Abric, J.-C. (1976). Jeux, conflits et représentations sociales. Thèse d’Etat. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (Ed.). (1994a). Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (1994b). L’organisation interne des représentations sociales: système central et système périphérique. In Guimelli, C. (Ed.). Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (1996). Prefácio. In Sá, C. P. (Ed.). Núcleo central das representações sociais. Petrópolis: Vozes, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

Abric, J.-C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar

de Alba, M. (2007). Mapas imaginarios del Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México: de la experiencia al imaginario urbano. In Arruda, A. and de Alba, M. (Eds.). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona, Spain: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 285–319.Google Scholar

Albarghouthi, S. I., and Klempe, S. H. (2019). ‘Al-Khabith’ – The malignant cunning disease: Sociocultural complexity and social representations of cancer in the occupied Palestinian territory. Culture & Psychology, 25: 99–131.Google Scholar

Allansdottir, A., Jovchelovitch, S., and Stathopoulou, A. (1993). Social representations: The versatility of the concept. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 3–10.Google Scholar

Allport, G. (1954/1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar

Andreouli, E. (2010). Identity, positioning and self–other relations. Papers on Social Representations, 19(1): 14.1–14.13.Google Scholar

Antonova, I., and Merkvert, J. (Eds.). (1995). Berlin-Moscow. Moscow: Galart.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar

, Aristotle. (1998). The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. and Eds. Ross, W. D., Ackrill, J. L., and Urmson, J. O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arruda, A. (2015). Image, social imaginary and social representations. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–142.Google Scholar

Arruda, A., and de Alba, M. (2007). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona: UAM-Anthropos.Google Scholar

Arruda, A., Gonçalves, L. V. P., and Mululo, S. C. C. (2008). Traveling with students through Brazilian varieties: Social representations and stereotypes. Psicologia em Estudo, 13(3): 513–522.Google Scholar

Arruda, A., and Ulup, L. (2007). Brasil imaginado: representaciones sociales de jovenes universitarios. In Arruda, A. and de Alba, M. (Eds.). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41: 258–290.Google Scholar

Atkin, A. (2013). Peirce’s theory of signs. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2013 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics.Google Scholar

Augoustinos, M. (2019). Dialoguing the difference: A reply to Batel and Castro’s ‘Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58: 423–427.Google Scholar

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1919/1990). Art and answerability. In Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V. (Eds.). Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1920–1923/1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity. In Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V. (Eds.). Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 4–256.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/1986). Response to a question from Novy Mir editorial staff. In Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (Eds.). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Trans. McGee, V. W.. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981a). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (Ed.). The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 259–422.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M (1981b). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Towards a historical poetics. In Holquist, M. (Ed.). The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 84–258.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed. and trans. Emerson, C.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Towards a Philosophy of the Act. Ed. Liapunov, V. and Holquist, M.. Trans. and notes Liapunov, V.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2017). The Noise of Time. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. (1932/1995). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An Experimental and Social Study. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Bastide, R. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. L’Année Sociologique, 21: 247–249.Google Scholar

Batel, S. (2012). Commentary on (re)presenting (and) cognitive polyphasia. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 10.1–10.15.Google Scholar

Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2009). Reification and consensualization in communication: An analysis of the impacts of two distinctive discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39: 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2018). Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57: 732–753.Google Scholar

Batel, S., and Castro, P. (2019). Commentary – Still a matter of dialogue: A response to Potter’s, Augoustinos’s, and Jovchelovitch’s commentaries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58: 428–434.Google Scholar

Baubion-Broye, A., Lapeyre, M., and Malrieu, P. (1977). Remarques sur la notion de représentation sociale. Psychologie et Éducation, 3: 37–56.Google Scholar

Baucal, A., Gillespie, A., Krstić, K., and Zittoun, T. (2020). Reproducibility in psychology: Theoretical distinction of different types of replication. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54: 152–157.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29: 163–186.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 335–353.Google Scholar

Benedict, R. (1942). Race and Racism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1936/1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Arendt, H. (Ed.). Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Trans. Zohn, H.. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 217–251.Google Scholar

Berger, A. A. (2020). Humor, Psyche and Society: A Socio-semiotic Analysis. Delaware: Vernon Press.Google Scholar

Berger, P., and Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will. Trans. Pogson, E. L.. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1932/1935). Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bianco, G., and Fruteau de Laclos, F. (Eds.). (2016). L’angle mort des années 1950. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1988). Social representations, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3: 1–16.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric and attitudes. In Breakwell, G. M. and Canter, D. V. (Eds.). Empirical Approaches to Social Representations. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (2008). Social representations and repression: Examining the first formulations of Freud and Moscovici. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 355–368.Google Scholar

Blass, T. (2004). The Man Who Shocked the World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bonnell, V. E. (1997). Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters under Lenin and Stalin. Beverley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Boulanger, D. (2017a). Extending social representation theory through dialogical self theory: Subjects’ and alter’s relating with space. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 9–33.Google Scholar

Boulanger, D. (2017b). Conclusion of Special Issue: Linking two theories. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 193–222.Google Scholar

Boulanger, D., and Valsiner, J. (2017). Linking two theories: How can the social representations theory be made dialogical? International Journal for Dialogical Science, 10(2): 1–8.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 271–284.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (2001). In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 305–311.Google Scholar

Brook, A. (1992). Psychoanalysis and commonsense psychology. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 20: 273–303.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (2020). Henri Tajfel: Explorer of Identity and Difference. Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1974). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Buschini, F., and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). (2001). Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Byrne, D., and Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of Art. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caillaud, S. (2016). A dialogical approach to the ecological crisis. Papers on Social Representations, 25(1): 6.1–6.30.Google Scholar

Caillaud, S., Doumergue, M., Prau, M., Haas, V., and Kalampalikis, N. (2019). The past and present of triangulation and social representations theory: A crossed history. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16: 375–391.Google Scholar

Camargo, B. V. (2007). O que o caminho interdisciplinar brasileiro da teoria das representações sociais não favorece? In Moreira, A. S. P. and Camargo, B. V. (Orgs). Contribuições para a teoria e o método de estudo das representações sociais. João Pessoa: Editora Universitária da UFPB, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar

Camargo, B. V. (2016). Um primeiro estudo histórico e conceitual do seminário Epistemologia e representações sociais’, conduzido por Serge Moscovici e Denise Jodelet em 1994. Psicologia e Saber Social, 5(1): 5–17.Google Scholar

Capecchi, D. (2017). Experiments, mathematics and principles of natural philosophy in the epistemology of Giovanni Battista Baliani. Advances in Historical Studies, 6: 78–94. doi: 10.4236/ahs.2017.62006.Google Scholar

Cartwright, D. (1948). Social psychology in the US during the Second World War. Human Relations, 1: 333–352.Google Scholar

Cartwright, D. (1979). Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42: 82–93.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1932/2013). Language and the construction of the world of objects. In Ernst Cassirer: The Warburg Years (1919–1933). Trans. and with an Introduction by Lofts, S. G. with Calcagno, A.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 334–362.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1944). An Essay on Man. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1950). The Problem of Knowledge. Trans. Woglom, W. H. and Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 1. Trans. Mainheim, R.; Preface and Introduction by Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 3. Trans. Mainheim, R.; introductory note by Hendel, C. W.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1996). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 4. Eds. Krois, J. M. and Verene, D. P.. Trans. Krois, J. M.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (2005). Vorlesungen und Studien zur Philosophischen Anthropologie. Ed. Hartung, G. and Kopp-Oberstebring, H.. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, C. (1987). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Castro, P. (2015). Social representations of sustainability: Researching time, institution, conflict and communication. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–308.Google Scholar

Castro, P., and Batel, S. (2008). Social representation, change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychology, 14: 475–497.Google Scholar

Chauhan, A. (2016). Developing a Social Psychology of Poverty: Social Objects and Dialogical Representations, PhD thesis. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Class, M. (2014). Introduction. Medical case histories as genres: New approaches. Literature and Medicine, 32: vii–xvi.Google Scholar

Collins, S., and Marková, I. (2004). Les énoncés collaboratifs: une nouvelle méthode dans l’étude des focus groups. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57: 291–298.Google Scholar

Colville, I., Brown, A. D., and Pye, A. (2009). Human Relations special issue call for papers: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling. Human Relations, 62: 1581–1583.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1908/1987). Microcosmographia Academica being a Guide for the Young Academic Politician. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar

Cornish, F. (2020). Towards a dialogical methodology for single case studies. Culture and Psychology, 26: 139–152.Google Scholar

Cornish, F. (2021). ‘Grenfell changes everything?’ Activism beyond hope and despair. Critical Public Health, 31: 293–305.Google Scholar

Cournut, J. (1990). Psychoanalysis in Paris: Act III. Social Research, 57: 859–873.Google Scholar

von Cranach, M. (1992). The multi-level organisation of knowledge and action. In von Cranach, M., Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Social Bases of Knowledge. Lewiston, Toronto, and Bern: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, pp. 10–22.Google Scholar

Crasnow, S. (2010). Evidence for use: Causal pluralism and the role of case studies in political science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, XX: 1–24.Google Scholar

Crasnow, S. (2012). The role of case study research in political science: Evidence for causal claims. Philosophy of Science, 79: 655–666.Google Scholar

Cremaschi, M., Fioretti, C., Mannarini, T., and Salvatore, S. (Eds.). (2021). Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Crombie, A. C. (1995). Commitments and styles of European scientific thinking. History of Science, 33: 225–238.Google Scholar

Czismas, M. (1971). Cybernetics – Marxism – Jurisprudence. Studies in Soviet Thought, 11: 90–108.Google Scholar

Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of the centre and periphery as a universal. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2: 9–21.Google Scholar

Davies, B., and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20: 43–63.Google Scholar

Dawson, P., and Sykes, C. (2016). Organizational Change and Temporality: Bending the Arrow of Time. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dawson, P., and Sykes, C. (2019). Concepts of time and temporality in the storytelling and sensemaking literatures: A review and critique. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21: 97–114.Google Scholar

Deaux, K., and Philogène, G. (2001). (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Bie, P., Lévi-Strauss, C., Nuttin, J., and Jacobson, E. (1954). Les Sciences Sociales dans l’enseignement supérieur; Sociologie, Psychologie Sociale et Anthropologie Culturelle (Social sciences in higher education: sociology, social psychology, and cultural anthropology). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Deriabin, A., and Gergen, K. (1997). http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/mosc1msg.txtGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as Experience. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (1985). Les représentations sociales. Definition d’un concept. Connexions, 45: 243–253.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (1986). Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (1990). Les représentations sociales. In Bonnet, C., Ghiglione, R., and Richard, T. F. (Eds.). Traité de psychologie cognitive. Vol. iii. Paris: Dunod, pp. 111–174.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (2001). Human rights studied as normative social representations. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 96–112.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (2002). Human Rights as Social Representations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Doise, W., Clémence, A., and Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1992/1993). The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations. Trans. Kaneko, J.. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (1975). Recherches sociogénétiques sur la coordination d’actions interdépendantes. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 34: 160–174.Google Scholar

Doise, W., Mugny, G., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5: 367–383.Google Scholar

Doise, W., and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). (1986). L’étude des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestle.Google Scholar

van Dongen, J. (2017). The epistemic virtues of the virtuous theorist: On Albert Einstein and his autobiography. In van Dongen, J. and Paul, H. (Eds.). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Vol. 321. Cham: Springer, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar

Dudás, L., and Szántó, R. (2021). Nudging in the time of coronavirus? Comparing public support for soft and hard preventive measures, highlighting the role of risk perception and experience. PLoS One, 16(8), e0256241: 1–15.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction Lukes, S.. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1897/1982). Marxism and sociology. The materialist conception of history (1897). In The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction Lukes, S.. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: The Free Press, pp. 167–174.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1898/2010). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Revue de La Métaphysique et de Morale, 6: 273–302. In Durkheim, E. Sociology and Philosophy. Trans. Pocock, D. F.. Introduction Peristiany, J. G.. London: Routledge, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (1993). The development of social representations of gender. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 171–177.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (2001a). Genesis and structure: Piaget and Moscovici. In Buschini, F. and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). Penser la vie, le social, la nature : Mélange à l’honneur de Serge Moscovici. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 163–173.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (2001b). Representations, identities, resistance. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representations of the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 257–270.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (2007). Culture and social representations. In Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 543–559.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (2008). Social actors and social groups: A return to heterogeneity in social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 369–374.Google Scholar

