Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T17:03:53.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Current Limitations and Future Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jean-Loup Baer
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Since 2003, the peak frequency at which single processors and chip multiprocessors have operated has remained largely unchanged. One basic reason is that power dissipation effects have limited frequency increases. In addition, difficulties in extracting more parallelism at the instruction level, design complexity, and the effects of wire lengths have resulted in a performance plateau for single processors. We elaborate on some of these issues in this chapter.

While improvements in clock frequency and in ILP exploitation have been stalled, Moore's law is still valid, and the amount of logic that can be laid out on a chip is still increasing. Adding more cache memory to a single processor to fill all the on-chip real estate has reached a point of diminishing return, performancewise. Multithreaded processors, which mitigate the effects of the memory wall, and multiprocessors on a chip (CMP, also called multicores) are the current approach to attaining more performance. A question that is of primary importance to computer architects and to computer users in general is the structure of future CMPs, as mentioned in the previous chapter.

In a conservative evolutionary fashion, future CMPs might look like those we have presented in Chapter 8, with naturally a slightly larger number of cores. Questions of whether there should be many simple cores vs. fewer high-performance ones, and of whether the cores should be homogeneous or not, have already been touched upon previously. Although speed is still the primary metric, other aspects such as reliability and security have gained importance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Microprocessor Architecture
From Simple Pipelines to Chip Multiprocessors
, pp. 335 - 350
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albonesi, D., Balasubramonian, R., Dropsho, S., Dwarkadas, S., Friedman, E., Huang, M., Kursun, V., Magklis, G., Scott, M., Semeraro, G., Bose, P., Buyuktosunoglu, A., Cook, P., and Schuster, S., “Dynamic Tuning Processor Resources with Adaptive Processing,” IEEE Computer, 36, 12, Dec. 2003, 49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramonian, R., Albonesi, D., Buyuktosunoglu, A., and Dwarkadas, S., “Memory Hierarchy Reconfiguration for Energy and Performance in General-purpose Processor Architectures,” Proc. 33rd Int. Symp. on Microarchitecture, 2000, 245–257Google Scholar
Brooks, D. and Martonosi, M., “Dynamic Thermal Management in High-Performance Microprocessors,” Proc.7th Int. Symp. on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2001, 171–182Google Scholar
Folegnani, D. and Gonzales, A., “Energy-effective Issue Logic,” Proc. 28th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2001, 230–239Google Scholar
Gunther, S., Beans, F., Carmean, D., and Hall, J., “Managing the Impact of Increasing Power Consumption,” Intel Tech. Journal, 5, 1, Feb. 2001, 1–9Google Scholar
Grunwald, D., Levis, P., Farkas, K., Morrey, C., and Neufeld, M., “Policies for Dynamic Clock Scheduling,” Proc. 4th USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2000, 73–86Google Scholar
Gochman, S., Ronen, R., Anati, I., Berkovits, A., Kurts, T., Naveh, A., Saeed, A., Sperber, Z., and Valentine, R., “The Intel Pentium M Processor: Microarchitecture and Performance,” Intel Tech. Journal, 7, 2, May 2003, 21–36Google Scholar
Hrishikesh, M., Jouppi, N., Farkas, K., Burger, D., Keckler, S., and Shivakumar, P., “The Optimal Logic Depth per Pipeline Stage is 6 to 8 FO4 Inverter Delays,” Proc. 29th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2002, 14–24Google Scholar
Ho, R., Mai, K., and Horowitz, M., “The Future of Wires,” Proc. of the IEEE, 89, 4, Apr. 2001, 490–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harstein, A. and Puzak, T., “The Optimum Pipeline Depth for a Microprocessor,” Proc. 29th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2002, 7–13Google Scholar
Kim, N., Flautner, K., Blaauw, D., and Mudge, T., “Drowsy Instruction Caches – Leakage Power Reduction Using Dynamic Voltage Scaling and Cache Sub-bank Prediction,” Proc. 29th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2002, 219–230Google Scholar
Kaxiras, S., Hu, Z., and Martonosi, M., “Cache Decay: Exploiting Generational Behavior to Reduce Cache Leakage Power,” Proc. 28th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2001, 240–251Google Scholar
Naveh, A., Rotem, E., Mendelson, A., Gochman, S., Chabuskwar, R., Krishnan, K., and Kumar, A., “Power and Thermal Management in the Intel Core Dual Processor,” Intel Tech. Journal, 10, 2, May 2006, 109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponomarev, D., Kucuk, G., and Ghose, K., “Reducing Power Requirements of Instruction Scheduling through Dynamic Allocation of Multiple Datapath Resources,” Proc. 34th Int. Symp. on Microarchitecture, 2001, 90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skadron, K., Stan, M., Huang, W., Velusamy, S., Sankararayanan, K., and Tarjan, D., “Temperature-Aware Microarchitecture,” Proc. 30th Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, 2003, 2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatachalam, V. and Franz, M., “Power Reduction Techniques for Microprocessor Systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, 37, 3, Sep. 2005, 195–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, M., Welch, B., Demers, A., and Shenker, S., “Scheduling for Reduced CPU Energy,” Proc. 1st USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 1994, 13–23Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×