Genre Criticism

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811142.004

2 - Genre Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Kenton L. Sparks

Edited by

Thomas B. Dozeman

Show author details

Kenton L. Sparks: Affiliation:
Professor of Biblical Studies, Eastern University
Thomas B. Dozeman: Affiliation:
United Theological Seminary, Ohio

Book contents

Get access

Summary

THE METHODOLOGY OF GENRE CRITICISM

Genre is a loan word from the French that means “kind” or “type.” The term is widely used with reference to human discourse; to inquire about the genre of verbal discourse, whether of a spoken utterance or written text, is to ask about the sort of discourse that it is. Utterances might be “commands,” “questions,” “poems,” or “stories,” just as texts might be “biographies,” “histories,” “letters,” or “newspaper articles.” When we identify verbal discourse using one of these labels, we imply that we know something about how that type of discourse works and that we have the competence to understand it to some degree. If we have this skill as interpreters of literature, scholars would say that we have generic or literary competence. Our objective in the present article is modestly to pursue generic competence as readers of the Bible and, more specifically, as readers of the Book of Exodus. The quest begins with a bit of historical reflection on form criticism, which is the theoretical forerunner of genre criticism.

The Origins and Nature of Form Criticism

It would be accurate to say that prior to the Enlightenment (c. eighteenth cent.), the Bible's genre was foremost understood as “divine word.” By this I do not mean to say that pre-Enlightenment scholars failed to notice that different types of literature were in the Bible; I mean instead that, whatever these other genres were, they were considered secondary to the Bible's status as divine discourse.

Type: Chapter
Information: Methods for Exodus , pp. 55 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811142.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beebee, T. O.The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, Dan, ed. Folklore Genres. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.

Duff, David, ed. Modern Genre Theory. Harlow: Longman, 2000.

Ehrlich, Carl, ed. From an Antique Land: An Introduction to Ancient Near Eastern Literature. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.

Hallo, W. W. “Compare and Contrast: The Contextual Approach to Biblical Literature.” In Hallo, W. W., Jones, B. W., and Mattingly, G. L., eds. The Bible in the Light of Cuneiform Literature. Scripture in Context 3. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1990: 1–30.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. H., ed. Old Testament Form Criticism. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press, 1974.

McKenzie, Steven L.How to Read the Bible: History, Prophecy, Literature – Why Modern Readers Need to Know the Difference, and What It Means for Faith Today. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Niditch, Susan. Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature. Library of Ancient Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar

Rosmarin, Adena. The Power of Genre. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Sparks, Kenton L.Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2005.Google Scholar

Sweeney, M. A., and Zvi, E. Ben, eds. The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.

Talmon, Sh. “The Comparative Method in Biblical Interpretation-Principles and Problems.” In Congress Volume: Göttingen. VTSup 29. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1978: 320–56.Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. Genres in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Vanstiphout, H. L. J., ed. Genre in Mesopotamian Literature. Leiden: Brill, 2005.

Bowker, J., The Targums and Rabbinic Literature: An Introduction to Jewish Interpretation of Scripture (Cambridge: University Press, 1969), 315CrossRef Google Scholar

Longenecker, Richard N., Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period (2nd ed.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), 18–24Google Scholar

Young, Frances, “Alexandrian and Antiochene Exegesis,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation: The Ancient Period (Vol. 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003), 334–54Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W., The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative (New Haven: Yale, 1974), 1–50Google Scholar

Yarchin, William, History of Biblical Interpretation (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004), 195–207, 218–248Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann, The Psalms: A Form-Critical Introduction (trans. Horner, Th. M.; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1967), 10Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann, The Legends of Genesis (trans. Albright, W. F.; New York: Schocken, 1964), 34–35Google Scholar

Muilenburg, James, “Form Criticism and Beyond,” JBL 88 (1969): 1–18Google Scholar

Hempfer, K. W., Gattungstheorie: Information und Synthese (Uni-Taschenbücher 133; Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1963)Google Scholar

Garber, Frederick et al., “Genre,” The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (ed. Preminger, A. and Brogan, T. V. F.; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 456–59Google Scholar

Sweeney, Marvin A. and Zvi, Ehud Ben, eds., The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003)

Ricouer, Paul, “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation,” Philosophy Today 17 (1973): 129–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Sparks, Kenton L., Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2005)Google Scholar

