Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter one Punishing, more or less
- Chapter two Re-Evaluating the Justifications for Aggravation and Mitigation at Sentencing
- Chapter three The Search for Principles of Mitigation
- Chapter Four Personal Mitigation and Assumptions about Offending and Desistance
- Chapter Five Intoxication as a sentencing factor
- Chapter Six Beyond the Partial Excuse
- Chapter Seven Equality before the law
- Chapter Eight Personal mitigation
- Chapter Nine Exploring Public Attitudes to Sentencing Factors in England and Wales
- Chapter Ten The Pernicious Impact of Perceived Public Opinion on Sentencing
- Chapter Eleven Addressing Problematic Sentencing Factors in the Development of Guidelines
- Chapter Twelve Proof of Aggravating and Mitigating Facts at Sentencing
- Chapter Thirteen Mitigation in Federal Sentencing in the United States
- Chapter Fourteen The discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors
- Index
- References
Chapter Eleven - Addressing Problematic Sentencing Factors in the Development of Guidelines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter one Punishing, more or less
- Chapter two Re-Evaluating the Justifications for Aggravation and Mitigation at Sentencing
- Chapter three The Search for Principles of Mitigation
- Chapter Four Personal Mitigation and Assumptions about Offending and Desistance
- Chapter Five Intoxication as a sentencing factor
- Chapter Six Beyond the Partial Excuse
- Chapter Seven Equality before the law
- Chapter Eight Personal mitigation
- Chapter Nine Exploring Public Attitudes to Sentencing Factors in England and Wales
- Chapter Ten The Pernicious Impact of Perceived Public Opinion on Sentencing
- Chapter Eleven Addressing Problematic Sentencing Factors in the Development of Guidelines
- Chapter Twelve Proof of Aggravating and Mitigating Facts at Sentencing
- Chapter Thirteen Mitigation in Federal Sentencing in the United States
- Chapter Fourteen The discretionary effect of mitigating and aggravating factors
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores the more practical challenges confronting sentencing guidelines authorities. Drawing on the recent experience creating sentencing guidelines in New Zealand, this chapter addresses the benefits of providing guidance to sentencers with respect to mitigation and aggravation. Particular emphasis is placed on factors which are problematic in some respect.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
In this essay we discuss the approach taken in New Zealand to developing guidance on aggravating and mitigating factors. After summarizing recent developments in this country, including the creation of a Sentencing Council, we outline the traditional approach taken to aggravation and mitigation in New Zealand before going on to discuss the ways in which the guidelines addressed some of the problems with this traditional approach and the difficulties faced in doing so.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing , pp. 208 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
- 20
- Cited by