We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2024
CASE
A car producer put a device or soft ware in its engines that could detect when the engine was being tested and improve its greenhouse gas emissions only during the test. Outside these laboratory test conditions, the level of emissions was much higher, exceeding the maximum level allowed by law.
A group of car owners demand compensation from the producer. Will they receive compensation and, if so, for what losses? And is it possible to start a collective proceeding? If so, please indicate the most important bottlenecks in this particular case.
DISCUSSIONS
AUSTRIA
Matthias Dangl and Georg E Kodek
Operative Rules
Car owners will receive compensation under Austrian tort law (§ § 874 and 1295 para 2 ACC). They will receive compensation for the difference between the price they actually paid for the car and the price they would have paid if they had known about the soft ware. Alternatively, they could rescind the contract. Then they have to return the car and can reclaim the purchase price (subject to a deduction for the use of the car in the meantime).
A collective action against the manufacturer (as described in the Austrian section in the procedural rules chapter) would be possible.
Legal Formants
The liability of the manufacturer under § 874 ACC presupposes that it acted intentionally (i.e. caused the conclusion of the contract through deliberate deception). In the case of vehicles with a switch-off device, it seems obvious that someone who ‘works for’ to the manufacturer must have committed the manipulation intentionally.
BELGIUM
Artuur Keukeleire, Larissa Vanhooff and Britt Weyts
Operative Rules
There are a number of grounds on which the consumers could base their claim; however, their chances of success are inversely proportional. First, they claim nullity of the contract based on defects of will to conclude a contract and, more specifically, on error or deceit (Article 1108 of the old BCC).
Second, they can claim the nullity of the contract for an illicit object. Third, the buyers can invoke the indemnity for hidden defects (see Case 5 above for further details). Fourth, they can claim annulment of the contract based on non-conformity (a consumer purchase agreement).
Both consumers and SMEs may institute an action for collective redress under Belgian law (see Case 6 above).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