Duveen, G., and de Rosa, A. S. (1992). Two approaches to the origins of development of social knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 1: 94–108.Google Scholar

Duveen, G., and Lloyd, B. (Eds.). (1990). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duveen, G., and Psaltis, C. (2008/2013). The constructive role of asymmetries in social interaction. In Mueller, U., Carpendale, J., Budwig, N., and Sokol, B.. (Eds.). Social Life and Social Knowledge: Toward a Process Account of Development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–204. Reprinted in Moscovici, S., Jovchelovitch, S., and Wagoner, B. (Eds.). (2013). Development as a Social Process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen. London: Routledge, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A Theory in Crisis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A., and Infeld, L. (1938/1961). The Evolution of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elejabarrieta, F. (1994). Social positioning: A way to link social identity and social representations. Social Science Information, 33: 241–253.Google Scholar

Epstein, J. (1992). Historiography, diagnosis, and poetics. Literature and Medicine, 11: 23–44.Google Scholar

Erdinast-Vulcan, D. (2010). Borderline subjectivity: The futurity of the present in Bakhtin’s work. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 8: 169–183.Google Scholar

Farmelo, G. (2009). The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. (1994). Attitude, social representations and social attitudes. Papers on Social Representations, 3(1): 30–33.Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. (1996). The Roots of Modern Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. (1998). From collective to social representations: aller et retour. Culture & Psychology, 4: 275–296.Google Scholar

Faucheux, C. (1961). La représentation sociale de la psychanalyse. Les Temps Modernes, 188: 981–989.Google Scholar

Faucheux, C., and Moscovici, S. (1962). Remarques critiques sur la ‘question microsociale’ (Critical remarks on the ‘microsocial question’). Arguments, 6: 19–27.Google Scholar

Fiske, D. W., and Shweder, R. A. (1986). Metatheory in Social Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12: 219–245.Google Scholar

Forrester, J. (1996). If p, then what? Thinking in cases. History of the Human Sciences, 9: 1–25.Google Scholar

Fox, J. (2020). The Age of the Image. BBC4 TV Series.Google Scholar

Fraser, C. (1994). Attitudes, social representations and widespread beliefs. Papers on Social Representations, 3: 13–25.Google Scholar

French, S. (2020). There Are No Such Things as Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fruteau de Laclos, F. (2016). Les fruits philosophiques perdue de la psychologie française. In Bianco, G. and Fruteau de Laclos, F. (Eds.). L’angle mort des années 1950. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 193–213.Google Scholar

Fryer, D. (1986). The social psychology of the invisible: An interview with Marie Jahoda. New Ideas in Psychology, 4: 107–118.Google Scholar

Fryer, D., and Jahoda, M. (1998). The simultaneity of the unsimultaneous: A conversation between Marie Jahoda and David Fryer. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8: 89–100.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (2001). Social representation of welfare and economic inequality. In Roland-Lévy, C. and Kirchler, E. (Eds.). Everyday Representations of Economy. Vienna: Wuv, pp. 113–136.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Garnier, C., and Rouquette, M.-L. (2000). (Eds.). Représentations sociales et éducation. Montréal: Ed. Nouvelles.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26: 309–320.Google Scholar

Gerring, J. (2011). The case study: What it is and what it does. In Goodin, E. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1133–1166.Google Scholar

Gervais, M.-C., and Jovchelovitch, S. (1998). Health and identity: The case of the Chinese community in England. Social Science Information, 37: 709–729.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 375–391.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2010). The intersubjective nature of symbols. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.). Symbolic Transformations: The Mind in Culture and Society. London: Routledge, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2020). Semantic contact and semantic barriers: Reactionary responses to disruptive ideas. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35: 21–25.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A., Howarth, C., and Cornish, F. (2012). Four problems for researchers using social categories. Culture & Psychology, 18: 391–402.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A., and Zittoun, T. (2016). The gift of a rock: A case study in the emergence and dissolution of meaning. In Bang, J. and Winther-Lindqvist, D. (Eds.). Nothingness. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Golding, P., and Middleton, S. (1983). Images of Welfare. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldmann, L. (1959). Recherches dialectiques. Paris: Les Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar

Gorky, M. (1935/1977). Soviet literature. In Scott, H. G. (Ed.). Soviet Writers Congress 1934. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 27–69.Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. (1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar

Grize, J.-B. (1989). Logique naturelle et représentations sociales. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar

Guerrero, A. (2007). Imágenes de América Latina y México a través de los mapas mentales. Arruda, In A. and de Alba, M. (coords). Espacios imaginarios y representaciones sociales. Aportes desde Latinoamérica. Barcelona, Spain: UAM-Anthropos, pp. 235–284.Google Scholar

Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.). Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, pp. 258–348.Google Scholar

Guttman, L. (1959). Introduction to facet design and analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology, Brussels – 1957. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 130–132.Google Scholar

Guttman, L. (1965). A faceted definition of intelligence. In Eifermann, R. R. (Ed.). Scripta Hierosolymitana. Studies in Psychology. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, pp. 166–181.Google Scholar

Häkli, T., and Hakoköngäs, E. (2022). Natural, enjoyable, and Finnish: Social representations of eating meat in Finnish meat product advertisements. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10: 306–322.Google Scholar

Hakoköngäs, E., and Sakki, I. (2016). The naturalized nation: Anchoring, objectification and naturalized social representations of history. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4: 646–669.Google Scholar

