Hamilton, L. and Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using Case Study in Education Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Ponterotto, J. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 538–549.Google Scholar

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google Scholar

Campana, A. (2007). The Soviet massive deportations: A chronology, Violence de masse et Résistance – Réseau de recherche. www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/fr/document/soviet-massive-deportations-chronologyGoogle Scholar

OECD (2018). Education Policy Outlook: Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/education/Education-Policy-Outlook-Country-Profile-Kazakhstan-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tolesh, F. A. (2012). The population history of Kazakhstan. Conference paper, European Population Conference, 13–16 June, Stockholm University, Sweden. https://epc2012.princeton.edu/abstracts/120586Google Scholar

Van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J. M., Beijaard, D. and Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balgabayeva, G. (2020). Fokus metodicheskoy podderzhki – sel’skaya shkola [The rural school at the focus of the methodological support]. Pedagogical Dialogue, 34(4), 27–31.Google Scholar

Bates, V. (2011). Preparing rural music teachers: Reflecting on ‘shared visions’. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(2), 89–98.Google Scholar

Biddle, C. and Azano, A. P. (2016). Constructing and reconstructing the ‘rural school problem’: A century of rural education research. Review of Research in Education, 40, 298–325.Google Scholar

Bureau of National Statistics, Agency of Strategic Planning and Reform of the Republic of Kazakhstan (n.d). Regionam [by regions]. https://stat.gov.kz/region/listGoogle Scholar

Chapman, S. (2020). The significance of context: Autonomy and curriculum reform in rural schools. The Curriculum Journal, 31(2), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Graczyk, P. A. and Weissberg, R. P. (2003). Implementation, sustainability, and scaling up of social-emotional and academic innovations in public schools. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 303–319.Google Scholar

Fim’yar, O. (2014). ‘Soviet’, ‘Kazakh’ and ‘world-class’ in the contemporary construction of educational understanding and practice in Kazakhstan. In Bridges, D. (Ed.), Educational Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–195.Google Scholar

Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581–584.Google Scholar

Greenough, R. and Nelson, S. R. (2015). Recognizing the variety of rural schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Information Analytic Center (2019). Natsionalniy sbornik ‘Statistika sistemy obrazovaniya Respubliki Kazakhstan’ [National collection ‘statistics of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan’]. http://iac.kz/sites/default/files/0_nacionalnyy_doklad_za_2018_god_final_s_oblozhkami_na_sayt_compressed_0.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ispussinova, S. and Kopeyeva, A. (2020). Shkol’nyy klimat: golosa uchenikov i uchiteley [The school climate: Voices of students and teachers]. Pedagogical Dialogue, 34(4), 4–15.Google Scholar

Kazhydromet (n.d.). Klimat Kazakhstana po oblastyam [Climate of Kazakhstan by Regions]. www.kazhydromet.kz/ru/klimat/klimat-kazahstana-po-oblastyamGoogle Scholar

National Test Center (2019). Statisticheskiye danniye ENT [UNT statistics data]. http://testcenter.kz/ru/stats/statisticheskie-dannye-ent/index.php?arrFilter_pf%5BYEAR%5D=111&set_filter=%D0%9A%D3%A9%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83&set_filter=YGoogle Scholar

Nurbayev, Z. (2021). Neravensvo v Sisteme Srednego Obrazovania: Analiz politiki reformirovaniya malokomplaktnyh shkol Respubliki Kazakhstan [Inequality in the system of secondary education: A policy analysis of the reform of multi-graded schools in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. www.soros.kz/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE-%D0%B2-%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5-%D0%A1%D0%9E-_-%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J. and Soini, T. (2018). Dynamic and shared sense-making in large-scale curriculum reform in school districts. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reagan, E. M., Hambacher, E., Schram, T., McCurdy, K., Lord, D., Higginbotham, T. and Fornauf, B. (2019). Place matters: Review of the literature on rural teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 83–93.Google Scholar

Tajik, M. A., Shamatov, D. and Fillipova, L. (2020). Quality of education in rural schools in Kazakhstan. Pedagogical Dialogue, 34(4), 38–42.Google Scholar

Zakon.kz (2019). Average monthly salary for the third quarter of 2019. www.zakon.kz/4993404-srednemesyachnaya-zarabotnaya-plata-za.htmlGoogle Scholar

DoE (2016). City education development plan for 2017–2022.Google Scholar

Dole, S., Bloom, L. and Kowalske, K. (2016). Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspective from teacher-centred to learner-centred. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 1.Google Scholar

Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S. and Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

IAC Information and Analytical Centre (2017). Main Results of PISA. Astana: MoES, IAC. http://iac.kz/sites/default/files/nac_otchet_pisa-2015_final.pdfGoogle Scholar

IAC (2019). Statistics of the System of Education, Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana: National Collection.Google Scholar

IAC (2020). Statistics of the System of Education, Republic of Kazakhstan. Nur-Sultan: National Collection.Google Scholar

Hajar, A., Sagintayeva, A. and Izekenova, Z. (2021). Child participatory research methods: Exploring Grade 6 pupils’ experiences of private tutoring in Kazakhstan. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(3), 369–389.Google Scholar

Hammer, C. S., Hoff, E., Uchikoshi, Y., Gillanders, C., Castro, D. C. and Sandilos, L. E. (2014). The language and literacy development of young dual language learners: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 715–733.Google Scholar

Kapalbek, B. S. and Toleuzhanova, Z. S. (2021). Methods of teaching the letter of A. Baitursynov. Вестник Академии педагогических наук Казахстана, 1, 29–37.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Teng, W., Tsai, L. and Lin, T. M. (2022). Does English proficiency support the economic development of non-English-speaking countries? The case of Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102623Google Scholar

MoES (2018). The Order of the Minister of Education and Science No. 308, dated 26 June 2018.Google Scholar

OECD/World Bank (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Bridges, D. (Ed.) (2014). Education Reform and Internationalisation: The Case of School Reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, D. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future, New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 157. http://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396072630.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lee, T., Cheng, Y. and Ko, J. (2018). Curriculum reform with a school‐based approach: Intellectual, structural and cultural challenges. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 278–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD (2014). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD/World Bank (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Kazakhstan 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J. and Soini, T. (2018) Dynamic and shared sense‐making in large‐scale curriculum reform in school districts. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 181–200.Google Scholar

Sarmurzin, Y., Amanzhol, N., Toleubayeva, K., Zhunusova, M. and Amanova, A. (2021). The impact of OECD research on the education system of Kazakhstan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 757–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seaton, A. (2002). Reforming the hidden curriculum: The key abilities model and four curricular forms. Curriculum Perspectives, 22(1), 9–15.Google Scholar

Supovitz, J. A. and Taylor, B. S. (2005). Systemic education evaluation: Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(2), 204–230.Google Scholar

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J. M., Beijaard, D. and Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699.Google Scholar

Winter, L., Makhmetova, Z. and Kurakbayev, K. (2020). Low-hanging fruit – flawed assessment and inaccurate textbooks as easy pickings in criticism of the Renewed Content of Education (низко висящие фрукты – легко критиковать недостатки в системе оценивания и ошибки в учебниках в контексте обновленного содержания образования). Bilim Education (білім – образование), 92(1), 2–26. Published in Kazakh and Russian by Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan I. Altynsarin National Academy of Education, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.Google Scholar