Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:27:55.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Affinely Invariant Matching Methods with Ellipsoidal Distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Paul R. Rosenbaum
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Abstract: Matched sampling is a common technique used for controlling bias in observational studies. We present a general theoretical framework for studying the performance of such matching methods. Specifically, results are obtained concerning the performance of affinely invariant matching methods with ellipsoidal distributions, which extend previous results on equal percent bias reducing methods. Additional extensions cover conditionally affinely invariant matching methods for covariates with conditionally ellipsoidal distributions. These results decompose the effects of matching into one subspace containing the best linear discriminant, and the subspace of variables uncorrelated with the discriminant. This characterization of the effects of matching provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the performance of specific methods such as matched sampling using estimated propensity scores. Calculations for such methods are given in subsequent articles.

BACKGROUND

Matched sampling is a popular and important technique for controlling bias in observational studies. It has received increasing attention in the statistical literature in recent years [Cochran (1968a); Cochran and Rubin (1973); Rubin (1973a, b), (1976b, c), (1979b); Carpenter (1977); and Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983a, 1985a)]. The basic situation has two populations of units, treated (e.g., smokers) and control (e.g., nonsmokers), and a set of observed matching variables X = (X1, …, Xp) (e.g., age, gender, weight). The objective is to compare the distributions of the outcome variables having adjusted for differences in the distributions of X in the two populations. Matched sampling is a way of adjusting for X through data collection.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×