Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:46:51.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

13 - Cognitive science and religious thought: the case of psychological interiority in the Analects

Edward Slingerland
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Dimitris Xygalatas
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Denmark, and Masaryk University, Czech Republic
William W. McCorkle
Affiliation:
Masaryk University, Czech Republic
Get access

Summary

One of the most commonly assigned secondary texts in university classes on early Chinese religious thought is Herbert Fingarette's classic Confucius: The Secular as Sacred (Fingarette 1972). This is not only because of its brevity and the lucidity of its prose, but also because Fingarette's book marked a sea change in the manner in which Western philosophers approached early Chinese texts. Fingarette (1972) played a central role in inaugurating an era of much more nuanced, culturally sensitive interpretations of the Analects, as well as other early Chinese texts, in philosophical circles: an era in which Confucius no longer appeared as a watered-down Christian or “Axial Age” Kantian who occasionally liked to play dress-up and perform some strange rituals, but rather demanded serious philosophical attention as a unique thinker in his own right. Fingarette was one of the first Western philosophers to recognize that the early Confucian model of the self fundamentally challenges a particular understanding of the ethical self, and the self vis-à-vis culture and society, that remains quite prominent in modern Western philosophical and popular discourse. Taken seriously on its own terms, the Analects presents a vision wherein the individual is not an autonomous atom, freely pursuing its own rational self-interest, but is rather always already embedded in a web of familial, social and cultural connections.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mental Culture
Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion
, pp. 197 - 212
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×