Towards the Ethical Robot

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511978036.019

14 - Towards the Ethical Robot

from PART IV - APPROACHES TO MACHINE ETHICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2011

James Gips

Edited by

Michael Anderson and

Susan Leigh Anderson

Show author details

Michael Anderson: Affiliation:
University of Hartford, Connecticut
Susan Leigh Anderson: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

When our mobile robots are free-ranging critters, how ought they to behave? What should their top-level instructions look like?

The best known prescription for mobile robots is the Three Laws of Robotics formulated by Isaac Asimov (1942):

A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second law.

Let's leave aside “implementation questions” for a moment. (No problem, Asimov's robots have “positronic brains”.) These three laws are not suitable for our magnificent robots. These are laws for slaves.

We want our robots to behave more like equals, more like ethical people. (See Figure 14.1.) How do we program a robot to behave ethically? Well, what does it mean for a person to behave ethically?

People have discussed how we ought to behave for centuries. Indeed, it has been said that we really have only one question that we answer over and over: What do I do now? Given the current situation what action should I take?

Type: Chapter
Information: Machine Ethics , pp. 244 - 253

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams-Webber, J., and Ford, K., M., (1991), “A Conscience for Pinocchio: A Computational Model of Ethical Cognition”, The Second International Workshop on Human and Machine Cognition: Android Epistemology, Pensacola, Florida, May.

Asimov, I., (1942), “Runaround”, Astounding Science Fiction, March. Republished in Robot Visions, Asimov, I., Penguin, 1991.

Churchland, P., (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ermann, M.D., Williams, M., and Gutierrez, C., (Eds.), (1990), Computers, Ethics, and Society, Oxford University Press.

Flanagan, O., (1991), Varieties of Moral Personality, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gert, M., (1988), Morality, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gowans, C., (Ed.), (1987), Moral Dilemmas, Oxford University Press.

Harnard, S., (1991), “Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem”, Minds and Machines, 1, 1, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar

Khan, A.F. Umar, (1991), “The Ethics of Autonomous Learning”, The Second International Workshop on Human and Machine Cognition: Android Epistemology, Pensacola, Florida, May. Reprinted in Android Epistemology, Ford, K.M., Glymour, C., Hayes, P.J., (Eds.), MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Knuth, D, (1973), “Computer Science and Mathematics”, American Scientist, 61, 6.Google Scholar

Nozick, R., (1981), Philosophical Explanations, Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Parfit, D., (1984), Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W.D., (1930), The Right and the Good, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J., (1980), “Minds, Brains and Programs”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 3, pp. 417–457.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walter, C., (Ed.), (1985), Computer Power and Legal Reasoning, West Publishing.

Walter, C., (Ed.), (1988), Computer Power and Legal Language, Quorum Books.