Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:33:26.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Piloting Initiatives and Scaling Up to the Whole System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Colleen McLaughlin
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Winter
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Natallia Yakavets
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Beane, J. A. (1995). Towards a Coherent Curriculum, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
Bridges, D (Ed.) (2014). International Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher educationJournal of Teacher Education57(3), 300314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desforges, C. and Abouchaar, A. (2003). The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment: A Literature Review. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development (Essays in Social Psychology). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. and Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts and Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Kambatyrova, A., Assylbekova, B. and Goodman, B. (2022). Primary school English language education in Kazakhstan: Policy, preparation, and practice. In Zein, S. and Butler, Y. B. (Eds.), English for Young Learners in Asia: Challenges and Directions for Teacher Education (1st ed.). London: Routledge, pp. 4864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabassova, L. (2020). Understanding trilingual education reform in Kazakhstan: Why is it stalled? In Egéa, D. (Ed.), Education in Central Asia: Education, Equity, Economy. Cham: Springer, pp. 3751.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
MoES and NAE (2016). Monitoring of Piloting of the New Standard of Education in 30 Piloting Schools in the RK in the Academic Year 2015–2016: Analytical Report. Astana: MoES and NAE. http://nao.kz/files/blogs/1466168737257.pdfGoogle Scholar
NAE (2015a). Monitoring and Mechanisms of Piloting of the Subject Programmes and Learning Materials According to the Renewed Content of Primary Education: Manual. Astana: NAE. http://new.nao.kz/files/blogs/1444200521435.pdfGoogle Scholar
NAE ( 2015b). Bastauysh bіlіm berudin memlekettіk zhalpyga mіndettі standarty [State Compulsory Standard of Primary Education]. https://uba.edu.kz/storage/app/media/Standart/327%20%D0%BE%D1%82%2025.04.2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
NAE (2016). Aprobatsiya obnovlennogo soderzhaniya obrazovaniya [Piloting a new content of education]. http://nao.kz/content/view/7/258Google Scholar
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E. and Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIS AEO (2018). Autonomous Educational Organisation ‘Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools’ 2030 development strategy. https://nis.edu.kz/ru/about/str-doc/Google Scholar
OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD/The World Bank (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Kazakhstan 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Opfer, D. and Peddar, D. (2011) Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376407.Google Scholar
Rosenmund, M. (2000) OP-ED approaches to international comparative research on curricular and curriculum-making process. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 599606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Program for Education and Science Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan [SPESD] for 2016–2019 (2016). https://primeminister.kz/assets/media/obrazovaniya-i-nauki-respubliki-kazakhstan-na-2016-2019-gody.pdfGoogle Scholar
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. and Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education/OECD.Google Scholar
Winter, L., Yakavets, N. and Kurakbayev, K. (2018). Changes in purpose: Examining the radical transition from a longstanding norm-based model of classroom assessment to a new criteria-based system. Paper presented at ECER, Bolzano, Italy.Google Scholar

References

Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M. and Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teachingBritish Journal of Educational Psychology90(3), 736752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, P. (2015). Effective School Partnerships and Collaboration for School Improvement: A Review of the Evidence. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Asmolov, A. G. (2010). Shock of the present. Educational Policy, 3(41), 24.Google Scholar
Bertrand, L., Roberts, R. A. and Buchanan, R. (2006). Striving for success: Teacher perspectives of a vertical team initiative. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 16(3), 110.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysisReview of Educational Research51(1), 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, M. G. R., Rakhymbayeva, Z., Shilibekova, A., Ziyedenova, D., Soltangazina, S., Muratkyzy, A., Goodman, B. and Olzhayeva, A. (2022). Kazakh, Russian, and Uyghur child language literacy: The role of the updated curriculum on longitudinal growth trajectories in Kazakhstan. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creemers, B. and Kyriakides, L. (2007). The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, D. M., Mozhayeva, O. I., Shilibekova, A. S., Ziyedenova, D. B. and Rakhymbayeva, Z. K. (2020). Updated content of education in Kazakhstan: Longitudinal trajectories of learning performance in mathematics and science. Journal of Education and Human Development, 9(1), 88102. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v9n1a9Google Scholar
Downes, P., Nairz-Wirth, E. and Rusinaitė, V. (2017). Structural Indicators for Inclusive Systems in and Around Schools: Analytical Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2016). The remarkable reach of growth mind-sets. Scientific American Mind, 27(1), 3641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egodawatte, G., McDougall, D. and Stoilescu, D. (2011). The effects of teacher collaboration in Grade 9 applied mathematicsEducational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(3), 189209.Google Scholar
Fadel, C., Trilling, B. and Bialik, M. (2015). Four-Dimensional Education: The Competencies Learners Need to Succeed. Boston: The Center for Curriculum Redesign.Google Scholar
