Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:05:17.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Embryo Culture and IVF Offspring Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2021

By
John Dumoulin  and
Aafke van Montfoort
Edited by
Kersti Lundin  and
Aisling Ahlström
Kersti Lundin
Affiliation:
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
Aisling Ahlström
Affiliation:
Livio Fertility Center, Gothenburg
Get access

Summary

Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first ‘test tube baby’, in 1978, assisted reproductive technology (ART) has become one of the standard treatments for couples with subfertility problems. Today, it is estimated that 8 million children have been born via ART worldwide and up to 6% of newborns in Europe are conceived via this technique (Adamson et al., 2019). Surprisingly, relatively little is known about the short- and especially long-term effects of ART manipulations on the health risks for the children.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual of Embryo Culture in Human Assisted Reproduction , pp. 92 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, GD, Dyer, S, Chambers, et al. ICMART preliminary world report 2015. Hum Repro. 2019;34 : i65.Google Scholar
Berntsen, S, Soderstrom-Anttila, V, Wennerholm, UB, et al. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’ Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25 :137–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouillon, C, Léandri, R, Desch, L, et al. Does embryo culture medium influence the health and development of children born after in vitro fertilization? PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150857.Google Scholar
Calle, A, Fernandez-Gonzalez, R, Ramos-Ibeas, P, et al. Long-term and transgenerational effects of in vitro culture on mouse embryos. Theriogenology. 2012;77 :785–793.Google Scholar
De Vos, A, Van Landuyt, L, Santos-Ribeiro, S, et al. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2442–2449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumoulin, JC, Land, JA, Van Montfoort, AP, et al. Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns. Hum Reprod. 2010;25 :605–612.Google Scholar
Duranthon, V, Chavatte-Palmer, P. Long term effects of ART: What do animals tell us? Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;85 :348–368.Google Scholar
Ealy, AD, Wooldridge, LK, McCoski, SR. Board Invited Review: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2019;97 :2555–2568.Google Scholar
Feuer, SK, Rinaudo, PF. Physiological, metabolic and transcriptional postnatal phenotypes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the mouse. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8 :403–410.Google Scholar
Gardner, DK, Kelley, RL. Impact of the IVF laboratory environment on human preimplantation embryo phenotype. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8 :418–435.Google Scholar
Glujovsky, D, Farquhar, C, Quinteiro Retamar, AM, Alvarez Sedo, CR, Blake, D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;CD002118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, XY, Liu, XM, Jin, L, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic profiles of offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;107 : 22–631 e625.Google Scholar
Kleijkers, SH, Mantikou, E, Slappendel, E., et al. Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT. Hum Reprod. 2016;31 :2219–2230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mani, S, Mainigi, M. Embryo culture conditions and the epigenome. Semin Reprod Med. 2018;36 :211–220.Google Scholar
Pinborg, A, Wennerholm, UB, Romundstad, LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19 :87–104.Google Scholar
Roseboom, TJ. Developmental plasticity and its relevance to assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2018;33 :546–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salilew-Wondim, D, Tesfaye, D, Hoelker, M, Schellander, K. Embryo transcriptome response to environmental factors: implication for its survival under suboptimal conditions. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;149 :30–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velazquez, MA, Sheth, B, Smith, SJ, Eckert, JJ, Osmond, C, Fleming, TP. Insulin and branched-chain amino acid depletion during mouse preimplantation embryo culture programmes body weight gain and raised blood pressure during early postnatal life. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864 :590–600.Google Scholar
Vrooman, LA, Bartolomei, MS. Can assisted reproductive technologies cause adult-onset disease? Evidence from human and mouse. Reprod Toxicol. 2017;68 :72–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wale, PL, Gardner, DK. The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22 :2–22.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Du, M, Guan, Y, Wang, B, Zhang, J, Liu, Z. Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15 :36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrenzycki, C. Gene expression analysis and in vitro production procedures for bovine preimplantation embryos: Past highlights, present concepts and future prospects. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018;53 Suppl 2:14–19.Google Scholar
Zandstra, H, Brentjens, L, Spauwen, B, et al. Association of culture medium with growth, weight and cardiovascular development of IVF children at the age of 9 years. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1645–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandstra, H, Van Montfoort, AP, Dumoulin, JC. Does the type of culture medium used influence birthweight of children born after IVF? Hum Reprod. 2015;30 :530–542.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×