Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T17:45:44.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Laboratory Monitoring for Embryo Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2021

By
Carlotta Zacà ,
Andrea Borini  and
Giovanni Coticchio
Edited by
Kersti Lundin  and
Aisling Ahlström
Kersti Lundin
Affiliation:
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
Aisling Ahlström
Affiliation:
Livio Fertility Center, Gothenburg
Get access

Summary

The IVF laboratory is central to Medically Assisted Reproduction perhaps representing also the most crucial extrinsic factor in determining success or failure of treatment. Current science and technology are unable to improve the intrinsic developmental potential of gametes. Therefore, the “mission” of the IVF laboratory consists in the ability to preserve the innate characteristics of sperm and oocytes in the course of preimplantation development and minimize the possible detrimental impact of diverse forms of manipulation. To this end, during culture and manipulation, physical factors (e.g., temperature, atmosphere composition) and stressors (e.g., oocyte microinjection, embryo biopsy) should be monitored and controlled, in order to guarantee stability of conditions considered to be the most appropriate to support and facilitate gamete and embryo function in vitro. In this scenario, the human factor and effectiveness of technical equipment contribute in similar or equivalent proportions in determining clinical outcome. In light of this, not only is monitoring of working conditions of equipment important, but objective assessment of key segments of the IVF process is vital. Performance indicators respond to this need, offering specific, important, and objective measurements of essential processes, such as fertilization, development to blastocyst stage, and cryopreservation. Thus, critical analysis and interpretation of indicators can lead to consistency of results and continued improvement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual of Embryo Culture in Human Assisted Reproduction , pp. 84 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25: 146–167.Google Scholar
Ahlström, A, Westin, C, Wikland, M, Hardarson, T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1199–1209.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S, Arroll, N, Cree, LM, Jordan, V, Farquhar, C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5(5):CD011320.Google Scholar
Bavister, B. Oxygen concentration and preimplantation development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9: 484–486.Google Scholar
Bedaiwy, MA, Falcone, T, Mohamed, MS, et al. Differential growth of human embryos in vitro: role of reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:593–600.Google Scholar
Boone, WR, Johnson, JE, Locke, AJ, Crane 4th, MM, Price, TM. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil. Steril. 1999;71:150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, WR, Lee Higdon, III H, Johson, JE. Quality management issues in the assisted reproduction laboratory. J Reprod Stem Cell Biotechnol. 2010;1:30–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontekoe, S, Mantikou, E, van Wely, M, Seshadri, S, Repping, S, Mastenbroek, S. Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;11;7:CD008950.Google Scholar
Cohen, J, Gilligan, A, Esposito, W, Schimmel, T, Dale, B. Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1742–1749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;35:494–510.Google Scholar
Esteves, SC, Verza, S Jr, Gomes, AP. Comparison between international standard organization (ISO) type 5 and type 6 cleanrooms combined with volatile organic compounds filtration system for micromanipulation and embryo culture in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S353–S354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawzy, M, AbdelRahman, MY, Zidan, MH, et al. Humid versus dry incubator: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:277–283.Google Scholar
Fischer, B, Bavister, BD. Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;99:673–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, Y, Noda, Y, Mori, T, Nakano, M. Increased generation of reactive oxygen species in embryos cultured in vitro. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;15:69–75.Google Scholar
Hall, J, Gilligan, A, Schimmel, T, Cecchi, M, Cohen, J. The origin, effects and control of air pollution in laboratories used for human embryo culture. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:146–155.Google Scholar
Hammond, ER, Morbeck, DE. Tracking quality: can embryology key performance indicators be used to identify clinically relevant shifts in pregnancy rate? Hum Reprod., 2019;34:37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3rd Higdon, HL, Blackhurst, DW, Boone, WR. Incubator management in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, K, Forman, E, Lee, H, Ferry, K, Treff, N, Scott, R. Optimizing the temperature for embryo culture in IVF: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard culture temperature of 37°C to the reduced more physiologic temperature of 36°C. Fertil Steril. 2012;98, s167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C, Association of Clinical Embryologists. Association of clinical embryologists – guidelines on good practice in clinical embryology laboratories 2012. Hum Fertil. 2012;15:174–189.Google ScholarPubMed
Hunter, RH. Temperature gradients in female reproductive tissues. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:377–380.Google Scholar
Hunter, RH, Einer-Jensen, N. Pre-ovulatory temperature gradients within mammalian ovaries: a review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. (Berl.) 2005;89:240–243.Google Scholar
Hunter, RH, Einer-Jensen, N, Greve, T. Presence and significance of temperature gradients among different ovarian tissues. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69:501–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwata, K, Yumoto, K, Mio, Y. Unstable osmotic pressure in microdrops cultured under mineral oil in non-humidified incubators. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:e355.Google Scholar
John, DP, Kiessling, AA. Improved pronuclear mouse embryo development over an extended pH range in Ham’s F-10 medium without protein. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:150–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoudja, RY, Xu, Y, Li, T, Zhou, C. Better IVF outcomes following improvements in laboratory air quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacic, B, Vlaisavljevic, V. Influence of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on development of human blastocysts in vitro: a prospective study on sibling oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:229–236.Google Scholar
Lane, M, Baltz, JM, Bavister, BD. Regulation of intracellular pH in hamster preimplantation embryos by the sodium hydrogen (Na+/ H+) antiporter. Biol Reprod. 1998;59:1483–1490.Google Scholar
