Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (eds.). (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2018). The governor’s dilemma: competence versus control in indirect governance (Working Paper No. SP IV 2018–101). WZB Discussion Paper. www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/177895Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–77.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.Google Scholar

Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Politicians and bureaucrats in western democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acs, A. (2018). Policing the administrative state. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1225–38.Google Scholar

Adam, C., Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Studinger, P. (2007). The termination of public organizations: theoretical perspectives to revitalize a promising research area. Public Organization Review, 7(3), 221–36.Google Scholar

Adam, C., Steinebach, Y., & Knill, C. (2018). Neglected challenges to evidence-based policy-making: the problem of policy accumulation. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S. O., Sarma, K. M., & Sinclair, L. (2002). Protecting the ozone layer: the United Nations history. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Andler, L. (2009). The secretariat of the global environment facility: from network to bureaucracy. In Bierman, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 203–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Andonova, L. B. (2017). Governance entrepreneurs: international organizations and the rise of global public–private partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Andrijasevic, R., & Walters, W. (2010). The International Organization for Migration and the international government of borders. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(6), 977–99.Google Scholar

Archer, C. (2015). International organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K., & Beyeler, M. (2004). The OECD and European welfare states. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1984). The economics of the agency. In Pratt, J. W. & Zeckhauser, R. J. (eds.), Principals and agents: the structure of business (pp. 37–51). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Ashutosh, I., & Mountz, A. (2011). Migration management for the benefit of whom? Interrogating the work of the International Organization for Migration. Citizenship Studies, 15(01), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asongu, S. (2014). How would monetary policy matter in the proposed African monetary unions? Evidence from output and prices. African Finance Journal, 16(2), 34–63.Google Scholar

AusAID. (2012a). Australian multilateral assessment March 2012: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Canberra: Australian Government. https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/fao-assessment.pdfGoogle Scholar

AusAID. (2012b). Australian multilateral assessment March 2012 International Labour Organization (ILO). Canberra: Australian Government. https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/ilo-assessment.pdfGoogle Scholar

Baccaro, L. (2015). Orchestration for the ‘social partners’ only: internal constraints on the ILO. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (eds.), International Organizations as orchestrators (pp. 262–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baccaro, L., & Mele, V. (2012). Pathology of path dependency? The ILO and the challenge of new governance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 65(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391206500201Google Scholar

Balla, S. J., & Gormley, W. T. (2018). Bureaucracy and democracy: accountability and performance. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. (2001). Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow. International Migration Review, 35(1), 244–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, M., & Coleman, L. (2005). Designing police: Interpol and the study of change in international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 593–620.Google Scholar

Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(04), 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: international organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (2007). The smallpox eradication game. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 179–207.Google Scholar

Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2013). Commission civil servants and politics: de-politicised bureaucrats in an increasingly political organisation. In Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S., & Verhey, L. (eds.), Civil servants and politics: a delicate balance (pp. 173–204). Houndmills, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–37.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2017). A matter of will and action: the bureaucratic autonomy of international public administrations. In Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Eckhard, S. (eds.), International bureaucracy: challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 13–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Eckhard, S. (eds.). (2017). International bureaucracy: challenges and lessons for public administration research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bauer, S. (2007). The ozone secretariat: administering the Vienna convention and the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Global Governance Working Paper No. 28). Amsterdam: Global Governance Project, www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/WP28.pdf.Google Scholar

Bauer, S. (2009). The secretariat of the United Nations Environment Programme: tangled up in blue. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 169–202). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, S., Andresen, S., & Biermann, F. (2012). International bureaucracies. In Biermann, F. & Pattberg, P. H. (eds.), Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 27–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bayerlein, L., & Knill, C. (2019). Administrative styles and policy styles. In Thompson, William R. (ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.618.Google Scholar

Beach, D. (2004). The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: the role and influence of the Council Secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beisheim, M., & Liese, A. (2014). Transnational partnerships: effectively providing for sustainable development? Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Bendor, J., Glazer, A., & Hammond, T. H. (2001). Theories of delegation. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 235–69.Google Scholar

Bennett, O. (2017). The end is nigh for the World Health Organisation. The Independent, 5 April. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/obamacare-trump-health-ebola-flu-pandemic-who-reforms-cancer-tb-a7622416.htmlGoogle Scholar

Best, J. (2012). Ambiguity and uncertainty in international organizations: a history of debating IMF conditionality. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 674–88.Google Scholar

Betts, A. (2009). Institutional proliferation and the global refugee regime. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 53–8.Google Scholar

Betts, A. (ed.). (2011). Global migration governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Betts, A. (2012). UNHCR, autonomy, and mandate change. In Oestreich, J. E. (ed.), International organizations as self-directed actors (pp. 139–61). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Betts, A. (2013). Regime complexity and international organizations: UNHCR as a challenged institution. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(1), 69–81.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2007). Reforming global environmental governance, from UNEP towards a world environment organization. In Swart, L. & Perry, E. (eds.), Global environmental governance: perspectives on the current debate (pp. 103–23). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. H. (2012). Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009a). Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009b). The influence of international bureaucracies in world politics: findings from the MANUS research program. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 319–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.). (2009c). Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., Busch, P.-O., et al. (2009). Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: a conceptual framework. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 37–74). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, R. (2014). NATO’s troubled relations with partner organizations: a resource-dependence explanation. In Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-cold war politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 215–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Birnholtz, J. P., Cohen, M. D., & Hoch, S. V. (2007). Organizational character: on the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organization Science, 18(2), 315–32.Google Scholar

Blau, Peter M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boschken, H. L. (1988). Strategic design and organizational change: Pacific coast seaports in transition. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–52.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. (2017). The International Organization for Migration (IOM): gaining power in the forced migration regime. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 33(1), 97–106.Google Scholar

Brechin, S. R., & Ness, G. D. (2013). Looking back at the gap: International Organizations as organizations twenty-five years later. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4(Special Issue), 14–39.Google Scholar

Broome, A. (2012). The politics of IMF–EU co-operation: institutional change from the Maastricht Treaty to the launch of the euro. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Seeing like the IMF: institutional change in small open economies. Review of International Political Economy, 14(4), 576–601.Google Scholar

Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2012). Seeing like an International Organisation. New Political Economy, 17(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Brown, R. L. (2010). Measuring delegation. Review of International Organizations, 5(2), 141–75.Google Scholar

Burci, G. L., & Vignes, C.-H. (2004). World Health Organization. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Busch, P.-O. (2009). The OECD environment directorate: the art of persuasion and its limitations. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 75–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Busch, P.-O. (2014). Independent influence of international public administrations: contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In Kim, S., Ashley, S., & Lambright, W. H. (eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Busch, P.-O., & Liese, A. (2017). The authority of international public administrations. In Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Eckhard, S. (eds.), International bureaucracy (pp. 97–122). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.Google Scholar

Cardesa-Salzmann, A. (2016). Multilateral environmental agreements and illegality. In Elliott, L. & Schaedla, W. H. (eds.), Handbook of transnational environmental crime (pp. 299–321). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Carney, T., & Bennett, B. (2014). Framing pandemic management: new governance, science or culture? Health Sociology Review, 23(2), 136–47.Google Scholar

CGD. (2013). Time for FAO to shift to a higher gear: a report of the CGD working group on food security. Center for Global Development. www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/FAO-text-Final.pdf.Google Scholar

Chan, L.-H. (2010). WHO: the world’s most powerful international organisation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(2), 97–8.Google Scholar

Chen, C. (2011). UNEP institutional reform with its impact on developing countries. In Ashwani, K. & Messner, D. (eds.), Power shifts and global governance: challenges from South and North (pp. 301–20). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar

Chorev, N. (2012). The World Health Organization between north and south. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Chorev, N. (2013). Restructuring neoliberalism at the World Health Organization. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 627–66.Google Scholar

Chow, J. C. (2010). Is the WHO becoming irrelevant? Foreign Policy, 8 December, www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/12/08/is_the_who_becoming_irrelevant (accessed 17 February 2020).Google Scholar

Chwieroth, J. (2010). Capital ideas: the IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chwieroth, J. (2011). The crisis in global finance: political economy perspectives on international financial regulatory change. In Centre for International Affairs (ed.), Beyond national boundaries: building a world without walls (pp. 1–30). London: Academy of Korean Studies Press. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/41825/Google Scholar

Chwieroth, J. (2013). ‘The silent revolution’: how the staff exercise informal governance over IMF lending. Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claude, I. (1984). Swords into plowshares: the problems and progress of International Organization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Clinton, C., & Sridhar, D. (2017). Who pays for cooperation in global health? A comparative analysis of WHO, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The Lancet, 390(10091), 324–32.Google Scholar

Cortell, A. P., & Peterson, S. (2006). Dutiful agents, rogue actors, or both? Staffing, voting rules, and slack in the WHO and WTO. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 255–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, R. W. (1973). ILO: limited monarchy. In Cox, R. W. & Jacobsen, H. K. (eds.), The anatomy of influence: decision making in international organization (pp. 102–138). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, R. W., & Jacobsen, H. K. (1973). The anatomy of influence: decision making in international organization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Czempiel, E.-O., & Rosenau, J. N. (eds.). (1992). Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahan, Y., Lerner, H., & Milman-Sivan, F. (2012). Shared responsibility and the International Labour Organization. Michigan Journal of International Law, 34, 675–743.Google Scholar

Das, T. (2010). Basically a house of experts: the production of World Health Organization information. African Health Sciences, 10(4), 390–4.Google Scholar

Davies, A. R., Doyle, R., & Pape, J. (2012). Future visioning for sustainable household practices: spaces for sustainability learning? Area, 44(1), 54–60.Google Scholar

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar

De Wijk, R. (1997). NATO on the brink of the new millennium: the battle for consensus. Dulles: Potomac Books Inc.Google Scholar

del Río, P. (2014). On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: the case of renewable energy support schemes. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 267–87.Google Scholar

Dembinski, M. (2012). NATO. In Freistein, K. & Leininger, J. (eds.), Handbuch Internationale Organisationen: Theoretische Grundlagen und Akteure. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH.Google Scholar

Deni, J. R. (2014). Perfectly flawed? The evolution of NATO’s force generation process. in Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-cold war politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 176–93). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Desai, R. M., & Vreeland, J. R. (2011). Global governance in a multipolar world: the case for regional monetary funds. International Studies Review, 13(1), 109–21.Google Scholar

DFID. (2011a). Multilateral aid review: assessment for the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). DFID. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224927/FAO.pdfGoogle Scholar

DFID. (2011b). Multilateral aid review: assessment of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). DFID. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67624/ilo.pdfGoogle Scholar

DFID. (2011c). Multilateral aid review: assessment of UNHCR. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224932/UNHCR.pdfGoogle Scholar

DFID. (2013a). Multilateral aid review: the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) – Update 2013. DFID. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261653/FAO-2013-summary-assessment-update2.pdfGoogle Scholar

DFID. (2013b). Multilateral aid review: the International Organization for Migration. DFID. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/260150/IOM-2013-summary-assessment-update.pdfGoogle Scholar

DFID. (2016). Raising the standard: the multilateral development review 2016. DFID. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/573884/Multilateral-Development-Review-Dec2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Diehl, P. F. (2005). The politics of global governance: international organizations in an interdependent world. (3rd ed.). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, H. (2008). Council secretariat’s role in the common foreign and security policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 13, 149–66.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, H. (2015). Functionalism, multiple principals and the reform of the NATO secretariat after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 128–45.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. G. (ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, K., Kerwer, D., & Nölke, A. (eds.). (2009). Die organisierte Welt. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Dionne, G. (2010). Development and organisational practice: ethnography at the food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations (FAO) (PhD Thesis). McGill University.Google Scholar

Douglas, W. A., Ferguson, J.-P., & Klett, E. (2004). An effective confluence of forces in support of workers’ rights: ILO standards, US trade laws, unions, and NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(2), 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downie, D. L., & Levy, M. A. (2000). The UN environment programme at a turning point: options for change. In Chasek, P. (ed.), The global environment in the twenty-first century: prospects for international cooperation (pp. 355–77). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Dumiak, M. (2012). Push needed for pandemic planning. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(11), 800–1.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice economic explanations in political science. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Durant, R. F. (2009). Theory building, administrative reform movements, and the perdurability of Herbert Hoover. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 327–51.Google Scholar

