Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:59:09.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - A critique of the capability approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Thomas Pogge
Affiliation:
Leitner Professor of Philosophy and International Affairs at Yale University
Harry Brighouse
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Ingrid Robeyns
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

During the past twenty-five years, the capability approach, developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, has come to play a major role in political philosophy and normative economics. This approach has gained much support, among academics as well as among international agencies and nongovernmental organizations, at the expense of competing resourcist and welfarist approaches exemplified, respectively, by John Rawls's theory and utilitarianism.

Here I examine how the capability approach has been, and might be, justified as superior to, in particular, its resourcist competition. I reach two main conclusions. First, this question should not be answered in isolation, but can be plausibly resolved only in conjunction with other key elements of a conception of social justice. Instead of asking which approach is superior, we should ask which approach can deliver the most plausible public criterion of social justice. Second, neither Sen nor Nussbaum has so far shown that the capability approach can produce a public criterion of social justice that would be a viable competitor to the more prominent resourcist views.

While I concentrate my critical attention on the capability approach and reject much of the case made in its favor, my intent is wholly constructive. I am working on the same problem as the pioneers of the capability approach and I do not have all the answers any more than they do. If they can learn from my critique even a fraction of what I have learned from their work, I will be well satisfied.

Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Justice
Primary Goods and Capabilities
, pp. 17 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D., Morris, J. N., Smith, C., and Townsend, P. 1990. “The Black Report,” in Townsend, P. and Davidson, N. (eds.), Inequalities in Health. London: Penguin, pp. 31–213.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1993. “Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods, and Capabilities,” in Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. 1999. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKerlie, D. 1989. “Equality and Time,” Ethics 99: 475–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerlie, D. 1992. “Equality Between Age-Groups,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 21: 475–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Musgrave, R. A. 1974. “Maximin, Uncertainty, and the Leisure Trade-Off,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88: 625–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1995. “Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings,” in Nussbaum, M. and Glover, J. (eds.), Women, Culture, and Development. Oxford University Press, pp. 61–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, S. M. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 1983. Kant, Rawls, and Global Justice. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 2007. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights (Second Edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999a. John Rawls: Collected Papers. Freeman, Samuel (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999b. A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, S. and Pogge, T. 2010 (forthcoming). “How Not to Count the Poor,” in Anand, S., Segal, P., and Stiglitz, J. (eds.), Debates in the Measurement of Global Poverty. Oxford University Press. Also available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=893159.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being,” in Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1997. On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1993. Inequality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parijs, P. 1995. Real Freedom for All. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. 1996. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×