Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:37:18.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

L. David Ritchie
L. David Ritchie
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Metaphorical Stories in Discourse , pp. 254 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, D. (1979). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. Basingstoke, UK: Pan Books.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, A. G., & Bruner, J. S. (2002). Minding the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. (2010). Diversity on the Supreme Court (cartoon). Houston Chronicle, May 11.Google Scholar
Axton, M., Crudup, A., Durden, T., & Presley, E. (1956). Heartbreak Hotel. Los Angeles, CA: Unichappell Music Inc.Google Scholar
Bagley, P. (2007). Mission accomplished (cartoon). Salt Lake City Tribune, May 3.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2007). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeler, N. (2014). Lady Justice and Lady Liberty embracing (cartoon). Columbus Dispatch. Available at www.dispatch.com/content/cartoons/2013/06/beeler0627.html.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. (2011). Coffin nails (cartoon). Chattanooga Times Free Press, February 10.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humor. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, T. (2005). A fight we have to win. A speech to Labour’s Spring Conference, Sage Center, Gateshead, England.Google Scholar
Blake, W. (1966). Complete writings. Ed. Keynes, G.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Brunvand, J. H. (1981). The vanishing hitchhiker: American urban legends and their meanings. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. (1984). The working woman report: Succeeding in business in the 1980s. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bulow, P. H. (2004). Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling. Discourse & Society, 15, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunyan, J. (1678/1969). Pilgrim’s progress. New York: Collier (Harvard Classics series).Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (Principal Investigator). (2006). Procedure for metaphor analysis. The Metaphor Analysis Project. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J., & Deignan, A. (2003). Using large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Low, G. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 116–146). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Quellenangabe: Linguistics Vanguard. ISSN (Online) 2199-174X, DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causley, C. (1975). Collected poems, 1951–1975. Boston: Godine.Google Scholar
Chiappe, D. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (2001). Literal bases for metaphor and simile. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, I. et al. (2006). Open Kyoto to debate. An open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Available at www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605.Google Scholar
Clement, J. (1968). Flushed from the bathroom of your heart. From Johnny Cash at Folsom Prison. New York: Sony Music Entertainment Inc.Google Scholar
Cole, J. (2014). Warning signs … (cartoon). Scranton Times-Tribune. January 19.Google Scholar
Cole, J. (2016). The dog that caught the bus. Scranton Times-Tribune, June 30.Google Scholar
Congreve, W. (1693). The old bachelor. Edinburgh: Printed by and for Martin & Wotherspoon 1768.Google Scholar
Conrad, J. (1958). Lord Jim. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Crisp, P. (1996). Imagism’s metaphors: A test case. Language and Literature, 5, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P. (2001). Allegory: Conceptual metaphor in history. Language and Literature, 10(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P. (2005a). Allegory and symbol – a fundamental opposition? Language and Literature, 14, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P. (2005b). Allegory, blending and possible worlds. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P. (2008). Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature, 17, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dante, A. (1320). The Divine Comedy. Translated by Robert and Jean Hollander. Doubleday: Inferno, 2000; Purgatorio, 2003; Paradiso, 2007. Available at http://etcweb.princeton.edu.Google Scholar
Darkow, J. (2014). Racism in America (cartoon). Daily Tribune, April 30.Google Scholar
Deignan, A., & Semino, E. (2010). Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In Cameron, L & Maslen, R. (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 161–179). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
De Mendoza Ibanez, R., & Masegosa, A. G. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disney, W. (1934). The ant and the grasshopper. From Silly Symphonies. Beverly Hills, CA: United Artists.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. G. (2012). Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In MacArthur, F., Oncins-Martinez, J. L., Sanchez-Garcia, M., & Piquer-Piriz, A. M. (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. (2014). Human Evolution. New York: Pelican BooksGoogle Scholar
DuVernay, A. (2014). Selma. Cloud Eight Films.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2009a). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2009b). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Roto, . (2003). La gran droga (cartoon). El País, June 6.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. (1995). Solid investments: Making full use of the nation’s human capital. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Feirstein, B., & Trippett, L. (1982). Real men don’t eat quiche. London: New English Library.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A., & DeSoucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, D. (2014). Mission Accomplished. Arizona Daily Star.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009a). The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 383–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009b). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 3–17). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkiel, Nora. (March 1984). The up-and-comers; Bryant takes aim at the settlers-in. Adweek (Magazine World). Special Report.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (1969). The road not taken. In The poetry of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, N. (2004). Playing with matches (cartoon). Daily Telegraph, November 2Google Scholar
