Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:37:39.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

12 - Why do religious cultures evolve slowly? The cultural evolution of cooperative calling and the historical study of religions

from III - Altruism, morality, and cooperation

István Czachesz
Affiliation:
University of Heidelberg, Germany
Risto Uro
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Summary

Collective representations are the result of an immense cooperation, which stretches out not only into space but into time as well; to make them, a multitude of minds have associated, united and combined their ideas and sentiments: for them, long generations have accumulated their experience and their knowledge. A special intellectual activity is therefore concentrated in them, which is infinitely richer and complexer than that of the individual.

(Émile Durkheim, Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, [1912] 1965: 29)

The languages and folkways of ancient peoples hold little relevance for us, except in one respect: the religions of the ancient world remain our religions. Though religions change, core features of the scriptures and rituals of the world's most popular religious traditions appear to have been conserved with remarkably high fidelity. We explain slow religious change from how religion facilitates cooperation at large social scales. At the end, we clarify how historians of religion, in collaboration with psychologists and computational biologists, might test and improve explanations such as ours.

COOPERATION AND RELIGION

An evolutionary problem of cooperation

Why do humans cooperate? That evolutionary scholars should find this question interesting might perplex some religious studies scholars. The benefits of cooperation are familiar. Yet, as Thomas Hobbes observed, these benefits are fragile, and cooperative exchange requires mechanisms for social order. Hobbes imagines life “in a state of nature” lacking such ordering mechanisms as “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes 1651: pt 1, ch. 13).

Type
Chapter
Information
Mind, Morality and Magic
Cognitive Science Approaches in Biblical Studies
, pp. 197 - 211
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×