Eccleston-Turner, M., & McArdle, S. (2017). Accountability, international law, and the World Health Organization: a need for reform? GLOBAL HEALTH, 11(1), 27–39.Google Scholar

Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2018). Self-legitimation in the face of politicization: why international organizations centralized public communication. The Review of International Organizations, 13(4), 519–46.Google Scholar

Eckhard, S. (2016). International assistance to police reform: managing peacebuilding. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2016). International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: a review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 960–78.Google Scholar

Eckhard, S., & Kern, C. (2017). A business case for international bureaucrats? Why NATO and the OSCE endure after the Cold War. Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo, 6–9 September.Google Scholar

Eckhard, S., Patz, R., & Schmidt, S. (2016). Coping with the sellout: bureaucratic governance and the UNESCO budget crisis. IPSA 24th World Congress of Political Science, Poznan, 23–28 July.Google Scholar

Eckhard, S., Patz, R., & Schmidt, S. (2019). Reform efforts, synchronization failure, and international bureaucracy: the case of the UNESCO budget crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(11), 1639–56.Google Scholar

Ege, J. (2017). Comparing the autonomy of international public administrations: an ideal-type approach. Public Administration, 95(3), 555–70.Google Scholar

Ege, J. (2019). Learning from the commission case: the comparative study of management change in international public administrations. Public Administration, 97(2), 384–98.Google Scholar

Ege, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2017). How financial resources affect the autonomy of international public administrations. Global Policy, 8(S5), 75–84.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, B. (2014). Banking on the BRICS. Project Syndicate, 13. www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/barry-eichengreen-is-bullish-on-the-group-s-new-development-bank--but-not-on-its-contingent-reserve-arrangement?barrier=accesspaylogGoogle Scholar

Elie, J. (2010). The historical roots of cooperation between the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration. Global Governance, 16(3), 345–60.Google Scholar

Ellinas, A. A., & Suleiman, E. N. (2011). Supranationalism in a transnational bureaucracy: the case of the European Commission. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 923–47.Google Scholar

Elliott, K. A., & Freeman, R. B. (2003). Can labor standards improve under globalization? Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iie/ppress/338.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ellis, D. C. (2010). The organizational turn in international organization theory. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 1(1), 11–28.Google Scholar

Ende, M. (1963). Jim Button and Luke the engine driver. London, Bombay: G. G. Harrap.Google Scholar

Enkler, J., Schmidt, S., Eckhard, S., Knill, C., & Grohs, S. (2017). Administrative styles in the OECD: bureaucratic policy-making beyond formal rules. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 637–48.Google Scholar

Enticott, G. (2004). Multiple voices of modernization: some methodological implications. Public Administration, 82(3), 743–56.Google Scholar

Evans, P., Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (1992). The state as problem and solution: predation, embedded autonomy, and structural change. In Haggard, S. & Kaufman, R. (eds.), The politics of economic adjustment: international constraints, distributive conflict and the state (pp. 139–181). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

FAO. (2007). FAO: the challenge of renewal – report of the independent external evaluation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved from www.fao.org/unfao/bodies/IEE-Working-Draft-Report/K0489E.pdfGoogle Scholar

FAO. (2013). FAO strategy for partnership with civil society organizations. FAO. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/a-i3443e.pdfGoogle Scholar

FAO. (2017). Programme evaluation report 2017. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/a-mt142e.pdfGoogle Scholar

FAO. (2018). Evaluation of FAO Strategic Objective 1: contribute to the eradication of hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition. FAO. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/I9572EN/i9572en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–69.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2003). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 727–52.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

Fidler, D. P. (2004). SARS: governance and the globalization of disease. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fidler, D. P. (2009). H1N1 after action review: learning from the unexpected, the success and the fear. Future Microbiology, 4(7), 767–69.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. (1993). International Organizations as teachers of norms: the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and science policy. International Organization, 47(4), 565–97.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar

Flockhart, T. (2014). Post-bipolar challenges: new visions and new activities. In Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-Cold War politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 71–88). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Fouilleux, È. (2009). À propos de crises mondiales... Revue Française de Science Politique, 59(4), 757–82.Google Scholar

Franke, U. (2018). The United Nations and regional security organizations in Africa, Europe and the North-Atlantic region. In Aris, Stephen, Snetkov, Aglaya, & Wenger, Andreas (eds.), Inter-organizational relations in international security (pp. 33–49). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2014). Knowledge, policy and coordinated action: mental health in Europe. In Freeman, R. & Sturdy, S. (eds.), Knowledge in policy: embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 61–78). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Freitas, R. (2013). The global human mobility architecture. In Reinalda, B. (ed.), Routledge handbook of International Organization (pp. 473–85). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the ‘logical framework approach’ towards learning-oriented development evaluation. Public Administration and Development, 20(1), 17–28.Google Scholar

Geiger, M., & Pécoud, A. (2010). The politics of international migration management. In Geiger, M. & Pécoud, A. (eds.), The politics of international migration management (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Geiger, M., & Pécoud, A. (2013). Migration, development and the ‘migration and development nexus’. Population, Space and Place, 19(4), 369–74.Google Scholar

Geiger, M., & Pécoud, A. (2014). International organisations and the politics of migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(6), 865–87.Google Scholar

Georgi, F. (2010). For the benefit of some: the International Organization for Migration and its global migration management. In Geiger, M. & Pécoud, A. (eds.), The politics of international migration management (pp. 45–72). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Georgi, F., & Schatral, S. (2012). Towards a critical theory of migration control: the case of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). In Geiger, M. & Pécoud, A. (eds.) The new politics of international mobility: migration management and its discontents (pp. 193–222). Osnabrück: Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies (IMIS).Google Scholar

Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection for case‐study analysis: qualitative and quantitative techniques. In Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Godlee, F. (1998). Change at last at WHO: but will the regions play ball? BMJ, 317, 296–300.Google Scholar

Gordenker, L. (1987). Refugees in international politics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Gostin, L. O., Sridhar, D., & Hougendobler, D. (2015). The normative authority of the World Health Organization. Public Health, 129(7), 854–63.Google Scholar