Malul, Meir, Comparative Method in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Legal Studies (AOAT 227; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1990)Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea, The Sacred & The Profane: The Nature of Religion (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1959), 37–41Google Scholar

Gressmann, Hugo, Mose und seine Zeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913)Google Scholar

Rendtorff, Rolf, The Problem of the Process of Transmission in the Pentateuch (trans. Scullion, J. J.; JSOTSup 89; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Blum, Erhard, Die Komposition der Vätergeschichte (WMANT 57; Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar

Carr, David M., Reading the Fractures of Genesis: Historical and Literary Approaches (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996)Google Scholar

Schmid, Konrad, Erzväter und Exodus: Untersuchungen zur doppelten Begründung der Ursprünge Israels innerhalb der Geschichtsbücher des Alten Testaments (WMANT 81; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar

Rad, Gerhard, The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1965)Google Scholar

Seters, John, Prologue to History: The Yahwist as Historian in Genesis (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1992)Google Scholar

Sparks, Kenton L., The Pentateuch: An Annotated Bibliography (IBR Bibliographies 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002), 22–36Google Scholar

Johnstone, W., “Reactivating the Chronicles Analogy in Pentateuchal Studies with Special Reference to the Sinai Pericope in Exodus,” ZAW 99 (1987): 16–37Google Scholar

Cody, Aelred, The History of the Old Testament Priesthood (AnBib 35; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969)Google Scholar

Grabbe, Lester L., Priests, Prophets, Diviners, Sages: A Socio-Historical Study of Religious Specialists in Ancient Israel (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Schniedewind, William, “The Source Citations of Manasseh: King Manasseh in History and Homily,” VT 41 (1991): 450–61Google Scholar

Knoppers, Gary N. and Levinson, Bernard M., The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 2007)Google Scholar

Toorn, Karel, “The Exodus as Charter Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar

Albertz, Rainer, “Exodus: Liberation History against Chart Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar

Malinowski, B., Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays (Boston: Beacon, 1948), 120Google Scholar

Müller, Hans-Peter, “History-oriented Foundation Myths in Israel and its Environment,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 169–90Google Scholar

Mendenhall, G. E., “Ancient Oriental and Biblical Law,” BA 17 (1954): 26–46Google Scholar

McCarthy, Dennis J., Treaty and Covenant (2nd ed.; AnBib 21a. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1978)Google Scholar

Frankena, R., “The Vassal-Treaties of Esarhaddon and the Dating of Deuteronomy,” in 1940–1965 Oudtestamentlich Werkgezelschap in Nederland (OtSt 14; Leiden: Brill, 1965), 122–54Google Scholar

Weinfeld, Moshe, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), 116–29Google Scholar

Propp, William H. C., Exodus (AB; 2 vols.; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1999–2006), 2.34–35Google Scholar

Fitzmeyer, Joseph A., The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefîre (rev. ed., BibOr 19/A; Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1995)Google Scholar

Roth, Martha T., Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; Writing from the Ancient World 6; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997), 70–142Google Scholar

Paul, Shalom M., Studies in the Book of the Covenant in the Light of Cuneiform and Biblical Law (VTSup 18; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1970)Google Scholar

Boecker, Hans J., Law and the Administration of Justice in the Old Testament and Ancient East (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1980)Google Scholar

Wright, David P., “The Laws of Hammurabi as a Source for the Covenant Collection (Exodus 20:23–23:19),” Maarav 10 (2003): 11–88Google Scholar

Seters, John, A Law Book for the Diaspora: Revision in the Study of the Covenant Code (Oxford: University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Levinson, Bernard M., Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Wells, Bruce, “The Covenant Code and Near Eastern Legal Traditions: A Response to David P. Wright,” Maarav 13 (2006): 85–118Google Scholar

Roth, Martha T., Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; SBLWAW 6; Atlanta: Scholars, 1997), 4–7Google Scholar

Hurowitz, Victor A., “The Priestly Account of the Building of the Tabernacle,” BASOR 105 (1985): 21–30Google Scholar

Sparks, Kenton L., “Enūma Elish and Priestly Mimesis: Elite Emulation in Nascent Judaism,” JBL 126 (2007): 625–48Google Scholar

Walker, C. and Dick, Michael B., “The Induction of the Cult Image in Ancient Mesopotamia: The Mesopotamian mīs pî Ritual,” in Born in Heaven, Made on Earth (ed. Dick, M. B.; Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 1999), 55–121Google Scholar

