The anthropologist Julian Pitt-Rivers defined honour as an individual’s ‘estimation of his own worth, his claim to pride, but it is also the acknowledgment of that claim, his excellence recognized by society, his right to pride’. Frank Stewart Henderson proposed an even simpler definition, describing honour as ‘the right to be treated as having a certain worth’. This ‘right’ must be accepted and acknowledged by others or else the individual will appear contemptible and ridiculous. It must also be protected, even to the point of forcing others to acknowledge it through acts of violence, which Pitt-Rivers described as ‘the ultimate vindication’ of honour. Failure to respond to such a challenge could itself strip the individual of their honour.

Notions of honour also have a powerful normative influence on societies. Through ritual and ceremonial acknowledgement of certain individuals who possess this ‘right’, social and cultural norms are reinforced:

For example, a modern state awarding military medals for gallantry reinforces cultural values of courage, duty and self-sacrifice.

Although Pitt-Rivers and Stewart based their theories on studies of twentieth- century Andalusian and Bedouin culture, respectively, their conclusions provide a useful framework for discussing historical notions of honour. In this essay, I will discuss how the medieval tournament enabled the knighthood of western Europe to establish their ‘right’ to be treated as worthy; that is, to stake their ‘claim to pride’ before their peers. I will discuss the language and phrasing used by contemporary sources to describe honour in the context of a tournament, before considering the specific actions by which individuals or groups could demonstrate or claim honour.