The history of mankind is a delightful subject. A rational enquirer is not less entertained than instructed, when he traces the gradual progress of manners, of laws, of arts, from their birth to their perfect maturity…. Law in particular becomes then only a rational study, when it is traced historically, from its first rudiments among savages, through successive changes, to its highest improvements in a civilized society…. Law, like geography, is taught as if it were a collection of facts merely: the memory is employed to the full, rarely the judgment…. Such neglect of the history of law is the more unaccountable, that in place of a dry, intricate and crabbed science, law treated historically becomes an entertaining study …

What are our law-books but a mass of naked propositions, drawn chiefly from the decisions of our supreme courts, rarely connected either with premises or consequences? … [The professors of Roman law] load the weak mind with a heap of uninteresting facts, without giving any exercise to the judgment. Is it surprising, that the Roman law, so taught, is held to be a dry and fatiguing study? … Were law taught as a rational science, its principles unfolded, and its connection with manners and politics, it would prove an enticing study …