Bibliography

Leon Horsten

doi:10.1017/9781139600293.014

Antonutti Marfori, Marianna, Naturalising mathematics: a critical look at the Quine-Maddy debate, Disputatio 4 (2012), 323–342.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anselm, , St., Proslogion, in S. N. Deane, St. Anselm: basic writings. Trans. by Sidney D. Deane (1962), Open Court, 1977.Google Scholar

Alon, Noga and Spencer, Joel, The probabilistic method. 2nd edn, Wiley, 2000.Google Scholar

Bacon, John, The untenability of genera, Logique et Analyse 65 (1974), 197–208.Google Scholar

Bell, John, Set theory: Boolean-valued models and independence proofs. Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, John and Slomson, Alan, Models and ultraproducts. 2nd edn, Dover, 2006.Google Scholar

Belnap, Nuel and Müller, Thomas, CIFOL: case-intensional first-order logic. I: toward a theory of sorts, Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2014), 393–437.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, Paul, What numbers could not be, Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 47–73.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, Paul, Mathematical truth, Journal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 661–679.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, Paul, What mathematical truth could not be – I, in Morton, A. and Stich, S. (eds), Benacerraf and his critics, pp. 9–59, Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Benci, Vieri and Di Nasso, Mauro, Numerosities of labelled sets: a new way of counting, Advances in Mathematics 17 (2003), 50–67.Google Scholar

Benci, Vieri, Forti, Marco, and Di Nasso, Mauro, An Euclidean measure of size for mathematical universes, Logique et Analyse 50 (2007), 43–62.Google Scholar

Benci, Vieri, Horsten, Leon, and Wenmackers, Sylvia, Non-Archimedean probability, Milan Journal of Mathematics 81 (2013), 121–151.Google Scholar

Benci, Vieri, Horsten, Leon, and Wenmackers, Sylvia, Infinitesimal probabilities, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2018), 509–552.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George, A treatise concerning human knowledge. Edited by Wilkins, D. R. (2002), Dublin, 1710.Google Scholar

Blitzstein, Joseph and Hwang, Jessica, Introduction to probability. CRC Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Boolos, George, Nominalist platonism, Philosophical Review 94 (1985), 327–344.Google Scholar

Boolos, George, Jeffrey, Richard, and Burgess, John, Computability and logic. 5th edn, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Breckenridge, Wylie and Magidor, Ofra, Arbitrary reference, Philosophical Studies 158 (2012), 377–400.Google Scholar

Brickhill, Hazel and Horsten, Leon, Triangulating non-Archimedean probability, Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (2018), 519–546.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brickhill, Hazel and Horsten, Leon, Sets and probability, arXiv:1903.08361, 2019, 26p.Google Scholar

Burgess, John and Rosen, Gideon, A subject with no object: strategies for nominalistic interpretation of mathematics. Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Bressan, Aldo, A general interpreted modal calculus, Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Identity, indiscernibility, and ante rem structuralism. Book Review: Stewart Shapiro, Philosophy of mathematics: structure and ontology, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1999), 283–291.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Mathematics and Bleak House, Philosophia Mathematica 12 (2004a), 18–36.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics, Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2004b), 38–55.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Critical study / book review: Charles Parsons. Mathematical thought and its objects, Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2008), 402–420.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Philosophical logic. Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Rigor and structure. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, Parsons and the structuralist view, in O. Rechter (ed), Intuition and reason, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Button, Tim and Walsh, Sean, Philosophy and model theory. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Cameron, Peter, The random graph, in Graham, R. and Nešetřil, J. (eds), The mathematics of Paul Erdős II. Algorithms and combinatorics, vol. 14, pp. 333–351, Springer, 1997.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg, Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 91 (1887), 81–125.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf, Empiricism, semantics, and ontology, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950), 40–50.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf, Meaning and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. 3rd edn, University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Chaitin, Gregory, A theory of program size complexity formally identical to information theory, Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery 22 (1975), 329–340.CrossRef Google Scholar

Church, Alonzo, Introduction to mathematical logic. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Damjanovic, Zlatan, Mutual interpretability of Robinson arithmetic and adjunctive set theory with extensionality, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 23 (2017), 381–404.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dedekind, Richard, Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Vieweg, 1888.Google Scholar

de Finetti, Bruno, Theory of probability. 2 vols. Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar

de la Vallée Poussin, Charles-Jean, Cours d’analyse infinitésimale. Tome I, A. Uystpruyst-Dieudonné, 1903.Google Scholar

Diestel, Richard, Graph theory. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar

Dieterle, Jill, Mathematical, astrological, and theological naturalism, Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1999), 129–135.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael, The logical basis of metaphysics. Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Erdős, Paul and Rényi, Alfréd, Asymmetric graphs, Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiae Hungaricae 14 (1963), 295–315.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonhard, Institutiones calculi differentialis. Vol. 1, Opera omnia, ser. 1, vol. 10 (1913), Acadamiae Imperialis Scientiarum, St. Petersburg, 1755.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth, Can there be vague objects?, Analysis 38 (1978), 208.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernando and Ferreira, Gilda, Interpretability in Robinson’s Q, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (2013), 289–317.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul, Against method. Verso, 1975.Google Scholar

Field, Hartry, Science without numbers. Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

Field, Hartry, Is mathematical knowledge just logical knowledge?, Philosophical Review 93 (1984), 509–552.Google Scholar

Fine, Arthur, And not anti-realism either, Noûs 18 (1984a), 51–65.Google Scholar

Fine, Arthur, The natural ontological attitude, in Leplin, J. (ed), Scientific realism, pp. 261–277, University of California Press, 1984b.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Vagueness, truth and logic, Synthese 30 (1975), 265–300.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, A defence of arbitrary objects. I: Kit Fine, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 57 (1983), 55–77.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Natural deduction and arbitrary objects, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1985a), 57–107.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Reasoning about arbitrary objects. Basil Blackwell, 1985b.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Cantorian abstraction: a reconstruction and defense, Journal of Philosophy 95 (1998), 599–634.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, The question of realism, Philosophical Imprints 1 (2001), 1–30.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Class and membership, Journal of Philosophy, 102, 547–572.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Our knowledge of mathematical objects, in Szabo, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds), Oxford studies in epistemology, vol. 1, pp. 89–110, Oxford University Press, 2005b.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Form, Journal of Philosophy 114 (2017a), 509–535.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit, Naive metaphysics, Philosophical Issues 1 (2017b), 98–113.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob, The foundations of arithmetic: a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. 2nd edn. Trans. by J.L. Austin (1968), Northwestern, 1984.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob, Philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege. Trans. by P. Geach and M. Black, Blackwell, 1960.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob, Posthumous writings. Trans. by P. Long and R.M. White, Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar

Freiling, Chris, Axioms of symmetry: throwing darts at the real number line, Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1986), 190–200.Google Scholar

Garson, James, Modal logic for philosophers. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gödel, Kurt, What is Cantor’s continuum problem?, American Mathematical Monthly 54 (1947), 515–525.Google Scholar

Goldblatt, Robert, Lectures on the hyperreals: an introduction to non-standard analysis. Springer, 1998.Google Scholar

Halbach, Volker and Horsten, Leon, Computational structuralism, Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2006), 174–186.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamkins, Joel, The set theoretic multiverse, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2012), 416–449.Google Scholar

Hazen, Alan, Review of Crispin Wright: Frege’s conception of numbers as objects, Journal of Philosophy 63 (1985), 250–254.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Introduction to ‘What is metaphysics’ (‘Getting to the bottom of metaphysics’). Trans. by M. Groth, 1949.Google Scholar

Hellman, Geoffrey, Mathematics without numbers: towards a modal-structural interpretation. Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hellman, Geoffrey, Structuralism, in Shapiro, S. (ed), Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic, pp. 536–562, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Heylen, Jan, Carnap’s theory of descriptions and its problems, Studia Logica 94 (2010), 355–380.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David, Naturerkennen und Logik, in Hilbert, D., Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Dritter Band (1935), pp. 378–387, Julius Springer, 1930.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David, Neubegrundung der Mathematik, in Hilbert, D., Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Dritter Band, pp. 157–177, Julius Springer, 1935.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon, Canonical naming systems, Minds and Machines 15 (2005), 229–257.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon, Levity, Mind 118 (2009), 555–581.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon, Vom Zählen zu den Zahlen. On the relation between computation and arithmetical structuralism, Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2012), 275–288.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon, Mathematical philosophy?, in Andersen, H. et al. (eds), The philosophy of science in a European perspective, vol. 4, pp. 73–86, Springer, 2013.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon, Generic structuralism, Philosophia Mathematica, online first (2019), 19p.Google Scholar

Horsten, Leon and Speranski, Stanislav, Reasoning about arbitrary natural numbers from a Carnapian perspective, Journal of Philosophical Logic (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Hume, David, A treatise of human nature. Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects (1986). Penguin, 1739.Google Scholar

Incurvati, Luca, On the concept of finitism, Synthese 129 (2015), 2413–2436.Google Scholar

Isaacson, Daniel, The reality of mathematics and the case of set theory, in Novak, S. and Simonyi, A. (eds), Truth, reference, and realism, pp. 1–76, Central European University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ito, Ryo, Russell’s metaphysical accounts of logic. PhD dissertation, University of St Andrews, 2017.Google Scholar

Jeshion, Robin, Intuiting the infinite, Philosophical Studies 171 (2014), 327–349.Google Scholar

Kaye, Richard, Models of Peano Arithmetic. Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kearns, Stephen and Magidor, Ofra, Epistemicism about vagueness and meta-linguistic safety, Philosophical Perspectives 22 (2008), 277–304.Google Scholar

Keränen, Jukka, The identity problem for realist structuralism, Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2001), 308–330.Google Scholar

Ketland, Geoffrey, Structuralism and the identity of indiscernibles, Analysis 66 (2006), 303–315.CrossRef Google Scholar

King, Jeffrey, Instantial terms, anaphora and arbitrary objects, Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 239–265.Google Scholar

Kremer, Philip, Indeterminacy of fair infinite lotteries, Synthese 191 (2014), 1757–1760.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul, Semantical considerations on modal logic, Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963), 83–94.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul, Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul, Individual concepts: their logic, philosophy, and some of their uses, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (1992), 70–73.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas, Objectivity, value judgement and theory choice, in Th. Kuhn, The essential tension, pp. 320–339, University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James and Ross, Don, Everything must go: metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James, Linnebo, Øystein, and Pettigrew, Richard, Identity and discernibility in philosophy and logic, Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2012), 162–186.Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre, Falsfication and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds), Cricism and the growth of knowledge, pp. 91–196, Cambridge University Press, 1970.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lawvere, William, Functorial semantics for algebraic theories. PhD dissertation, Columbia University, 1963.Google Scholar

Leitgeb, Hannes and Ladyman, James, Criteria of identity and structuralist ontology, Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2008), 388–396.Google Scholar

Lewis, David, On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Lewis, David, Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein, Philosophy of mathematics. Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Littlewood, J., Littlewood’s miscellany. Edited by Bollobas, B., Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Littlewood, J., Thin objects: an abstractionist account. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein and Pettigrew, Richard, Two types of abstraction for structuralism, Philosophical Quarterly 64 (2014), 267–283.Google Scholar

Locke, John, An essay concerning human understanding. Edited by Fraser, A. C. (1894), Clarendon Press, 1690.Google Scholar

Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (eds), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

MacBride, Fraser, Structuralism reconsidered, in Shapiro, S. (ed), Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic, pp. 563–589, Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Macnamara, John, Review: Kit Fine. Reasoning with arbitrary objects, Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1988), 305–306.Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope, Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope, Second philosophy: a naturalistic method. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Manders, Kenneth, Domain extensions and the philosophy of mathematics, Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989), 553–562.Google Scholar