Gottwald, M. (2010). Competing in the humanitarian marketplace: UNHCR’s organizational culture and decision-making processes. UNHCR, Policy Development and Evaluation Service, available at www.unhcr.org/research/working/4cb41ef49/competing-humanitarian-marketplace-unhcrs-organizational-culture-decision.html.Google Scholar

Gould, E. R. (2006). Delegating IMF conditionality: understanding variations in control and conformity. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 281–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grabel, I. (2011). Not your grandfather’s IMF: global crisis, ‘productive incoherence’ and developmental policy space. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(5), 805–30.Google Scholar

Graham, E. R. (2014). International organizations as collective agents: fragmentation and the limits of principal control at the World Health Organization. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 366–90.Google Scholar

Graham, E. R. (2015). Money and multilateralism: how funding rules constitute IO governance. International Theory, 7(1), 162–94.Google Scholar

Graham, E. R. (2017). Follow the money: how trends in financing are changing governance at International Organizations. Global Policy, 8, 15–25.Google Scholar

Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–54.Google Scholar

Grundmann, R. (2001). Transnational policy networks and the role of advocacy scientists: from ozone layer protection to climate change. In Bierman, F., Brohm, R., & Dingwerth, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change ‘global environmental change and the nation-state’ (pp. 405–14). Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.Google Scholar

Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the nation-state: functionalism and International Organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (2008). Climate change governance after Bali. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 1–7.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (ed.). (2016). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M., & McCabe, D. (2001). Amplifiers or dampeners: international institutions and social learning in the management of global environmental risks. In Learning to manage global environmental risks: a comparative history of social responses to climate change, ozone depletion, and acid rain (Vol. 1, pp. 323–48). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2006). The independence of International Organizations – concept and applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(2), 253–75.Google Scholar

Hall, N. (2013). Moving beyond its mandate? UNHCR and climate change displacement. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4(1), 91–108.Google Scholar

Hall, N. (2015). Money or mandate? Why International Organizations engage with the climate change regime. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 79–97.Google Scholar

Hall, N. (2016). Displacement, development, and climate change: international organizations moving beyond their mandates. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, T. (2014). Gradual change in international organisations: agency theory and historical institutionalism. Politics, 34(4), 324–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanrieder, T. (2015). The path-dependent design of international organizations: federalism in the World Health Organization. European Journal of International Relations, 21(1), 215–39.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, T., & Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2014). WHO decides on the exception? Securitization and emergency governance in global health. Security Dialogue, 45(4), 331–48.Google Scholar

Harman, S. (2010). The World Bank and HIV/AIDS: setting a global agenda. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hartlapp, M. (2007). On Enforcement, management and persuasion: different logics of implementation policy in the EU and the ILO. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 653–74.Google Scholar

Hawkins, D. G., & Jacoby, W. (2006). How agents matter. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 199–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.) (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heclo, H. (1977). A Government of strangers: executive politics in Washington. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. (2006). Understanding change in International Organizations: globalization and innovation in the ILO. Vanderbilt Law Review, 59(3), 646–726.Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. (2008). Monitoring compliance with un-ratified treaties: the ILO experience. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(1), 193–218.Google Scholar

Henderson, D. A. (2016). The development of surveillance systems. American Journal of Epidemiology, 183(5), 381–86.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, R. C. (2006). Diplomacy and war at NATO: the Secretary General and military action after the Cold War. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, R. C. (2014). The changing role of NATO’s Secretary General. In Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-Cold War politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 124–39). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hensler, R. (2005). As the UNO celebrates its 60th anniversary, Geneva adopts new mechanisms to serve international community. In Dembinski-Gourmard, D. (ed.), International Geneva yearbook 2005–2006: organization and activities of international institutions in Geneva (Vol. 19). Geneva: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar

Herz, D., Schattenmann, M., Dortants, S. L., Linke, K., & Steuber, S. (2008). Professional education for international organizations: preparing students for international public service. Frankfurt a. M: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Heymann, D. L., & Rodier, G. (2004). SARS: a global response to an international threat. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 185–97.Google Scholar

Hildyard, N. (1991). Editorial: open letter to Eduoard Saouma, Director- General of FAO. The Ecologist, 21(2), 43–6.Google Scholar

Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargains: reward, competency, loyalty – and blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L. (2001). The European Commission and the integration of Europe: images of governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Ceka, B., & Derderyan, S. (2017). Measuring international authority: a postfunctionalist theory of governance (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in International Organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–28.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–36.Google Scholar

Howlett, M. (2003). Administrative styles and the limits of administrative reform: a neo-institutional analysis of administrative culture. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique Du Canada, 46(4), 471–94.Google Scholar

Howlett, M. (2004). Administrative styles and regulatory reform: institutional arrangements and their effects on administrative behavior. International Public Management Review, 5(2), 13–35.Google Scholar

Hughes, S., & Haworth, N. (2011). The International Labour Organization: coming in from the cold. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hurd, I. (2013). International Organizations: politics, law, practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hustedt, T., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2014). Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(4), 746–65.Google Scholar

ILO. (2016). How the ILO works. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/global/about-the- ilo/how-the-ilo-works/lang–en/index.htmGoogle Scholar

ILO. (2018). Programme and budget for the biennium 2018–19. ILO. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/–ed_mas/–program/documents/genericdocument/wcms_582294.pdfGoogle Scholar

Imber, M. F. (1994). Environment, security and UN reform. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Inomata, T. (2016). Building institutional and managerial foundations for a new structure for environmental governance with the United Nations system. In Kuokkanen, T., Couzens, E., Honkonen, T., & Lewis, M. (eds.), International environmental law-making and diplomacy: insights and overviews (pp. 96–110). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

IOM. (2013). IOM in the EU member states, Norway and Switzerland. Brussels: IOM. Retrieved from www.iom.int/sites/default/files/country/docs/AUP00550-RO-Brussels-Regional-Strategy.pdfGoogle Scholar

IOM. (2016). IOM UK strategic plan 2016–2020. IOM. Retrieved from https://unitedkingdom.iom.int/blob/AMIfv95pSabRlhQH3ytVDAtcovbBchiNPw6x9EY_jGgMGexJo1Mhm6O8QcO-UUr3u3grY16OCfyxrSOa1XtJXSGZcEn_2JMGH76j1TetsdcNCyNql1Ck6nZy9sFRfBulIhWJ4p1es_gMAaatgbX5iydYFnk84aQ_O_4P0TrSOa2jtwQjrtck-6A?type=mimeGoogle Scholar

