Book contents
- Metaphor in Homer
- Metaphor in Homer
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Note on Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Ancient and Modern Views on Metaphor in Homer
- Chapter 2 Conceptual Metaphors for Time in Homer
- Chapter 3 Conceptual Metaphors for Speech in Homer
- Chapter 4 Conceptual Metaphors for Mind, Intention, and Self in Homer
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Verborum
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2019
Book contents
- Metaphor in Homer
- Metaphor in Homer
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Note on Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Ancient and Modern Views on Metaphor in Homer
- Chapter 2 Conceptual Metaphors for Time in Homer
- Chapter 3 Conceptual Metaphors for Speech in Homer
- Chapter 4 Conceptual Metaphors for Mind, Intention, and Self in Homer
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Verborum
- Index Locorum
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Metaphor in HomerTime, Speech, and Thought, pp. 233 - 247Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Accame, S. (1961) “La concezione del tempo nell’età omerica e arcaica” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 39, 359–394.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. (1970) From the Many to the One: A Study of Personality and Views of Human Nature in the Context of Ancient Greek Society, Values, and Beliefs, London.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (2003) The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study in Polysemy, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ameis, K. F. and Hentze, K. (1903) Homers Ilias für den Schulgebrauch. Erster Band, erstes Heft. Gesang I–III, 6th edition, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ameis, K. F. and Hentze, K. (1905) Homers Ilias für den Schulgebrauch. Zweiter Band, erstes Heft. Gesang XIII–XV, 4th edition, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ameis, K. F. and Hentze, K. (1908) Homers Odyssee für den Schulgebrauch. Erster Band, erstes Heft. Gesang I–VI, 12th edition, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Cairns, D., and Sprevak, M. (2018) Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Antović, M. and Pagán Cánovas, C. (eds.) (2016) Oral Poetics and Cognitive Science, Berlin.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., Samuel, S., and Bylund, E. (2017) “The Psychological Reality of Spatio-Temporal Metaphors” in: Athanasiadou, A. (ed.) Studies in Figurative Thought and Language, Amsterdam, 296–321.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1975) Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer’s Odyssey, Berkeley (CA).Google Scholar
Bakker, E. (1993) “Activation and Preservation: The Interdependence of Text and Performance in an Oral Tradition” Oral Tradition 8, 5–20.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2005) Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
Bartolotta, A. (2015) “Spatial Representations of Future in Homeric Greek” InVerbis 5, 25–42.Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1937) Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bergren, A. (1975) The Etymology and Usage of ΠΕΙΡΑΡ in Early Greek Poetry, New York (NY).Google Scholar
Bergren, A. (2008) Weaving Truth: Essays on Language and the Female in Greek Thought, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (trans. Van Sickle, J.) (1991) Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul, Baltimore (MD).Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. (2018) “Embedded Focalization and Free Indirect Speech in Homer as Viewpoint Blending” in: Ready, J. L. and Tsagalis, C. C. (eds.) Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, and Characters, Austin (TX), 230–254.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1978) “Metaphor as Rhetoric: The Problem of Evaluation” in: Sacks, S. (ed.) On Metaphor, Chicago (IL), 47–70.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000) “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors” Cognition 75, 1–28.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. and Gaby, A. (2010) “Remembrances of Times East: Absolute Spatial Representations of Time in an Aboriginal Australian Community” Psychological Science 21, 1635–1639.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. and Ramscar, M. (2002) “The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought” Psychological Science 13, 185–189.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003) Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, F. (1878) Die Metaphern: Studien über den Geist der modernen Sprachen, volume 1, Bonn.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1915a) “Words of Speaking and Saying in the Indo-European Languages: First Paper” American Journal of Philology 36, 1–18.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1915b) “Words of Speaking and Saying in the Indo-European Languages: Second Paper” American Journal of Philology 36, 125–154.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and LeVen, P. (2014) “Timotheus’ Poetics of Blending: A Cognitive Approach to the Language of New Music” Classical Philology 109, 191–210.Google Scholar
Buttmann, P. (trans. Fishlake, J. R.) (1861) Lexilogus; or, a Critical Examination of the Meaning and Etymology of Numerous Greek Words and Passages, 5th edition, London.Google Scholar
Buttmann, P. (1865) Lexilogus; oder, Beiträge zur griechischen Wort-Erklärung: hauptsächlich für Homer und Hesiod, re-edition, Berlin.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2003b) “Ethics, Ethnology, Terminology: Iliadic Anger and the Cross-Cultural Study of Emotion” in: Braund, S. and Most, G. W. (eds.) Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2012) “Atē in the Homeric Poems” Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 15, 1–52.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2014) “Ψυχή, Θυμός, and Metaphor in Homer and Plato” Études platoniciennes [Online] 11, URL: http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/566 [last accessed: October 7, 2016].Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2016) “Clothed in Shamelessness, Shrouded in Grief. The Role of ‘Garment’ Metaphors in Ancient Greek Concepts of Emotion” in: Fanfani, G., Harlow, M., and Nosch, M.-L. (2016), 25–41.Google Scholar
Calhoun, G. M. (1935) “The Art of Formula in Homer – ἔπεα πτερόεντα” Classical Philology 30, 215–227.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2009) “Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-Handers” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138, 351–367.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2014) “Bodily Relativity” in: Shapiro, L. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, New York (NY), 108–117.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2017a) “The Hierarchical Structure of Mental Metaphors” in: Hampe, B. (ed.) Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, Cambridge, 46–61.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2017b) “Relationships between Language and Cognition” in: Dancygier, B. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge, 19–37.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Boroditsky, L. (2008) “Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time” Cognition 106, 579–593.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Bottini, R. (2014) “Mirror Reading Can Reverse the Flow of Time” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 473–479.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Gijssels, T. (2015) “What Makes a Metaphor an Embodied Metaphor?” Linguistics Vanguard 1, 327–337.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1942b) “Le rôle et la valeur de ἐν dans la composition” Revue de Philologie 68, 115–125.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y. and O’Seaghdha, P. G. (2013) “Do Mandarin and English Speakers Think about Time Differently? Review of Existing Evidence and Some New Data” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 41, 338–358.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. (2009) “The End of Speeches and a Speech’s End: Nestor, Diomedes, and the telos muthon” in: Myrsiades, K. (ed.) Reading Homer: Film and Text, Teaneck (NJ), 136–162.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1973) “Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child” in: Moore, T. E. (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York (NY), 27–63.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1999) Flesh and Spirit in the Songs of Homer: A Study of Words and Myths, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2001) “‘Heart-Cutting Talk’: Homeric κερτομέω and Related Words” Classical Quarterly 51, 329–338.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2005) “On the Semantics of Ancient Greek Smiles” in: Cairns, D. (ed.) Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds, Swansea, 37–53.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (2005) “Zu den homerischen Bezeichnungen für die Träger oder Organe seelischer und geistiger Fähigkeiten und Tätigkeiten” Emerita 73, 55–71.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1999) “Iliad 24.649 and the Semantics of ΚΕΡΤΟΜΕΩ” Classical Quarterly 49, 618–621.Google Scholar
Colli, G. and Montinari, M. (1973) Nietzsche: Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, volume 32, Berlin.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2007) “Metaphor Comprehension and the Brain” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 177–204.Google Scholar
Darmesteter, J. (1878) “Iranica. VI. Une métaphore grammaticale de la langue indo-européenne” Mémoires de la Société de linguistique de Paris 3, 319–321.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. (2007) “Homer” in: De Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. (eds.) Time in Ancient Greek Literature; Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, volume 2, Leiden, 17–37.Google Scholar
De la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Román, A., and Casasanto, D. (2014) “When You Think About It, Your Past Is in Front of You: How Culture Shapes Spatial Conceptions of Time” Psychological Science 25, 1682–1690.Google Scholar
