Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor Acknowledgments
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects
- My Introduction to Matched Sampling
- PART I THE EARLY YEARS AND THE INFLUENCE OF WILLIAM G. COCHRAN
- PART II UNIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS AND THE DANGERS OF REGRESSION ADJUSTMENT
- 3 Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies
- 4 The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies
- 5 Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate
- PART III BASIC THEORY OF MULTIVARIATE MATCHING
- PART IV FUNDAMENTALS OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
- PART V AFFINELY INVARIANT MATCHING METHODS WITH ELLIPSOIDALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS, THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
- PART VI SOME APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS
- PART VII SOME FOCUSED APPLICATIONS
- Conclusion: Advice to the Investigator
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
5 - Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor Acknowledgments
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects
- My Introduction to Matched Sampling
- PART I THE EARLY YEARS AND THE INFLUENCE OF WILLIAM G. COCHRAN
- PART II UNIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS AND THE DANGERS OF REGRESSION ADJUSTMENT
- 3 Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies
- 4 The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies
- 5 Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate
- PART III BASIC THEORY OF MULTIVARIATE MATCHING
- PART IV FUNDAMENTALS OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
- PART V AFFINELY INVARIANT MATCHING METHODS WITH ELLIPSOIDALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS, THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
- PART VI SOME APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS
- PART VII SOME FOCUSED APPLICATIONS
- Conclusion: Advice to the Investigator
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Summary
Abstract: When assignment to treatment group is made solely on the basis of the value of a covariate, X, effort should be concentrated on estimating the conditional expectations of the dependent variable Y given X in the treatment and control groups. One then averages the difference between these conditional expectations over the distribution of X in the relevant population. There is no need for concern about “other” sources of bias, e.g., unreliability of X, unmeasured background variables. If the conditional expectations are parallel and linear, the proper regression adjustment is the simple covariance adjustment. However, since the quality of the resulting estimates may be sensitive to the adequacy of the underlying model, it is wise to search for nonparallelism and nonlinearity in these conditional expectations. Blocking on the values of X is also appropriate, although the quality of the resulting estimates may be sensitive to the coarseness of the blocking employed. In order for these techniques to be useful in practice, there must be either substantial overlap in the distribution of X in the treatment groups or strong prior information.
INTRODUCTION
In some studies, the experimental units are divided into two treatment groups solely on the basis of a covariate, X. By this we mean that if two units have the same value of X either they both must receive the same treatment or they must be randomly assigned (not necessarily with probability 0.5) to treatments.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Matched Sampling for Causal Effects , pp. 99 - 114Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
- 1
- Cited by