George, A. R., Babylonian Topographical Texts (OLA 40; Leuven: Peeters, 1992)Google Scholar

Higginbotham, Carolyn R., Egyptianization and Elite Emulation in Ramesside Palestine: Governance and Accommodation on the Imperial Periphery (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East; Leiden: Brill, 2000)Google Scholar

Taussig, Michael T., Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (New York: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar

Fleming, Daniel E., “Mari's Large Public Tent and the Priestly Sanctuary,” VT 50 (2000): 484–98Google Scholar

Wilson, Robert R., Genealogy and History in the Biblical World (YNER 7; New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Sparks, Kenton L., “Genesis 49 and the Tribal List Tradition in Ancient Israel,” ZAW 115 (2003): 327–47Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Israel, The Archaeology of the Israelite Settlement (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1988)Google Scholar

Lewis, Brian, The Sargon Legend: A Study of the Akkadian Text and the Tale of the Hero Who Was Exposed at Birth (ASOR Dissertation Series 4; Cambridge, Mass.: ASOR, 1980)Google Scholar

Greenberg, Moshe, Understanding Exodus (New York: Behrman House for the Melton Research Center of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1969), 39Google Scholar

Otto, Eckhart, “Mose und das Gesetz: Die Mose-Figur als Gegenentwurf politischer Theologie zur neuassyrischen Königsideologie im 7. Jh v. Chr,” in Mose: Agypten und das Alte Testament (ed. Otto, E.; SBS 189; Stuttgart: BKW, 2000), 43–83Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S., “The Birth of Moses,” JBL 84 (1965): 109–22Google Scholar

Thompson, Stith's standard folkore manual, Motif-Index of Folk-Literature (Bloomington: Indiana University, 1955)Google Scholar

Alter, Robert, The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic, 1982), 47–62Google Scholar

Martin, Michael W., “Betrothal Journey Narratives,” CBQ 70 (2008): 505–23Google Scholar

Polak, Frank H., “The Covenant at Mount Sinai in Light of Texts from Mari,” in Sefer Moshe: The Moshe Weinfeld Jubilee Volume (ed. Cohen, Ch., Hurvitz, A., and Paul, Sh. M.; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004), 119–34Google Scholar

Clifford, R. J., The Cosmic Mountain in Canaan and the Old Testament (HSM 4; Cambridge: Harvard, 1972)Google Scholar

Jeremias, Jorg, Theophanie: Die Geschichte einer alttestamentlischen Gattung (WMANT 10; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchen Verlag, 1965)Google Scholar

Mettinger, T. N. D., The Dethronement of Sabaoth: Studies in Shem and Kabod Theologies (ConBOT 18; Lund: Gleerup, 1982), 19–37Google Scholar

Görg, M., “Die Gattung des sogenannten Tempelweihspruches (1 Kg 8, 12f.),” UF 6 (1974): 55–63Google Scholar

Dozeman, Thomas B., God on the Mountain: A Study of Redaction, Theology and Canon in Exodus 19–24 (Atlanta: Scholars, 1989)Google Scholar

Parpola, Simo and Watanabe, K., Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (SAA 2; Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Weinfeld, Moshe, “The Decalogue: Its Significance, Uniqueness, and Place in Israel's Tradition,” in Religion and Law: Biblical-Judaic and Islam Perspectives (ed. Firmage, E. B.; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1990), 3–47Google Scholar

Tappy, Ron E., “The Code of Kinship in the Ten Commandments,” RB 107 (2000): 321–27Google Scholar

Kratz, R. G., “Der Dekalog im Exodusbuch,” VT 44 (1994): 205–38Google Scholar

Stamm, Johann J. and Andrew, Maurice E., The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (SBT2 2; London: SCM Press, 1967), 22–35Google Scholar

Smith, Mark S., The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford: University Press, 2001)CrossRef Google Scholar

Norbert, Lohfink, “Kennt das Alte Testament einen Unterschied von ‘Gebot’ und ‘Gesetz’ Zur bibeltheolgischen Einstufung des Dekalogs,” JBTh 4 (1989): 63–89Google Scholar

Crüsemann, Frank, The Torah: Theology and Social History of Old Testament Law (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1996), 351–61Google Scholar

Sarna, Nahum, Exodus (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1991), 109Google Scholar

Harper, William Rainey, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Amos and Hosea (New York: Scribners, 1905), 250Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - Genre Criticism

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive