Agent-based models as scientific methodology: a case study analysing the DomWorld theory of primate social structure and female dominance

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511731525.024

19 - Agent-based models as scientific methodology: a case study analysing the DomWorld theory of primate social structure and female dominance

from Part III - Action selection in social contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011

Yasushi Ando and

Edited by

Tony J. Prescott and

Anil K. Seth: Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Tony J. Prescott: Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Joanna J. Bryson: Affiliation:
University of Bath

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A scientific methodology must provide two things: first a means of explanation, and second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. It is also advantageous if a methodology facilitates communication between scientists. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method for exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the model is the extent to which an observed meta-level phenomena can be accounted for by the behaviour of its micro-level actors. But to demonstrate ABM is truly a scientific method, we must demonstrate that the theory it embodies can be verified, falsified, extended, and corrected. This chapter contains a case study demonstrating ABM as biological science. We show that agent-based models like any scientific hypotheses can be tested, critiqued, generalised, or specified. After first reviewing the state of the art for ABM as a methodology, we present our case: an analysis of Hemelrijk's DomWorld, a widely published model of primate social behaviour. Our analysis shows some significant discrepancies between the model and the behaviour of the genus we compare it to, the macaques. We then demonstrate that the explanation embodied in the DomWorld model is not fragile: its other results are still valid and can be extended to compensate for the problems identified. This robustness is a significant advantage of experiment-based artificial intelligence modelling techniques over purely analytic modelling.

Introduction

Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method for testing the collective effects of individual action selection. More generally, ABM allows the examination of macro-level effects from micro-level behaviour. Science requires understanding how an observed characteristic of a system (e.g., a solid) can be accounted for by its components (e.g., molecules). In ABM we build models of both the components and the environment in which they exist, and then observe whether the overall system-level behaviour of the model matches that of the target (or subject) system.

Type: Chapter
Information: Modelling Natural Action Selection , pp. 427 - 453

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511731525.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ando, YLehmann, HBryson, J. J 2007 The effects of centrality on the distribution of dominant animals in DomWorldPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci 362 1685http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2061Google Scholar

Aujard, FHeistermann, MThierry, BHodges, J. K 1998 Functional significance of behavioral, morphological, and endocrine correlates across the ovarian cycle in semifree ranging female Tonkean macaquesAmer. J. Primatol 46 2853.0.CO;2-8>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Axelrod, R 1985 The Evolution of CooperationNew YorkBasic BooksGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R 1997 The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and ColloborationPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, RHamilton, W. D 1981 The evolution of cooperationScience 211 1390CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Axelrod, RTesfatsion, L 2006 A guide for newcomers to agent-based modeling in the social sciencesHandbook of Computational EconomicsTesfatsion, LJudd, K. LAmsterdamElsevierGoogle Scholar

Axtell, R 2000

Axtell, RAxelrod, REpstein, J. MCohen, M. D 1996 Aligning simulation models: a case study and resultsComput. Math. Org. Theor 1 123CrossRef Google Scholar

Balci, O 1998 Verification, validation and testingThe Handbook of SimulationBanks, JNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons335CrossRef Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P 1979 Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. InRobustness in StatisticsLauner, R. LWilkinson, G. NNew YorkAcademic Press201CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryson, J. JAndo, YLehmann, H 2007 Agent-based models as scientific methodology: a case study analysing primate social behaviourPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci 362 1685CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bundy, AJamnik, MFugard, A 2005 What is a proof?Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 363 2377CrossRef Google Scholar

Christman, M. CLewis, D 2005 Spatial distribution of dominant animals within a group: comparison of four statistical tests of locationAnim. Behav 70 73CrossRef Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M 2000 Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeysAnim. Behav 60 253CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

de Waal, F. B. MJohanowicz, D. L 1993 Modification of reconciliation behavior through social experience: an experiment with two macaque speciesChild Dev 64 897CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

de Waal, F. B. MLuttrell, L 1989 Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus : different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptailed macaquesAmer. J. Primatol 19 83CrossRef Google Scholar

Delius, J. DSiemann, M 1998 Transitive responding in animals and humans: exaptation rather than adaptation?Behav. Proc 42 107CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eaton, G. GModahl, K. BJohnson, D. F 1980 Aggressive behavior in a confined troop of Japanese macaques: effects of density, season and genderAggressive Behav 7 1453.0.CO;2-M>CrossRef Google Scholar

Galef, B. G. J 1988 Imitation in animals: history, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratorySocial Learning: Psychological and Biological PerspectivesZentall, TGalef, B. G. JHillsdale, NYErlbaum3Google Scholar

Gleditsch, N. PMetelits, C 2003 The replication debateInt. Stud. Perspec 4 72Google Scholar

Gleditsch, N. PMetelits, CStrand, H 2003 Posting your data: will you be scooped or famousInt. Stud. Perspec 4 89Google Scholar

