Book contents
- Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry
- Reviews
- Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Symbols
- 1 The Concept of Model
- 2 Atmospheric Structure and Dynamics
- 3 Chemical Processes in the Atmosphere
- 4 Model Equations and Numerical Approaches
- 5 Formulations of Radiative, Chemical, and Aerosol Rates
- 6 Numerical Methods for Chemical Systems
- 7 Numerical Methods for Advection
- 8 Parameterization of Subgrid-Scale Processes
- 9 Surface Fluxes
- 10 Atmospheric Observations and Model Evaluation
- 11 Inverse Modeling for Atmospheric Chemistry
- Book part
- Further Reading
- Index
- References
11 - Inverse Modeling for Atmospheric Chemistry
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2017
Book contents
- Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry
- Reviews
- Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Symbols
- 1 The Concept of Model
- 2 Atmospheric Structure and Dynamics
- 3 Chemical Processes in the Atmosphere
- 4 Model Equations and Numerical Approaches
- 5 Formulations of Radiative, Chemical, and Aerosol Rates
- 6 Numerical Methods for Chemical Systems
- 7 Numerical Methods for Advection
- 8 Parameterization of Subgrid-Scale Processes
- 9 Surface Fluxes
- 10 Atmospheric Observations and Model Evaluation
- 11 Inverse Modeling for Atmospheric Chemistry
- Book part
- Further Reading
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry , pp. 487 - 537Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bousserez, N., Henze, D. K., Perkins, K. W., et al. (2015) Improved analysis-error covariance matrix for high-dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model, QJRMS, doi: 10.1002/qj.2495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeter, M. N., Emmons, L. K., Francis, G. L., et al. (2003) Operational carbon monoxide retrieval algorithm and selected results for the MOPITT instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4399.Google Scholar
Errera, Q. and Ménard, R. (2012) Technical note: Spectral representation of spatial correlations in variational assimilation with grid point models and application to the Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical Observations (BASCOE), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10015–10031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errera, Q., Daerden, F., Chabrillat, S., et al. (2008) 4D-Var assimilation of MIPAS chemical observations: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide analyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6169–6187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Jones, D., et al. (2004) Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., and Seinfeld, J. H. (2007) Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2413–2433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, D. J., Crawford, J., Kleb, M., et al. (2003) The Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) aircraft mission: Design, execution, and first results, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 9000.Google Scholar
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L., et al. (2015) Sensitivity of population smoke exposure to fire locations in Equatorial Asia, Atmos. Environ., 102, 11–17.Google Scholar
Kopacz, M., Jacob, D. J., Henze, D., et al. (2009) Comparison of adjoint and analytical Bayesian inversion methods for constraining Asian sources of carbon monoxide using satellite (MOPITT) measurements of CO columns, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04305.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M., Michalak, A. M., and Levi, P. J. (2014) Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: An example for trace gas emissions, Geosci. Mod. Dev., 7, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, C. D., and Connor, B. J. (2003) Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4116.Google Scholar
Turner, A. J. and Jacob, D. J. (2015) Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7039–7048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wecht, K. J., Jacob, D. J., Frankenberg, C., et al. (2014) Mapping of North America methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7741–7756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., et al. (2010) Intercomparison methods for satellite measurements of atmospheric composition: Application to tropospheric ozone from TES and OMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4725–4739.Google Scholar
Zoogman, P. W., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., et al. (2014) Monitoring high-ozone events in the US Intermountain West using TEMPO geostationary satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6261–6271.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by