Halfin, I. (2009). Stalinist Confessions. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of ‘social representation’. Social Research, 51: 927–938.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (1998). The epistemology of social representations. In Flick, W. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–137.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2006). Key Thinkers in Psychology. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Culture & Psychology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2015). Positioning theory and social representations. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–233.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Secord, P. F. (1972). The Explanation of Social Behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1977). The Phenomenology of the Spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/2001). Philosophy of Right. Trans. Dyde, S. W.. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1892–1896). History of Philosophy, in 3 vols. Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1935/1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 vols. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heider, F. (1927). Ding und Medium. Sonderdruke der Symposion, Weltkreis-Verlag, 7: 109–158.Google Scholar

Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69: 366–378.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. von (1792/2004). Letters concerning the progress of humanity (1792) (excerpts on European politics). In Johann Gottfried von Herder: Philosophical Writings. Trans. and Ed. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 361–369.Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M., and Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The Dialogical Self. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Herzlich, C. (1969/1973). Santé et maladie. Analyse d’une représentation sociale. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études/Mouton (Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Herzlich, C. (2018). A journey in the field of health: From social psychology to multi-disciplinarity. Journal of Health Psychology, 23: 286–396.Google Scholar

Hewstone, M., and Augoustinos, M. (1998). Social attributions and social representations. In Flick, U. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–76.Google Scholar

Hilton, D. J., and Liu, J. H. (2008). Culture and inter-group relations: The role of social representations of history. In Sorrentino, R. and Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.). The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Cultural Context. New York: Guilford, pp. 343–368.Google Scholar

van Holthoon, F. L., and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). (1987). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1973). The roots of complementarity. In Holton, G. (Ed.). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 115–161.Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1974). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1975). On the role of themata in scientific thought. Science, 188: 328–334.Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1978). The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hovland, C. I. (1952). A ‘communication analysis’ of concept learning. Psychological Review, 59: 461–472.Google Scholar

Hovland, C. I., and Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 14: 635–650.Google Scholar

Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 65–86.Google Scholar

Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An Introduction to Its Experimental Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Hyams, N. M. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Ichheiser, G. (1968). Six meanings of the terms ‘rational’ and ‘irrational’. Sociologia Internationalis, 6: 96–100.Google Scholar

Isambert, F.-A. (1961). Moscovici Serge, La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Revue française de sociologie, 2–4: 328–330.Google Scholar

Israel, J., and Tajfel, H. (Eds.). (1972). The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jacob, F. (1981/1982). The Possible and the Actual. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Published originally as Jacob, F. (1981). Le jeu des possibles. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1951). Race differences and race prejudice. Biology and Human Affairs, 16: 138–144.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1954). Political attitudes and judgments of other people. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 49: 330–334.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1964). Children’s concepts of nationality: A critical study of Piaget’s stages. Child Development, 3: 1081–1092.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on ‘social representations’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3): 195–209.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1999). Images of Savages: Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (2000). Piaget and Lévy-Bruhl. History of Psychology, 3: 218–238.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G., and Moscovici, S. (1967). European Association for Experimental Social Psychology. Social Science Information, 6: 297–305.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Jaspars, J. M. F., and Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar

Jenkins, S., and Delbridge, R. (2020). Organizational deception: Organizational contexts, social relations and types of lying. Organization Theory, 1: 1–24.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (1997). Anchoring and Objectification. Lecture at the Summer School of Social Representations and Communication, August 1997. Lisbon.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (2001). Ancrages. In Buschini, I. and Kalampalikis, N. (Eds.). Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l’honneur de Serge Moscovici. Paris: Ed. de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 267–291.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (2008). Linking science to common sense. Journal for the Theory of Social Representations, 38: 393–409.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (2009). L’evolversi della teoria. In Palmonari, A. and Emiliani, F. (Eds.). Paradigmi delle Rappresentazioni Sociali. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 113–146.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (2017). www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUXlKk3Wvhk.Google Scholar

Jesuino, J. C. (2019). Regard sur une théorie en cours. Emiliani, In F. and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). Repenser la théorie de représentations sociales. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines. Coll. ‘Psychologie du social’, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1984). Représentation sociale: phénomènes, concept et théorie. In Moscovici, S. (Ed.). Psychologie Sociale. Paris: P.U.F., pp. 357–378.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1989). Représentations sociales: un domaine en expansion. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: P.U.F., pp. 47–78.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1989/1991). Madness and Social Representations. Trans. Pownall, T.. Ed. Duveen, G.. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1992/2015). Mémoire de masse: le côté moral et affectif de l’histoire. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Représentations sociales et mondes de vie. Paris: Éditions des Archives contemporaines, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: The beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 411–430.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2011). Returning to past features of Serge Moscovici’s theory to feed the future. Papers on Social Representations, 20(2): 39.1–39.11.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2013). Encounters between forms of knowledge. Papers on Social Representations, 22: 9.1–9.20.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2015). Représentations sociales et mondes de vie. Ed. Kalampalikis, N.. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2016). On structuring and outlining processes in the study of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 26(2): 2.1–2.11.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D., and Haas, V. (2019) Mémoires et représentations sociales. In Emiliani, F. and Palmonari, A. (Eds.). Repenser la théorie de Représentations Sociales. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines. Coll. ‘Psychologie du social’, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar

Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 217: 84–93.Google Scholar

Joffe, H. (2011). Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: Are changes afoot? Public Understanding of Science, 20: 446–460.Google Scholar

Joffe, H., and Haarhoff, G. (2002). Representations of far-flung illnesses: The case of Ebola in Britain. Social Science & Medicine, 54: 955–696.Google Scholar

Joffe, H., Rossetto, T., Solberg, C., and O’Connor, C. (2013). Social representations of earthquakes: A study of people living in three highly seismic areas. Earthquake Spectra, 29: 367–397.Google Scholar

Joffe, H., Washer, P., and Solberg, C. (2011). Public engagement with emerging infectious disease: The case of MRSA in Britain. Psychology & Health, 26: 667–683.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S., and Gervais, M.-C. (1999). Social representations of health and illness: The case of Chinese community in England. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9: 247–260.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S., and Priego-Hernández, J. (2013). Underground Sociabilities: Identity, Culture and Resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas. Brasilia: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S., and Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public space. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–178.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Collected Works. Volume 9, Part 1. Trans. Hull, R. F. C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Kaiser, D. I. (2013). Epilogue: Textbooks and the emergence of a conceptual trajectory. In Badino, M., and Navarro, J. (Eds.). Research and Pedagogy: A History of Quantum Physics through Its Textbooks. Berlin: Edition Open Access, pp. 281–285.Google Scholar