Dell’Oro, (2005) “ΕΠΕΑ ΠΤΕΡΟΕΝΤΑ. La formula omerica e l’evoluzione semantica dell’aggettivo πτερόεις” Quaderni della sezione di glottologia e linguistica 17–18, 25–40.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (trans. Moore, F. C. T.) (1974) “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy” New Literary History 6, 5–74.Google Scholar
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2013) “A Piece of the Action: Modulation of Sensory-Motor Regions by Action Idioms and Metaphors” NeuroImage 83, 862–869.Google Scholar
Duffy, W. and Short, W. (2016) “Metaphor as Ideology: The Greek ‘Folk Model’ of the Epic Tradition” in: Antović, M. and Pagán Cánovas, C. (2016), 52–78.Google Scholar
Dunkel, G. E. (1982/1983) “πρόσσω καὶ ὀπίσσω” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 96, 66–87.Google Scholar
Durante, M. (1958) “Epea pteroenta. La parola come ‘cammino’ in immagini greche e vediche” Rendiconti. Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 13, 3–14.Google Scholar
Durante, M. (1976) Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca. Parte seconda. Risultanze della comparazione indoeuropea, Rome.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1969) “On some ‘Answering’ Expressions in Homer” Classical Philology 64, 81–87.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1970) “Homeric Speech Introductions” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74, 1–36.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1986) “Homer and Oral Tradition: The Formula, Part I” Oral Tradition 1, 171–230.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1988) “Homer and Oral Tradition: The Formula, Part II” Oral Tradition 3, 11–60.Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. (2013) The Poetics of Consent; Collective Decision Making and the Iliad, Baltimore (MD).Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. (2015) “The ‘Narrow Road’ and the Ethics of Language Use in the Iliad and the Odyssey” Ramus 44, 155–183.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2004) Structure of Time: Language, Meaning, and Temporal Cognition, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Falkner, T. (1989) “Ἐπὶ γήραος οὐδῷ: Homeric Heroism, Old Age and the End of the Odyssey” in: Falkner, T. (ed.) Old Age in Greek and Latin Literature, Albany (NY), 21–67.Google Scholar
Fanfani, G., Harlow, M., and Nosch, M.-L. (2016) Spinning Fates and the Song of the Loom: The Use of Textiles, Clothing and Cloth Production as Metaphor, Symbol and Narrative in Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1994) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, 2nd edition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (2001) “Conceptual Blending” in: Smelser, N. and Baltes, P. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford, 4, 2495–2498.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Lakoff, G. (2009) “On Metaphor and Blending” Cognitive Semiotics 5, 393–399.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York (NY).Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2007) “Rethinking Metaphor” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 53–66.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. A. (2006) From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (1986) “Is κλέος ἄφθιτον a Homeric Formula?” Classical Quarterly 36, 1–5.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (1987) “Homer’s View of the Epic Narrative: Some Formulaic Evidence” Classical Philology 82, 135–138.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (1989) “Formulaic and Nonformulaic Elements in Homer” Classical Philology 84, 179–197.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (2004) “Oral Theory and the Limits of Formulaic Diction” Oral Tradition 19, 236–252.Google Scholar
Floyd, E. (1980) “Kleos Aphthiton: An Indo-European Perspective on Early Greek Poetry” Glotta 58, 133–157.Google Scholar
Forte, A. (2018) “The Cognitive Linguistics of Homeric Surprise” in: Meineck, P., Short, W. M., and Devereaux, J. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Cognitive Theory, New York (NY), 39–58.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1946) “Man’s ‘Ephemeros’ Nature According to Pindar and Others” Transactions of the American Philological Association 77, 131–145.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (2006 [1951]) Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, 5th edition, Munich.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. and Redfield, J. (1978) “Speech as a Personality Symbol: The Case of Achilles” Language 54, 263–288.Google Scholar
Friedrich, R. (2007) Formular Economy in Homer: The Poetics of the Breaches, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O. and Boroditsky, L. (2010) “Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence from an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task” Cognitive Science 34, 1430–1451.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G. (2005) “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge” Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 455–479.Google Scholar