IOM. (2017a). Council 108th session: programme and budget for 2018 (No. C/108/6). IOM. Retrieved from https://governingbodies.iom.int/system/files/en/council/108/C-108–6%20-%20Programme%20and%20Budget%20for%202018.pdfGoogle Scholar

IOM. (2017b). Constitution and basic texts. IOM. Retrieved from http://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iom_constitution_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ivanova, M. (2005). Assessing UNEP as anchor institution for the global environment: lessons for the UNEO debate. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy Working Paper Series, 5(1).Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. (2009). UNEP as anchor organization for the global environment. In Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., & Schreyögg, A. (eds.), International Organizations in global environmental governance (pp. 151–73). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. (2013). The contested legacy of Rio+ 20. Global Environmental Politics, 13(4), 1–11.Google Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, M. (2005). The monopoly of legitimate force: denationalization, or business as usual. European Review, 13(S1), 37–52.Google Scholar

Jann, W. (2002). Der Wandel verwaltungspolitischer Leitbilder: Von Management zu Governance? In König, K. (ed.), Verwaltung und Verwaltungsforschung: Deutsche Verwaltung an der Wende zum 21. Jahrhundert: Deutsche Verwaltung an der Wende zum 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 279–303). Speyer: Forschungsinstitut für Öffentliche Verwaltung.Google Scholar

Jinnah, S. (2010). Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 54–79.Google Scholar

JIU (2012). Review of management, administration and decentralization in the World Health Organization (WHO). Part I: review of management and administration of WHO, JIU/REP/2012/6.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. (2016). Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: international bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world. Review of International Political Economy, 23(5), 737–67.Google Scholar

Johnson, T., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). International bureaucrats and the formation of intergovernmental organizations: institutional design discretion sweetens the pot. International Organization, 68(1), 177–209.Google Scholar

Kamradt-Scott, A. (2016). WHO’s to blame? The World Health Organization and the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Third World Quarterly, 37(3), 401–18.Google Scholar

Kaplan, L. S. (2004). NATO divided, NATO united: the evolution of an alliance. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kaplan, L. S. (2010). NATO and the UN: a peculiar relationship. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Karns, M. A., Mingst, K. A., & Stiles, K. W. (2004). International Organizations: the politics and processes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: a study in administrative behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International social science journal, 51(159), 89–101.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of national administrations: patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policy-making by international public administrations: concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–59.Google Scholar

Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Grohs, S., & Enkler, J. (2019). Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in International Organizations. Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106.Google Scholar

Knill, C., Eckhard, S., & Grohs, S. (2016). Administrative styles in the European Commission and the OSCE-Secretariat: striking similarities despite different organisational settings. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1057–76.Google Scholar

Knill, C., Enkler, J., Schmidt, S., Eckhard, S., & Grohs, S. (2017). Administrative styles of international organizations: can we find them, do they matter? In Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Eckhard, S. (eds.), International bureaucracy: challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 43–71). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Grohs, S. (2015). Administrative styles of EU institutions. In Bauer, M. W. & Trondal, J. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system (pp. 93–107). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private actors and the state: internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance, 15(1), 41–63.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2001). ‘Seek and ye shall find!’: linking different perspectives on institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 34(2), 187–215.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2005). Compliance, competition and communication: different approaches of European governance and their impact on national institutions. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(3), 583–606.Google Scholar

Koch, A. (2014). The politics and discourse of migrant return: the role of UNHCR and IOM in the governance of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(6), 905–23.Google Scholar

Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(04), 761–99.Google Scholar

Koschut, S. (2018). Inter (b)locking institutions: NATO, the EU, the OSCE and inter-organizational European security governance. In Aris, Stephen, Snetkov, Aglaya, & Wenger, Andreas (eds.), Inter-organizational relations in international security (pp. 85–103). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Koser, K. (2010). Introduction: international migration and global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 16(3), 301–15.Google Scholar

Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473–92.Google Scholar

La Hovary, C. (2015). A challenging ménage à trois? International Organizations Law Review, 12(1), 204–36.Google Scholar

Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives: the principal–agent model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lall, R. (2017). Beyond institutional design: explaining the performance of international organizations. International Organization, 71(2), 245–80.Google Scholar

Landman, J. C. (2002). The evolution of the OSCE – A perspective from the Netherlands. In Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg /IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2001 (pp. 81–93). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Lavenex, S. (2016). Multilevelling EU external governance: the role of international organizations in the diffusion of EU migration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(4), 554–70.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., & Denis, B. (2005). Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: the case of the introduction of ISO norms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 873–96.Google Scholar

Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2006). A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization, 13(5), 627–51.Google Scholar

Lee, G., Benoit‐Bryan, J., & Johnson, T. P. (2012). Survey research in public administration: assessing mainstream journals with a total survey error framework. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 87–97.Google Scholar

Lee, K. (2009). The World Health Organization (WHO). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Patterns of international organization: task specific vs. general purpose. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49, 107–32.Google Scholar

Levinson, D. J. (2011). Parchment and politics: the positive puzzle of constitutional commitment. Harvard Law Review, 124(3), 659–746.Google Scholar

Liese, A. (2010). Explaining varying degrees of openness in the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In Jönsson, C. & Tallberg, J. (eds.), Transnational actors in global governance: patterns, explanations and implications (pp. 88–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Liese, A., & Weinlich, S. (2006). Die Rolle von Verwaltungsstäben internationaler Organisationen. Lücken, Tücken und Konturen eines (neuen) Forschungsgebiets. In Bogumil, J., Jann, W., & Nullmeier, F. (eds.), Politik Und Verwaltung (PVS-Sonderheft 37) (pp. 491–525). Wiesbaden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Lindley-French, J. (2006). The North Atlantic Treaty Organization: the enduring alliance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipson, C. (1984). International cooperation in economic and security affairs. World Politics, 37(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Littoz-Monnet, A. (ed.). (2017). The politics of expertise in International Organizations: how international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loescher, G. (2001). The UNHCR and World Politics: state interests vs. institutional autonomy. International Migration Review, 35(1), 33–56.Google Scholar

Loh, C., Galbraith, V., & Chiu, W. (2004). The media and SARS. In Loh, C. (ed.), At the epicentre: Hong Kong and the SARS outbreak (pp. 195–214). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Lyne, M. M., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2006). Who delegates? Alternative models of principals in development aid. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in International Organizations (pp. 41–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–79.Google Scholar

Mahon, R., & McBride, S. (2008). The OECD and global governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Manulak, M. W. (2017). Leading by design: informal influence and international secretariats. The Review of International Organizations, 12(4), 497–522.Google Scholar

March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Marcussen, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). The OECD civil servant: caught between Scylla and Charybdis. Review of International Political Economy, 18(5), 592–621.Google Scholar

Margulis, M. E. (2014). Trading out of the global food crisis? The World Trade Organization and the geopolitics of food security. Geopolitics, 19(2), 322–50.Google Scholar

Margulis, M. E. (2017). The global governance of food security. In Koops, J. A. & Biermann, R. (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 503–25). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Martin, L. (2006). Distribution, information, and delegation to international organizations: the case of IMF conditionality. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in International Organizations (pp. 140–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maupain, F. (2013). The future of the International Labour Organization in the global economy. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Mayer, P. (2008). Civil society participation at the margins: the case of NATO and OSCE. In Steffek, J. & Kissling, C. (eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: a cure for the democratic deficits (pp. 109–15). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mayer, S. (2014a). Introduction: NATO as an Organization and Bureaucracy. In NATO’s post-Cold War politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 1–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mayer, S. (ed.). (2014b). NATO’s post-Cold War politics: the changing provision of security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mayer, S., & Theiler, O. (2014). Coping with complexity: informal political forums at nato’s headquarters. In Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-Cold war politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 140–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mayntz, R., & Derlien, H.-U. (1989). Party patronage and politicization of the West German administrative elite 1970–1987 – toward hybridization? Governance, 2(4), 384–404.Google Scholar

McCalla, R. B. (1996). NATO’s persistence after the cold war. International Organization, 50(3), 445–75.Google Scholar

McCubbins, M. D. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 721–48.Google Scholar

McKeon, N. (2009). The United Nations and civil society: legitimating global governance–whose voice? London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar

McKittrick, A. (2008). UNHCR as an autonomous organisation: complex operations and the case of Kosovo (No. 50). Working Paper: Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre Oxford University.Google Scholar

Jr McNeil, D. G. (2014). Polio’s return after near eradication prompts a global health warning. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/05/06/health/world-health-organization-polio-health-emergency.htmlGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.Google Scholar

Megens, I. (1998). The role of NATO’s bureaucracy in shaping and widening the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. In Reinalda, B. & Verbeek, B. (eds.), Autonomous policy making by International Organizations (pp. 120–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. E., Egger‐Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–85.Google Scholar

Michiels, L., & den Boer, R. (2016). Forging partnerships for the future: IOM and the private sector. Geneva: IOM. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/ps_photobook.pdfGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal–agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 203–25.Google Scholar

Mingst, K. A. (1990). The United States and the World Health Organization. In Karns, M. P. & Mingst, K. A. (eds.), The United States and multilateral institutions: patterns of changing instrumentality and influence (pp. 205–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–67.Google Scholar

Moe, T. M. (1990). Political institutions: the neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 6 (Special Issue), 213–53.Google Scholar

Momani, B. (2005). Limits on streamlining Fund conditionality: the International Monetary Fund’s organizational culture. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8(2), 142–63.Google Scholar

MOPAN (2013). MOPAN 2013 assessments: World Health Organisation (WHO). Institutional assessment report (No. 1). MOPAN. Retrieved from www.mopanonline.org/assessments/who2013/MOPAN_2013-_WHO_Vol._I.pdfGoogle Scholar

MOPAN (2016). MOPAN 2015–16 assessments: International Labour Organization Institutional assessment report. MOPAN. Retrieved from www.mopanonline.org/assessments/ilo2015-16/Mopan%20ILO%20[interactive]%20[final].pdfGoogle Scholar

MOPAN (2017). MOPAN 2015–16 assessments: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Institutional assessment report. MOPAN. Retrieved from www.mopanonline.org/assessments/unep2015-16/Mopan%20UNEP%20report%20[interactive]%20[final].pdfGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1999). A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation. International Organization, 53(2), 267–306.Google Scholar

Morth, U. (2000). Competing frames in the European Commission: the case of the defence industry and equipment issue. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 173–89.Google Scholar

Moschella, M. (2010). Governing risk: the IMF and global financial crises. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mouritzen, H. (2013). In spite of reform: NATO HQ still in the grips of nations. Defense & Security Analysis, 29(4), 342–55.Google Scholar

NATO. (2017a). Annual report of the Secretary-General. NATO. Retrieved from www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_03/20180315_SG_AnnualReport_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

NATO. (2017b). The science for peace and security programme. NATO. Retrieved from www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_85373.htm?Google Scholar

Nay, O. (2011). What drives reforms in international organizations? External pressure and bureaucratic entrepreneurs in the UN response to AIDS. Governance, 24(4), 689–712.Google Scholar

Nay, O. (2012). How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32(1), 53–76.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, S. C. (2014). Playing favorites: how shared beliefs shape the IMF’s lending decisions. International Organization, 68(2), 297–328.Google Scholar

Ness, G. D., & Brechin, S. R. (1988). Bridging the gap: international organizations as organizations. International Organization, 42(02), 245–73.Google Scholar

Newland, K. (2010). The governance of international migration: mechanisms, processes, and institutions. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 16(3), 331–43.Google Scholar

Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(02), 241–76.Google Scholar

Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Noetzel, T., & Schreer, B. (2009). Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change. International Affairs, 85(2), 211–26.Google Scholar

OECD/FAO. (2016). International regulatory co-operation and international organisations: the case of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). OECD/FAO. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/FAO_Full-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.Google Scholar

Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–76.Google Scholar

Page, E. C. (1985). Political authority and bureaucratic power: a comparative analysis. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Page, E. C. (2012). Policies without politicians: bureaucratic influence in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, G. W. (1995). Environment: the international challenge: essays. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. R. (2015). How do policy entrepreneurs influence policy change? Framing and boundary work in EU transport biofuels policy. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 270–87.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–53.Google Scholar

Parsanoglou, D. (2015). Organizing an international migration machinery: the intergovermental committee for European migration. In Venturas, L. (ed.), International ‘migration management’ in the early Cold War. The Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration (pp. 55–85). Corinth: University of the Peloponnese.Google Scholar

Patz, R., & Goetz, K. H. (2019). Managing money and discord in the UN: budgeting and bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pécoud, A. (2013). ‘Suddenly, migration was everywhere’: the conception and future prospects of the Global Migration Group. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from www.migrationpolicy.org/article/suddenly-migration-was-everywhere-conception-and-future-prospects-global-migration-groupGoogle Scholar

Pécoud, A. (2017). What do we know about the International Organization for Migration?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(10), 1621–38.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2010). Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31(7), 917–40.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2011). The (n)ever-changing world: stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22(6), 1369–83.Google Scholar

Pernet, C. A., & Ribi Forclaz, A. (2019). Revisiting the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): international histories of agriculture, nutrition, and development. The International History Review, 41(2), 345–50.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy (6th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2013). Strategies for comparative research in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., & Hogwood, B. W. (1988). The death of immortality: births, deaths and metamorphoses in the U.S. federal bureaucracy, 1933–1982. American Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 119.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004a). Politicization of the civil service: concepts, causes, consequences. In Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (eds.), The politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: the quest for control (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004b). The politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: a quest for control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–68.Google Scholar

Pollack, M. A. (1997). Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51(1), 99–134.Google Scholar

Pollack, M. A. (2003). The engines of European integration: delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pollack, M. A. (2006). Delegation and discretion in the European Union. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.), Delegation and agency in International Organizations (pp. 165–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: a comparative analysis. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Reinalda, B. (1998). Autonomous policy making by International Organizations (Vol. 5). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reinalda, B. (2013). Routledge handbook of International Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reinalda, B., & Verbeek, B. (eds.). (2003). Autonomous policy making by International Organisations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R., t’Hart, P., & Noordegraaf, M. (eds.). (2007). Observing government elites: up close and personal. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Richardson, J., Gustafsson, G., & Jordan, G. (1982). The concept of policy style. In Richardson, J. (ed.), Policy styles in Western Europe (pp. 1–16). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (eds.). (1999). The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rittberger, V., & Zangl, B. (2006). International Organization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2),147–75.Google Scholar

Rochester, J. M. (1986). The rise and fall of international organization as a field of study. International Organization, 40(4), 777–813.Google Scholar

Ross, S. (2011). The World Food Programme in global politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Rothgang, H., & Schneider, S. (eds.). (2015). State transformations in OECD countries: dimensions, driving forces, and trajectories. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Rourke, F. E. (1969). Bureaucracy, politics, and public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. In Sabel, C. F. & Zeitlin, J. (eds.), Experimentalist governance in the European Union: towards a new architecture (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salvato, C., & Rerup, C. (2011). Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37(2), 468–90.Google Scholar

Sandford, R. (1994). International environmental treaty secretariats: stagehands or actors. In Bergesen, H. O. & Parmann, G. (eds.), Green globe yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development (Vol. 17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53.Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–19.Google Scholar

Schnapp, K.-U. (2004). Ministerialbürokratien in westlichen Demokratien: Eine vergleichende Analyse [Ministerial Bureaucracies in Western Democracies: A Comparative Analysis]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar

Seabrooke, L., & Nilsson, E. R. (2015). Professional skills in international financial surveillance: assessing change in IMF policy teams. Governance, 28(2), 237–54.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: a study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Senghaas-Knobloch, E. (2004). Auftrag und Möglichkeiten der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation (ILO) unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung. Arbeit, 13(3), 236–47.Google Scholar

Sharma, P. (2013). Bureaucratic imperatives and policy outcomes: the origins of World Bank structural adjustment lending. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 667–86.Google Scholar

Shaw, D. J. (2007). World food security: a history since 1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Shaw, D. J. (2009). Global food and agricultural institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K. (1986). Codes of conduct for transnational corporations: the case of the WHO/UNICEF code. International Organization, 40(4), 815–40.Google Scholar

Simmons, B. A., & Danner, A. (2010). Credible commitments and the international criminal court. International Organization, 64(2), 225–56.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, D., Isba, R., Kredo, T., Zani, B., Smith, H., & Garner, P. (2013). World Health Organization guideline development: an evaluation. PLOS ONE, 8(5), e63715.Google Scholar

Smith, R. (1995). The WHO: change or die. British Medical Journal, 310 (6979), 543–4.Google Scholar

Snidal, D. (1990). IGOs, regimes, and cooperation: challenges for international relations theory. In Karns, M. P. & Mingst, K. A. (eds.) The United States and multilateral institutions: patterns of changing instrumentality and influence (pp. 221–41). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2008). The ILO: an agency for globalization? Development and Change, 39(3), 355–84.Google Scholar

Stene, E. O. (1940). An approach to a science of administration. American Political Science Review, 34(6), 1124–37.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton, Inc.Google Scholar

Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.Google Scholar

Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International Organizations and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, R. W. (2013). Informal governance in international organizations: introduction to the special issue. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 121–36.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., & Palmer, E. (2017). A Kantian system of constitutional justice: rights, trusteeship, balancing. Global Constitutionalism, 6(3), 377–411.Google Scholar

Strang, D., & Chang, P. M. Y. (1993). The International Labor Organization and the welfare state: institutional effects on national welfare spending, 1960–80. International Organization, 47(2), 235–62.Google Scholar

Suri, J. (2006). The normative resilience of NATO: a community of shared values amid public discord. In Wenger, A., Nuenlist, C., & Locher, A. (eds.), Transforming NATO in the Cold War: challenges beyond deterrence in the 1960s (pp. 15–30). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tallberg, J. (2000). The anatomy of autonomy: an institutional account of variation in supranational influence. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 843–64.Google Scholar

Tallberg, J., Lundgren, M., Sommerer, T., & Squatrito, T. (2017). Explaining policy norm adoption by International Organizations (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3059442). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3059442Google Scholar

Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2014). Explaining the transnational design of International Organizations. International Organization, 68(4), 741–74.Google Scholar

Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2015). Replication data for: explaining the transnational design of international organizations [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HQ7ZCLGoogle Scholar

Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Lundgren, M. (2016). The performance of International Organizations: a policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1077–96.Google Scholar

Tarasofsky, R. (2002). International environmental governance: strengthening UNEP. UCN/IAS.Google Scholar

Thomann, L. (2008). The ILO, tripartism, and NGOs: do too many cooks really spoil the broth? In Steffek, J., Kissling, C., & Nanz, P. (eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: a cure for the democratic deficit? (pp. 71–94). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Thouez, C., & Channac, F. (2006). Shaping international migration policy: the role of regional consultative processes. West European Politics, 29(2), 370–87.Google Scholar

Tomescu-Hatto, O. (2014). Self-presentation and impression management: NATO’s new public diplomacy. In Mayer, S. (ed.), NATO’s post-Cold War politics: the changing provision of security (pp. 89–103). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Tortora, P., & Steensen, S. (2014). Making earmarked funding more effective: Current practices and a way forward. Better Policies for Better Lives Report, (1).Google Scholar

Trebilcock, M. J., & Howse, R. (2004). Trade policy & (and) labor standards. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 14, 261–300.Google Scholar

Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., Larson, T., & Veggeland, F. (2010) Unpacking International Organisations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F., & Fern, M. J. (2012). Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: the effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1407–34.Google Scholar

Unger, C. R. (2019). International organizations and rural development: the FAO perspective. The International History Review, 41(2), 451–8.Google Scholar

Vabulas, F., & Snidal, D. (2013). Organization without delegation: informal intergovernmental organizations (IIGOs) and the spectrum of intergovernmental arrangements. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2),193–220.Google Scholar

Van Daele, J. (2008). The International Labour Organization (ILO) in past and present research. International Review of Social History, 53(3), 485–511.Google Scholar

van der Lugt, C., & Dingwerth, K. (2015). Governing where focality is low: UNEP and the principles for responsible investment. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 237–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–87.Google Scholar

Venturas, L. (ed.). (2015). International ‘migration management’ in the early Cold War: the intergovernmental committee for European migration. Corinth: University of the Peloponnese.Google Scholar

Venzke, I. (2010). International bureaucracies from a political science perspective – agency, authority and international institutional law. In Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R., Bernstorff, J., Dann, P., & Goldmann, M. (eds.), The exercise of public authority by international institutions: advancing international institutional law (pp. 67–98). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Verbeek, B. (1998). International organizations: the ugly duckling of international relations theory. In Reinalda, B. & Verbeek, B. (eds.), Autonomous Policy Making by International Organizations (pp. 11–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101–18.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, P., Zietsma, C., Greenwood, R., & Langley, A. (2016). Strategic responses to institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 277–86.Google Scholar

Vetterlein, A. (2012). Seeing like the World Bank on poverty. New Political Economy, 17(1), 35–58.Google Scholar

Viola, L. A. (2015). The governance shift: from multilateral IGOs to orchestrated networks. In Mayntz, R. (ed.), Negotiated reform: the multilevel governance of financial regulation (pp. 17–36). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wallander, C. A. (2000). Institutional assets and adaptability: NATO after the Cold War. International Organization, 54(4), 705–35.Google Scholar

Weaver, C. (2008). Hypocrisy trap: the World Bank and the poverty of reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weaver, C. (2010). The politics of performance evaluation: independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund. The Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 365–85.Google Scholar

Weaver, C., & Leiteritz, R. J. (2005). ‘Our poverty is a world full of dreams’: reforming the World Bank. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 11(3), 369–88.Google Scholar

Webber, M., Sperling, J., & Smith, M. (2012). NATO’s post-Cold War trajectory: decline or regeneration. Basingstoke: Springer.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weible, C. M. (2005). Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: an advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 461–75.Google Scholar

Weinlich, S. (2014). Emerging powers at the UN: ducking for cover? Third World Quarterly, 35(10), 1829–44.Google Scholar

Weisband, E. (2000). Discursive multilateralism: global benchmarks, shame, and learning in the ILO labor standards monitoring regime. International Studies Quarterly, 44(4), 643–66.Google Scholar

Weiss, T. G. (1982). International Bureaucracy: the myth and reality of the international civil service. International Affairs, 58(2), 287–306.Google Scholar

Weiss, T. G., & Pasic, A. (1997). Reinventing UNHCR: enterprising humanitarians in the former Yugoslavia, 1991–1995. Global Governance, 3(1), 41–57.Google Scholar

Weller, P., & Yi-Chong, X. (eds.). (2015). The politics of International Organizations: views from insiders. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

WHO. (1980). The global eradication of smallpox. final report of the global commission for the certification of smallpox eradication (Vol. 4). Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Wilson, W. (1919). The League of Nations. 3 Session 65 Congress. Senate Document No. 389: 12–15.Google Scholar

WMO. (2011). Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2010 (Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project No. 52). World Meteorological Organization. Retrieved from www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/gaw/ozone_2010/documents/Ozone-Assessment-2010-complete.pdfGoogle Scholar

Woolf, L. S. (1916). International government: two reports. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2004). The governance of World Trade – international civil servants and GATT/WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2008). ‘To be, but not to be seen’: exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51.Google Scholar

Yamey, G. (2002). The WHO in 2002: have the latest reforms reversed WHO’s decline? British Medical Journal, 325(7372), 1107–12.Google Scholar

Yeager, S. J. (2007). Classic methods in public administration research. In Hildreth, W. B., Miller, G. J., & Rabin, J. (eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 683–794). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Yi-Chong, X., & Weller, P. (2004). The governance of world trade: international civil servants and the GATT/WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Yi-chong, X., & Weller, P. (2018). The working world of International Organizations: authority, capacity, legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zacher, M., & Keefe, T. J. (2008). The Politics of global health governance: united by contagion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Zahariadis, Nikolaos (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: political decision making in modern democracies. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–72.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(01), 69–106.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., & Checkel, J. T. (2005). Getting socialized to build bridges: constructivism and rationalism, Europe and the nation-state. International Organization, 59(04), 1045–79.Google Scholar