Book contents
- Matter and Making in Early English Poetry
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- Matter and Making in Early English Poetry
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and Editorial Conventions
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Words and Deeds in Chaucer
- Chapter 2 Gower and the Crying Voice
- Chapter 3 Hoccleve and the Force of Literature
- Chapter 4 Lydgate and the Surplus of History
- Chapter 5 Copy and Copia in Skelton
- Chapter 6 Wyatt’s Grace
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2023
Book contents
- Matter and Making in Early English Poetry
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- Matter and Making in Early English Poetry
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and Editorial Conventions
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Words and Deeds in Chaucer
- Chapter 2 Gower and the Crying Voice
- Chapter 3 Hoccleve and the Force of Literature
- Chapter 4 Lydgate and the Surplus of History
- Chapter 5 Copy and Copia in Skelton
- Chapter 6 Wyatt’s Grace
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Matter and Making in Early English PoetryLiterary Production from Chaucer to Sidney, pp. 283 - 317Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Alan of Lille. Literary Works. Edited and translated by Wetherbee, Winthrop. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 22. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Summa theologica. Edited by Klumper, Bernard. 4 vols. Rome: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–1948.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. Orlando Furioso in English Heroical Verse, by Iohn Haringto[n]. Translated by John Harington. STC 746. London, 1591.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De Interpretatione vel periermenias. Edited by Minio-Paluello, Laurence. In Aristoteles Latinus, edited by Gerard Verbeke, vol. 2.1–2. Brussels and Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1965.Google Scholar
Physica. Edited by Bossier, Fernand and Brams, Jozef. In Aristoteles Latinus, edited by Gerard Verbeke, vol. 7.1.2. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. Toxophilus the Schole of Shooting Contayned in Tvvo Bookes. STC 837. London, 1545.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. De doctrina Christiana. Edited by Martin, Joseph. CCSL 32. Turnhout: Brepols, 1962.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger. Opera quaedam hactenus inedita. Edited by Brewer, J. S.. Vol. 1. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts, 1859.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger. “Secreta Secretorum.” In Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, edited by Steele, Robert, vol. 5. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1920.Google Scholar
du Bellay, Joachim. The Regrets. Edited and translated by Helgerson, Richard. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro. Prose e Rime Di Pietro Bembo. Edited by Dionisotti, Carlo. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, 1966.Google Scholar
Bentley, Elna-Jean Young. “The Formulary of Thomas Hoccleve.” PhD Dissertation. Emory, 1965.Google Scholar
Blyke, Richard, and Strachey, John, eds. Rotuli Parliamentorum, 8 vols. London, 1780–1832.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni. Boccaccio on Poetry: Being the Preface and Fourteenth and Fifteenth Books of Boccaccio’s Genealogia Deorum Gentilium. Translated by Charles G. Osgood. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1956.Google Scholar
Decameron. In Tutte Le Opere Di Giovanni Boccaccio, edited by Vittore Branca, vol. 4. Milan: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 1976.Google Scholar
Boethius, Ancius Manlius. The Theological Tractates and the Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by E. K. Rand, S. J. Tester, and H. F. Stewart. LCL 74. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bokenham, Osbern. Bokenham’s Legendys of Hooly Wummen. Edited by Serjeantson, Mary. EETS o.s. 206. Oxford University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Bolland, William Craddock. Select Bills in Eyre, A.D. 1292–1333. Publications of the Selden Society 30. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1914.Google Scholar
Brinton, Thomas. The Sermons of Thomas Brinton, Bishop of Rochester (1373–1389). Edited by Devlin, Mary Aquinas. 2 vols. London: Royal Historical Society, 1954.Google Scholar
Buridan, John. Quaestiones super octos libros physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam) libri i–ii. Edited by Streijger, Michiel and Bakker, Paul J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Capgrave, John. The Life of St. Katherine. Edited by Karen, A. Winstead. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 1999.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier. Translated by Thomas Hoby. London: David Nutt, 1900.Google Scholar
Charland, Th.-M., ed. Artes Praedicandi: Contribution à l’histoire de la rhétorique au moyen age. Paris: J. Vrin, 1936.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Benson, Larry. Third edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986.Google Scholar
Colwell, Thomas, ed. Merie Tales Newly Imprinted [and] Made by Master Skelton Poet Laureat. STC 22618. London, 1567.Google Scholar
Correale, Robert M., and Hamel, Mary, eds. Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2002.Google Scholar
Crow, Martin M., and Olson, Clair C., eds. Chaucer Life-Records. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Curley, Michael J., tr. Physiologus: A Medieval Book of Nature Lore. University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
De Poorter, A. “Un Manuel de Prédication Médiévale: Le MS. 97 de Bruges.” Revue Neo-Scolastique de Philosophie 25, no. 97 (1923), 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, James M., ed. Medieval English Political Writings. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedeck-Héry, V. L. “Boethius’ De Consolatione by Jean de Meun.” Mediaeval Studies, no. 14 (1952), 165–275.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn, ed. Ciceronian Controversies. Translated by Brian Duvick. I Tatti Renaissance Library 26. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Deschamps, Eustache. L’art de Dictier. Translated by Deborah Sinnreich-Levi. Lansing: Colleagues Press, 1994.Google Scholar
de Diceto, Ralph. The Historical Works of Master Ralph de Diceto, Dean of London. Edited by Stubbs, William. 2 vols. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1876.Google Scholar
Douglas, Gavin. Eneydos. Edited by Coldwell, David F. C.. Scottish Text Society, Third Series, 27–30. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood, 1957.Google Scholar
Dyer, Edward. The Life and Lyrics of Sir Edward Dyer. Edited by Ralph, M. Sargent. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Collected Works of Erasmus. Edited by Shoeck, Richard J. and Corrigan, Beatrice M.. 86 vols. University of Toronto Press, 1974–.Google Scholar
Faral, Edmond, ed. Les arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle: recherches et documents sur la technique littéraire du moyen âge. Paris: Libraire Honoré Champion, 1962.Google Scholar
Froissart, Jean. Chroniques de Jean Froissart. Edited by Luce, Siméon, Raynaud, Gaston, and Mirot, Léon. 15 vols. Paris: Société de L’Histoire de France, 1869.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Vivian Hunter, ed. The Anonimalle Chronicle, 1333–1381. Manchester University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, George. A Hundreth Sundrie Flowres. Edited by Pigman, G. W.. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
de Gayangos, Pascual, ed. Calendar of State Papers, Spain. Vol. 5.2. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1888.Google Scholar
Geoffrey of Vinsauf. Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi. Translated by Roger P. Parr. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Gilbertus Anglicus, . Compendium Medicinae. Edited by Getz, Faye M.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome. The Governance of Kings and Princes: John Trevisa’s Translation of the De Regimine Principum of Aegidius Romanus. Edited by Fowler, David C., Briggs, Charles F., and Remley, Paul G.. Translated by John Trevisa. Garland Medieval Texts 19. New York: Garland Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Warren, ed. Wynnere and Wastoure and The Parlement of the Thre Ages. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 1992.Google Scholar
Googe, Barnabe. Eclogues, Epitaphs, and Sonnets. Edited by Kennedy, Judith M.. University of Toronto Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gower, John. Confessio Amantis. Edited by Peck, Russell A.. Translated by Andrew Galloway. 3 vols. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 2004–2013.Google Scholar
John Gower: Poems on Contemporary Events. Edited by Carlson, David. Translated by A. G. Rigg. Toronto: PIMS, 2011.Google Scholar
Mirour de l’omme. Translated by William Burton Wilson. East Lansing: Colleagues Press, 1992.Google Scholar
The Complete Works of John Gower: The French Works. Edited by Macaulay, G. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899.Google Scholar
The Complete Works of John Gower: The Latin Works. Edited by Macaulay, G. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.Google Scholar
The Major Latin Works of John Gower. Translated by Eric W. Stockton. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1962.Google Scholar
The Minor Latin Works, with In Praise of Peace. Edited by Yeager, R. F. and Livingston, Michael. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 2005.Google Scholar
Grimsdale, D. M., ed. Three Middle English Sermons from the Worcester Chapter Manuscript F. 10. Leeds School of English Language Texts and Monographs 5. Leeds: Titus Wilson of Kendal, 1939.Google Scholar
Harpsfield, Nicholas. The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More. Edited by Hitchcock, Elsie Vaughan. EETS o.s. 186. Oxford University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Higden, Ranulph. Ars Componendi Sermones. Translated by Margaret Jennings and Sally A. Wilson. Paris: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Polychronicon Ranulphi Higden monachi cestrensis. Edited by Babington, Churchill. Translated by John Trevisa. Vol. 1. London: Longman, 1865.Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas. Hoccleve’s Works: The Minor Poems. Edited by Furnivall, Frederick J.. EETS e.s. 41. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and company, 1892.Google Scholar
“My Compleinte” and Other Poems. Edited by Ellis, Roger. University of Exeter Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Holton, Amanda, and MacFaul, Tom, eds. Tottel’s Miscellany: Songs and Sonnets of Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, Sir Thomas Wyatt, and Others. London: Penguin, 2012.Google Scholar
Horace, . Ars Poetica. Translated by H. R. Fairclough. LCL 194. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Howard, Henry, Earl of Surrey. The Complete Poems. Edited by McGaw, William. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Huygens, R. B. C., ed. Accessus ad Auctores, Bernard D’Utrecht, Conrad D’Hirsau: Édition Critique. Leiden: Brill, 1970.Google Scholar
Idley, Peter. Instructions to His Son. Edited by D’Evelyn, Charlotte. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1935.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. Isidori Hispalensis episcopi etymologiarum sive originum libri xx. Edited by Lindsay, W. M.. Oxford University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