Garcia, L. Jr. F. (2013) Homeric Durability; Telling Time in the Iliad, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (1990) “Do Homeric Heroes Make Real Decisions?” Classical Quarterly 40, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. and Bowdle, B. (2007) “Metaphor as Structure-Mapping” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 109–128.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2007b) “Metaphor and Thought. The State of the Art” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 3–13.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. and Matlock, T. (2007) “Metaphor, Imagination, and Simulation: Psycholinguistic Evidence” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 161–176.Google Scholar
Gijssels, T., Bottini, R., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., and Casasanto, D. (2013) “Space and Time in the Parietal Cortex: fMRI Evidence for a Neural Asymmetry” in: Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N., and Wachsmuth, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin (TX), 495–500.Google Scholar
Gijssels, T. and Casasanto, D. (2017) “Conceptualizing Time in Terms of Space: Experimental Evidence” in: Dancygier, B. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge, 651–688.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue, Oxford.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2007) “How Metaphors Create Categories – Quickly” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 67–83.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2013) The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1998) “The ‘Conduit’ Metaphor Revisited: A Reassessment of Metaphors for Communication” in: Koenig, J.-P. (ed.) Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, Stanford (CA), 1–16.Google Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., and Coulson, S. (1999) “Blending and Metaphor” in: Gibbs, R.W. and Steen, G. (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, 101–124.Google Scholar
Greindl, M. (1938) ΚΛΕΟΣ ΚΥΔΟΣ ΕΥΧΟΣ ΤΙΜΗ ΦΑΤΙΣ ΔΟΞΑ. Eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung des epischen und lyrischen Sprachgebrauches, Lengerich.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2006) Das Geschichtsbild der Ilias. Eine Untersuchung aus phänomenologischer und narratologischer Perspective, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Huitink, L. (2017) “Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach” Journal of Hellenic Studies 137, 67–91.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1986) “Homeric Words and Speakers” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106, 36–57.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1995) “A Homeric Metaphor Cluster Describing Teeth, Tongue, and Words” American Journal of Philology 116, 1–5.Google Scholar
Guilleux, N. (2016) “Of Metaphorical Matrices and their Networks” in: Fanfani, G., Harlow, M., and Nosch, M.-L. (2016), 1–16.Google Scholar
Hackstein, O. (1997) “Probleme der homerischen Formenlehre I: ἐνίψω β 137, ἐνίψει Η 447, λ 148 und die Etymologie von gr. ἔννεπε, ἐνίσσω/ἐνίπτω und (alt)lat. insece, inquit” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 57, 19–46.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, J. B. (1960) “Ἄπτερος μῦθος: A Concealed False Division?” Glotta 38, 263–268.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, J. B. (1962) “The Homeric Formula and the Problem of its Transmission” Bulletin for the Institute of Classical Studies 9, 57–68.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988) A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume I: Introduction and Books I–VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, A. (1965) Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes: Studies in the Development of Greek Epic Diction, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hollmann, A. (2011) The Master of Signs: Signs and the Interpretation of Signs in Herodotus’ Histories, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Holoka, J. P. (1991) “Homer, Oral Poetry Theory, and Comparative Literature: Major Trends and Controversies in Twentieth-Century Criticism” in: Latacz, J. (ed.) Zweihundert Jahre Homer-Forschung: Rückblick und Ausblick, Stuttgart, 456–481.Google Scholar
Horn, F. (2015a) “‘Sleeping the Brazen Slumber’ – A Cognitive Approach to Hom. Il. 11.241” Philologus 159, 129–206.Google Scholar
Horn, F. (2015b) “Visualizing Iliad 3.57: ‘Putting on the Shirt of Stone’” Rheinisches Museum 158, 1–7.Google Scholar
Horn, F. (2016) “‘Building in the Deep’: Notes on a Metaphor for Mental Activity and the Metaphorical Concept of Mind in Early Greek Epic” Greece and Rome 63, 163–174.Google Scholar
Horn, F. (2018) “Dying is Hard to Describe: Metonymies and Metaphors of Death in the Iliad” Classical Quarterly 68.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. C. (1981) Space and Time in Homer; Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic, New York (NY).Google Scholar
Hualde Pascual, P. (2016) “Metáforas del amor en la poesía de la Grecia antigua (I): la épica y la lírica arcaicas” Cuadernos de Filologia Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 26, 17–47.Google Scholar
