Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- A message to readers
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: feminism, bodies and biological sex
- Part I HORMONE HISTORIES
- Part II HORMONAL BODIES
- 2 Articulating endocrinology's body
- 3 Activating sexed behaviours
- Part III HORMONE CULTURES
- Conclusion: hormones as provocation
- References
- Index
2 - Articulating endocrinology's body
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- A message to readers
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: feminism, bodies and biological sex
- Part I HORMONE HISTORIES
- Part II HORMONAL BODIES
- 2 Articulating endocrinology's body
- 3 Activating sexed behaviours
- Part III HORMONE CULTURES
- Conclusion: hormones as provocation
- References
- Index
Summary
Stories and facts do not naturally keep a respectable distance; indeed, they promiscuously cohabit the same very material places. Determining what constitutes each dimension takes boundary-making and maintenance work. In addition, many empirical studies of technoscience have disabled the notion that the word technical designates a clean and orderly practical or epistemological space. Nothing so productive could be so simple.
(Haraway 1997: 68)Across the twentieth century, hormones came to be seen as messengers of sex. As such, they figure today as key players in maintaining the biological life of human and non-human animals. Sex hormones are understood as essential both to the development and maintenance of healthy foetal, child and adult bodies and to the very possibility of sexual reproduction. This chapter examines contemporary technoscientific representations of the messaging actions of sex hormones. Working with contemporary theories of scientific knowledge production, it suggests that explanations of hormonal messaging contain unrealised potentialities for recognising the significant interweaving of ‘the social’ and ‘the biological’ constituting this messaging. In focusing attention on the intricate and microscopic patterns of hormonal flows, biologists and physiologists attempt to leave the social aside – to create, as Haraway puts it, ‘respectable distance’ between these explanatory categories. Close examination, however, shows that this ‘clean … epistemological space’ is never fully achieved. Indeed, ‘nothing so productive could be so simple’: biological explanations of hormonal actions are always articulated with the social, both in their epistemologies and in their production as technoscientific knowledge.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Messengers of SexHormones, Biomedicine and Feminism, pp. 53 - 77Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007