Goodall, J 1986 The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of BehaviorCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Hall, C. LFedigan, L. M 1997 Spatial benefits afforded by high rank in white-faced capuchinsAnim. Behav 53 1069CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D 1971 Geometry for the selfish herdJ. Theor. Biol 31 295CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hemelrijk, C. K 1999 An individual-oriented model on the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societiesProc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci 266 361CrossRef Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. K 2000 Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structureAnim. Behav 59 1035CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hemelrijk, C. K 2002 Despotic societies, sexual attraction and the emergence of male ‘tolerance’: an agent based modelBehav 139 729CrossRef Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. K 2004 The use of artificial-life models for the study of social organizationMacaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social OrganizationThierry, BSingh, MKaumanns, WCambridgeCambridge University Press,157Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. Kvan Laere, G. Jvan Hooff, J. A. R. A. M 1992 Sexual exchange relationships in captive chimpanzeesBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 30 269CrossRef Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. KWantia, JDätwyler, M 2003 Female co-dominance in a virtual world: ecological, cognitive, social and sexual causesBehav 140 1247CrossRef Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. KWantia, JGygax, L 2005 The construction of dominance order: comparing performance of five methods using an individual-based modelBehav 142 1037CrossRef Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, C. KWantia, JIsler, K 2008 Female dominance over males in primates: self-organisation and sexual dimorphismPLoS One 3CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hogeweg, P 1988 MIRROR beyond MIRROR: Puddles of LIFEArtificial Life: Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of ComplexityLangton, CReading, MAAddison-Wesley297Google Scholar

Hogeweg, PHesper, B 1979 Heterarchical selfstructuring simulation systems: concepts and applications in biologyMethodologies in Systems Modelling and SimulationZeigler, B. PEzas, M. SKlir, G. JÖren, T. IAmsterdamNorth-Holland221Google Scholar

Hogeweg, PHesper, B 1983 The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: a MIRROR modelBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol 12CrossRef Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. CXiang, XMadey, G. RCosimano, T. F 2006 Verification and validation of scientific and economic modelsProceedings of Agent 2005: Generative Social Processes, Models, and MechanismsNorth, MSallach, D. LMacal, CChicago, ILArgonne National Laboratory177Google Scholar

King, G 1995 Replication, replicationPS: Political Science and Politics XXVIII 443Google Scholar

King, G 2003 The future of replicationInt. Stud. Perspec 4 100Google Scholar

Kitchen, D. MCheney, D. LSeyfarth, R. M 2005 Male chacma baboons () discriminate loud call contests between rivals of different relative ranksAnim. Cogn 8 1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kokko, H 2007 Modelling for Field Biologists and Other Interesting PeopleCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S 1970 The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Kummer, HAnzenberger, GHemelrijk, C. K 1996 Hiding and perspective taking in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis)J. Comp. Psychol. 110 97CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann, HWang, JBryson, J. J 2005 Tolerance and sexual attraction in despotic societies: a replication and analysis of Hemelrijk (2002)Modelling Natural Action Selecton: Proceedings of an International WorkshopBryson, J. JPrescott, T. JSeth, A. KEdinburghThe Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB)135Google Scholar

Preuschoft, Svan Schaik, C. P 2000 Dominance and communication: conflict management in various social settingsNatural Conflict ResolutionAureli, Fde Waal, F. B. MBerkeley, CAUniversity ofCalifornia Press77Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. W 1987 Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral modelComp. Graph 21 25CrossRef Google Scholar

Rowell, T. E 1966 Hierarchy in the organization of a captive baboon groupAnim. Behav 14 430CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Samuels, ASilk, J. BAltmann, J 1987 Continuity and change in dominance relations among female baboonsAnim. Behav 35 785CrossRef Google Scholar

Stanford, C. B 1996 The hunting ecology of wild chimpanzees: implications for the evolutionary ecology of Pliocene hominidsAmer. Anthropol 98 96CrossRef Google Scholar

te Boekhorst, I. J. AHogeweg, P 1994 Self-structuring in artificial ‘chimps’ offers new hypotheses for male grouping in chimpanzeesBehaviour 130 229CrossRef Google Scholar

Thierry, B 1985 Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaqueMacaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggressive Behav 11 223Google Scholar PubMed

Thierry, B 2006 The macaques: a double-layered social organisationPrimates in PerspectiveOxfordOxford University Press224Google Scholar

Thierry, BSingh, MKaumanns, W 2004 Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Society OrganizationCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

van Schaik, C. P 1989 The ecology of social relationships amongst female primatesComparative Sociecology of Mammals and ManStanden, VFoley, ROxfordBlackwell Scientific195Google Scholar

Wang, J. J 2003

Wilensky, U 2005 NetLogo ver. 2.1Evanston, ILUSAGoogle Scholar

Wynne, C. D. L 1998 A minimal model of transitive inferenceModels of ActionMahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates269Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M 1940 Social behavior of chimpanzees: dominance between mates in relation to sexual statusJ. Comp. Psychol 30 147CrossRef Google Scholar