Jeremiah, E. T. (2012) The Emergence of Reflexivity in Greek Language and Thought, Leiden.Google Scholar
Jiménez Delgado, J. M. and Martínez Vázquez, R. (2011) “Verbos de movimiento virtual en griego antiguo” Emerita 79, 277–300.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind; The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago (IL).Google Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2000) “Evening Dress: The Metaphorical Background of Latin uesper and Greek ἕσπερος” in: Jones-Bley, K., Huld, M., and della Volpe, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Washington (DC), 69–93.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. J. and Lamberton, R. (1996) [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer, Atlanta (GA).Google Scholar
Keith, A. L. (1914) Simile and Metaphor in Greek Poetry. From Homer to Aeschylus, Menasha (WI).Google Scholar
Kuhn, A. (1853) “Über die durch Nasale erweiterten Verbalstämme” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 2, 455–471.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1989) “Pouring Prayers: A Formula of IE Sacral Poetry?” Journal of Indo-European Studies 17, 113–125.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., and Sathian, K. (2012) “Metaphorically Feeling: Comprehending Textural Metaphors Activates Somatosensory Cortex” Brain and Language 120, 416–421.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago (IL).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1992) “Multiple Selves: The Metaphorical Models of the Self Inherent in Our Conceptual System,” paper presented at The Conceptual Self in Context, Emory University, Atlanta (GA).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993) “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor” in: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edition, Cambridge, 202–251.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York (NY).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Kövecses, Z. (1987) “The Cognitive Models of Anger Inherent in American English” in: Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.) Cultural Models of Language and Thought, Cambridge, 195–221.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, Chicago (IL).Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford (CA).Google Scholar
Laspia, P. (1996) Omero linguista. Voce e voce articolata nell’enciclopedia omerica, Palermo.Google Scholar
Laspia, P. (2002) “Chi dà le ali alle parole? Il significato articolatorio di ΕΠΕΑ ΠΤΕΡΟΕΝΤΑ” in: Montanari, (ed.) Omero tremila anni dopo. Atti del congresso di Genova 6–8 Iuglio 2000, Rome, 471–488.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. (1968) “ἄπτερος μῦθος – ἄπτερος φάτις: ungeflügelte Worte?” Glotta 46, 27–47.Google Scholar
Latacz, J., Nünlist, R., and Stoevesandt, M. (2000) Homers Ilias: Gesamtkommentar. Band I; 1. Gesang, Fazikel 2: Kommentar, Munich.Google Scholar
Leidl, C. G. (2003) “The Harlot’s Art: Metaphor and Literary Criticism” in: Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003), 31–54.Google Scholar
Lesky, A. (1961) Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966) Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (2004) “The Politeness of Achilles: Off-Record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of Kertomia” Journal of Hellenic Studies 124, 75–89.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. and Harding, J. L. (1998) “Back (or Forward?) to the Future: The Role of Perspective in Temporal Language Comprehension” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24, 1211–1223.Google Scholar
Mallory, J. P. and Adams, D. Q. (2006) The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World, Oxford.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad, Ithaca (NY).Google Scholar
Martínez Vázquez, R. and Jiménez Delgado, J. M. (2008) Metáfora conceptual y verbo griego antiguo, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. and Bergmann, T. (2016) “Fictive Motion” in: Dąbrowska, E. and Divjak, D. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin, 546–562.Google Scholar
Mead, S. M. (1984) “Ka tupu te toi whakairo ki Aotearoa: Becoming Maori Art” in: Mead, S. M. (ed.) Te Maori: Maori Art from New Zealand Collections, New York (NY), 63–75.Google Scholar
Merritt, D. J., Casasanto, D., and Brannon, E. M. (2010) “Do Monkeys Think in Metaphors? Representations of Space and Time in Monkeys and Humans” Cognition 117, 191–202.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. (2001) Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and Odyssey, Oxford.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2006) “Space-to-Time Mappings and Temporal Concepts” Cognitive Linguistics 17, 199–244.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2014) The Spatial Language of Time: Metaphor, Metonymy, and Frames of Reference, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Muellner, L. C. (1976) The Meaning of Homeric Euchomai through Its Formulas, Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Muellner, L. C. (1990) “The Simile of the Cranes and Pygmies: A Study of Homeric Metaphor” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 93, 59–101.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N. (1974) Spontaneity and Tradition: A Study in the Oral Art of Homer, Berkeley (CA).Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2015) Masterpieces of Metonymy: From Ancient Greek Times to Now, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
Núñez, R. and Sweetser, E. (2006) “With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence from Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time” Cognitive Science 30, 1–49.Google Scholar
Núñez, R., Motz, B. A., Teuscher, U. (2006) “Time after Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time” Metaphor and Symbol 2, 133–146.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998) Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2012) “Aristarch und das Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos” in: Meier-Brügger, M. (ed.) Homer, gedeutet durch ein großes Lexikon, Berlin, 193–214.Google Scholar
Padel, R. (1992) In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self, Princeton (NJ).Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. and Antović, M. (2016a) “Formulaic Creativity: Oral Poetics and Cognitive Grammar” Language and Communication 47, 66–74.Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C. and Antović, M. (2016b) “Construction Grammar and Oral Formulaic Poetry” in: Antović, M., and Pagán Cánovas, C. (2016), 79–98.Google Scholar
Palm, J. (1969) “Lag die Zukunft der Griechen hinter ihnen?” Annales Academiae Regiae Scientiarum Upsaliensis 13, 5–13.Google Scholar
Parry, A. (1956) “The Language of Achilles” Transactions of the American Philological Association 87, 1–7.Google Scholar
Parry, A. (ed.) (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Parry, A. A. (1973) Blameless Aegisthus: A Study of ΑΜΥΜΩΝ and Other Homeric Epithets, Leiden.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Porter, A. (2017) “Human Fault and ‘[Harmful] Delusion’ (ἄτη) in Homer” Phoenix 71, 1–20.Google Scholar
Purves, A. (2015) “Ajax and Other Objects: Homer’s Vibrant Materialism” Ramus 44, 75–94.Google Scholar
Radin, A. P. (1988) “Sunrise, Sunset: ἦμος in Homeric Epic” American Journal of Philology 109, 293–307.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, T. (1996) Böser Blick, Macht des Auges und Neid der Götter. Eine Untersuchung zur Kraft des Blickes in der griechischen Literatur, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Raphals, L. (2015) “Body and Mind in Early China and Greece” Journal of Cognitive Historiography 2, 132–182.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1979) “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language” in: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge, 284–310.Google Scholar
Reece, S. (2009) “Homer’s Winged and Wingless Words: ΠΤΕΡΟΕΙΣ / ΑΠΤΕΡΟΣ” Classical Philology 104, 261–278.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (1995) “Zeit und Gleichzeitigkeit in den homerischen Epen” Antike und Abendland 41, 1–33.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2015) “Tyrants, Fire, and Dangerous Things” in: Williams, G. D. and Volk, K. (eds.) Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford, 111–128.Google Scholar
Rose, G. P. (1979) “Odysseus’ Barking Heart” Transactions of the American Philological Association 109, 215–230.Google Scholar
Russo, J. (2012) “Re-Thinking Homeric Psychology: Snell, Dodds and their Critics” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica 101, 11–28.Google Scholar
Russo, J., Fernandez-Galiano, M., and Heubeck, A. (1992) A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume III: Books XVII–XXIV, Oxford.Google Scholar
Russo, J. and Simon, B. (1968) “Homeric Psychology and the Oral Epic Tradition” Journal of the History of Ideas 29, 483–498.Google Scholar
Sale, M. (1996) “In Defense of Milman Parry: Renewing the Oral Theory” Oral Tradition 11, 374–417.Google Scholar
Šćepanović, S. (2011) Αἰών and χρόνος: Their Semantic Development in the Greek Poets and Philosophers down to 400 BC, DPhil Dissertation (Oxford University), Oxford.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2018) The Best of the Grammarians. Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad, Ann Arbor (MI).Google Scholar
Schlunk, R. R. (1993) Porphyry: The Homeric Questions; A Bilingual Edition, New York (NY).Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. (1990) Selbständigkeit und Abhängigkeit menschlichen Handelns bei Homer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Semino, E. and Steen, G. (2007) “Metaphor in Literature” in: Gibbs, R. W. (2007a), 232–246.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1983) “‘But Why Has My Spirit Spoken with Me Thus?’: Homeric Decision-Making” Greece & Rome 30, 1–7.Google Scholar
Short, W. (2013a) “Latin Dē: A View from Cognitive Semantics” Classical Antiquity 32, 378–405.Google Scholar
Short, W. (2013b) “‘Transmission’ Accomplished? Latin’s Alimentary Metaphors of Communication” American Journal of Philology 134, 247–275.Google Scholar
Short, W. (2016a) “Spatial Metaphors of Time in Roman Culture” Classical World 109, 381–412.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1974) Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (2003) “Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and Others” in: Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003), 115–147.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., Sinha, V. D., Zinken, J., and Sampaio, W. (2011) “When Time is not Space: The Social and Linguistic Construction of Time Intervals and Temporal Event Relations in an Amazonian Culture” Language and Cognition 3, 137–169.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1924) Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1929) “Das Bewusstsein von eigenen Entscheidungen im frühen Griechentum” in: Snell, B. (1966) Philologus 85, 141–158.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (trans. Rosenmeyer, T. G.) (1953) The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1955) Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, 3rd edition, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1978) Der Weg zum Denken und zur Wahrheit. Zur frühgriechischen Sprache, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2013) “Atē in Aeschylus” in: Cairns, D. (ed.) Tragedy and Archaic Greek Thought, Swansea, 1–16.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. D. (1988) Psychological Activity in Homer: A study of Phren, Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (2017) “Opening Commentary: Conceptual Mappings” in: Dancygier, B. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge, 379–384.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1951) “Greek μέλλω. A Historical and Comparative Study” American Journal of Philology 72, 346–368.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996) “Fictive Motion in Language and ‘Ception’” in: Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., and Garrett, M. L. (eds.) Language and Space, Cambridge (MA), 211–276.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. (1984) Homer’s Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Thornton, H. and Thornton, A. (1962) Time and Style: A Psycho-Linguistic Essay in Classical Literature, London.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1978) “On the Expression of Spatio-Temporal Relations in Language” in: Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) Universals of Human Language. Volume 3: Word Structure, Palo Alto (CA), 369–399.Google Scholar
Treu, M. (1955) Von Homer zur Lyrik. Wandlungen des griechischen Weltbildes im Spiegel der Sprache, Munich.Google Scholar
Trümpy, H. (1950) Kriegerische Fachausdrücke im griechischen Epos: Untersuchungen zum Wortschatze Homers, Fribourg.Google Scholar
Tuck, A. (2006) “Singing the Rug: Patterned Textiles and the Origins of Indo-European Metrical Poetry” American Journal of Archaeology 110, 539–550.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1987) Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism, Chicago (IL).Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., and Winter, A. (1991) “Cross-Cultural and Developmental Trends in Graphic Productions” Cognitive Psychology 23, 515–557.Google Scholar
Van der Mije, S. R. (2011) “πείθειν φρένα(ς), πείθειν θυμόν – A Note on Homeric Psychology” Mnemosyne 64, 447–454.Google Scholar
Ventris, M. and Chadwick, J. (1973) Documents in Mycenaean Greek, 2nd edition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Visser, E. (1987) Homerische Versifikationstechnik. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Visser, E. (1988) “Formulae or Single Words? Towards a New Theory on Homeric Verse-Making” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 14, 21–37.Google Scholar
Voigt, C. (1933) Überlegung und Entscheidung. Studien zur Selbstauffassung des Menschen bei Homer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, W. (1860) ΕΠΕΑ ΠΤΕΡΟΕΝΤΑ: Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Mythologie, Basel.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011) The Making of the Iliad: Disquisition and Analytical Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, G. (1967) Untersuchungen zum Bild vom Fließen der Sprache in der griechischen Literatur, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Williams, L. E. and Bargh, J. A. (2008) “Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth” Science 322, 606–607.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. (2003) The Development of Ideas about Communication in European Thought: From Ancient Greece to the Early Modern Age, Ph.D. Dissertation (ANU), Canberra.Google Scholar
Zanker, A. T. (2016) Greek and Latin Expressions of Meaning: The Classical Origins of a Modern Metaphor, Munich.Google Scholar
Zanker, A. T. (2018) “Metaphor in Latin Descriptions of Reading and Meaning” PhaoS 18, 97–118.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1998) “Beyond Reciprocity: The Akhilleus-Priam Scene in Iliad 24” in: Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N., and Seaford, R. (eds.) Reciprocity in Ancient Greece, Oxford, 73–92.Google Scholar
Zhong, C.-B. and Leonardelli, G. J. (2008) “Cold and Lonely: Does Social Exclusion Literally Feel Cold?” Psychological Science 19, 838–842.Google Scholar