Martens, David, Combination, convention, and possibility, Journal of Philosophy 103 (2006), 577–586.Google Scholar

Martin, Donald, Multiple universes of sets and indeterminate truth values, Topoi 20 (2001), 5–16.Google Scholar

Mates, Benson, Identity and predication in Plato, Phronesis 24 (1979), 211–229.Google Scholar

Mayberry, John, What is required for a foundation of mathematics?, Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1994), 16–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan, A case for scientific realism, in Leplin, J. (ed), Scientific realism, pp. 8–40, University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Menger, Karl, On variables in mathematics and in natural science, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1954), 134–142.Google Scholar

Meyer Viol, Wilfried, Instantial logic: an investigation into reasoning with instances. ILLC, 1995.Google Scholar

Myhill, John, Review: W. V. Quine, On Carnap’s views on ontology, Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1955), 61–62.Google Scholar

Nelson, Edward, Predicative arithmetic. Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Nickel, Benhard, Generics, in Hale, B., Miller, A., and Wright, C. (eds), The Blackwell companion to the philosophy of language, 2nd edn, pp. 437–462, Blackwell, 2017.Google Scholar

Niebergall, Karl-Georg, On the logic of reducibility: axioms and examples, Erkenntnis 53 (2000), 27–62.Google Scholar

Nodelman, Uri and Zalta, Edward, Foundations for mathematical structuralism, Mind 123 (2014), 39–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oliver, Alex and Smiley, Oliver, What are sets and what are they for?, Philosophical Perspectives 20 (2006), 123–155.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles, Mathematical intuition, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 80 (1980), 145–168.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles, The structuralist view of mathematical objects, Synthese 84 (1990), 303–346.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles, Structuralism and metaphysics, Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2004), 56–77.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles, Mathematical thought and its objects. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, Richard, Platonism and Aristotelianism in mathematics, Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2008), 310–332.Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri, Science and hypothesis. Dover, 1905.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary, Mathematics without foundations, Journal of Philosophy 67 (1967), 5–22.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., On what there is, Review of Metaphysics 2 (1948), 21–48.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., Two dogmas of empiricism, Philosophical Review 60 (1951), 20–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., Epistemology naturalized, in W.V.O. Quine, Ontological relativity and other essays, pp. 69–90, Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., The variable, in Parikh, R. (ed), Logic Colloquium 1972–1973, pp. 155–168, Springer, 1975.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., Theories and things. Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., Review of Parsons’s ‘Mathematics in philosophy’, Journal of Philosophy 81 (1984), 783–794.Google Scholar

Quine, William V.O., Philosophy of logic. 2nd edn, Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas, Can there be random individuals? Analysis 18 (1958), 114–117.Google Scholar

Resnik, Michael, Mathematics as a science of patterns: ontology and reference, Noûs 15 (1981), 529–550.Google Scholar

Resnik, Michael, Second order logic still wild, Journal of Philosophy 85 (1988), 75–87.Google Scholar

Robinson, Abraham, Non-standard analysis, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam, Series A 64 (1961), 432–440.Google Scholar

Rosen, Gideon, Metaphysical dependence: grounding and reduction, in Hale, B. and Hoffmann, A. (eds), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology, pp. 109–136, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Rovelli, Carlo, ’Space is blue and birds fly through it’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 376 (2018), no. 2017.0312, 12p.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, On meaning and denotation, in Urquhart, A. (ed), The collected papers of Bertrand Russell 4: foundations of logic 1903–1905, pp. 314–358, Routledge, 1903a.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, The principles of mathematics (1996). W. W. Norton, 1903b.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, On denoting, Mind 56 (1905), 479–493.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11 (1910), 108–128.CrossRef Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, Introduction to mathematical philosophy. George Allen & Unwin, 1919.Google Scholar