Lane, M, Baltz, JM, Bavister, BD. Bicarbonate/chloride exchange regulates intracellular pH of embryos but not oocytes of the hamster. Biol Reprod. 1999a;61:452–457.Google Scholar
Lane, M, Baltz, JM, Bavister, BD. Na+/H+ antiporter activity in hamster embryos is activated during fertilization. Dev Biol. 1999b;208:244–252.Google Scholar
Lane, M, Bavister, BD. Regulation of intracellular pH in bovine oocytes and cleavage stage embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;54:396–401.Google Scholar
Lane, M, Mitchell, M, Cashman, KS, Feil, D, Wakefield, S, Zander-Fox, DL. To QC or not to QC: The key to a consistent laboratory. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20:23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclerc, C, Becker, D, Buehr, M, Warner, A. Low intracellular pH is involved in the early embryonic death of DDK mouse eggs fertilized by alien sperm. Dev Dyn. 1994;200:257–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, HJ, Baumann, CG, Brison, DR, McEvoy, TG, Sturmey, RG. Metabolism of the viable mammalian embryo: quietness revisited. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:667–672.Google Scholar
Li, R, Pedersen, KS, Liu, Y, et al. Effect of red light on the development and quality of mammalian embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:795–801.Google Scholar
Lopez-Regalado, ML, Martínez-Granados, L, González-Utor, A, et al. Critical appraisal of the Vienna consensus: performance indicators for assisted reproductive technology laboratories. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37:128–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magli, MC, Van den Abbeel, E, Lundin, K, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1253–1262.Google Scholar
Mantikou, E, Bontekoe, S, van Wely, M, Seshadri, S, Repping, S, Mastenbroek, S. Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKiernan, SH, Bavister, BD. Environmental variables influencing in vitro development of hamster 2-cell embryos to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod. 1990;43:404–413.Google Scholar
Meintjes, M, Chantilis, SJ, Douglas, JD, et al. A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:300–307.Google Scholar
Merton, JS, Vermeulen, ZL, Otter, T, Mullaart, E, de Ruigh, L, Hasler, JF. Carbon-activated gas filtration during in vitro culture increased pregnancy rate following transfer of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2007;67:1233–1238.Google Scholar
Meseguer, M, Rubio, I, Cruz, M, Basile, N, Marcos, J, Requena, A. Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1481–1489.e1410.Google Scholar
Morbeck, DE. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1019–1024.Google Scholar
Morriss, GM, New, DA. Effect of oxygen concentration on morphogenesis of cranial neural folds and neural crest in cultured rat embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979;54:17–35.Google Scholar
Nakahara, T, Iwase, A, Goto, M, Harata, T, Suzuki, M, Ienaga, M, et al. Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:93–96.Google Scholar
Ng, KYB, Mingels, R, Morgan, H, Macklon, N, Cheong, Y. In vivo oxygen, temperature and pH dynamics in the female reproductive tract and their importance in human conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:15–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, S, Stemm, K, Wachter, K, Wiemer, K. Analysis of embryo culture media pH changes during incubator use and media evaporation under oil using a continous pH monitoring system. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:e318–e319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabon, JE Jr, Findley, WE, Gibbons, WE. The toxic effect of short exposures to the atmospheric oxygen concentration on early mouse embryonic development. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:896–900.Google Scholar
Phillips, KP, Leveille, MC, Claman, P, Baltz, JM. Intracellular pH regulation in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:896–904.Google Scholar
Quinn, P, Harlow, GM. The effect of oxygen on the development of preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro. J Exp Zool. 1978;206:73–80.Google Scholar
Sun, XF, Wang, WH, Keefe, DL. Overheating is detrimental to meiotic spindles within in vitro matured human oocytes. Zygote. 2004;12:65–70.Google Scholar
Swain, JE. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, JE. Decisions for the IVF laboratory: comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;28:535–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, JE. Optimal human embryo culture. Semin Reprod Med 2015;33:103–117.Google Scholar
Swain, JE. Controversies in ART: considerations and risks for uninterrupted embryo culture. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, JE, Cabrera, L, Xu, X, Smith, GD. Microdrop preparation factors influence culture-media osmolality, which can impair mouse embryo preimplantation development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:142–147.Google Scholar
Swain, J, Graham, C, Kile, R, Schoolcraft, WB, Krisher, R. Media evaporation in a dry culture incubator; effect of dish, drop size and oil on media osmolality. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:e363–e364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umaoka, Y, Noda, Y, Narimoto, K, Mori, T. Effects of oxygen toxicity on early development of mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992;31:28–33.Google Scholar
Waldenstrom, U, Engstrom, AB, Hellberg, D, Nilsson, S. Low-oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009:91:2461–2465.Google Scholar
Wang, WH, Meng, L, Hackett, RJ, Odenbourg, R, Keefe, DL. Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling-rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2374–2378.Google Scholar
Wang, WH, Meng, L, Hackett, RJ, Oldenbourg, R, Keefe, DL. Rigorous thermal control during intracytoplasmic sperm injection stabilizes the meiotic spindle and improves fertilization and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:1274–1277.Google Scholar
Will, MA, Clark, NA, Swain, JE. Biological pH buffers in IVF: help or hindrance to success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:711–724.Google Scholar
Wolff, HS, Fredrickson, JR, Walker, DL, Morbeck, DE. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1776–1782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, JQ, Li, XL, Peng, Y, Guo, X, Heng, BC, Tong, GQ. Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:510–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Y, Baltz, JM. Bicarbonate/chloride exchange and intracellular pH throughout preimplantation mouse embryo development. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C1512–C1520.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y, Chauvet, PJ, Alper, SL, Baltz, JM. Expression and function of bicarbonate/chloride exchangers in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:24428–24434.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×