from Part II - Characteristics of the Powysian Polities: Structures, Fault-Lines and Political Culture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2017
One of the most important recurrent features revealed by the narrative set out in the first part of this study is the tendency of Powysian polities to fragment at moments of dynastic stress, and under the impact of external intervention. The whole subject of fragmentation within Welsh polities was highlighted by J. G. Edwards's British Academy lecture, ‘The Normans and the Welsh March’, in which he advanced the argument that kingship in Wales was ‘inherent in each commote’, so that fission into multiple fully royal polities was a frequent phenomenon, a natural consequence of the Welsh political structure. That idea was prevalent for a generation, until it was undermined by the work of Beverley Smith, whose approach stemmed from his demonstration that the Welsh law-texts set out clearly mechanisms for the transmission of a large polity – such as Gwynedd, Powys or Deheubarth – in its entirety to a single heir. Fragmentation was not, therefore, the product of the inevitable workings of a concept of the partible regnum, but resulted, in Powys in 1160, Gwynedd in 1170 and Deheubarth in 1197, from the ‘rejection by the membra regis of the apanage provision made for them, and the inability of any one of them to determine the issue by force’. Much of Smith's analysis cannot be gainsaid; but the following survey will indicate that in terms of practical politics detached fragments of the Powysian realm, however produced, threatened to become permanent. Lordship base on concepts of regality might not be inherent in the commote or cantref, but the socio-political nature of the commote or cantref might make it relatively easy for multiple regalities, or lordships, to develop.
Numerous territorial fault-lines associated with morcellation within Powys are evidenced by the following, far from exhaustive, examples. Mechain, at the heart of Madog ap Maredudd's kingdom, subsequently became the centre of the lordship associated with one of Madog's sons, Owain Fychan. After Owain's death at the hands of the sons of Owain Cyfeiliog in 1187, Mechain was apparently occupied by Gwenwynwyn ab Owain. Regained by Owain Fychan's sons after Gwenwynwyn's death, Mechain was partitioned into two segments, Is Coed and Uwch Coed. By the 1270s it is clear that it had been further fragmented, with some lands within it occupied by members of the dynasty of northern Powys and some by descendants of Owain Fychan.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.