San Gines, Aranzanzu, On Skolem functions, and arbitrary objects: an analysis of Kit Fine’s mysterious claim, Teorema 33 (2014), 137–150.Google Scholar

Santambrogio, Marco, Generic and intensional objects, Synthese 73 (1987), 637–663.Google Scholar

Santambrogio, Marco, Review: Reasoning about arbitrary objects, by K. Fine, Noûs 22 (1988), 630–635.CrossRef Google Scholar

Santambrogio, Marco, Was Frege right about variable objects?, in Mulligan, K. (ed), Language, truth and ontology, pp. 133–156, Kluwer, 1992.Google Scholar

Schiemer, Georg and Wigglesworth, John, The structuralist thesis reconsidered, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Schiffer, Jonathan, The things we mean. Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schoenfield, Joseph, The axioms of set theory, in Barwise, J. (ed), Handbook of mathematical logic, pp. 321–345, North-Holland, 1977.Google Scholar

Shafer, Glenn, When to call a variable random, working paper no 41 of the Game-Theoretic Probability and Finance Project (2018), 64p.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart, Acceptable notation, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1982), 14–20.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart, Foundations without foundationalism: a case for second-order logic. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart, Philosophy of mathematics: structure and ontology. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart, Structure and identity, in MacBride, F. (ed), Identity and modality, pp. 34–69, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart, Identity, indiscernibility, and ante rem structuralism: the tale of i and -i, Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2008), 285–309.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stuart C., A logic of arbitrary and indefinite objects, in Dubois, D. et al. (eds), Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning: proceedings of the ninth international conference (KR2004), pp. 265–275, AAAI Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore, Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time. Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore, Writing the book of the world. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Sklar, Lawrence, Space, time, and spacetime. University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Skolem, Thoralf, Some remarks on axiomatized set theory, in van Heijenoort, J. (ed), From Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (1967), pp. 252–263, Harvard University Press, 1922.Google Scholar

Solomonoff, Ray, A preliminary report on a general theory of inductive inference, Report v-131, Zator Co., 1960.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter, Individuals. Methuen, 1959.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter, Entity and identity, in Strawson, P., Entity and identity and other essays (1997), pp. 21–51, Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Švejdar, Vítězslav, On interpretability in the theory of concatenation, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2009), 87–95.Google Scholar

Szubka, Tadeusz, Metaontological maximalism and minimalism: Fine versus Horwich, in Kuzniar, A. and Odrowaz-Sypniewska, J. (eds), Uncovering facts and values: studies in contemporary epistemology and political philosophy. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities 107, 2016.Google Scholar

Tait, William, Finitism, Journal of Philosophy 78 (1981), 524–546.Google Scholar

Tait, William, Truth and proof: the platonism of mathematics, in W. Tait, The provenance of pure reason: essays in the philosophy of mathematics and its history (2005), pp. 61–88, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Tait, William, Beyond the axioms: the question of objectivity in mathematics, Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2001), 21–36.Google Scholar

Tennant, Neil, A defence of arbitrary objects. II: Neil Tennant, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 57 (1983), 79–89.Google Scholar

Troelstra, Anne, Choice sequences: a chapter in intuitionistic mathematics. Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Truss, John, Foundations of mathematical analysis. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Väänänen, Jouko, Dependence logic: A new approach to independence-friendly logic. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Väänänen, Jouko and Grädel, Erich, Dependence and independence, Studia Logia 101 (2013), 399–410.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas, The scientific image. Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Visser, Albert, Growing commas: a study of sequentiality and concatenation, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2009), 61–85.Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy, Modal logic as metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar

Worrall, John, Structural realism: the best of both worlds?, Dialectica 43 (1989), 99–124.Google Scholar

Zermelo, Ernst, On boundary numbers and domains of sets (translated by W. Hallett), in Ewald, W. (ed), From Kant to Hilbert: a source book in mathematics. Vol. 2 (1996), pp. 1208–1233, Oxford, 1930.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive