Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T16:10:50.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Source and Redaction Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Suzanne Boorer
Edited by
Thomas B. Dozeman
Suzanne Boorer
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Old Testament Theology, Murdoch University
Thomas B. Dozeman
Affiliation:
United Theological Seminary, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Source and redaction criticism are two related methodologies that come under the broader umbrella of the historical critical approach, which seeks to interpret texts within their original historical contexts. The aim of source and redaction criticism is to discern the history of the literary composition of the text. They seek to explore the diachronic dimensions of the text by identifying the literary sources or layers of which the text is composed, their relative chronology, and how they have been brought together and edited over time to eventually form the text as we now have it. Source criticism as such focuses on identifying the earlier written sources of which the present text is comprised, and, if possible, discerning the date and original historical context of each, and to interpret them in relation to these. Redaction criticism focuses on the stages and processes, and something of the intent, whereby these written sources were combined with each other and/or redacted (or edited) to give the final form of the text. As such these methods are interrelated: source criticism takes the text apart into its earlier written components; redaction criticism puts the text back together again and shows the rationale behind each of the stages identified.

THE METHODOLOGY OF SOURCE CRITICISM

Source criticism grew out of the study of Pentateuch, which, especially from the nineteenth century onward, was recognized not as the work of one author but as a composite text, made up of several written sources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Methods for Exodus , pp. 95 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, John. “Source Criticism.” Pages 162–65 in vol. 6 of Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by Freedman, D. N.. 6 vols. New York: Doubleday, 1992.Google Scholar
Barton, John. “Redaction Criticism.” Pages 644–47 in vol. 5 of Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by Freedman, D. N.. 6 vols. New York: Doubleday, 1992.Google Scholar
Boorer, Suzanne. The Promise of the Land as Oath: A Key to the Formation of the Pentateuch. Pages 5–33. BZAW 205; Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Brevard S.Exodus: A Commentary. London: SCM, 1974.Google Scholar
Clements, Ronald E.One Hundred Years of Old Testament Interpretation. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1976.Google Scholar
Dozeman, Thomas B.God on the Mountain: A Study of Redaction Theology and Canon in Exodus 19–24. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Dozeman, Thomas B., and Schmid, Konrad, eds. A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006.
Hayes, John H.An Introduction to Old Testament Study. Nashville: Abingdon, 1979.Google Scholar
Hyatt, J. P.Exodus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980. Repr., London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1971.Google Scholar
Knierim, Rolf. “Criticism of Literary Features, Forms, Tradition and Redaction.” Pages 123–65 in The Hebrew Bible and Its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Knight, Douglas A. and Tucker, Gene M.. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Nicholson, E. W.The Pentateuch in the Twentieth Century: The Legacy of Julius Wellhausen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Noth, Martin. Exodus: A Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962.Google Scholar
Noth, Martin. A History of Pentateuchal Traditions. Translated by Anderson, Bernhard W.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
Propp, William H.Exodus 1–18; Exodus 19–40. New York: Doubleday, 1999, 2006.Google Scholar
Rad, Gerhard. “The Form-Critical Problem of the Hexateuch.” Pages 1–78 in The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays. London: SCM, 1984.Google Scholar
Rendtorff, Rolf. The Problem of the Process of Transmission of the Pentateuch. Translated by Scullion, J. J.. Sheffield: JSOT, 1990.Google Scholar
Steck, Odil. Old Testament Exegesis: A Guide to the Methodology. 2nd ed. Translated by Noyalski, J. D.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Seters, John. The Life of Moses: The Yahwist as Historian in Exodus. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 1994.Google Scholar
Westermann, Claus. Genesis 1–11. Pages 575–84. London: SPCK, 1984.Google Scholar
Knierim, Rolf, “Criticism of Literary Features, Form, Tradition and Redaction,” in The Hebrew Bible and Its Modern Interpreters (ed. Knight, Douglas A. and Tucker, Gene M.; Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985), 130–31Google Scholar
Westermann, Claus, Genesis 1–11 (London: SPCK, 1984), 575–84Google Scholar
Steck, Odil, Old Testament Exegesis: A Guide to the Methodology (2nd ed.; trans. Nogalski, J. D.; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998), 54–58Google Scholar
Alter, Robert, The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 88–113Google Scholar
Hayes, John H., An Introduction to Old Testament Study (Nashville: Abingdon, 1979), 106–20, 155–97Google Scholar
Clements, Ronald E., One Hundred Years of Old Testament Interpretation (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1976)Google Scholar
Boorer, Suzanne, The Promise of the Land as Oath: A Key to the Formation of the Pentateuch (BZAW 205; Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992), 5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, E. W., The Pentateuch in the Twentieth Century: The Legacy of Julius Wellhausen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Wellhausen, Julius, Geschichte Israels I (Berlin, 1978)Google Scholar
,English Translation, Prolegomena to the History of Ancient Israel (New York: Meridian Books, 1957)Google Scholar
Wellhausen, Julius, Die Composition des Hexateuchs und der historischen Bucher des Alten Testaments (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1889)Google Scholar
Rad, Gerhard, Das Formgeschichtliche Problem des Pentateuch (BWANT 26; Stuttgart, 1938)Google Scholar
,English Translation, “The Form-Critical Problem of the Hexateuch,” in The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays (trans. Dicken, E.; Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966), 1–78Google Scholar
Noth, Martin, A History of Pentateuchal Traditions (trans. Anderson, Bernhard W.; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972)Google Scholar
Brueggemann, Walter and Wolff, Hans W., eds., The Vitality of Old Testament Traditions (2nd ed.; Atlanta: John Knox, 1982)
Jenks, A. W., The Elohist and North Israelite Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 1965)Google Scholar
Propp, William H., Exodus 1–18; Exodus 19–40 (AB; New York: Doubleday, 1999, 2006)Google Scholar
Cross, Frank M., Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973)Google Scholar
Schmid, H. H., Der Sogenannte Yahwist: Beobachtungen und Fragen zu Pentateuchforschung (Zurich: Theologischen, 1976)Google Scholar
Seters, John, In Search of History: Historiography in the Ancient World and the Origins of Biblical History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Rendtorff, Rolf, The Problem of the Process of Transmission in the Pentateuch (trans. Scullion, J. J.; Sheffield: JSOT, 1990)Google Scholar
Blum, Erhard, Studien zur Komposition des Pentateuch (BZAW 189; Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, E., “The Literary Connection between the Books of Genesis and Exodus and the end of the book of Joshua,” in A Farewell to the Yahwist: The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation (ed. Dozeman, Thomas B. and Schmid, Konrad; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006), 89–106Google Scholar
Noth, Martin (Exodus: A Commentary [Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962] 19–20)Google Scholar
Hyatt, J. P. (Exodus [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1980] 56–7)Google Scholar
Coats, George W. (Exodus 1–18 [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999] 22)Google Scholar
Childs, Brevard S., Exodus: A Commentary [London: SCM, 1974] 2–3Google Scholar
Dozeman, T., God on the Mountain: A Study of Redaction Theology and Canon in Exodus 19–24 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Nicholson, E. W., “The Covenant Ritual in Exodus 24:3–8,” VT 32 (1982): 74–86, 77Google Scholar
Childs, Brevard S., Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979) 65Google Scholar
Nicholson, E. W., “The Decalogue as the Direct Address of God,” VT 27 (1977): 422–33Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×