The Pluralistic Vision of Marriage

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139087568.017

13 - The Pluralistic Vision of Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2012

Shahar Lifshitz

Edited by

Marsha Garrison and

Elizabeth S. Scott

Show author details

Marsha Garrison: Affiliation:
Brooklyn Law School
Elizabeth S. Scott: Affiliation:
Columbia University Law School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In what manner should the state design institutions for couples and influence couples’ choices among these institutions? The current legal discourse is polarized between two opposite approaches to this question: one supporting public channeling, the other preferring private neutrality.

The public-channeling approach is based on a monolithic-perfectionist philosophy that posits the state's authority and duty to foster certain ways of life and to prefer them over others. In the spousal context, application of this approach requires regulating intimate relationships based mainly on public interests and shared moral values. The public-channeling approach perceives marriage as a public institution and stresses the state's role in steering couples into traditional, legal marriage.

By contrast, the private-neutral approach is based on a liberal-neutralist philosophy. According to this view, the liberal state must maintain a neutral approach toward various lifestyles and refrain from preferring one over another. The application of this approach to spousal law requires the state to respect the conjugal pattern selected by the parties and to refrain from attempts to channel couples toward any specific affiliative pattern. In its radical versions, this approach seeks to abolish marriage as a legal institution, or at the very least to replace the perception of marriage as a public institution with a contractual account of marriage.

Type: Chapter
Information: Marriage at the Crossroads
Law, Policy, and the Brave New World of Twenty-First-Century Families
, pp. 260 - 284

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amato, P.R. 1993 Children's Adjustment to Divorce: Theories, Hypotheses and Empirical SupportJournal of Marriage and Family 55 23CrossRef Google Scholar

American Law Institute (ALI) 2002

Atkin, I. 2008 The Legal World of Unmarried Couples: Reflections on “de Facto Relationships” in Recent New Zealand LegislationVictoria University of Wellington Law Review 39 793Google Scholar

Berger, P.L.Luckmann, T. 1966 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of KnowledgeNew YorkAnchor Books.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1969 Four Essays on LibertyNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bix, B. 2010 Private Ordering and Family LawJournal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 23 249Google Scholar

Blumberg, G.G. 2001 Unmarried Partners and the Legacy of : The Regularization of Non-Marital Cohabitation: Rights and Responsibilities in the American Welfare StateNotre Dame Law Review 76 1265Google Scholar

Bowman, C.G. 2010 Unmarried Couples, Law, and Public PolicyNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bradford, L. 1997 The Counterrevolution: A Critique of Recent Proposals to Reform No-Fault Divorce LawsStanford Law Review 49 607CrossRef Google Scholar

Brinig, M.F. 2006 Domestic Partnership and Default RulesWilson, R.F.Reconceiving the FamilyNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Broyde, M.J. 2001 Marriage, Divorce and the Abandoned Wife in Jewish Law: A Conceptual Understanding of the Agunah Problems in AmericaNew JerseyKtav Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar

Case, M.A. 2003 Of “This” and “ThatLawrence v. Texas. The Supreme Court Review 2003 75CrossRef Google Scholar

Case, M.A. 2005 Marriage LicensesMinnesota Law Review 89 1758Google Scholar

Case, M.A. 2010 What Feminists Have to Lose in Same-Sex Marriage LitigationUCLA Law Review 57 1199Google Scholar

Case, M.A.Why Evangelical Protestants Are Right When They Claim that State Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Their Marriages and What the Law Should Do about ItSullivan, W.F.Sacred/Secular Divide: The Legal StoryPalo Alto, CAStanford University Press

Chambers, D.L. 1985 The “Legalization” of the Family: Toward a Policy of Supportive NeutralityUniversity of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 18 805Google Scholar

Chambers, D.L. 1996 What If? The Legal Consequences of Marriage and the Legal Needs of Lesbian and Gay Male CouplesMichigan Law Review 95 447CrossRef Google Scholar

Cherlin, A.J.Furstenberg, F.F.Morrison, D.R.Robins, P.K. 1991 Longitudinal Studies of Effects of Divorce on Children in Great Britain and the United statesScience 252 1386CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cott, N.F. 2000 Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the NationCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Crane, D.A. 2006 A “Judeo-Christian” Argument for Privatizing MarriageCardozo Law Review 27 1221Google Scholar

Dagan, H.Pluralism and Perfectionism in Private LawColumbia Law Review 113

Dagan, H.Franz, C.J. 2004 Properties of MarriageColumbia Law Review 104 75Google Scholar

Davis, A.D. 2010 Regulating Polygamy: Intimacy, Default Rules, and Bargaining for EqualityColumbia Law Review 110 1955Google Scholar

Dubler, A. 2006 Immoral Purposes: Marriage and the Genus of Illicit SexYale Law Journal 115 756CrossRef Google Scholar

Dubler, A. 2010 Sexing History and the Politics of the Right to MarryColumbia Law Review 110 1348Google Scholar

Eekelaar, J.M.Thandabantu, N. 1998 The Changing Family: Family Forms and Family LawOxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Eichner, M. 2007 Marriage and the Elephant: The Liberal Democratic State's Regulation of Intimate Relationships between AdultsHarvard Journal of Law & Gender 30 25Google Scholar

Ellman, I.M. 2001 Contract Thinking” Was 's Fatal FlawNotre Dame Law Review 76 1365Google Scholar

Emens, E.F. 2004 Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous ExistenceNew York University Review of Law & Social Change 29 277Google Scholar

Emens, E.F. 2011 Regulatory Fictions: On Marriage and Counter-MarriageCalifornia Law Review 99 235Google Scholar

Emery, E. 1988 Marriage, Divorce and Children's AdjustmentNewbury Park, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Estin, A.L. 2001 Ordinary CohabitationNotre Dame Law Review 76 1381Google Scholar

Estin, A.L. 2004 Embracing tradition: Pluralism in American family lawMaryland Law Review 63 540Google Scholar

Fineman, M.A. 1995 The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century TragediesNew YorkRoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Galston, W.A. 1991 A Liberal Democratic Case for the Two-Parent FamilyThe Responsive Community 1 145Google Scholar

Galston, W.A. 1991 Liberal Purpose – Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal StateNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S.A. 1991 Why the Liberal State Can Promote Moral Ideals After AllHarvard Law Review 104 1350CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrison, M. 1983 Marriage: The Status of ContractUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review 131 1039CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrison, M. 2005 Is Consent Necessary? An Evaluation of the Emerging Law of Cohabitant ObligationUCLA Law Review 52 815Google Scholar

Garrison, M. 2007 The Decline of Formal Marriage: Inevitable or ReversibleFamily Law Quarterly 41 491Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 1973 The Interpretation of CulturesNew YorkBasic BooksGoogle Scholar

Glendon, M.A. 1989 The Transformation of Family Law – State, Law and Family in the United States and Western EuropeChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Haddock, D.D.Polsby, D.D. 1996 Family as a Rational ClassificationWashington University Law Quarterly 74 15Google Scholar

Hafen, B.C. 1983 The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship, and Sexual Privacy: Balancing the Individual and Social InterestsMichigan Law Review 81 463CrossRef Google Scholar

Halperin-Kaddari, R. 2004 Women in Israel: A State of Their OwnPhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Katz, S.N.Eekelaar, J.M.Maclean, M. 2000 Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the U.S. and EnglandNew YorkOxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kekes, J. 1993 The Morality of PluralismPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar

Kymlicka, W. 1989 Liberalism, Community and CultureNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2005 Cohabitation Law in Israel from the Perspective of a Civil Law Theory of the FamilyHaifaHaifa University PressGoogle Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2008 The Best Interest of the Child and Spousal LawsRonen, Y.Greenbaum, C.W.The Case for the Child: Towards a New AgendaCambridge, UKIntersentia PublishingGoogle Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2008 A Potential Lesson from the Israeli Experience for the American Same-Sex Marriage DebateBrigham Young University Journal of Public Law 22 359Google Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2009 A Liberal Analysis of Western Cohabitant LawVerschraegen, B.Family FinanceViennaJan Sramek VerlagGoogle Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2010 Married against Their Will? Toward a Pluralist Regulation of Spousal RelationshipsWashington and Lee Law Review 66 1565Google Scholar

Lifshitz, S. 2012 The Liberal Transformation of Spousal Law: Past, Present and FutureTheoretical Inquiries in Law 13 15CrossRef Google Scholar

McClain, L.C. 2007 Love, Marriage, and the Baby Carriage: Revisiting the Channeling Function of Family LawCardozo Law Review 28 2133Google Scholar

McLanahan, S.Sandefur, G. 1994 Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What HelpsCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Mill, J.S. 1942 On LibertyNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

MurphyJr., R.D. 2002 A Good Man Is Hard to Find: Marriage as an InstitutionJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization 47 27CrossRef Google Scholar

Nichols, J.A. 1998 Louisiana's Covenant Marriage Statute: A First Step toward a More Robust Pluralism in Marriage and Divorce LawEmory Law Journal 47 929Google Scholar

Nichols, J.A. 2007 Multi-Tiered Marriage: Ideas and Influences from New York and Louisiana to the International CommunityVanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40 135Google Scholar

Phillips, R. 1988 Putting Asunder: A History of Divorce in Western SocietyNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Polikoff, N.D. 2003 Ending Marriage as We Know ItHofstra Law Review 32 201Google Scholar

Polikoff, N.D. 2008 Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families under the LawBoston, MABeacon PressGoogle Scholar

Posner, E.A. 2000 Law and Social NormsCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. 1993 Political LiberalismNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. 1999 A Theory of JusticeNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Raz, J. 1986 The Morality of FreedomNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Raz, J. 1994 Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and PoliticsNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Regan, M.C. 1999 Alone Together: Law and the Meanings of MarriageNew YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, A. 1973 The Rights to MarriageTel-Aviv Studies in Law 3 433Google Scholar

Sandel, M.J. 1996 Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public PhilosophyCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Schneider, C.E. 1985 Moral Discourse and the Transformation of American Family LawMichigan Law Review 83 1803CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, C.E. 1994 Marriage, Morals, and the Law: No-Fault Divorce and Moral DiscourseUtah Law Review 1994 503Google Scholar

Scott, E.S. 1990 Rational Decision Making about Marriage and DivorceVirginia Law Review 76 9CrossRef Google Scholar

Scott, E.S. 1994 Rehabilitation Liberalism in Modern Divorce LawUtah Law Review 1994 687Google Scholar

Scott, E.S. 2000 Social Norms and the Legal Regulation of MarriageVirginia Law Review 86 1901CrossRef Google Scholar

Scott, E.S. 2004 Marriage, Cohabitation and Collective Responsibility for DependencyUniversity of Chicago Legal Forum 2004 225Google Scholar

Scott, E.S. 2006 Domestic Partnerships, Implied Contracts, and Law ReformWilson, R. F.Reconceiving the Family7New YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Scott, E.S. 2007 World without MarriageFamily Law Quarterly 41 537Google Scholar

Singer, J.B. 1992 The Privatization of Family LawWisconsin Law Review 1992 1443Google Scholar

Shifman, P. 1995 Civil Marriage in Israel: The Case for ReformJerusalemJerusalem Institute for Israeli StudiesGoogle Scholar

Spaht, K.S. 1998 Louisiana's Covenant Marriage: Social Analysis and Legal ImplicationsLouisiana Law Review 59 63Google Scholar

Stake, J.E. 1992 Mandatory Planning for DivorceVanderbilt Law Review 45 397Google Scholar

Stone, L. 1990 Road to Divorce – England 1530–1987New YorkOxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Stone, S.L. 2000 The Intervention of American Law in Jewish Divorce: A Pluralist AnalysisIsrael Law Review 34 170CrossRef Google Scholar

Teitelbaum, L.E. 1985 Moral Discourse and Family LawMichigan Law Review 84 430CrossRef Google Scholar

Thornton, A. 1994 Comparative and Historical Perspectives on Marriage, Divorce, and Family LifeUtah Law Review 1994 587Google Scholar

Waite, L.Gallagher, M. 2000 The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier and Better Off FinanciallyNew YorkBroadway BooksGoogle Scholar

Wallerstein, J.S.Blakeslee, S. 1989 Second Chances: Men, Women, and Children a Decade after DivorceNew YorkHoughton MifflinGoogle Scholar

Wardle, L. D. 1998 and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790–1990Howard Law Journal 41 289Google Scholar

Wardle, L.D. 2008 A Response to the “Conservative Case” for Same-Sex Marriage: Same-Sex Marriage and “The Tragedy of the CommonsBrigham Young University Journal of Public Law 22 441Google Scholar

Wax, A.L. 1996 The Two-Parent Family in the Liberal State: The Case for Selective SubsidiesMichigan Journal of Race & Law 1 491Google Scholar

Weitzman, L.J. 1981 The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the LawNew YorkThe Free PressGoogle Scholar

Weitzman, L.J. 1985 The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in AmericaNew YorkSimon & SchusterGoogle Scholar

WitteJr., J. 1997 From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western TraditionLouisville, KYWJK PressGoogle Scholar

Zelinsky, E.A. 2006 Deregulating Marriage: The Pro-Marriage Case for Abolishing Civil MarriageCardozo Law Review 27 1161Google Scholar

1976

1992

2010