Kalampalikis, N. (2007). Les Grecs et le mythe d’Alexandre (The Greeks and the myth of Alexander). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Kalampalikis, N., and Moscovici, S. (2005). Une approche pragmatique de l’analyse Alceste. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 66: 15–24.Google Scholar

Kallemeyn, L. M., Hall, J. N., and Gates, E. (2020). Exploring the relevance of complexity theory for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14: 288–304.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1781/1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, N. K.. London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1788/1873). Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Abbott, T. K.. London: Longsman, Green.Google Scholar

Karcevskij, S. (1929/1982). Du dualisme asymetrique du sign linguistique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 1: 33–38. Reprinted as The asymmetric dualism of the linguistic sign. In Steiner, F. (Ed.). The Prague School: Selected Writings, 1919–1946. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 47–54.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. (1992). Common sense psychology and scientific psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43: 1–23.Google Scholar

Kepler, J. (1619/2014). Harmonies of the World. Trans. Wallis, C. G., 1939. New York: Global Grey.Google Scholar

Kojève, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. (1936). Review of C. Bougie: Bilan de la sociologie française contemporaine. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 5: 260–264.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. (1943). Galileo and Plato. Journal of the History of Ideas, 4: 400–428.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. (1948). ‘Du monde de l’ « à-peu-près » à l’univers de la précision’ (From the world of ‘very nearly’ to the universe of precision). Critique, 28: 806–823.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. (2018). Hegel at Jena. Translation and introduction by D. Tazi: Alexandre Koyré ´s ‘Hegel at Jena’. Contemporary Philosophical Review, 51: 361–400.Google Scholar

Kragh, H. (2013). Paul Dirac and the principles of quantum mechanics. In Badino, M. and Navarro, J. (Eds.). Research and Pedagogy: A History of Quantum Physics through Its Textbooks. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Edition Open Access, pp. 245–260.Google Scholar

Krause, M. (2019). What is Zeitgeist? Examining period-specific cultural patterns. Poetics, 76: October, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.02.003.Google Scholar

Kronberger, N. (2015). Of worlds and objects: Scientific knowledge and its publics. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 358–368.Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W. (2001). Social cognition, social representations, and the dilemmas of social theory construction. In Deaux, K. and Philogène, G. (Eds.). Representing the Social. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 242–248.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1984). Revisiting Planck. Historical Studies in Physical Sciences, 14: 231–252.Google Scholar

Kuper, A. (1988). The Invention of Primitive Society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lagache, D. (1949). L’Unité de la Psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Lahlou, S. (1998). Penser manger. Les représentations sociales de l’alimentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

László, J. (1997). Narrative organization of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 6(2): 155–172.Google Scholar

László, J. (2008). The Science of Stories. An Introduction to Narrative Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lecourt, D. (1977). Proletarian Science? The Case of Lysenko. Introduction Althusser, L.. Trans. Brewster, B.. London: NLB.Google Scholar

Leman, P. J., and Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children’s understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 683–702.Google Scholar

Leman, P. J., and Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children’s moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 557–575.Google Scholar

Lenin, V. I. (1902/1961). What is to be done. In Lenin’s Collected Works, Vol. 5. Trans. Fineberg, J. and Hanna, G.. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 347–530.Google Scholar

Lenin, V. I. (1913/1977). Three sources and three component parts of Marxism. In Lenin’s Collected Works, Vol. 19. Trans. Hanna, G.. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 21–28.Google Scholar

Lenoble, R. (1943). Essai sur la notion d’expérience. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Le Roux, R. (2009). Lévi-Strauss, une réception paradoxale de la cybernétique. L’Homme, 189: 165–190.Google Scholar

Lévinas, E. (1951/1996). Is ontology fundamental? In Peperzak, A. T., Critchley, S., and Bernasconi, R. (Eds.). Emmanuel Lévinas: Basic Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Lévinas, E. (1998). Philosophy, justice and love. In Lévinas, E. (Ed.). Entre-nous: On Thinking of the Other. Trans. Smith, M. B. and Harshav, B.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar

Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levine, D. N. (2018). Dialogical Social Theory. Ed. Schneiderman, H. G.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1954). Introduction: The mathematics of man. UNESCO International Social Science Bulletin, VI. 581–590.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1961). Tristes Tropiques. Trans. Russell, J.. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1949/1975). The Notebooks of Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1939/1952). Field theory and experiment in social psychology. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.). Field Theory in Social Science. London: Tavistock, pp. 130–154.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the ‘field at a given time’. Psychological Review, 50: 292–310.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1981). Cassirers Wissenschaftsphilosophie und die Sozialwissenschaften. In Kurt-Lewin-Werkausgabe, (hrsg) Carl-Fridrich Graumann. Wissenschafttheorie I, (hrsg) Alexandre Métraux. Bern: Hans Huber, pp. 347–365.Google Scholar

Lichtheim, G. (1970). Georg Lukács. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Lindenberg, S. (1987). Common sense and social structure: A sociological view. In van Holthoon, F. and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar

Litton, I., and Potter, J. (1985). Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15: 371–388.Google Scholar

Liu, J. H., and Sibley, C. G. (2015). Representations of world history. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 269–279.Google Scholar

Lloyd, B., and Duveen, G. (1990). A semiotic analysis of the development of social representations of gender. In Lloyd, B. and Duveen, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, B., and Duveen, G. (1992). Gender Identities and Education. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Lofts, S. G., and Calgagno, A. (2013). Translators’ introduction. In Ernst Cassirer: The Warburg Years (1919–1933). Trans. and with an Introduction by Lofts, S. G. with Calcagno, A.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. ix–xxxiii.Google Scholar

Lo Monaco, G., Delouvée, S., and Rateau, P. (2016). Représentations sociales: théories, méthodes, applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Superieur.Google Scholar

London, A. (1970). The Confession. New York: William Morrow and Co.Google Scholar

Lotman, Y. M. (1977). The dynamic model of a semiotic system. Semiotica, 21(3/4): 193–210. Un modèle dynamique du système sémiotique. In Lotman, Y. M. and Ouspenski, B. A. (Eds.). Travaux sur les systèmes de signes. Trans. Zouboff, A.. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar

Lotman, Y. M. (1992). Vmesto zaklucenija o roli slucajnych faktorov v istorii kultury. In Lotman, Y. M. (Ed.). Izbrannyje stati v trech tomax. Tom I, pp. 472–479.Google Scholar

Luckmann, T. (1987). Some thoughts on common sense and science. In van Holthoon, F. and Olson, D. R. (Eds.). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America, pp. 179–197.Google Scholar

Malrieu, P. (1977). Langage et représentation, La genèse de la parole, Symposium de l’Association de Psychologie scientifique de langue française. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Malrieu, P., and Malrieu, S. (1973). La socialisation. In Gratiot-Alphandéry, H. and Zazzo, R. (Eds.). Traité de psychologie de l’enfant, Vol. 5. Paris: PUF, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar

Mannheim, K. (1953). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Ed. Kecskemeti, P.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (1978). The Social Context of Language. Chichester and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, Thought and Language. Chichester and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6: 419–460.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2007). Haemophilia. In Baum, A., McManus, C., Newman, S., Weinman, J., and West, R. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 718–720.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2012a). Objectification in common sense thinking. Mind, Culture and Activity, 19: 207–221.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2012b). Confession as a communication genre: The logos and mythos of the Party. In Marková, I. and Gillespie, A. (Eds.). Trust and Conflict: Culture, Representation and Dialogue. London: Routledge, pp. 181–200.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2013). Forms of resistance during Stalinism. In Bauer, M. W., Harré, R., and Jensen, C. (Eds.). Resistance and the Practice of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2016). The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2017). Themata in science and in common sense. Kairos. Journal of Philosophy and Science, 19: 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2018). From imagination to well-controlled images. In Zittoun, T. and Glaveanu, V. (Eds.). Handbook of Imagination and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 319–344.Google Scholar

Marková, I., and Jahoda, A. (2018). Editorial: Across history, mind, and culture. Culture & Psychology, 24: 265–281.Google Scholar

Marková, I., and Jahoda, A. (2019). Gustav Jahoda. In Bibliographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XVIII. London: British Academy, pp. 155–174.Google Scholar

Marková, I., McKee, K., Power, K., and Moodie, E. (1995). The self, the other and perceived risk: Lay representations of HIV/AIDS in Scottish prisons. In Marková, I. and Farr, R. M. (Eds.). Representations of Health, Illness and Handicap. New York: Harwood, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar

Marková, I., Moodie, I., Farr, R., Drozda-Senkowska, E., Erös, F., Plichtová, J., Gervais, M-C., Hoffmannová, J., and Mullerová, O. (1998). Social representations of the individual: A post-communist perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28: 797–829.Google Scholar

Marková, I., and Novaes, A. (2020). Chronotopes. Culture & Psychology, 26: 117–138.Google Scholar

Marková, I., Wilkie, P. A., Naji, S., and Forbes, C. (1990). Self- and other-awareness of the risk of HIV/AIDS in people with haemophilia and implications for behavioural change. Social Science and Medicine, 31: 73–79.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1844/1970). Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Trans. Milligan, M.. Moscow and London: Progress Publishers and Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1867/1887). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I. Trans. Moore, S. and Aveling, E.. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Massoud, L. A., and Kuipers, J. C. (2008). Objectification and the inscription of knowledge in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 19: 211–224.Google Scholar

McDougall, W. (1908). Introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26: 446–456.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1936). Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of Perception. Translation of French Original (1945) by C. Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960/1964). Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Méthode en psychologie de l’enfant. Bulletin de Psychologie, 18: 109–140.Google Scholar

Milgram, S., and Jodelet, D. (1976). Psychological map of Paris. In Proshansky, H., Ittelson, W. H., and Rivlin, L. G. (Eds.). Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings (second ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp. 104–124.Google Scholar

Miller, A. I. (1975). Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: A Gestalt psychologist’s view of the genesis of special relativity theory. History of Science, 13: 75–103.Google Scholar

Miller, A. I. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time and the Beauty that Causes Havoc. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Moliner, P. (1995). A two-dimensional model of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 27–40.Google Scholar

Moliner, P. (2020). On Serge Moscovici’s 95th anniversary: The theory of social representations – History, postulates, and dissemination. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17: 542–553.Google Scholar

Moliner, P., and Abric, J.-C. (2015). Central core theory. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–85.Google Scholar

Moloney, G., Gamble, M., Hayman, K., and Smith, G. (2015). Without anchor: Themata and blood donation. Papers on Social Representations, 24(2): 2.1–2.21.Google Scholar

Moloney, G., Hall, R., and Walker, I. (2005). Social representations and themata: The construction and functioning of social knowledge about donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44: 415–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moloney, G., and Walker, I. (Eds.). (2007). Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moloney, G., Walker, I., and Charlton, T. (2013). Social understandings of organ donation: Implications for practice. In Lauri, M. A. (Ed.). Organ Donation and Transplantation: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 141–150.Google Scholar

Moloney, G., Williams, J., and Blair, D. (2012). Cognitive polyphasia, themata and blood donation: Between or within representation. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 4.1–4.12.Google Scholar

Moodie, E., Marková, I., and Plichtová, J. (1995). Lay representations of democracy: A study in two cultures. Culture & Psychology, 1: 423–454.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. S. (2012). Case studies: One observation or many? Justification or discovery? Philosophy of Science, 79: 667–677.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. S. (2014). Re-situating knowledge: Generic strategies and case studies. Philosophy of Science, 80: 1012–1024.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. S., and Wise, M. N. (2017). Narrative science and narrative knowing: Introduction to special issue on narrative science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, 62: 1–5.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1977/1982). Le systéme, paradigme ou théorie? The inaugural address to the Congres de l’A.F.C.E.T, Versailles, November 21, 1977. In Morin, E. (Ed.). Science avec conscience. Trans. Kelly, S.. Paris: Fayard, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 15: 371–385.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1996). A new way of thinking. The UNESCO Courier, February 1996.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1997). Comprendre la complexité dans les organisations de soins. Paris: ASPEPS.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1999). Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future. Trans. from French Poller, N.. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Morin, M. (2004). Parcours de santé. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Morin, E. (2008). Restricted complexity, general complexity. arXiv:cs/0610049v1[csCC], 10 October 2006.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1952). Premiers résultats d’une enquête concernant la psychanalyse. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 3: 386–415.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1953). Remarques sur les problèmes structuraux dans l’étude des opinions. Bulletin de Psychologie, VI, 190: 420–428.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1954). L’analyse hiérarchique. Sur une contribution importante à la construction des échelles. Année Psychologique, 54: 83–110.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1958). Reconversion industrielle. Problèmes de formation et durée. Bulletin de l’Agence Européenne de Productivité, 30: 47–59.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1959). La résistance à la mobilité géographique dans les expériences de reconversion. Sociologie du travail, 1: 24–25.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1960). Sur l’incertitude des rapports entre expérience et théorie au 17e siècle: La loi de Baliani. Physis, 2: 14–43.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961a). La psychanalyse: son image et son public (Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961/1976). La psychanalyse: son image et son public (Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961b). Reconversion industrielle et changement sociaux. Un exemple: la chapellerie dans l’Aude. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14: 231–260.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1966). L’histoire des sciences et la science des historiens. Archives Européennes Sociologiques, VII: 116–126.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1965). Les développements historiques de la théorie galiléenne des marées. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et de leurs Applications, 18: 129–240. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1965.241.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1967). L’expérience du mouvement. Jean-Baptiste Baliani, disciple et critique de Galilée. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1968/1977). Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature (Essay on the human history of nature). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1969). Le marxisme et la question naturelle. L’Homme et la société, 13: 59–109.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1969/1973). Foreword. In Herzlich, C. (Ed.). Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press, pp. ix–xiv.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1970). Préface. In Jodelet, D., Viet, J., and Besnard, P. (Eds.). La psychologie sociale, une discipline en mouvement (Social psychology, a discipline in movement). Paris-La Haye: Mouton, pp. 9–64.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1972a). Society and theory in social psychology. In Israel, J. and Tajfel, H. (Eds.). The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 17–68.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1972b). The Psychosociology of Language. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1972/1976). La société contre nature. Paris: Union Générale d’éditions (édition revue et corrigée par l’auteur, postface inédite, Paris, Seuil, 1994). English trans. Rabinovitch, S.. Society against Nature: The Emergence of Human Societies. London: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1974/1979). Hommes domestiques et hommes sauvages. Paris: Union Générale d’éditions (nouvelle édition, C. Bourgois, 1979).Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1974/2012). Nos sociétés biuniques. Revue Communications, 22: 135–150. Reprinted by Le Seuil. Revue Communications, 91: 93–112.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. Trans. Sherrard, C. and Heinz, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1976/2008). La psychanalyse: son image et son public, second ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. Macey, D. as Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1979a). Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1979b). ‘La dissidence d’un seul’ (The dissent of one). In Psychologie des minorités actives (Psychology of active minorities). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 241–266.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. (Ed.). Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. New York: Academic Press, pp. 181–210.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1981/1985). The Age of the Crowd. Trans. Whitehouse, J. C.. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1982). The coming era of representations. In Codol, J.-P. and Leyens, J.-P. (Eds.). Cognitive Approaches to Social Behavior. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, pp. 115–150.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984a). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–69.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984b). The myth of a lonely paradigm: A rejoinder. Social Research, 51: 939–967.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984c). Introduction: Le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In Moscovici, S. (Ed.). Psychologie sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 5–22.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1985). Comment on Potter and Litton. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24: 91–92.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1986). The discovery of the masses. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1987). The conspiracy mentality. In Graumann, C. F. and Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. New York: Springer, pp. 151–169.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 211–250.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1988/1993). La machine à faire des dieux: sociologie et psychologie. Paris: Fayard. Trans. Hall, W. D. as The Invention of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1989). Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales: éléments pour une histoire. In Jodelet, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 62–86.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1990a). Social representations and developmental psychology: Extending the conversation. In Duveen, G. and Lloyd, B. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–185.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1990b). The origin of social representations: A response to Michael. New Ideas in Psychology, 8: 383–388.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1992). The psychology of scientific myths. In von Cranach, M., Doise, W., and Mugny, G. (Eds.). Social Representations and the Social Bases of Knowledge. Lewiston, Toronto, and Bern: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1993a). The return of the unconscious. Social Research, 60(1): 39–93.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1993b). Introductory address. Papers on Social Representations, 2: 160–170.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33(2): 163–177.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1995). Modernité, sociétés vécues et sociétés conçues. Penser le sujet. Autour d’Alain Touraine. Colloque de Cerisy. Paris: Fayard, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1996). Just remembering. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 5–14.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1997a). Chronique des années égarées: récit autobiographique. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1997b). http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/mosc1.htm.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1997c). Singer, Sakharov et avoir air. L’inactuel, 7, printempt. Eds. Lacoste, P., Moscovici, M., and Fédida, P.. Paris: Calmann-Levy, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1998). Social consciousness and its history. Culture & Psychology, 4: 410–429.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1998/2000). The history and actuality of social representations. In Flick, U. (Ed.). The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 209–247. Reprinted in Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Ed. Duveen, G.. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 120–155.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2000). What is in the name? In Chaib, M. and Orfali, B. (Eds.). Social Representations and Communicative Processes. Jönköping: Jönköping University Press, pp. 12–27.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2001). Age des masses, âge des minorités. In Segatori, R., Cristofori, C., and Santambrogio, A. (Eds.). Sociologia ed esperienza di vita: Scritti in onore di Franco Crespi. Milan: Il Mulino, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2002a). De la Nature. Pour penser l’écologie. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2002b). Review of Durkheim and Representations. Ed. Pickering, W. S. F.. Contemporary Sociology, 31: 799–800.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2003) Le premier article (The first article). Journal des Psychologues, Numéro hors série: 10–13.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2005). Le regard psychosocial. Entretien avec Birgitta Orfali. Hermès, La Revue, 41: 17–24.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2010). Let us not forget to think, nor the thinkers! Papers on Social Representations, 19: 2.1–2.4.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2011). Essay on social representations and ethnic minorities. Social Science Information, 50: 442–461.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2019). Mon après-guerre à Paris: chronique des années retrouvée. Texte établi, présenté et annoté par Alexandra Laignel-Lavastine. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2020). Reflections on the popularity of ‘conspiracy mentalities’. International Review of Social Psychology, 33: 1–13.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., Ackerman, W., Barbichon, G., Buffard, D., Rialan, B., and Vidal, D. (1962). Diffusion des connaissances scientifiques et techniques. Etudes sur l’assimilation des connaissances et sur la formation des adultes. Rapport au Commissariat General au Plan et à la Productivité. Centre d’Etudes et Recherches Psychotechniques.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Columelli, F. (1957). Contribution à l’étude des aspirations économiques des travailleurs. Bulletin du CERP, 6: 405–422.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Dibie, P. (2002). Retour à la nature. Entretiens. Gémenos: Editions de l’Aube.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Doise, W. (1992/1994). Dissensions et consensus. Une théorie générale des décisions collectives. Paris: PUF. Trans. Halls, W. D. as Conflict and Consensus: A General Theory of Collective Decisions. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the ‘naïve’ to the ‘amateur’ scientist. In Hewstone, M. (Ed.). Attribution Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 98–125.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., Jovchelovitch, S., and Wagoner, B. (Eds.). (2013). Development as a Social Process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (1998). Presenting social representation: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4: 371–410.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (2000). Ideas and their development: A dialogue between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Marková. In Moscovici, S.. Social Representations. Ed. Duveen, G.. London: Polity Press, pp. 224–286.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Marková, I. (2006). The Making of Modern Social Psychology: The Hidden Story of How an International Social Science Was Created. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Pérez, J. A. (2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37: 725–746.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Toublanc, P. (1957). Structure et problèmes démographiques de la Haute-Valée de l’Aude. Revue de l’Economie Méridionale, 5: 161–170.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Vidal, D. (1961). Difficultés et enseignement de la reconversion. Travail Social, 1–4: 53–55.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., and Vignaux, G. (1994/2000). Le concept de thêmata. In Guimelli, C.. Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé, pp. 25–72. Reprinted in Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations. Ed. and trsl. Duveen, G.. London: Polity Press, pp. 156–183.Google Scholar

Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mouro, C., and Castro, P. (2012). Cognitive polyphasia in the reception of legal innovations for biodiversity conservation. Papers on Social Representations, 21: 3.1–3.21.Google Scholar

Neculau, A. (Ed.). (2008). La vie quotidienne en Roumanie sous communisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Némedi, D. (1995). Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations: Durkheim’s sociology of knowledge, 1894–1900. Sociological Perspectives, 38: 41–56.Google Scholar

Némedi, D. (2000). A change in ideas: Collective consciousness, morphology and collective representations. In Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). Durkheim and Representations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar

Nicholson, C. (2016). How Intractable Is Intractable? A Social Psychological Study of the Permeability of Imaginary Boundaries across Groups in Conflict. PhD thesis. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Nicholson, C., and Howarth, C. (2018). Imagining collective identities beyond intergroup conflict. In de Saint-Laurent, C., Obradović, S., and Carriere, K. R. (Eds.). Imagining Collective Futures. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–196.Google Scholar

Nicolson, M. (1950). The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect of the ‘New Science’ upon Seventeenth Century Poetry. Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar

Paoletti, G. (2004/2005). Durkheim and the problem of objectivity: A reading of Les forms élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Revue française de sociologie, 45: 3–25.Google Scholar

Panagiotou, E., and Kadianaki, I. (2019). From cognitive dissonance to cognitive polyphasia: A sociocultural approach to understanding meat‐paradox. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49: 235–253.Google Scholar

Panofsky, E. (1956). Galileo as a critic of the arts: Aesthetic attitude and scientific thought. Isis, 47: 3–15.Google Scholar

Panofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Trans. Wood, C. S.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Paredes, E. C., and Jodelet, D. (2009). Pensamento mitico e representações sociais. Cuiabá: EdUFMT.Google Scholar

Parker, I. (1987). Social representations: Social psychology’s (mis)use of sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17: 447–470.Google Scholar

Parsons, A. (1955). La pénétration de la psychanalyse en France et aux États-Unis. Une étude de la psychologie sociale comparative. La thèse doctorale. Paris: Université de Paris. Faculté des Lettres.Google Scholar

Parsons, A. (1964/2010). Is Oedipus complex universal? In LeVine, R. A. (Ed.). Psychological Anthropology: A Reader in Self in Culture. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 131–153.Google Scholar

Parsons, A. (1969). Belief, Magic and Anomie: Essays in Psychological Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Paskins, M., and Morgan, M. S. (2019). An anthology of narrative science. www.narrative-science.org/uploads/3/1/7/6/31762379/narrative_science_anthology_complete_final_draft_9_11_2019.pdf.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6. Eds. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8. Ed. Burks, A. W., 1958. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development in Children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1994). Articuler l’individuel et le collectif. New Review of Social Psychology, 3: 94–102.Google Scholar

Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Perret, J. A., and Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar

Pétard, J.-P. (2009). Hommage aux pionniers. En feuilletant les premiers tomes du Bulletin de Psychologie. Bulletin de Psychologie, 62: 109–118.Google Scholar

Phoenix, A., Howarth, C., and Philogène, G. (2017). The everyday politics of identities and social representations: A critical approach. Papers on Social Representations, 26(1): 2.1–2.21.Google Scholar