John of Garland. Parisiana Poetria. Edited and translated by Traugott Lawler. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. Edited by Hutson, Lorna. Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Josephus, Flavius. Flavii Josephi de bello Judaico libri septim. Edited by Cardwell, Edward. 2 vols. Oxford, 1937.Google Scholar
Knighton, Henry. Knighton’s Chronicle, 1337–1396. Edited and translated by G. H. Martin. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo. In Quinti Horatii Flacci artem poetica ad pisones interpretationes. Edited by Gabriele Bugada. Florence: SISMEL edizioni del Galluzzo, 2012.Google Scholar
Langland, William. Piers Plowman: B Version. Edited by Kane, George and Donaldson, E. Talbot. Revised edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Littlehales, Henry, ed. The Prymer, or, Lay Folks’ Prayer Book. EETS o.s. 105. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and company, 1895.Google Scholar
Livy. History of Rome. Translated by Evan T. Sage. Vol. 9. LCL 295. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sententiae in iv libris distinctae. Edited by Brady, Ignatius. 2 vols. Revised third edition. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas, 1971–81.Google Scholar
de Lorris, Guillaume and de Meun, Jean. Roman de La Rose. Edited by Langlois, Ernest. 5 vols. Paris: Libraire de Firmin-Didot, Libraire Ancienne Honoré Champion, and Libraire Ancienne Édouard Champion, 1919.Google Scholar
The Romance of the Rose. Translated by Charles Dahlberg. Third Edition. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Luria, Maxwell S., and Hoffman, Richard L., eds. Middle English Lyrics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974.Google Scholar
Lydgate, John. Fall of Princes. Edited by Bergen, Henry. 4 vols. EETS e.s. 121–24. Oxford University Press, 1924–27.Google Scholar
John Lydgate’s Dance of Death and Related Works. Edited by Cook, Megan L. and Strakhov, Elizaveta. Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 2019.Google Scholar
John Lygdate’s Lives of Ss. Edmund and Fremund. Edited by Edwards, A. S. G. and Bale, Anthony. Middle English Texts 41. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2009.Google Scholar
Troy Book. Edited by Bergen, Henry. 4 vols. EETS e.s. 97, 103, 106, 126. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Company, 1906–35.Google Scholar
Machaut, Guillaume de. The Fountain of Love and Two Other Love Vision Poems. Edited by Palmer, R. B.. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Marie, de France. The Lais of Marie de France. Edited and translated by Waters, Claire M.. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Matthew of Linköping. Testa Nucis and Poetria. Edited and translated by Bergh Birger. Arlöv: Berlings, 1996.Google Scholar
Matthew of Vendôme, Ars versificatoria. Translated by Roger P. Parr. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Merriman, Roger Bigelow, ed. Life and Letters of Thomas Cromwell. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.Google Scholar
Michael of Northgate. Dan Michel’s Ayenbite of Inwyt. Edited by Gradon, Pamela. Vol. 1. EETS o.s. 23. Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair and Scott, Brian A., eds., with David Wallace, tr. Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism, c. 1100–c. 1375: The Commentary Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
d’Orléans, Charles. Fortunes Stabilnes: Charles of Orleans English Book of Love. Edited by Arn, Mary-Jo. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1994.Google Scholar
Orosius, Paulus. Pavli Orosii historiarum adversvm paganos libri septem. Edited by Zangemeister, Karl. CSEL 5. Leipzig: Teubner, 1889.Google Scholar
Otto of Freising and Rahewin. Ottonis et Rahewini Gesta Friderici I. Imperatoris. Edited by Waitz, Georg and von Simson, Bernhard. Third edition. Scriptores Rerum Germanicum in Usum Scholarum Ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis Recusi 46. Hanover and Leipzig: Impensis bibliopolii Hahniani, 1912.Google Scholar
The Deeds of Frederick Barbarossa. Translated by C. C. Mierow. New York: Columbia University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Ovid, . Heroides and Amores. Translated by Grant Showerman. Second edition. LCL 41. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Metamorphoses. Translated by Frank Justus Miller. Revised G. P. Goold. 2 vols. LCL 42–43. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Peter of Spain. Summaries of Logic. Edited and translated by Brian P. Copenhaver, with Calvin Normore and Terence Parsons. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Petrarca, Francesco. Le Familiari. Edited by Bosco, Umberto. 4 vols. Florence: G. C. Sansoni, 1933.Google Scholar
Lyric Poems: The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics. Edited and translated by Robert M. Durling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Pitra, J. B. Spicilegium solesmense complectens sanctorum patrum scriptorumque ecclesiasticorum. 4 vols. Paris, 1852.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder, . Natural History. Translated by H. Rackham. Vol. 2. LCL 352. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Priscian, . “Praeexercitamina.” In Grammatici Latini, edited by Keil, Heinrich, vol. 3. Leipzig: Teubner, 1859.Google Scholar
Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis institutionum grammaticarum libri xviii. Edited by Hertz, Martin. 2 vols. Leipzig: G. Teubner, 1855.Google Scholar
Ps.-Albertus Magnus, . Quaestiones Alberti de modis significandi. Edited and translated by L. G. Kelly. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1977.Google Scholar
Ps.-Cicero, . Rhetorica ad Herennium. Translated by Harry Caplan. LCL 403. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Art of English Poesy. Edited by Whigham, Frank and Rebhorn, Wayne A.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. Tod, ed. The Bannatyne Manuscript. Scottish Text Society, new series 26. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1934.Google Scholar
Rolle, Richard. The Psalter, or, Psalms of David and Certain Canticles, With a Translation and Exposition in English by Richard Rolle of Hampole. Edited by Bramley, H. R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar. Ivlii Caesaris Scaligeri viri clarissimi poetices libri septem. Lyons, 1561.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The New Oxford Shakespeare. Edited by Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, Bourus, Terri, and Egan, Gabriel. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
The Bibliotheca Historica of Didorus Siculus, Translated by John Skelton. Edited by Salter, F. M. and Edwards, H. L. R.. Translated by John Skelton. EETS o.s. 233. Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney. Edited by Duncan-Jones, Katherine and Van Dorsten, Jan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
The Countess of Pembroke’s Arcadia (The Old Arcadia). Edited by Robertson, Jean. Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
The Poems of Sir Philip Sidney. Edited by Ringler, William A.. Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Skelton, John. The Complete English Poems of John Skelton. Edited by Scattergood, John. Revised edition. Liverpool University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
“The Latin Writings of John Skelton.” Edited by David Carlson. Studies in Philology 88, no. 4 (1991), 1–125.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene. Edited by Hamilton, A. C., Yamashita, Hiroshi, and Toshiyuki, Suzuki. Revised second edition. London: Longman Pearson, 2007.Google Scholar
Stemmler, Theo, ed. Die Liebesbriefe Heinrichs VIII an Anna Boleyn. Zürich: Belser Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Richard S., and Harding, Davis P., eds. Two Early Tudor Lives. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Usk, Adam. The Chronicle of Adam Usk, 1377–1421. Edited and translated by Chris Given-Wilson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Vida, Marco Girolamo. De Arte Poetica. Edited and translated by Ralph G. Williams. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
de Vienne, Philibert. The Philosopher of the Court. Translated by George North. STC 19832. London, 1575.Google Scholar
Walsingham, Thomas. The St. Albans Chronicle. Edited by Taylor, John, Childs, Wendy R., and Watkiss, Leslie. Translated by Leslie Watkiss. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Walter of England. The Fables of “Walter of England.” Edited by Wright, Aaron E.. Toronto: PIMS, 1997.Google Scholar
Walton, John, tr. De Consolatione Philosophiae. Edited Mark Science. EETS o.s. 170. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
William of Malmesbury. De Gestis regum Anglorum libri quinque atque historiae novellae. Edited by Stubbs, William. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas. The Arte of Rhetorique for the vse of All Suche as Are Studious of Eloquence. STC 25799. London, 1553.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Thomas. Collected Poems of Sir Thomas Wyatt. Edited by Muir, Kenneth and Thompson, Patricia. Liverpool University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
The Complete Works of Sir Thomas Wyatt the Elder. Edited by Powell, Jason. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Continuum, 1997.Google Scholar
Aers, David. Chaucer, Langland, and the Creative Imagination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
“Reflections on Gower as ‘Sapiens’ in Ethics and Politics.” In Re-Visioning Gower, edited by Yeager, R. F., 185–201. Asheville: Pegasus Press, 1998.Google Scholar
“Representations of the ‘Third Estate’: Social Conflict and Its Milieu around 1381.” Southern Review 16, no. 3 (1983), 335–49.Google Scholar
“Vox Populi and the Literature of 1381.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, edited by Wallace, David, 432–53. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Aiken, Pauline. “Vincent of Beauvais and Dame Pertelote’s Knowledge of Medicine.” Speculum 10, no. 3 (1935), 281–87.Google Scholar
Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval Allegory. University of Toronto Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Alford, Stephen. “Some Elizabethan Spies in the Office of Sir Francis Walsingham.” In Diplomacy and Early Modern Culture, edited by Adams, Robyn and Cox, Rosanna, 46–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Allen, Judson Boyce. The Ethical Poetic of the Later Middle Ages: A Decorum of Convenient Distinction. University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
The Friar as Critic: Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Allen, Rosamund. “The Siege of Thebes: Lydgate’s Canterbury Tale.” In Chaucer and Fifteenth-Century Poetry, edited by Boffey, Julia and Cowen, Janet,122–42. Exeter: Short Run Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Alpers, Paul. “Pastoral and the Domain of Lyric in Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender.” Representations 12 (1985), 83–100.Google Scholar
Ambrisco, Alan, and Strohm, Paul. “Succession and Sovereignty in Lydgate’s Prologue to the Troy Book.” Chaucer Review 30, no. 1 (1995), 40–57.Google Scholar
Appleford, Amy. Learning to Die in London, 1380–1540. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
“The Dance of Death in London: John Carpenter, John Lydgate, and the Daunce of Poulys.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 38, no. 2 (2008), 285–314.Google Scholar
“The Sea Ground and the London Street: The Ascetic Self in Julian of Norwich and Thomas Hoccleve.” Chaucer Review 51, no. 1 (2016), 49–67.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Second edition. University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Arner, Lynn. Chaucer, Gower, and the Vernacular Rising: Poetry and the Problem of the Populace after 1381. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. Dante and the Making of a Modern Author. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Terminist Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Pasnau, Robert, 146–58. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Astell, Ann W. Chaucer and the Universe of Learning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Laurie. “‘Why That Yee Meeued Been / Can I Nat Knowe’: Autobiography, Convention, and Discerning Doublenesse in Thomas Hoccleve’s The Series.” Neophilologus 101, no. 3 (2017), 479–94.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Figura.” In Scenes From the Drama of European Literature, translated by Manheim, Ralph, 11–76. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ayers, Robert W. “Medieval History, Moral Purpose, and the Structure of Lydgate’s Siege of Thebes.” PMLA 73, no. 5 (1958), 463–74.Google Scholar
Babcock, R. W. “The Mediæval Setting of Chaucer’s Monk’s Tale.” PMLA 46, no. 1 (1931), 205–13.Google Scholar
Bahr, Arthur. Fragments and Assemblages: Forming Compilations of Medieval London. University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Baker, John. “Deeds Speak Louder than Words: Covenants and the Law of Proof, 1290–1321.” In Laws, Lawyers, and Texts: Studies in Medieval Legal History in Honour of Paul Brand, edited by Jenks, Suzanne, Rose, Jonathan, and Whittick, Christopher, 177–99. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Barlow, Gania. “Remodeling Authorship in Lydgate’s Fall of Princes.” Viator 49, no. 1 (2018), 257–80.Google Scholar
Barnes, A. W. “Constructing the Sexual Subject of John Skelton.” ELH 71, no. 1 (2004), 29–51.Google Scholar
Baron, Helen. “Mary (Howard) Fitzroy’s Hand in the Devonshire Manuscript.” The Review of English Studies, new series, vol. 45, no. 179 (1994), 318–35.Google Scholar
Barr, Helen. Socioliterary Practice in Late Medieval England. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Barrington, Candace. “John Gower’s Legal Advocacy and ‘In Praise of Peace.’” In John Gower, Trilingual Poet: Language, Translation, and Tradition, edited by Dutton, Elizabeth, 112–25. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Robyn. “Penitential Discourse in Hoccleve’s Series.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 34 (2012), 277–305.Google Scholar
Relics and Writing in Late Medieval England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bates, Catherine. Masculinity and the Hunt: Wyatt to Spenser. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Masculinity, Gender and Identity in the English Renaissance Lyric. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Batkie, Stephanie. “The Sound of My Voice: Aurality and Credible Faith in the Vox Clamantis.” In John Gower: Others and the Self, edited by Yeager, R. F. and Peck, Russell A., 32–49. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2017.Google Scholar
Batt, Catherine. “Hoccleve and … Feminism? Negotiating Meaning in The Regiment of Princes.” In Essays on Thomas Hoccleve, edited by Batt, Catherine, 55–84. University of London Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Edited by Arendt, Hannah. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael. “Gower, Richard II and Henry IV.” In Historians on John Gower, edited by Rigby, Stephen, with assistance from Siân Echard, 425–88. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2019.Google Scholar
Bertolet, Craig. “The Anxiety of Exclusion: Speech, Power, and Chaucer’s Manciple.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 33 (2011), 183–218.Google Scholar
Bishop, Ian. “The Nun’s Priest’s Tale and the Liberal Arts.” The Review of English Studies, new series, vol. 30, no. 119 (1979), 257–67.Google Scholar
Bishop, Louise M. Words, Stones, and Herbs: The Healing Word in Medieval and Early Modern England. Syracuse University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero. “The Monk’s Tale: Dante and Boccaccio.” Medium Ævum 45, no. 1 (1976), 50–69.Google Scholar
Boone, Lalia Phipps. “Chauntecleer and Partlet Identified.” Modern Language Notes 64, no. 2 (1949), 78–81.Google Scholar
Børch, Marianne. “Chaucer’s Poetics and the Manciple’s Tale.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 25 (2003), 287–97.Google Scholar
Bose, Mishtooni. “Useless Mouths: Reformist Poetics in Audelay and Skelton.” In Form and Reform: Reading Across the Fifteenth Century, edited by Tonry, Kathleen and Gayk, Shannon, 159–79. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
“Writing, Heresy, and the Anticlerical Muse.” In The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Literature in English, edited by Walker, Greg and Treharne, Elaine, 276–93. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Edited by Johnson, Randal. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Boyd, David Lorenzo. “Reading through the Regiment of Princes: Hoccleve’s Series and Lydgate’s Dance of Death in Yale Beinecke MS 493.” Fifteenth-Century Studies 20 (1993), 15–34.Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon. “Wyatt and Petrarch: Italian Fashion at the Court of Henry VIII.” Annali d’Italianistica 22 (2004), 237–65.Google Scholar
Brady, Andrea. Poetry and Bondage: A History and Theory of Lyric Constraint. Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Bradley, Danielle. “‘By Communynge Is the Beste Assay’: Gossip and the Speech of Reason in Hoccleve’s Series.” Mediaevalia 40 (2019), 187–217.Google Scholar
Brantley, Jessica. “Reading the Forms of Sir Thopas.” Chaucer Review 47, no. 4 (2013), 416–38.Google Scholar
Breen, Dan. “Laureation and Identity: Rewriting Literary History in John Skelton’s Garland of Laurel.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 40, no. 2 (2010), 347–71.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. “The Authorization of Letters Under the Great Seal.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 37 (1964), 125–56.Google Scholar
“The Privy Seal Clerks in the Early Fifteenth Century.” In The Study of Medieval Records: Essays in Honour of Kathleen Major, edited by Bullough, D. A. and Storey, R. L., 260–81. Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Brown, Carleton. “Another Contemporary Allusion in Chaucer’s Troilus.” Modern Language Notes 26, no. 7 (1911), 208–11.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew Clifton. “‘Lo, Heer the Fourme’: Hoccleve’s Series, Formulary, and Bureaucratic Textuality.” Exemplaria 23, no. 1 (2011), 27–49.Google Scholar
Brownlow, F. W. “The Boke of Phyllyp Sparowe and the Liturgy.” English Literary Renaissance 9, no. 1 (1979), 5–20.Google Scholar
Bryan, Jennifer. “‘A Berd! A Berd!’: Chaucer’s Miller and the Poetics of the Pun.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 38 (2016), 1–37.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve, the Virgin, and the Politics of Complaint.” PMLA 117, no. 2 (2002), 1172–87.Google Scholar
Looking Inward: Devotional Reading and the Private Self in Late Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bullón-Fernández, María. Fathers and Daughters in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2000.Google Scholar
“Translating Women, Translating Texts: Gower’s ‘Tale of Tereus’ and the Castilian and Portuguese Translations of the Confessio Amantis.” In John Gower: Manuscripts, Readers, Contexts, edited by Urban, Malte, 109–32. Turnhout: Brepols, 2009.Google Scholar
Burger, Glenn. Chaucer’s Queer Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. A. “Autobiographical Poetry in the Middle Ages: The Case of Thomas Hoccleve.” Proceedings of the British Academy 68 (1982), 389–412.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve’s Complaint and Isidore of Seville Again.” Speculum 73, no. 2 (1998), 424–28.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve’s Series: Experience and Books.” In Fifteenth-Century Studies: Recent Essays, edited by Yeager, R. F., 259–73. Hamden: Archon Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Ricardian Poetry: Chaucer, Gower, Langland, and the Gawain Poet. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
“The Portrayal of Amans in ‘Confessio Amantis.’” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: Responses and Reassessments, edited by Minnis, A. J., 5–24. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis. “Articulating the Author: Gower and the French Vernacular Codex.” The Yearbook of English Studies, Medieval and Early Modern Miscellanies and Anthologies, 33 (2003), 80–96.Google Scholar
Poetry and Music in Medieval France: From Jean Renart to Guillaume de Machaut. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
The Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher. From Literacy to Literature: England, 1300–1400. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
“The Language Group of the Canterbury Tales.” In Medieval Latin and Middle English Literature: Essays in Honour of Jill Mann, edited by Cannon, Christopher and Nolan, Maura, 25–40. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2011.Google Scholar
Carlin, Martha. “Gower’s Life.” In Historians on John Gower, edited by Rigby, Stephen, with assistance from Siân Echard, 23–120. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2019.Google Scholar
“Gower’s Southwark.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Gower, edited by Sáez-Hidalgo, Ana, Yeager, R. F., and Gastle, Brian, 132–49. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
John Gower: Poetry and Propaganda in Fourteenth-Century England. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2012.Google Scholar
“John Skelton.” In The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English, Vol. 1: 800–1558, edited by Copeland, Rita, 541–60. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
“Skelton, Garnesche, and Henry VIII: Revels and Erudition at Court.” The Review of English Studies, new series, vol. 66, no. 274 (2015), 240–57.Google Scholar
“The ‘Grammarians’ War’ 1519–21, Humanist Careerism in Early Tudor England, and Printing.” Medievalia et Humanistica 18 (1992), 157–81.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
“The Concept of Ductus, or Journeying through a Work of Art.” In Rhetoric Beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages, edited by Carruthers, Mary. 190–213. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Chaganti, Seeta. Strange Footing: Poetic Form and Dance in the Late Middle Ages. University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Chalker, John. “The Literary Seriousness of John Skelton’s ‘Speke, Parrot’.” Neophilologus 44, no. 1 (1960), 39–47.Google Scholar
Chenu, M.-D. “Auctor, Actor, Autor.” Archivium Latinitatis Medii Aevi 3 (1927), 81–86.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. Third edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. Press Censorship in Elizabethan England. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Coffman, George. “John Gower in His Most Significant Role.” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: A Critical Anthology, edited by Nicholson, Peter, 40–48. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1991.Google Scholar
Coleman, Joyce. “‘A Bok for King Richardes Sake’: Royal Patronage, the Confessio, and the Legend of Good Women,” In On John Gower: Essays at the Millennium, edited by Yeager, R. F., 104–23. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 2007.Google Scholar
Coley, David. The Wheel of Language: Representing Speech in Middle English Poetry, 1377–1422. Syracuse University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. The Mirror of Language: A Study of the Medieval Theory of Knowledge. Revised edition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen. “Gower and Mortality: The Ends of Storytelling.” In John Gower: Others and the Self, edited by Yeager, R. F. and Peck, Russell A., 91–107. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2017.Google Scholar
“The Four Last Things in Dante and Chaucer: Hugolino and the House of Rumour.” New Medieval Literatures 3 (1999), 39–66.Google Scholar
Cooper, Lisa. “Agronomy and Affect in Duke Humfrey’s On Husbrondie.” Speculum 95, no. 1 (2020), 36–88.Google Scholar
Artisans and Narrative Craft in Late Medieval England. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Copeland, Rita. “Chaucer and Rhetoric.” In The Yale Companion to Chaucer, edited by Lerer, Seth, 122–43. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
“Lydgate, Hawes, and the Science of Rhetoric in the Late Middle Ages.” Modern Language Quarterly 53, no. 1 (1992), 57–82.Google Scholar
Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
“The Pardoner’s Body and the Disciplining of Rhetoric.” In Framing Medieval Bodies, edited by Kay, Sarah and Rubin, Miri, 138–59. Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cormack, Bradin. A Power to Do Justice: Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of Common Law, 1509–1625. University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. “Force of Words and Figures of Speech: The Crisis over Virtus Sermonis in the Fourteenth Century.” Franciscan Studies 44, no. 1 (1984), 107–28.Google Scholar
Cowdery, Taylor. “Hoccleve’s Formulary and the Matter of Everyday Life.” In Thomas Hoccleve: New Approaches, edited by Nuttall, Jenni and Watt, David, 167–96. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Crewe, Jonathan. Trials of Authorship: Anterior Forms and Poetic Reconstruction from Wyatt to Shakespeare. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Crocker, Holly A. “Engendering Affect in Hoccleve’s Series.” In Medieval Affect, Feeling, and Emotion, edited by Crocker, Holly A. and Burger, Glenn D., 70–89. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
The Matter of Virtue: Women’s Ethical Action from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. The Literary Culture of the Reformation: Grammar and Grace. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Princeton University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Cushman, H. M. “Chaucer’s Merchant’s Tale and the Sense of Having.” Exemplaria 34, no. 3 (2023), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Daileader, Celia R. “When a Sparrow Falls: Women Readers, Male Critics, and John Skelton’s Phyllyp Sparowe.” Philological Quarterly 75, no. 4 (1996), 391–409.Google Scholar
Dasenbrock, Reed Way. “Wyatt’s Transformation of Petrarch.” Comparative Literature 40, no. 2 (1988), 122–33.Google Scholar
David, Alfred. The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Davis, Alex. “Revolution by Degrees: Sidney and Gradatio.” Modern Philology 108, no. 4 (2011), 488–506.Google Scholar
Davis, Isabel. “Calling: Langland, Gower, and Chaucer on Saint Paul.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 34 (2012), 53–97.Google Scholar
Dean, James M. The World Grown Old in Later Medieval Literature. Cambridge: Medieval Academy of America, 1997.Google Scholar
Denny-Brown, Andrea. “Lydgate’s Golden Cows: Appetite and Avarice in Bycorne and Chychevache.” In Lydgate Matters: Poetry and Material Culture in the Fifteenth Century, edited by Cooper, Lisa and Denny-Brown, Andrea, 71–87. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Corrected edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Desmond, Marilyn. Reading Dido: Gender, Textuality, and the Medieval Aeneid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Conrad. John Gower and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2013.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.Google Scholar
“Rape, Rivalry, and Manhood: Gower and Chaucer.” In Chaucer and Gower: Difference, Mutuality, Exchange, edited by Yeager, R. F., 130–52. Victoria: English Literary Studies, 1991.Google Scholar
Dolven, Jeff. “Reading Wyatt for the Style.” Modern Philology 105, no. 1 (2007), 65–86.Google Scholar
Doob, Penelope. Nebuchadnezzar’s Children: Conventions of Madness in Middle English Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Drimmer, Sonja. The Art of Allusion: Illuminators and the Making of English Literature, 1403–1476. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England,c. 1400–c.1580. Second edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Richard A. “Arthur’s Stellification in the Fall of Princes.” Philological Quarterly 57, no. 2 (1978), 155–71.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân. “With Carmen’s Help: Latin Authorities in the Confessio Amantis.” Studies in Philology 95, no. 1 (1998), 1–40.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., ed. Skelton: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
“Skelton’s English Poems in Manuscript and Print.” In John Skelton and Early Modern Culture: Papers Honoring Robert S. Kinsman, edited by Carlson, David, 85–98. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert R. Invention and Authorship in Medieval England. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
“Lydgate’s Troy Book and the Confusion of Prudence.” In The North Sea World in the Middle Ages: Studies in the Cultural History of North-Western Europe, edited by Thomas, R. Liszka and Walker, Lorna E. M., 52–69. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. Policy and Police: The Enforcement of the Reformation in the Age of Thomas Cromwell. Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Ensley, Mimi. “Meeting Lydgate’s Ghost: Building Medieval History in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Review of English Studies, new series, vol. 71, no. 299 (2019), 251–71.Google Scholar
Estrin, Barbara. “Becoming The Other/The Other Becoming in Wyatt’s Poetry.” ELH 51, no. 3 (1984), 431–45.Google Scholar
Falk, Seb. “Natural Sciences.” In Historians on John Gower, edited by Rigby, Stephen, with assistance from Siân Echard, 491–525. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2019.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Richard W. “‘A Yeerd Enclosed al Aboute’: Literature and History in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale.” Chaucer Review 29, no. 2 (1994), 134–48.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret. “Hamlet: Letters and Spirits.” In Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, edited by Hartman, Geoffrey and Parker, Patricia, 291–307. New York and London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Ferster, Judith. Fictions of Advice: The Literature and Politics of Counsel in Late-Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Fisher, John H. John Gower: Moral Philosopher and Friend of Chaucer. New York: New York University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Flannery, Mary C. John Lydgate and the Poetics of Fame. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2012.Google Scholar
“The English Laureate in Time: John Skelton’s Garland of Laurel.” In Medieval into Renaissance: Essays for Helen Cooper, edited by King, Andrew and Woodcock, Matthew, 107–22. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2016.Google Scholar
Fleming, John V. “The Friars and Medieval English Literature.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, edited by Wallace, David, 349–75. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Alan. “The Preaching of the Pardoner.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 11 (1989), 15–35.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. Conceitful Thought: The Interpretation of English Renaissance Poems. Edinburgh University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Fowler, Elizabeth. Literary Character: The Human Figure in Early English Writing. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fox, Alistair. Politics and Literature in the Reigns of Henry VII and Henry VIII. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Fox, George G. The Mediaeval Sciences in the Works of John Gower. Princeton University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Fradenburg, L. O. Aranye. Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
“The Manciple’s Servant Tongue: Politics and Poetry in the Canterbury Tales.” ELH 52, no. 1 (1985), 85–118.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert Worth, Jr. Chaucer and the Legend of Good Women. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Friedman, Donald M. “The Mind in the Poem: Wyatt’s ‘They Fle from Me.’” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 7, no. 1 (1967), 1–13.Google Scholar
Fumo, Jamie C. The Legacy of Apollo: Antiquity, Authority, and Chaucerian Poetics. University of Toronto Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Language and the Declining World in Chaucer, Dante, and Jean de Meun. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Galloway, Andrew. “John Lydgate and the Origins of Vernacular Humanism.” JEGP 107, no. 4 (2008), 445–71.Google Scholar
“Reassessing Gower’s Dream-Visions.” In John Gower, Trilingual Poet: Language, Translation, and Tradition, edited by Dutton, Elizabeth, 288–303. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
“The Literature of 1388 and the Politics of Pity in Gower’s Confessio Amantis.” In The Letter of the Law: Legal Practice and Literary Production in Medieval England, edited by Steiner, Emily and Barrington, Candace, 67–104. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
“Writing History in England.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, edited by Wallace, David, 255–83. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gastle, Brian W. “The Constraints of Justice and Gower’s ‘Lawyerly Habit of Mind.’” In Studies in the Age of Gower: A Festschrift in Honour of R. F. Yeager, edited by Chewning, Susannah Mary, 203–15. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2020.Google Scholar
Gaston, Kara. Reading Chaucer in Time: Literary Formation in England and Italy. Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Gayk, Shannon. Image, Text, and Religious Reform in Fifteenth-Century England. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gaylord, Alan T. “Chaucer’s Dainty ‘Dogerel’: The ‘Elvyssh’ Prosody of Sir Thopas.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 1 (1979), 83–104.Google Scholar
“Sentence and Solaas in Fragment VII of the Canterbury Tales: Harry Bailly as Horseback Editor.” PMLA 82, no. 2 (1967), 226–35.Google Scholar
Gerard, Albert. “Wyatt’s ‘They Fle from Me.’” Essays in Criticism 11, no. 3 (1961), 359–65.Google Scholar
Giancarlo, Matthew. Parliament and Literature in Late Medieval England. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Vincent. “Chichele’s Church: Vernacular Theology in England after Thomas Arundel.” In After Arundel: Religious Writing in Fifteenth-Century England, edited by Gillespie, Vincent and Ghosh, Kantik, 3–42. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar
“Justification by Faith: Skelton’s Replycacyon.” In The Long Fifteenth Century: Essays for Douglas Gray, edited by Cooper, Helen and Mapstone, Sally, 273–311. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
“Justification by Good Works: Skelton’s The Garland of Laurel.” Reading Medieval Studies 7 (1981), 19–31.Google Scholar
Given-Wilson, Chris. Chronicles: The Writing of History in Medieval England. London: Carnegie Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Gleckman, Jason. “Thomas Wyatt’s Epistolary Satires: Parody and the Limitations of Rhetorical Humanism.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 43, no. 1 (2001), 29–45.Google Scholar
Goldie, Matthew Boyd. “Psychosomatic Illness and Identity in London,1416–1421: Hoccleve’s Complaint and Dialogue with a Friend.” Exemplaria 11, no. 1 (1999), 23–52.Google Scholar
“Skelton’s ‘Philip Sparrow’ and the Roman Service-Book.” The Modern Language Review 29, no. 4 (1934), 389–96.Google Scholar
Gordon, Kipling. The Triumph of Honour: Burgundian Origins of the Elizabethan Renaissance. The Hague: Leiden University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Rudolf. “Sir Thomas Wyatt and Pietro Bembo.” Notes and Queries 199, no. 1 (1954), 278–80.Google Scholar
Grady, Frank. “The Lancastrian Gower and the Limits of Exemplarity.” Speculum 70, no. 3 (1995), 552–75.Google Scholar
Graham, Kenneth J. E. “The Performance of Conviction: Wyatt’s Antirhetorical Plainness.” Style 23, no. 3 (1989), 374–94.Google Scholar
Grant, Linda. Latin Erotic Elegy and the Shaping of Sixteenth-Century English Love Poetry. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “Shakespeare in Quotation Marks.” In The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstruction of the Works and the Myth, edited by Marsden, Jean I., 57–71. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth. A Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth, and Knapp, Ethan. “Thomas Hoccleve’s Seal.” Medium Ævum 77, no. 2 (2008), 319–21.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Greene, R. L. “Wyatt’s ‘They Fle From Me’ and the Busily Seeking Critics.” Bucknell Review 12, no. 3 (1964), 17–30.Google Scholar
Greene, Roland. Five Words: Critical Semantics in the Age of Shakespeare and Cervantes. University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Greetham, D. C. “Self-Referential Artifacts: Hoccleve’s Persona as a Literary Device.” Modern Philology 86, no. 3 (1989), 242–51.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jane. “‘In Bookes Thus Writen I Fynde’: Hoccleve’s Self-Glossing in the Regiment of Princes and the Series.” Medium Ævum 86, no. 1 (2017), 91–107.Google Scholar
John Skelton and Poetic Authority: Defining the Liberty to Speak. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Grudin, Michaela. “Chaucer’s Manciple’s Tale and the Poetics of Guile.” Chaucer Review 25, no. 4 (1991), 329–42.Google Scholar
Guenée, Bernard. “L’historien et La Compilation Au XIIIe Siècle.” Journal Des Savants 1, no. 1 (1985), 119–35.Google Scholar
Guss, Donald L. “Wyatt’s Petrarchism: An Instance of Creative Imitation in the Renaissance.” Huntington Library Quarterly 29, no. 1 (1965), 1–15.Google Scholar
Haas, Renate. “Chaucer’s ‘Monk’s Tale’: An Ingenious Criticism of Early Humanist Conceptions of Tragedy.” Humanistica Lovaniensia 36 (1987), 44–70.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. Literature, Politics, and National Identity: Reformation to Renaissance. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Halasz, Alexandra. The Marketplace of Print: Pamphlets and the Public Sphere in Early Modern England. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas N. “Latin Sermons and Lay Preaching: Four Latin Sermons from Post-Reform Canterbury.” In The Power of Words: Anglo-Saxon Studies Presented to Donald G. Scragg on His Seventieth Birthday, edited by Magennis, Hugh and Wilcox, Jonathan, 132–70. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haller, Robert S. “Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale and the Uses of Rhetoric.” Modern Philology 62, no. 4 (1965): 285–95.Google Scholar
Halpern, Richard. The Poetics of Primitive Accumulation: English Renaissance Culture and the Genealogy of Capital. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. C. Sir Philip Sidney: A Study of His Life and Works. Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hammond, Eleanor Prescott. “Lydgate and Coluccio Salutati.” Modern Philology 25, no. 1 (1927), 49–57.Google Scholar
“Poet and Patron in the Fall of Princes: Lydgate and Humphrey of Gloucester.” Anglia 38 (1914), 121–36.Google Scholar
Hannen, Thomas A. “The Humanism of Sir Thomas Wyatt.” In The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry: From Wyatt to Milton, edited by Sloane, Thomas O. and Waddington, Raymond B., 37–57. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Harbert, Bruce. “The Myth of Tereus in Ovid and Gower.” Medium Ævum 41, no. 3 (1972), 208–14.Google Scholar
Harding, Alan. “Plaints and Bills in the History of English Law, Mainly in the Period 1250–1350.” In Legal History Studies, 1972, edited by Jenkins, Dafydd, 65–86. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Harding, Vanessa. The Dead and the Living in Paris and London, 1500–1670. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Harris, Carissa M. Obscene Pedagogies: Transgressive Talk and Sexual Education in Late Medieval Britain. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Harwood, Britton J. “Language and the Real: Chaucer’s Manciple.” Chaucer Review 6, no. 4 (1972), 268–79.Google Scholar
Hazrat, Florence. “Fashioning Faith to Forms (Im)Mutable: The Rondeau and Trust in the Poetry of Sir Thomas Wyatt.” The Cambridge Quarterly 47, no. 3 (2018), 222–42.Google Scholar
Heale, Elizabeth. ““An Owl in a Sack Troubles No Man’: Proverbs, Plainness, and Wyatt.” Renaissance Studies 11, no. 4 (1997), 420–33.Google Scholar
Heale, Martin. “Monastic Life.” In Historians on John Gower, edited by Rigby, Stephen, with assistance from Siân Echard, 271–89. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2019.Google Scholar
Hector, L. C. and Harvey, Barbara F., ed. and tr. The Westminster Chronicle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton, and the Literary System. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
“The New Poet Presents Himself: Spenser and the Idea of a Literary Career.” PMLA 93, no. 5 (1978), 893–911.Google Scholar
Herman, Peter C. “Treason in the Manciple’s Tale.” Chaucer Review 25, no. 4 (1991), 318–28.Google Scholar
Hickey, Helen. “Legal Personhood and the Inquisitions of Insanity in Thomas Hoccleve’s Series.” In Theorizing Legal Personhood in Late Medieval England, edited by Boboc, Andreea D., 192–217. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Hilton, Rodney. Bond Men Made Free: Medieval Peasant Movements and the English Rising of 1381. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Hines, John, Cohen, Natalie, and Roffey, Simon. “Iohannes Gower, Armiger, Poeta: Records and Memorials of His Life and Death.” In A Companion to Gower, edited by Echard, Siân, 23–41. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Hobson, Christopher Z. “Country Mouse and Towny Mouse: Truth in Wyatt.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 39, no. 3 (1997), 230–58.Google Scholar
Holsinger, Bruce. Music, Body, and Desire in Medieval Culture: Hildegard of Bingen to Chaucer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald R. The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hsy, Jonathan. Trading Tongues: Merchants, Multilingualism, and Medieval Literature. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Huismann, Tyler. “John Buridan’s Metaphysics of Persistence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, no. 3 (2016), 373–94.Google Scholar
Hurnard, Naomi D. The King’s Pardon for Homicide before A. D. 1307. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Hyman, Wendy Beth. Impossible Desire and the Limits of Knowledge in Renaissance Poetry. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia Claire. The Medieval New: Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Irvin, Matthew. The Poetic Voices of John Gower: Politics and Personae in the Confessio Amantis. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2014.Google Scholar
“Voices and Narrators.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Gower, edited by Sáez-Hidalgo, Ana, Yeager, R. F., and Gastle, Brian, 237–52. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Jager, Katharine. “The Practice of Makynge: Masculine Poetic Identity in Late Medieval English Poetry.” PhD Dissertation. City University of New York, 2007.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England. Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, Michel. A Feast of Words: Banquets and Table Talk in the Renaissance. University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Johnson, Eleanor. Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve. University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Justice, Steven. Writing and Rebellion: England in 1381. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Karnes, Michelle. Imagination, Meditation, and Cognition in the Middle Ages. University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
“The Possibilities of Medieval Fiction.” New Literary History 51, no. 1 (2020), 209–28.Google Scholar
Kay, Dennis. “Wyatt and Chaucer: ‘They Fle From Me’ Revisited.” Huntington Library Quarterly 47, no. 3 (1984), 211–25.Google Scholar
Kempshall, Matthew. Rhetoric and the Writing of History, 400–1500. Manchester University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kendall, Elliot. Lordship and Literature: John Gower and the Politics of the Great Household. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. The Clerical Proletariat and the Resurgence of Medieval English Poetry. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, Gerald. “Gower’s Confessio Amantis and the Penitentials.” Chaucer Review 19, no. 2 (1984), 144–61.Google Scholar
Kinsman, R. S. “Phyllyp Sparowe: Titulus.” Studies in Philology 47, no. 3 (1950), 473–84.Google Scholar
“‘Uppon a Deedmans Hed’: New Light on the Origin of the Skeltonic.” Studies in Philology 50, no. 2 (1953), 101–9.Google Scholar
Kittredge, George Lyman. Chaucer and His Poetry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1915.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Nominalist Semantics.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Pasnau, Robert, 159–72. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Knapp, Ethan. “John Gower: Balzac of the Fourteenth Century.” In John Gower in England and Iberia: Manuscripts, Influences, Reception, edited by Sáez-Hidalgo, Ana and Yeager, R. F., 215–27. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2014.Google Scholar
The Bureaucratic Muse: Thomas Hoccleve and the Literature of Late Medieval England. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Knox, Philip. “Circularity and Linearity: The Idea of the Lyric and the Idea of the Book in the Cent Ballades of Jean Le Seneschal.” New Medieval Literatures 16 (2016), 213–49.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A. Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales. Stanford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kraebel, Andrew. Biblical Commentary and Translation in Later Medieval England: Experiments in Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Langdell, Sebastian. Thomas Hoccleve: Religious Reform, Transnational Poetics, and the Invention of Chaucer. Liverpool University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
“‘What World Is This? How Vndirstande Am I?’ A Reappraisal of Poetic Authority in Thomas Hoccleve’s Series.” Medium Ævum 78, no. 2 (2009), 281–99.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Isabella. Communication and Conflict: Italian Diplomacy in the Early Renaissance, 1350–520. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall, Jr. The Disenchanted Self: Representing the Subject in the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Leonard, Nancy S. “The Speaker in Wyatt’s Lyric Poetry.” Huntington Library Quarterly 41, no. 1 (1977), 1–18.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. Chaucer and His Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England. Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Courtly Letters in the Age of Henry VIII: Literary Culture and the Arts of Deceit. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding Drama. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Lochrie, Karma. Covert Operations: The Medieval Uses of Secrecy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Longo, Pamela L. “Gower’s Public Outcry.” Philological Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2013), 357–87.Google Scholar
Ma, Ruen-chuan. “Curatorial Hoccleve: Spiritual and Codicological Illumination in the Regiment of Princes.” In Thomas Hoccleve: New Approaches, edited by Nuttall, Jenni and Watt, David, 215–29. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. A Theory of Literary Production. Translated by Geoffrey Wall. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. A History of Renaissance Rhetoric, 1380–1620. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Manly, John Matthews. “Chaucer and the Rhetoricians.” Proceedings of the British Academy 12 (1926), 95–113.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill. Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
From Aesop to Reynard: Beast Literature in Medieval Britain. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Manning, Stephen. “The Nun’s Priest’s Morality and the Medieval Attitude Towards Fables.” JEGP 59, no. 3 (1960), 403–16.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur A. “Love Is Not Love: Elizabethan Sonnet Sequences and the Social Order.” ELH 49, no. 2 (1982), 396–428.Google Scholar
Mason, H. A. Humanism and Poetry in the Early Tudor Period: An Essay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1959.Google Scholar
Matthew, Henry Colin Gray, and Harrison, Brian, eds. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 60 vols. Oxford University Press, 2004–.Google Scholar
McCabe, Matthew T. Gower’s Vulgar Tongue: Ovid, Lay Religion, and English Poetry in the Confessio Amantis. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2011.Google Scholar
McFarlane, K. B. Lancastrian Kings and Lollard Knights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
McKinley, Kathryn. “Lessons for a King from Gower’s Confessio Amantis 5.” In Metamorphosis: The Changing Face of Ovid in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, edited by Keith, Alison and Rupp, Stephen, 107–28. Toronto: Center for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Martin L. Literary Imitation in the Italian Renaissance: The Theory and Practice of Literary Imitation in Italy from Dante to Bembo. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McMillan, Samuel F. “Talk of the Tavern and Boatmen’s Songs: Authorship in Thomas Hoccleve’s Male Regle.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 40 (2018): 435–46.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, Robert J. “The Emergence of the Literary in Lydgate’s Life of Our Lady.” JEGP 109, no. 3 (2010), 322–48.Google Scholar
Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne. “Chaucer’s ‘New Men’ and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales.” In Literature and Society: Selected Papers from the English Institute, edited by Said, Edward, 15–56. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
“The Idea of Public Poetry in the Reign of Richard II.” Speculum 53, no. 1 (1978), 94–114.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark. Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J. Fallible Authors: Chaucer’s Pardoner and Wife of Bath. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Magister Amoris: The Roman de La Rose and Vernacular Hermeneutics. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. Second edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Allan. Ethics and Exemplary Narrative in Chaucer and Gower. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
“John Gower and John Lydgate: Forms and Norms of Rhetorical Culture.” In A Companion to Medieval English Literature and Culture, c. 1350–c. 1500, edited by Brown, Peter, 571–84. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jerome. Thomas Hoccleve: A Study in Early Fifteenth Century English Poetic. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne. “Some New Light on Thomas Hoccleve.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 29 (2007), 293–340.Google Scholar
Muller, Alex. Translating Troy: Provincial Politics in Alliterative Romance. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Muscatine, Charles. Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
“The Canterbury Tales: Style of the Man and Style of the Work.” In Chaucer and Chaucerians: Critical Studies in Middle English Literature, edited by Brewer, D. S., 88–113. University, AL: University of Alabama Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Nathan, Leonard E. “Tradition and Newfangleness in Wyatt’s ‘They Fle From Me.’” ELH 32, no. 1 (1965), 1–16.Google Scholar
Ngai, Sianne. Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Nolan, Barbara. “‘A Poet Ther Was’: Chaucer’s Voices in the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales.” PMLA 101, no. 2 (1986), 154–69.Google Scholar
Nolan, Maura. “Agency and the Poetics of Sensation in Gower’s Mirour de l’omme.” In Answerable Style: The Idea of the Literary in Medieval England, edited by Grady, Frank and Galloway, Andrew, 214–43. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
“Lydgate’s Literary History: Chaucer, Gower, Canacee.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 27 (2005), 59–92.Google Scholar
“Lydgate’s Worst Poem.” In Lydgate Matters: Poetry and Material Culture in the Fifteenth Century, edited by Cooper, Lisa and Denny-Brown, Andrea, 71–87. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
“Making the Aesthetic Turn: Adorno, the Medieval, and the Future of the Past.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 34, no. 3 (2004), 549–75.Google Scholar
“‘Now Wo, Now Gladnesse’: Ovidianism in the Fall of Princes.” ELH 71, no. 3 (2004), 531–58.Google Scholar
von Nolcken, Christina. “‘O, Why Ne Had Y Lerned for to Die?’ Lerne for to Dye and the Author’s Death in Thomas Hoccleve’s Series.” Essays in Medieval Studies 10 (1993), 27–51.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, Scott. “Hard Lords and Bad Food-Service in the Monk’s Tale.” JEGP 100, no. 3 (2001), 313–23.Google Scholar
Olson, Glending. “Making and Poetry in the Age of Chaucer.” Comparative Literature 31, no. 3 (1979), 272–90.Google Scholar
Olsson, Kurt. John Gower and the Structures of Conversion: A Reading of the Confessio Amantis. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1992.Google Scholar
Oosterwijk, Sophie. “Death, Memory, and Commemoration: John Lydgate and ‘Macabrees Daunce’ at Old St. Paul’s Cathedral, London.” In Memory and Commemoration in Medieval England: Proceedings of the 2008 Harlaxton Symposium, edited by Barron, Caroline M. and Burgess, Clive, 185–201. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2010.Google Scholar
Orlemanski, Julie. Symptomatic Subjects: Bodies, Medicine, and Causation in the Literature of Late Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Owst, G. R. Literature and Pulpit in Medieval England. Second edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1966.Google Scholar
Preaching in Medieval England: An Introduction to the Sermon Manuscripts of the Period, c. 1350–1450. Cambridge University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Parr, Johnstone. “Astronomical Dating for Some of Lydgate’s Poems.” PMLA 67, no. 2 (1952), 251–58.Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen. “‘The Makere of This Boke’: Chaucer’s Retraction and the Author as Scribe and Compiler.” In Author, Reader, Book: Medieval Authorship in Theory and Practice, edited by Partridge, Stephen and Kwakkel, Erik, 106–53. University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hermogenes and the Renaissance: Seven Ideas of Style. Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar
“Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies,” Speculum 76, no. 3 (2001), 638–80.Google Scholar
“Making Identities in Fifteenth-Century England: Henry V and John Lydgate.” In New Historical Literary Study: Essays on Reproducing Texts, Representing History, edited by Cox, Jeffrey N. and Reynolds, Larry J., 69–107. Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
“‘No Man His Reson Herde’: Peasant Consciousness, Chaucer’s Miller, and the Structure of the Canterbury Tales.” In Literary Practice and Social Change in Britain, 1380–1530, edited by Patterson, Lee, 113–55. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
“‘What Is Me?’ Self and Society in the Poetry of Thomas Hoccleve.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 23 (2001), 437–70.Google Scholar
“‘What Man Artow?’: Authorial Self-Definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 11 (1989), 117–75.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek. “Gower’s Latin in the Confessio Amantis.” In Latin and Vernacular: Studies in Late-Medieval Texts and Manuscripts, edited by Minnis, A. J.,13–25. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989.Google Scholar
“Gower’s Narrative Art.” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: A Critical Anthology, edited by Nicholson, Peter, 62–80. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1991.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve’s Regement of Princes: The Poetics of Royal Self-Representation.” Speculum 69, no. 2 (1994), 386–410.Google Scholar
“Introduction.” In A Variorum Edition of the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Volume Two, Part Nine: The Nun’s Priest’s Tale, edited by Pearsall, Derek, 3–123. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1984.Google Scholar
“The Gower Tradition.” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: Responses and Reassessments, edited by Minnis, A. J., 179–97. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983.Google Scholar
Peck, Russell A. “The Politics and Psychology of Governance in Gower: Ideas of Kingship and Real Kings.” In A Companion to Gower, edited by Echard, Siân, 215–38. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Kingship and Common Profit in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Perkins, Nicholas. The Gift of Narrative in Medieval England. Manchester University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Perry, R. D. “Chaucer’s ‘Summoner’s Tale’ and the Logic of Literature.” Poetics Today 41, no. 1 (2020), 37–57.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve and the Logic of Incompleteness.” In Thomas Hoccleve: New Approaches, edited by Nuttall, Jenni and Watt, David, 65–84. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022.Google Scholar
“Lydgate’s Virtual Coteries: Chaucer’s Family and Gower’s Pacifism in the Fifteenth Century.” Speculum 93, no. 3 (2018), 669–98.Google Scholar