Fastré, G. M. J., Van der Klink, M. R. and Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2010). The effects of performance-based assessment criteria on student performance and self-assessment skills. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(4), 517532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullan, M. (2013). The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gajda, R. and Koliba, C. J. (2008). Evaluating and improving the quality of teacher collaboration: A field-tested framework for secondary school leadersNASSP Bulletin92(2), 133153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gipps, C. (1999). Chapter 10: Socio-cultural aspects of assessmentReview of Research in Education24(1), 355392.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questionsAmerican Psychologist18(8), 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Y., Goddard, R. and Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayward, L., Priestley, M. and Young, M. (2004). Ruffling the calm of the ocean floor: Merging practice, policy and research in assessment in ScotlandOxford Review of Education30(3), 397415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F. and Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedbackJournal of Second Language Writing10(3), 185212.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. (1999). The Schools Our Children Deserve: Moving Beyond Traditional Classrooms and ‘Tougher Standards’. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C. (2016). The Problem Solvers: The Teachers, the Students and the Radically Disruptive Nuns Who Are Leading a Global Learning Movement. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (2008). How to Change 5000 Schools: A Practical and Positive Approach for Leading Change at Every Level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (2010). Governments and education reform: Some lessons from the last 50 yearsJournal of Education Policy25(6), 739747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H. and Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement: A meta-analysisSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement22(2), 121148.Google Scholar
Moolenaar, N. M. (2010). Ties with Potential: Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences of Social Networks in School Teams. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Mozhayeva, O. I., Shilibekova, A. S. and Ziyedenova, D. B. (2017). Methodology of the Criteria-Based Assessment System of Student Academic Achievements: Educational-Methodical Manual. Astana: Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (2009–2018). Mplus User’s Guide (Version 8.3). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education (2014). Development of Strategic Directions for Education Reforms in Kazakhstan for 2015–2020: Diagnostic Report. Astana: Indigo Print.Google Scholar
OECD (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD/CERI (2008). Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554299.pdfGoogle Scholar
Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 125 dated 18 March (2008). On approval of the model rules for the current monitoring of academic performance, intermediate and final certification of students for organizations of secondary, technical and vocational, post-secondary education.Google Scholar
Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 52 dated 21 January (2016). On approval of criteria of students’ knowledge assessment.Google Scholar
Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 130 dated 6 April (2020). On approval of the list of documents required for the record-keeping by teachers of organizations of secondary, technical and professional, postsecondary education, and their forms.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, J. W. (2004). The Evolution of Educational Assessment: Considering the Past and Imagining the Future. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Policy Information Center.Google Scholar
Phelps, R. P. (2006). Characteristics of an effective student testing systemEducational Horizons85(1), 1929.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. and Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio‐cultural theorisation of formative assessmentOxford Review of Education34(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravela, P., Arregui, P., Valverde, G., Wolfe, R., Ferrer, G., Rizo, F. M. and Wolff, L. (2009). The Educational Assessments that Latin America NeedsWashington, DC: PREAL.Google Scholar
Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 460 dated 24 July (2018). On approval of the State Program of Development of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2016–2019.Google Scholar
SABER (2012). Systems Approach for Better Education Results (SABER) Country Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/346291468038347210/SABER-student-assessment-country-report-Kazakhstan-2012Google Scholar
Schwartz, F. and White, K. (2000). Making sense of it all: Giving and getting online course feedback. In The Online Teaching Guide: A Handbook of Attitudes, Strategies, and Techniques for the Virtual Classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 5772.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning cultureEducational Researcher29(7), 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedbackETS Research Report Series7, i47.Google Scholar
Slavit, D., Kennedy, A., Lean, Z., Nelson, T. H. and Deuel, A. (2011). Support for professional collaboration in middle school mathematics: A complex webTeacher Education Quarterly38(3), 113131.Google Scholar
Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) (2018). First Results of Kazakhstan: National Report (2019) (Vol. 1). Astana: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan Information and Analytical Center.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2017). Global education monitoring report summary 2017/8: Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments. gem-report-2017.unesco.orgGoogle Scholar
