Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:53:39.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Paul R. Rosenbaum
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Abstract: Matched sampling is a method for selecting units from a large reservoir of potential controls to produce a control group of modest size that is similar to a treated group with respect to the distribution of observed covariates. We illustrate the use of multivariate matching methods in an observational study of the effects of prenatal exposure to barbiturates on subsequent psychological development. A key idea is the use of the propensity score as a distinct matching variable.

INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND; WHY MATCH?

Matched Sampling in Observational Studies. In many observational studies, there is a relatively small group of subjects exposed to a treatment and a much larger group of control subjects not exposed. When the costs associated with obtaining outcome or response data from subjects are high, some sampling of the control reservoir is often necessary. Matched sampling attempts to choose the controls for further study so that they are similar to the treated subjects with respect to background variables measured on all subjects.

The Danish Cohort. We examine multivariate matched sampling using initial data from a proposed study of the effects on psychological development of prenatal exposure to barbiturates. The analyses presented are preliminary and intended only to explore methodological options; none of the matched samples are the actual ones to be used for study of in utero exposure to barbiturates. The children under study were born between 1959 and 1961 and have been the object of other studies (e.g., Mednick et al. 1971; Zachau-Christiansen and Ross 1975).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×