Peterson, Douglas L. The English Lyric from Wyatt to Donne: A History of the Plain and Eloquent Styles. Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Petrina, Alessandra. Cultural Politics in Fifteenth-Century England: The Case of Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Phillips, Noëlle. “Vernacular Makynge, Jack Upland, and the Aesthetics of Antifraternalism.” In Vernacular Aesthetics in the Later Middle Ages: Politics, Performativity, and Reception from Literature to Music, edited by Jager, Katharine W., 233–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.Google Scholar
Pigman, G. W. “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance.” Renaissance Quarterly 33, no. 1 (1980), 1–32.Google Scholar
Plumley, Yolanda. The Art of Grafted Song: Citation and Allusion in the Age of Machaut. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Poirion, Daniel. Le Poète et le prince: l’évolution de lyrisme courtois de Guillaume de Machaut à Charles d’Orléans. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1965.Google Scholar
Pollet, Maurice. John Skelton: Poet of Tudor England. Translated by John Warrington. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1971.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick, and Maitland, F. W.. The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I. Second edition. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Porter, Elizabeth. “Gower’s Ethical Microcosm and Political Macrocosm.” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: Responses and Reassessments, edited by Minnis, A. J., 135–62. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983.Google Scholar
Pouzet, Jean-Pascal. “Southwark Gower: Augustinian Agencies in Gower’s Manuscripts and Texts – Some Prolegomena.” In John Gower, Trilingual Poet: Language, Translation, and Tradition, edited by Dutton, Elizabeth, 11–25. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Powell, Jason. “Editing Wyatts: Reassessing the Textual State of Sir Thomas Wyatt’s Poetry.” Poetica 71 (2009), 93–104.Google Scholar
“‘For Caesar’s I Am’: Henrician Diplomacy and Representations of King and Country in Thomas Wyatt’s Poetry.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 36, no. 2 (2005), 415–31.Google Scholar
“Marginalia, Authorship, and Editing in the Manuscripts of Thomas Wyatt’s Verse.” English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 15 (2009), 1–40.Google Scholar
“Thomas Wyatt’s Poetry in Embassy: Egerton 2711 and the Production of Literary Manuscripts Abroad.” Huntington Library Quarterly 67, no. 2 (2004), 261–82.Google Scholar
Pratt, Robert A. “Some Latin Sources of the Nonnes Preest on Dreams.” Speculum 52, no. 3 (1977), 538–70.Google Scholar
Pugh, Tison. Chaucer’s (Anti-)Eroticisms and the Queer Middle Ages. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Purcell, William. “Transsumptio: A Rhetorical Doctrine of the Thirteenth Century.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 5, no. 4 (1987), 369–410.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Translated by Steven Corcoran. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Suzanne. Medieval Reading: Grammar, Rhetoric, and the Classical Text. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rigg, A. G. “Hoccleve’s Complaint and Isidore of Seville.” Speculum 45, no. 4 (1970), 564–74.Google Scholar
Robbins, Rossell Hope. “Signs of Death in Middle English.” Mediaeval Studies 32 (1970), 282–98.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., Jr. A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspectives. Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Robertson, Kellie. “Authorial Work.” In Middle English: Twenty-First Century Approaches, edited by Strohm, Paul, 441–58. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Nature Speaks: Medieval Literature and Aristotelian Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jon. “My King, My Country, Alone for Whom I Live: The Pragmatic Imperatives of Sir Thomas Wyatt’s Verse.” Literature Compass 3, no. 6 (2006), 1278–96.Google Scholar
Root, Robert. The Poetry of Chaucer: A Guide to Its Study and Appreciation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1906.Google Scholar
Rosen, David Matthew. “Time, Identity, and Context in Wyatt’s Verse.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 21, no. 1 (1981), 5–20.Google Scholar
Rosen, Ralph M. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ross, Diane. “Sir Thomas Wyatt: Proverbs and the Poetics of Scorn.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 18, no. 2 (1987), 201–12.Google Scholar
Rossiter, William T. Wyatt Abroad: Tudor Diplomacy and the Translation of Power. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2014.Google Scholar
Rouse, R. H., and Rouse, M. A.. “Biblical Distinctions in the Thirteenth Century.” Archives d’histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire Du Moyen Âge 41 (1974), 27–37.Google Scholar
Rozenski, Steven, Jr. “‘Your Ensaumple and Your Mirour’: Hoccleve’s Amplification of the Imagery and Intimacy of Henry Suso’s Ars Moriendi.” Parergon 25, no. 2 (2008), 1–16.Google Scholar
Runacres, Charles. “Art and Ethics in the ‘Exempla’ of ‘Confessio Amantis.’” In Gower’s Confessio Amantis: Responses and Reassessments, edited by Minnis, A. J., 106–34. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983.Google Scholar
Russell, J. Stephen. “Is London Burning? A Chaucerian Allusion to the Rising of 1381.” Chaucer Review 30, no. 1 (1995), 107–9.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Eve. “Remembering Origins: Gower’s Monstrous Body Poetic.” In Re-Visioning Gower, edited by Yeager, R. F., 159–84. Asheville: Pegasus Press, 1998.Google Scholar
“Violence and the Sacrificial Poet: Gower, the Vox, and the Critics,” In On John Gower: Essays at the Millennium, edited by Yeager, R. F., 124–43. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 2007.Google Scholar
Saul, Nigel F. “John Gower: Prophet or Turncoat?” In John Gower, Trilingual Poet: Language, Translation, and Tradition, edited by Dutton, Elizabeth, 85–97. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2010.Google Scholar
Saunders, Corinne. “Gower and Romance.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Gower, edited by Sáez-Hidalgo, Ana, Yeager, R. F., and Gastle, Brian,281–95. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo. “Dante and the Ars Grammatica.” In De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg, edited by Bursill-Hall, G. L., Ebbesen, Sten, and Koerner, Konrad, 305–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1990.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Larry. Narrative, Authority, and Power: The Medieval Exemplum and the Chaucerian Tradition. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
“The Authority of Fable: Allegory and Irony in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale.” Exemplaria 1, no. 1 (1989), 43–68.Google Scholar
“The King’s Two Voices: Narrative and Power in Hoccleve’s Regement of Princes.” In Literary Practice and Social Change in Britain, 1380–1530, edited by Patterson, Lee, 216–47. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Scase, Wendy. “John Gower’s Scribes and Literatim Copying.” In John Gower in Manuscripts and Printed Books, edited by Driver, Martha, Pearsall, Derek, and Yeager, R. F., 13–31. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2020.Google Scholar
“Latin Composition Lessons, Piers Plowman, and the Piers Plowman Tradition.” In An Answerable Style: The Idea of the Literary in Medieval England, edited by Grady, Frank and Galloway, Andrew, 34–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Scattergood, John. John Skelton: The Career of an Early Tudor Poet. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2014.Google Scholar
“‘Portraying a Life’: Skelton’s Flytings and Some Related Poems.” In John Skelton and Early Modern Culture: Papers Honoring Robert S. Kinsman, edited by Carlson, David, 189–214. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
Schibanoff, Susan. “Taking Jane’s Cue: Phyllyp Sparowe as a Primer for Women Readers.” PMLA 101, no. 5 (1986), 832–47.Google Scholar
Schieberle, Misty. “A New Hoccleve Literary Manuscript: The Trilingual Miscellany in London, British Library, MS Harley 219.” The Review of English Studies, new series, 70, no. 297 (2019), 799–822.Google Scholar
“‘Thing Which a Man Mai Noght Areche’: Women and Counsel in Gower’s Confessio Amantis.” Chaucer Review 42, no. 1 (2007), 91–109.Google Scholar
Schirmer, Walter F. John Lydgate: A Study in the Culture of the XVth Century. Translated by Ann E. Keep. London: Methuen and Company, 1961.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. V. C. The Clerkly Maker: Langland’s Poetic Art. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1987.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Leah. “Redressing Griselda: Restoration through Translation in the Clerk’s Tale.” Chaucer Review 47, no. 2 (2013), 274–99.Google Scholar
Seal, Samantha Katz. Father Chaucer: Generating Authority in the Canterbury Tales. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Severs, J. Burke. The Literary Relationships of Chaucer’s Clerkes Tale. Hamden: Archon Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Christian. “May in the Marketplace: Commodification and Textuality in the Merchant’s Tale.” Studies in Philology 102, no. 1 (2005), 27–44.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor. Theory of Prose. Translated by Benjamin Sher. Normal: Dalkey Archive Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Shrank, Cathy. “‘But I, That Knew What Harbred in That Hed’: Sir Thomas Wyatt and His Posthumous ‘Interpreters.’” Proceedings of the British Academy 154 (2008), 375–401.Google Scholar
Simon, Joan. Education and Society in Tudor England. Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Simpson, James. “Chaucer as a European Writer.” In The Yale Companion to Chaucer, edited by Lerer, Seth, 55–86. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
“‘Dyesmol Daies and Fatal Houres’: Lydgate’s Destruction of Thebes and Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale.” In The Long Fifteenth Century: Essays for Douglas Gray, edited by Cooper, Helen and Mapstone, Sally, 15–33. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
“‘For al My Body … Weieth Nat an Unce’: Empty Poets and Rhetorical Weight in Lydgate’s Churl and the Bird.” In John Lydgate: Poetry, Culture, and Lancastrian England, edited by Scanlon, Larry and Simpson, James, 129–46. University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.Google Scholar
“Madness and Texts: Hoccleve’s Series.” In Chaucer and Fifteenth-Century Poetry, edited by Boffey, Julia and Cowen, Janet, 15–29. Exeter: Short Run Press, 1991.Google Scholar
“Nobody’s Man: Thomas Hoccleve’s Regement of Princes.” In London and Europe in the Later Middle Ages, edited by Boffey, Julia and King, Pamela, 149–80. University of London Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1995.Google Scholar
Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s Anticlaudianus and John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. “Life of Geoffrey Chaucer.” In The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Vol. 1, edited by Skeat, Walter W., ix–lxi. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith Anne. Tudor Autobiography: Listening for Inwardness. University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Smalley, Beryl. The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages. Third edition. University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J. “Theory and Practice in Renaissance Poetry: Two Kinds of Imitation.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 47, no. 1 (1964), 212–43.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Vance. Arts of Dying: Literature and Finitude in Medieval England. University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sobecki, Sebastian. “A Southwark Tale: Gower, the 1381 Poll Tax, and Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales.” Speculum 92, no. 3 (2017), 630–60.Google Scholar
“Communities of Practice: Thomas Hoccleve, London Clerks, and Literary Production.” Journal of the Early Book Society 24 (2021), 51–106.Google Scholar
“‘Gens sans Argent’: A New Holograph Manuscript by Thomas Hoccleve.” The Library 24 (2023), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Last Words: The Public Self and the Social Author in Late Medieval England. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
“Lydgate’s Kneeling Retraction: The Testament as a Literary Palinode.” Chaucer Review 49, no. 3 (2015), 265–93.Google Scholar
“New Life Records for John Skelton as Rector of Diss, Norfolk (1514 and 1516).” Huntington Library Quarterly 83, no. 2 (2020), 395–400.Google Scholar
Solomon, Deborah C. “Representations of Lyric Intimacy in Manuscript and Print Versions of Wyatt’s ‘They Flee from Me.’” Modern Philology 111, no. 4 (2014), 668–82.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “The Semantics of Terms.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kennedy, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan, 188–96. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C. Medieval Autographies: The “I” of the Text. University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.Google Scholar
The Medieval Poet as Voyeur: Looking and Listening in Medieval Love-Narratives. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sponsler, Claire. The Queen’s Dumbshows: John Lydgate and the Making of Early Theatre. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, Chris. Sir Thomas Wyatt and the Rhetoric of Rewriting: ‘Turning the Word.’ Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Steiner, Emily. Documentary Culture and the Making of Early English Literature. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
John Trevisa’s Information Age: Knowledge and the Pursuit of Literature, c. 1400. Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Stevens, John. Music and Poetry in the Early Tudor Court. Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Stockard, Emily. “Who Was Jane Scrope?” In Renaissance Papers, 2014, edited by Pearce, Jim, Risvold, Ward J., and Dixon, Nathan, 1–15. Cambridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2015.Google Scholar
Straker, Scott-Morgan. “Deference and Difference: Lydgate, Chaucer, and the Siege of Thebes.” The Review of English Studies, new series, 52, no. 205 (2001), 1–21.Google Scholar
Strakhov, Elizaveta. Continental England: Form, Translation, and Chaucer in the Hundred Years’ War. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
String, Tatiana. Art and Communication in the Reign of Henry VIII. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
“Politics and Poetics: Usk and Chaucer in the 1380s.” In Literary Practice and Social Change in Britain, 1380–1530, edited by Patterson, Lee. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. 83–112.Google Scholar
England’s Empty Throne: Usurpation and the Language of Legitimation, 1399–422. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Politique: Languages of Statecraft between Chaucer and Shakespeare. University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
“Sovereignty and Sewage.” In Lydgate Matters: Poetry and Material Culture in the Fifteenth Century, edited by Cooper, Lisa and Denny-Brown, Andrea, 57–70. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
“Storie, Spelle, Geste, Romaunce, Tragedie: Generic Distinctions in the Middle English Troy Narratives.” Speculum 46, no. 2 (1971), 348–59.Google Scholar
“Hoccleve, Lydgate and the Lancastrian Court.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, edited by Wallace, David, 640–61. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Strub, Spencer. “Hoccleve, Swelling and Bursting.” In Thomas Hoccleve: New Approaches, edited by Nuttall, Jenni and Watt, David, 124–41. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022.Google Scholar
Summit, Jennifer. Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England. University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte Adolphe. History of English Literature. Translated by H. Van Laun. New York: Holt and Williams, 1871.Google Scholar
Targoff, Ramie. Posthumous Love: Eros and the Afterlife in Renaissance England. University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. Arwen. “Speech Acts and Conversation in the Series.” In Thomas Hoccleve: New Approaches, edited by Nuttall, Jenni and Watt, David, 47–64. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022.Google Scholar
Taylor, Karla. “Social Aesthetics and the Emergence of Civic Discourse from the Shipman’s Tale to Melibee.” Chaucer Review 39, no. 3 (2005), 298–322.Google Scholar
Teskey, Gordon. “Literature.” In Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History, edited by Cummings, Brian and Simpson, James, 379–95. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Thornley, Eva. “The Middle English Penitential Lyric and Hoccleve’s Autobiographical Poetry.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 68, no. 3 (1967), 295–321.Google Scholar
Tilley, Morris Palmer. A Dictionary of the Proverbs in England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Tinkle, Theresa. “Contested Authority: Jerome and the Wife of Bath on 1 Timothy 2.” Chaucer Review 44, no. 3 (2010), 268–93.Google Scholar
Tolmie, Sarah. “The Professional: Thomas Hoccleve.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 29 (2007), 341–73.Google Scholar
Tonry, Kathleen. “John Skelton and the New Fifteenth Century.” Literature Compass 5, no. 4 (2008), 721–39.Google Scholar
Tout, Thomas. Chapters in the Administrative History of Mediaeval England: The Wardrobe, the Chamber, and the Small Seals. 6 vols. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter. Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Trigg, Stephanie. Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer from Medieval to Postmodern. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Turner, Marion. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-Century London. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tuve, Rosemund. Elizabethan and Metaphysical Imagery: Renaissance and Twentieth-Century Critics. University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Vance, Eugene. Mervelous Signals: Poetics and Sign Theory in the Middle Ages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel. Humanism, Reading, and English Literature, 1430–530. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Immaterial Texts in Late Medieval England: Making English Literary Manuscripts, 1400–1500. Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Walker, Greg. John Skelton and the Politics of the 1520s. Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Writing Under Tyranny: English Literature and the Henrician Reformation. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wallace, David. Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy. Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wallace, Nathaniel Owen. “The Responsibilities of Madness: John Skelton, ‘Speke, Parott,’ and Homeopathic Satire.” Studies in Philology 82, no. 1 (1985), 60–80.Google Scholar
Walling, Amanda. “Feminizing Aureation in Lydgate’s Life of Our Lady and Life of Saint Margaret.” Neophilologus 101, no. 2 (2017), 321–36.Google Scholar
“‘In Hir Tellyng Difference’: Gender, Authority, and Interpretation in the Tale of Melibee.” Chaucer Review 40, no. 2 (2005), 163–81.Google Scholar
Ward, John O. “Some Principles of Historiography in the Twelfth Century.” In Classical Rhetoric and Medieval Historiography, edited by Breisach, Ernst, 103–65. Kalamazoo: Medieval institute Publications, 1985.Google Scholar
Waswo, Richard. Language and Meaning in the Renaissance. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Waters, Claire. Angels and Earthly Creatures: Preaching, Performance, and Gender in the Later Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Watt, David. The Making of Thomas Hoccleve’s Series. Liverpool University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Watt, Diane. Amoral Gower: Language, Sex, and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
“Gender and Sexuality in Confessio Amantis.” In A Companion to Gower, edited by Echard, Siân, 197–213. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried. Latin Sermon Collections from Later Medieval England: Orthodox Preaching in the Age of Wyclif. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Edward. Mastering Aesop: Medieval Education, Chaucer, and His Followers. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Whigham, Frank. Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 7, no. 1 (1980), 5–27.Google Scholar
Whiting, Bartlett Jere. Proverbs, Sentences, and Proverbial Phrases from English Writings Mainly before 1500. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Wickert, Maria. Studies in John Gower. Translated by Robert J. Meindl Second edition. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2016.Google Scholar
Williams, Arnold. “The ‘Limitour’ of Chaucer’s Time and His ‘Limitacioun’.” Studies in Philology 57, no. 3 (1960), 463–78.Google Scholar
Williams, Deanne. The French Fetish from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Winser, Leigh. “The Question of Love Tradition in Wyatt’s ‘They Flee From Me.’” Essays in Literature 2, no. 1 (1975), 3–9.Google Scholar
Winstead, Karen A. “‘I Am al Othir to Yow than Yee Weene’: Hoccleve, Women, and the Series.” Philological Quarterly 72, no. 2 (1993), 143–55.Google Scholar
Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn, Watson, Nicholas, Taylor, Andrew, and Evans, Ruth. The Idea of the Vernacular: An Anthology of Middle English Literary Theory, 1280–1520. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Jessica. Humanism, Machinery, and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Yeager, R. F. “Gower in Winter: Last Poems.” In The Medieval Python: The Purposive and Provocative Work of Terry Jones, edited by Yeager, R. F. and Takamiyais, Toshiyuki, 83–107. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
“Gower’s French Audience: The Mirour de L’Omme.” Chaucer Review 41, no. 2 (2006), 111–37.Google Scholar
“Gower’s Religions.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Gower, edited by Sáez-Hidalgo, Ana, Yeager, R. F., and Gastle, Brian, 56–74. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
“John Gower and the Exemplum Form: Tale Models in the Confessio Amantis.” Mediaevalia 8 (1982), 307–35.Google Scholar
“Pax Poetica: On the Pacifism of Gower and Chaucer.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 9 (1981), 97–121.Google Scholar
Young, Karl. “Chaucer and Geoffrey of Vinsauf.” Modern Philology 41, no. 3 (1944), 172–82.Google Scholar
Zarins, Kim. “Violence Without Warning: Sympathetic Villains and John Gower’s Crafting of Ovidian Narrative.” In John Gower: Others and the Self, edited by Yeager, R. F. and Peck, Russell A., 141–55. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2017.Google Scholar
Zieman, Katherine. Singing the New Song: Literacy and Liturgy in Late Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar