Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor Acknowledgments
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects
- My Introduction to Matched Sampling
- PART I THE EARLY YEARS AND THE INFLUENCE OF WILLIAM G. COCHRAN
- PART II UNIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS AND THE DANGERS OF REGRESSION ADJUSTMENT
- PART III BASIC THEORY OF MULTIVARIATE MATCHING
- PART IV FUNDAMENTALS OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
- 10 The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects
- 11 Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome
- 12 Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
- 13 Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score
- 14 The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching
- PART V AFFINELY INVARIANT MATCHING METHODS WITH ELLIPSOIDALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS, THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
- PART VI SOME APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS
- PART VII SOME FOCUSED APPLICATIONS
- Conclusion: Advice to the Investigator
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
12 - Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor Acknowledgments
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects
- My Introduction to Matched Sampling
- PART I THE EARLY YEARS AND THE INFLUENCE OF WILLIAM G. COCHRAN
- PART II UNIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS AND THE DANGERS OF REGRESSION ADJUSTMENT
- PART III BASIC THEORY OF MULTIVARIATE MATCHING
- PART IV FUNDAMENTALS OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
- 10 The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects
- 11 Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome
- 12 Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
- 13 Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score
- 14 The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching
- PART V AFFINELY INVARIANT MATCHING METHODS WITH ELLIPSOIDALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS, THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
- PART VI SOME APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS
- PART VII SOME FOCUSED APPLICATIONS
- Conclusion: Advice to the Investigator
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Summary
Abstract: The propensity score is the conditional probability of assignment to a particular treatment given a vector of observed covariates. Previous theoretical arguments have shown that subclassification on the propensity score will balance all observed covariates. Subclassification on an estimated propensity score is illustrated, using observational data on treatments for coronary artery disease. Five subclasses defined by the estimated propensity score are constructed that balance 74 covariates, and thereby provide estimates of treatment effects using direct adjustment. These subclasses are applied within subpopulations, and model-based adjustments are then used to provide estimates of treatment effects within these subpopulations. Two appendixes address theoretical issues related to the application: the effectiveness of subclassification on the propensity score in removing bias, and balancing properties of propensity scores with incomplete data.
INTRODUCTION: SUBCLASSIFICATION AND THE PROPENSITY SCORE
Adjustment by Subclassification in Observational Studies
In observational studies for causal effects, treatments are assigned to experimental units without the benefits of randomization. As a result, treatment groups may differ systematically with respect to relevant characteristics and, therefore, may not be directly comparable. One commonly used method of controlling for systematic differences involves grouping units into subclasses based on observed characteristics, and then directly comparing only treated and control units who fall in the same subclass. Obviously such a procedure can only control the bias due to imbalances in observed covariates.
Cochran (1968a) presents an example in which the mortality rates of cigarette smokers, cigar/pipe smokers, and nonsmokers are compared after subclassification on the covariate age.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects , pp. 193 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
- 3
- Cited by