Garner, J. (1994). Politically correct bedtime stories. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2011). The allegorical impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Boers, E. (2005). Metaphoric processing of allegorical poetry. In Maalej, Z. (Ed.), Metaphor and culture. Tunis, Tunisia: University of Manouba Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., Gould, J., & Andric, M. (2005–2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 25, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2006). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, A. (2013). Honeymoon Avenue. On Yours truly. Island Records.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In Martin, J. R. & Veel, R. (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185–237). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassel.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. (1988). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee (June 23).Google Scholar
Hansen, J. (2008). Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (June 23).Google Scholar
Hansen, J. (2012). Why I must speak out about climate change. TED Talks.Google Scholar
Harris, R. A., & Tolmie, S. (2011). Cognitive allegory: An introduction. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, E. (1987). The complete short stories of Ernest Hemingway. New York: Charles Scriveners’ & Sons.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Carter, G. L. (2005). Working women in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. (2003). The mind and its stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., Pollack, H. N., & Shen, P. Y. (2008). A late quaternary climate reconstruction based on borehole heat flux data, borehole temperature data, and the instrumental record. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, July 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, R. B. Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. Wall Street Journal, March.Google Scholar
Ijzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhofe, J. (2006). Speech before the U.S. Senate (September 25).Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamiol, P. (2014). SCOTUS / Animal Farm (cartoon). Available at www.juancole.com/2014/04/supreme-editorial-cartoon.html.Google Scholar
Juckes, M. N., Allen, M. R., Briffa, K. R., Esper, J., Hegerl, G. C., Moberg, A., Osborn, T. J., & Weber, S. L. (2007). Millennial temperature reconstruction intercomparison and evaluation. Climate of the Past, 3(4), 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junger, S. (1997). The perfect storm. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, (pp. 201–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, D., Schneider, D. P., McKay, N. P., Ammann, C. M., Bradley, R. S., Briffa, K. R., Miller, G. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Overpeck, J. T., & Vinther, Bo M., Arctic Lakes 2k Project Members (2009). Recent warming reverses long-term arctic cooling. Science, 325(5945), 1236–1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W. (2008). How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 129–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosinski, J. (1970). Being there. Toronto: Bantam.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, W. (2013). The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In Helm, J. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, December 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. C. K., Zwiers, F. W., & Tsao, M. (2008). Evaluation of proxy-based millennial reconstruction methods. Climate Dynamics, 31(2–3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. Y, & Chiang, W. (2015). Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on US beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, T. (2016). Brexit: An often rocky marriage ends in sudden divorce. CNN, June 25, 2016. Available at www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/europe/uk-european-union-divorce/.Google Scholar
Lithwick, D. (2011). Her honor. New York Magazine, November 27.Google Scholar
Lithwick, D. (2016). Narrative and metaphor in media depictions of crime. Presented at the Stanford Symposium on Narrative and Metaphor in the Law. Stanford, CA, January 30.Google Scholar
Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S., & Hughes, M. K. (1999). Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, F. (2010). On cognition and function of grammatical metaphor. A dissertation presented for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, C. (2011). The machine-body as contested metaphor in clinical care. Genre, 44, 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, S., & McKitrick, R. (2003). Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998): Proxy data base and northern hemispheric average temperature series. Energy & Environment, 14(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, R. (2013). Digging your own grave (cartoon). Augusta Chronicle, September 18.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In Suls, J. and Wills, T. A. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mooney, Chris. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mooney, Chris. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science and reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse: Son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. M. (2000). The new science of Alzheimer’s. TIME, July 17.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. (2008). The class ceiling (cartoon). The Australian, July 20.Google Scholar
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. ANNALS, AAPSS, 658, 36–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2000). Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R., & Spitz, A. (2010). The interplay of humor and conflict in conversation and scripted humorous performance. Humor, 23, 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T., & Crisp, P. (2011). Honeymoons and pilgrimages: Conceptual integration and allegory in old and new media. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obama, B. (2008). A more perfect union. Constitution Center, Philadelphia, PA, March 18.Google Scholar
Obama, B. (2013). Remarks by the President on climate change at Georgetown University. Available at www.whitehouse.gov.Google Scholar
Oliphant, P. (2011). Perils of Pauline / The electoral process (cartoon). Universal Press, June 29.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (1993). The role of similarity in similes and metaphors. In Ortony, A., (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 342–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orwell, G. (1946). Animal farm. Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion – classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Piper, W. (1930). The little engine that could. New York: Platt & Munk.Google Scholar
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prudentius. (1723). Psychomachia; the war of the soul: Or, the battle of the virtues, and vices. Translated from Aur. Prudentius Clemens.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2011). The philosophical stance of allegory in Stoicism and its reception in Platonism, Pagan and Christian: Origin in dialog with the Stoics and Plato. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 18, 335–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reps, P. (1957). Zen flesh, Zen bones: A collection of Zen and pre-Zen writings. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (1991). Communication concepts 2: Information. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2003a). “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2003b). Categories and similarities: A note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2004). Lost in “conceptual space”: Metaphors of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2008). Gateshead revisited: The integrative function of ambiguous metaphors in a tricky political situation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2009a). Distributed cognition and play in the quest for the double helix. In Pishwa, H. (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 289–323). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2009b). Relevance and simulation in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2010). “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2011a). “Justice is blind”: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2011b). Why the block is the block: Reinforcing community through casual conversation. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2011c). “You’re lying to Jesus!” Humor and play in a discussion about homelessness. Humor, 24, 481–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2012). Metaphor and stories in discourse about personal and social change. In Wagoner, B., Jensen, E., & Oldmeadow, J. (Eds.), Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas. London: Information Age.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2014). “Born on third base”: Stories, simulations, and metaphor comprehension. Presented at the annual conference of Researching and Analyzing Metaphor, Cagliari, Italy.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Cameron, L. (2014). Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: Metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Dyhouse, V. (2008). FINE AS FROG’S HAIR: Three models for the development of meaning in figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Negrea-Busuioc, E. (2014). “Now everyone knows I’m a serial killer.” Spontaneous intentionality in conversational metaphor and story-telling. Metaphor and the Social World, 4, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Schell, C. (2009). “The ivory tower” on an “unstable foundation”: Playful language, humor, and metaphor in the negotiation of scientists’ identities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Thomas, M. (2015). A “glowing marble”: “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away”? Obama’s use of contrasting metaphors and stories in framing climate change. Metaphor and the Social World, 5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockmore, E. B. (2015). How Texas teaches history. New York Times, October 21.Google Scholar
Rollins, D. (1964). The race is on. Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Berman, T. R. (2002). The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem solving in social policy. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W., Waldzus, S., & Seibt, B. (2008). The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 160–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senzaki, N., & Reps, P. (1957). 101 Zen stories. In Reps, P., Zen flesh, Zen bones (pp. 3–82). Originally published by Rider and Company, London and David McKay Company, Philadelphia in 1939.Google Scholar
Snaevarr, S. (2010). Metaphors, narratives, emotions: Their interplay and impact. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soon, W., & Baliunas, S. (2003). Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years. Climate Research, 23, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spenser, E. (1590). The Faerie Queene: Disposed into twelue books, fashioning XII. morall vertues. London: William Ponsonbie.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2013). Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. S., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2013). When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky. PLOS One. Available at www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0113536.Google Scholar
Terrion, J. L., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (2011). The brain is wider than the sky: Analogy, emotion, and allegory. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness: A neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 811–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science, 35, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., Iyiewaure, P. O., & Boroditsky, L. (2016). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2).Google Scholar
Toles, T. (2012). Strip search (cartoon). Washington Post.Google Scholar
Toles, T. (2013). The canary in the coal mine (cartoon). Washington Post, February 25.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1955). The return of the king. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, R., and Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 452–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark (1996). The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today, 20(3), 397–418.Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2003). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 469–487). Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, K. (2011). Mission accomplished (cartoon). Blade.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. (1991). From the textual to the temporal: Early Christian “allegory” and early romantic “symbol.” New Literary History, 1, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J., ed. (2003). Interpretation and allegory: Antiquity to the modern period. Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, M., & Loudermilk, J. D. (1959). Waterloo. Universal Music.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language, 21, 404–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, N., and Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winn, M. (1977). The plug-in drug: Television, children, and the family. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In Forceville, C. J. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multi-modal metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A. (2015). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin Review.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphorical Stories in Discourse
  • Online publication: 20 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphorical Stories in Discourse
  • Online publication: 20 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphorical Stories in Discourse
  • Online publication: 20 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316717172.014
Available formats
×