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. & Papert, S. 1969. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, R. C. & Busby, R. S. 2001. Generalizable relational binding from coarse-coded distributed representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (ed. S. Becker), pp. 75–82 MIT Press.Google Scholar
Packard, A. 1972. Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 46, 241–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plän, T. 1987. Functional Neuroanatomy of Sensory-motor Lobes of the Brain of Octopus Vulgaris. PhD Thesis, University of Regensburg.Google Scholar
Rorig, B. & Sutor, B. 1996. Regulation of gap junction coupling in the developing neocortex. Mol Neurobiol 12, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. E. & Cullen, K. E. 2004. Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei. J Neurosci 24, 2102–2111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. G. 2002. Retina. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (ed. Arbib, M. A.). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1994. The effect of L-glutamate on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 642, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1999. Effects of L-arginine on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 845, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000a. Inhibitory effect of cyclic guanosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate (cGMP) on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 880, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000b. Effects of nitric oxide donors on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res 865, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usrey, W. M. & Reid, R. C. 1999. Synchronous activity in the visual system. Ann Rev Physiol 61, 435–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmen, L. J., Cowan, J. D. & Domany, E. (ed.) 2001. Models of Neural Networks, Vol. IV. Early Vision and Attention. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Velte, T. J. & Masland, R. H. 1999. Action potentials in the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 81, 1412–1417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogels, T. P, Rajan, K. & Abbott, L. F. 2005. Neural network dynamics. Ann Rev Neurosci 28, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassle, H. 2004. Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Nature Rev Neurosci 5, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, R. 1985. Efferent influences on the afferent activity from the octopus angular acceleration receptor system. J Exp Biol 119, 251–264.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. 1986. Efferent activity in the octopus statocyst nerves. J Comp Physiol A 158, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R. 1989a. Electrical coupling between secondary hair cells in the statocyst of the squidAlloteuthis subulata. Brain Res 486, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, R. 1989b. Secondary hair cells and afferent neurones in the squid statocyst receive both inhibitory and excitatory efferent inputs. J Comp Physiol A 165, 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R. 1989c. Electrophysiological evidence for cholinergic and catecholaminergic efferent transmitters in the statocyst of octopus. Comp Biochem Physiol 93C, 23–27.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. 1991. The responses of primary and secondary sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst to mechanical stimulation. J Comp Physiol A 167, 655–664.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. 1995. Ionic currents in secondary sensory hair cells isolated from the statocysts of squid and cuttlefish. J Comp Physiol A 177, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R. & Budelmann, B. U. 1985. The responses of the octopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation. J Comp Physiol A 156, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R, & Chrachri, A. 1994. The efferent system in cephalopod statocysts. Biomed Res 15, 51–56.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. & Chrachri, A. 2004. Cephalopod neural networks. Neurosignals 13, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. Z. 1960. The statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Proc R Soc B 152, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z. 1989. The angular-acceleration receptor system of diverse cephalopods. Phil Trans RSoc Lond 325B, 189–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×