Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489709.001

Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Nira Granott and

Jim Parziale

Edited by

Nira Granott and

Jim Parziale

Show author details

Nira Granott: Affiliation:
School of Human Development, University of Texas at Dallas
Jim Parziale: Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts at Boston
Nira Granott: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Dallas
Jim Parziale: Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This book presents a new, process-oriented view of development and learning focusing on microdevelopment. Microdevelopment is the process of change in abilities, knowledge, and understanding during short time spans. The defining attributes of microdevelopment are embedded in its name. “Micro-” pertains to short time scales, periods ranging from months to just a few minutes. “Development” indicates the evolving nature of the process, the real-time (on-line) evolution of skills and abilities of development and learning. Studies of cognitive, motor, and emotional microdevelopment commonly focus on processes in which lower-level abilities are reorganized into higher-level ones (Werner, 1957). In this way abilities are examined as they are constructed and before they become automatic reactions (Vygotsky, 1978; Werner, 1957). The microdevelopmental perspective allows researchers to follow the evolution and modification of the functional models that people use (Inhelder et al., 1980). When observing microdevelopment, researchers examine processes within specific task contexts, while people solve problems, perform assignments, or make discoveries. They analyze the process of change, identify its attributes and patterns, and look for the processes that underlie quantitative and qualitative change (Miller & Coyle, 1999; Siegler, 1996). Researchers focus, then, on the “how” of development and learning, on giving explanations, which is the ultimate goal of science (Flavell, 1984).

State-oriented vs. process-oriented approaches

Although development and learning are evolving processes, their understanding has been based on comparing knowledge and abilities at different ages. In pre- and posttests or cross-sectional designs, researchers compare abilities at different time points.

Type: Chapter
Information: Microdevelopment
Transition Processes in Development and Learning
, pp. 1 - 28

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489709.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, E. L., O'Neil, H. F., & Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist, 48(12), 1210–1218CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. (1982). Learning and development: The problem of compatibility, access, and induction. Human Development, 25, 89–115CrossRef Google Scholar

Coyle, T. R., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1997). Age differences in, and consequences of, multiple- and variable-strategy use on a multitrial sort-recall task. Developmental Psychology, 33, 372–380CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, K. W., & Yan, Z. (this volume). Darwin's construction of the theory of evolution: Microdevelopment of explanations of variation and change in species

Flavell, J. H. (1984). Discussion. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 187–209). New York: Freeman

Flavell, J. H., & Draguns, J. (1957). A microgenetic approach to perception and thought. Psychological Bulletin, 54(3), 197–217CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gelman, R., Romo, L., & Francis, W. S. (this volume). Notebooks as windows on learning: The case of a science-into-ESL program

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (this volume). Looking at the hands through time: A microgenetic perspective on learning and instruction

Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. In R. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Granott, N. (1998a). A paradigm shift in the study of development. Human Development, 41(5–6), 360–365CrossRef Google Scholar

Granott, N. (1998b). We learn, therefore we develop: Learning versus development – or developing learning? In C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 15–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Granott, N. (1998c). Unit of analysis in transit: From the individual's knowledge to the ensemble process. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 5(1), 42–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Granott, N. (this volume). How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences, backward transitions, and the Zone of Current Development

Granott, N., Fischer, K. W., & Parziale, J. (this volume). Bridging to the unknown: A transition mechanism in learning and development

Halford, G. S. (1995). Learning processes in cognitive development: A reassessment with some unexpected implications. Human Development, 38, 295–301CrossRef Google Scholar

Inhelder, B., Blanchet, A., Boder, A., Caprona, D., Saada-Robert, M., & Ackermann-Valladao, E. (1980). Procédures et significations dans la résolution d’un problème concret. Bulletin de Psychologie, 33(345), 645–648Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91–118CrossRef Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). Getting developmental differences or studying child development?Cognition, 10, 151–158CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuhn, D. (Ed.). (1995a). Development and learning: Reconceptualizing the intersection [Special issue]. Human Development, 38(2).

Kuhn, D. (1995b). Introduction. Human Development, 38, 293–294CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1995c). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us?Psychological Science 6(3), 133–139CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (this volume). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study

Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (this volume). Macro- and microdevelopmental research: Assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities

Lewis, M. D. (this volume). Interacting time scales in personality (and cognitive) development: Intentions, emotions, and emergent forms

Liben, L. S. (Ed.). (1987). Development and learning: Conflict or congruence? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Metz, K. E. (1993). Preschoolers’ developing knowledge of the pan balance: From new representation to transformed problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 11(1), 31–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, P. H., & Coyle, T. R. (1999). Developmental change: Lessons from microgenesis. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 209–239). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum

Parziale, J. (this volume). Observing the dynamics of construction: Children building bridges and new ideas

Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. Ripple & V. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7–19). Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Musssen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 103–128). New York: Wiley

Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press

Siegler, R. S. (this volume). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation

Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Strauss, S. (1993). Theories of learning and development for academics and educators [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 191–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Thelen, E., & Corbetta, D. (this volume). Microdevelopment and dynamic systems: Applications to infant motor development

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

van Geert, P. (this volume). Developmental dynamics, intentional action, and fuzzy sets

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press

Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 347–353CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Attaining reciprocality between learning and development through self-regulation. Human Development, 38, 367–372CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive