Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Refugees: a world made of fragments
- 2 The middle ground
- 3 The fur trade
- 4 The alliance
- 5 Republicans and rebels
- 6 The clash of empires
- 7 Pontiac and the restoration of the middle ground
- 8 The British alliance
- 9 The contest of villagers
- 10 Confederacies
- 11 The politics of benevolence
- Epilogue: Assimilation and otherness
- Index
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Refugees: a world made of fragments
- 2 The middle ground
- 3 The fur trade
- 4 The alliance
- 5 Republicans and rebels
- 6 The clash of empires
- 7 Pontiac and the restoration of the middle ground
- 8 The British alliance
- 9 The contest of villagers
- 10 Confederacies
- 11 The politics of benevolence
- Epilogue: Assimilation and otherness
- Index
Summary
Stories of cultural contact and change have been structured by a pervasive dichotomy: absorption by the other or resistance to the other. A fear of lost identity, a Puritan taboo on mixing beliefs and bodies, hangs over the process. Yet what if identity is conceived not as [a] boundary to be maintained but as a nexus of relations and transactions actively engaging a subject? The story or stories of interaction must then be more complex, less linear and teleological.
James Clifford, The Predicament of CultureThe history of Indian-white relations has not usually produced complex stories. Indians are the rock, European peoples are the sea, and history seems a constant storm. There have been but two outcomes: The sea wears down and dissolves the rock; or the sea erodes the rock but cannot finally absorb its battered remnant, which endures. The first outcome produces stories of conquest and assimilation; the second produces stories of cultural persistence. The tellers of such stories do not lie. Some Indian groups did disappear; others did persist. But the tellers of such stories miss a larger process and a larger truth. The meeting of sea and continent, like the meeting of whites and Indians, creates as well as destroys. Contact was not a battle of primal forces in which only one could survive. Something new could appear.
As many scholars have noted, American myth, in a sense, retained the wider possibilities that historians have denied American history. Myths have depicted contact as a process of creation and invention.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Middle GroundIndians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815, pp. ix - xviPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1991
- 1
- Cited by