Van der Linden, W. J. (2005). Linear Models for Optimal Test Design. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maele, D. and Van Houtte, M. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher–student trust relationships and the organizational school contextSocial Indicators Research100(1), 85100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of education 1. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Routledge, pp. 756783.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, M. (2011). The Effects of Teacher Collaboration on Students’ Understanding of High School Earth Science Concepts. Master’s thesis, Montana State University.Google Scholar
World Bank (2012). The World Bank Annual Report 2012: Volume 1. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yisrael, S. B. (2008). A Qualitative Case Study: The Positive Impact Interdisciplinary Teaming Has on Teacher Morale. Oxford, Ohio: Miami University.Google Scholar

References

Busick, K. and Inos, R. (1992). Synthesis of the research on educational change: Implementation phase. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED349705Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (2005). School-Based Management. UNESCO International Academy of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141025Google Scholar
Chubb, J. and Moe, T. (1990). Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. (2018). A review of formula funding: Identifying the main bottlenecks for formula funding for general secondary schools. www.unicef.org/kazakhstan/en/reports/review-formula-fundingGoogle Scholar
Financial Center (2021). Universal manual on per-capita funding for schools (in Russian). https://pnf.kz/pnf/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%20%D0%9F%D0%A41.pdfGoogle Scholar
Financial Center (2022). Piloting of per-capita funding model. www.fincenter.kz/funding/approbation/Google Scholar
Frost, D., Fim’yar, O., Yakavets, N. and Biyalov, D. (2014). The role of the school director in education reform in Kazakhstan. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217238.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogwood, B. and Gunn, L. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Information Analytic Center (2021). The national report 2020 on the state and development of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://iac.kz/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/naczionalnyj-doklad-po-itogam-2020_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, I. and Hill, M. (2011). Public Policy Analysis. Astana: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marier, P. (2013). Policy feedback and learning. In Araral Jr, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Wu, X. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 401414.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education and Science (2010). State Program of Education Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan (SPED) for 2011–2020. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, No. 1118.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education and Science, Order No. 355 (2017). Ob utverzhdenii Tipovykh pravil organizatsii raboty Popechitel’skogo soveta i poryadok yego izbraniya v organizatsiyakh obrazovaniya [On the approval of the model rules for the organisation of the work of the board of trustees and the procedure for its election in educational organisations]. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1700015584Google Scholar
National Education Database (NOBD) (2021). General education day schools.Google Scholar
OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205208-enGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Kazakhstan 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-reviews-of-school-resources-kazakhstan-2015-9789264245891-en.htmGoogle Scholar
Pons, A., Amoroso, J., Herczynski, J., Kheyfets, I., Lockheed, M. and Santiago, P. (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Qanay, G., Ait Si Mhamed, A. and Kasa, R. (2021). Issues of adequacy, equity and accountability within the new system of per-capita funding model in Kazakhstani public schools. Annual conference of the National Academy of Education named after Y. Altynsarin, Nur-Sultan.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2013). Developing and piloting the methodology for a per capita financing scheme in general secondary education in Kazakhstan and piloting the proposed model. www.unicef.org/kazakhstanGoogle Scholar
Vedung, E. (2013). Six models of evaluation. In Araral Jr, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Wu, X. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 387400.Google Scholar
Yakavets, N. and Dzhadrina, M. (2014). Educational reform in Kazakhstan: Entering the world arena. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2852.Google Scholar

References

Fielding, M., Bragg, S., Craig, J., Cunningham, I. A. N., Eraut, M., Gillinson, S. and Thorp, J. (2005). Factors Influencing the Transfer of Good Practice. Brighton and Hove: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the Wrong Drivers for Whole System Reform. Victoria, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Harper, F. K., Rosenberg, J. M., Comperry, S., Howell, K., Womble, S. (2021). #Mathathome during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring and reimagining resources and social supports for parents, Education Sciences, 11(2), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., Sudweeks, R. R. and Barbour, M. K. (2013). Academic performance, course completion rates, and student perception of the quality and frequency of interaction in a virtual high school. Distance Education, 34(1), 6483.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, R. and Matthews, P. (2008). Schools Leading Schools: The Power and Potential of National Leaders of Education. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. www.nationalcollege.org.uk/index/docinfo.htm?id=17375Google Scholar
Hill, R. and Matthews, P. (2010). Schools Leading Schools II: The Growing Impact of National Leaders of Education. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
Leana, C. (2011). An open letter to Bill and Melinda Gates on the value of social capital in school reform (draft, 28 February 2011). Stanford Social Innovation Review.Google Scholar
Odden, A. (2011). Strategic Management of Human Capital in Education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. and Berwick, G. (2013). Teaching Schools: First Among Equals. Nottingham: National College for Teaching and Leadership.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Sciences Research, 34, 11891208.Google Scholar
Popyk, A. (2021). The impact of distance learning on the social practices of schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic: Reconstructing values of migrant children in Poland. European Societies, 23(S1), S530S544.Google Scholar
Rasmitadila, R., Rusmiati, R. A., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M. and Riana Suryanti Tambunan, A. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90109.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2018). Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

References

Bangs, J. and Frost, D. (2012). Teacher Self-efficacy, Voice and Leadership: Towards a Policy Framework for Education International. Brussels: Education International.Google Scholar
Berry, B., Zeichner, N. and Evans, R. (2016). Teacher leadership: A reinvented teaching profession. In Evers, J. and Kneyber, R. (Eds.), Flip the System: Changing Education from the Ground Up. London: Routledge, pp. 209225.Google Scholar
Bolat, O. (2013). A Non-positional Teacher Leadership Approach to School Improvement: An Action Research Study in Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bridges, D., Kurakbayev, K. and Kambatyrova, A. (2014). Lost – and found – in translation? Interpreting the processes of the international and intranational translation of educational policy and practice in Kazakhstan. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263286.Google Scholar
Crowther, F., Ferguson, M. and Hann, L. (2009). Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 144.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. F. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Eltemamy, A. (2017). Developing a Programme of Support for Teacher Leadership in Egypt. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frost, D. (2011). Supporting Teacher Leadership in 15 Countries: International Teacher Leadership Project, Phase 1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Frost, D. (2014). Transforming Education through Teacher Leadership. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frost, D. (2018). HertsCam: A teacher-led organisation to support teacher leadership. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 9(1), 79100.Google Scholar
Frost, D. and Durrant, J. (2003). Teacher-Led Development Work: Guidance and Support. London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
Frost, D., Fim’yar, O., Yakavets, N. and Bilyalov, D. (2014). The role of the school director in educational reform in Kazakhstan. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217238.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, V. (2014). The HertsCam TLDW programme. In Frost, D. (Ed.), Transforming Education through Teacher Leadership. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, pp. 7283.Google Scholar
Ho, D. and Tikly, L. P. (2012). Conceptualizing teacher leadership in a Chinese, policy-driven context: A research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 401416.Google Scholar
Hoyle, E. (1974). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. London Educational Review, 3(2), 1319.Google Scholar
Hoyle, E. (1982). The professionalisation of teachers: A paradox. British Journal of Educational Studies, 30(2), 161171.Google Scholar
Kanayeva, G. (2019). Facilitating Teacher Leadership in Kazakhstan. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Katzenmeyer, M. and Moller, G. (1996). Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Leadership Development for Teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, L. (1998). How to build leadership capacity. Education Week, 55(7), 1719.Google Scholar
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 27 December (2019). No. 293-VІ, On the status of a teacher. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36737082&pos=5;-106#pos=5;-106Google Scholar
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. Research report, National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
Lieberman, A. and Miller, L. (2007). What research says about teacher leadership. In Ackerman, R.H. and Mackenzie, S.V. (Eds.), Uncovering Teacher Leadership: Essays and Voices from the Field. London: Sage, pp. 3750.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, C., McLellan, R., Fordham, M., Chandler-Grevatt, A. and Daubney, A. (2014). The role of the teacher in educational reform in Kazakhstan. In Bridges, D. (Eds.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239260.Google Scholar
OECD (2014a). TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2014b). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Qanay, G., Anderson-Payne, E., Ball, S., Barnett, P., Kurmankulova, K., Mussarova, V., Kenzhetayeva, G. and Tanayeva, A. (2019). Developing teacher leadership in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 10(1), 5364.Google Scholar
Qanay, G., Courtney, M. and Nam, A. (2021). Building teacher leadership capacity in schools in Kazakhstan: A mixed method study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1869314Google Scholar
Qanay, G., Frost, D., Zakayeva, G. and Kalikova, S. (2023). The Teacher Leadership in Kazakhstan. Almaty: Jibek Joly Publishing House.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Steiner-Khamsi, G., Harris-Van Keuren, C., Silova, I. and Chachkhiani, K. (2009). Decentralization and Recentralization Reforms: Their Impact on Teacher Salaries in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Google Scholar
Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium (2011). Teacher Leader Model Standards. USA: Teacher Leadership Consortium.Google Scholar
Teleshaliyev, N. (2013). ‘Leave me alone – simply let me teach’: An exploration of teacher professionalism in Kyrgyzstan. European Education, 45(2), 5174.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (2017). Impact study of the Centre of Excellence Programme: Technical report. Centre of Excellence, Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools and Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12373Google Scholar
Winter, L. and Kasa, R. (2021). Financial autonomy of schools in Kazakhstan: International comparison and a national perspective. The European Conference on Education 2021. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/ece2021/ECE2021_60485.pdfGoogle Scholar
Yakavets, N., Frost, D. and Khoroshash, A. (2017). School leadership and capacity building in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 345370.Google Scholar
York-Barr, J. and Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255316.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., Gordon, A. and Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behaviour: Integrating a half century of behaviour research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ayubayeva, N. (2018). Teacher Collaboration for Professional Learning: Case Studies of Three Schools in Kazakhstan. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S. and Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities. Nottingham: DES.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. (Ed.) (2014). Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (2005). Staying criticalEducational Action Research13(3), 347358.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. L. (2009). Teacher research as stance. In Noffke, S. E. and Somekh, B. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research. London: Sage, pp. 3949.Google Scholar
Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans, D. and Firth, A. (2005). The Impact of Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning: Review: What Do Teacher Impact Data Tell Us about Collaborative CPD? London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Daubney, A. and Chandler-Grevett, A. (2012, 2013, 2014) Independent Evaluation Reports of the Action Research Element within the Integrated Programme for Development (unpublished reports). University of Sussex and the NIS.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Fim’yar, O., Wang, T. and Contreras, P. (2021) School Hubs for Action Research in Education SHARE 2021: End of Year Report (unpublished report). University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Fordham, M. (2016). Realising and extending Stenhouse’s vision of teacher research: The case of English history teachers. British Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 135150.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1996). Russian education reform in the 1990s. The Harriman Review, 9(4), 3645.Google Scholar
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S. and Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In Louis, S. D. and Louis, K. S., Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, pp. 2342.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991): Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. (1993). What matters most in teachers’ workplace context? In Little, J. W. and McLaighlin, M. W., Teachers’ Work: Individuals, Colleagues, and Contexts. London: Teachers College Press, pp. 79103.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, C. and Ayubayeva, N. (2015) ‘It is the research of self experience’: Feeling the value in action research. International Journal of Educational Action Research, 23(1), 5167.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, C., Black-Hawkins, K. and McIntyre, D. (2007). Networking Practitioner Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, C., McLellan, R., Fordham, M., Chandler-Grevett, A. and Daubney, A. (2014). The role of teachers in educational reform in Kazakhstan: Teacher enquiry as a vehicle for change. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinovic, D., Wiebe, N., Ratkovic, S., Willard-Holt, C., Spencer, T. and Cantalini-Williams, M. (2012). ‘Doing research was inspiring’: Building a research community with teachers. Educational Action Research, 20(3), 385406.Google Scholar
OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
PLC Associates (n.d.). Professional learning community assessment-revised (PLCA-R). www.plcassociates.org/assessments/formal/plca-r/Google Scholar
Pollard, A. and Collins, J. (2005). Reflective Teaching. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Saginov, K. M., Ermagambetova, G. N. and Ateybek, S. T. (2014). Toolkit: The Study of the Teacher’s H. Own Practice. Astana: Center for Pedagogical Skills of AEO Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2004). How does culture matter? In Rao, V. and Walton, M., Culture and Public Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Sciences, pp. 3759.Google Scholar
Shamshidinova, K. (2015a). Innovation in education as a condition for establishing a new pedagogical culture. http://nis.edu.kz/ru/press-center/perform/?id=4196Google Scholar
Shamshidinova, K. (2015b). Capacity building as an important condition for development. www.nis.edu.kz/ru/press-center/perform/?id=4565Google Scholar
Shamshidinova, K., Ayubayeva, N. and Bridges, D. (2014). Implementing radical change: Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools as agents of change. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7182.Google Scholar
Somekh, B. and Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 521.Google Scholar
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016) Teach or perish: The Stavka system and its impact on the quality of instruction references. Voposy Obrazonvaniya (Educational Studies Moscow), 2, 1439.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M. and Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221258.Google Scholar
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. and Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Webber, S. (2000). School, Reform and Society in the New Russia. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Action research: Personal renewal and social reconstruction. Educational Action Research, 1(2), 199219.Google Scholar
Zeichner, K. M. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301326.Google Scholar
Zhumagulov, B. T. (2011). Speech of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan on issues of the quality of the teaching profession in Kazakhstan.Google Scholar
Zhumagulov, B. (2012). Educational policy achievements in Kazakhstan. In Proceedings from Eurasian Higher Education Leaders Forum. Astana: Indigo Print, pp. 59.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×