[1] Donald J., Albers, Gerald L., Alexanderson, and Constance, Reid (editors), More mathematical people, Contemporary conversations, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, Boston, MA, 1990.

[2] Joan, Bagaria, Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness,Archives in Mathematical Logic, vol. 39 (2000), no. 6, pp. 393–401.

[3] Paul, Cohen, The independence of the Continuum Hypothesis,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 50, 1963, pp. 1143–1148.

[4] Paul J., Cohen, Set theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1966.

[5] Patrick, Dehornoy, Progrés récents sur l'Hypothése du Continu [d'aprés Woodin], Séminaire Bourbaki, 55éme année, 2002–2003, #915.

[6] Solomon, Feferman, Harvey M., Friedman, Penelope, Maddy, and John R., Steel, Does mathematics need new axioms?,The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 6 (2000), no. 4, pp. 401–446.

[7] Qi, Feng, Menachem, Magidor, and Hugh, Woodin, Universally Baire sets of reals,Set Theory of the Continuum (Berkeley, CA, 1989), Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 203–242.

[8] M., Foreman, M., Magidor, and S., Shelah, Martin's Maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters, I,Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 127 (1988), no. 1, pp. 1–47.

[9] Matthew, Foreman, Generic large cardinals: new axioms for mathematics?,Proceedings of the International Congress ofMathematicians, vol. II (Berlin, 1998), 1998, (electronic), pp. 11–21.

[10] Kurt, Gödel, The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1940.

[11] Martin, Goldstern and Saharon, Shelah, The bounded proper forcing axiom, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 60 (1995), no. 1, pp. 58–73.Google Scholar

[12] Steve, Jackson, ad and the projective ordinals, Cabal seminar 81–85, Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 117–220.

[13] Akihiro, Kanamori, The emergence of descriptive set theory,From Dedekind to Gödel, Boston, MA, 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995, pp. 241–262.

[14] A., Lévy and R.M., Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 5 (1967), pp. 234–248.Google Scholar

[15] N., Luzin, Sur les ensembles projectifs de M. Henri Lebesgue, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, vol. 180 (1925), pp. 1572–1574.Google Scholar

[16] Donald A., Martin, Hilbert's first problem: the Continuum Hypothesis. Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert problems, Proceedings of the Symposium on Pure Mathematics, Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, Illinois, 1974, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1976, pp. 81–92.

[17] Donald A., Martin and John R., Steel, A proof of projective determinacy, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 2 (1989), no. 1, pp. 71–125.Google Scholar

[18] William J., Mitchell and John R., Steel, Fine structure and iteration trees, Springer, Berlin, 1994.

[19] Yiannis N., Moschovakis, Descriptive set theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.

[20] Jan, Mycielski, Axioms which imply GCH, Fundamenta Mathematicae, (2002).

[21] Jan, Mycielski and H., Steinhaus, A mathematical axiom contradicting the axiom of choice, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys., vol. 10 (1962), pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

[22] Jan, Mycielski and S., Świerczkowski, On the Lebesgue measurability and the axiom of determinateness, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 54 (1964), pp. 67–71.Google Scholar

[23] Itay, Neeman, Optimal proofs of determinacy, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 1 (1995), no. 3, pp. 327–339.Google Scholar

[24] Saharon, Shelah, The future of set theory, Set Theory of the Reals (Ramat Gan, 1991), Bar-Ilan Univ., Ramat Gan, 1993, pp. 1–12.

[25] Saharon, Shelah, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Science Publications, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.

[26] Robert M., Solovay, A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 92 (1970), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar

[27] Robert M., Solovay, Strongly compact cardinals and the GCH, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. XXV, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1971), American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1974, pp. 365–372.

[28] John R., Steel, The core model iterability problem, Springer, Berlin, 1996

[29] W., Wadge, Degrees of complexity of subsets of the Baire space, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 19 (1972), pp. A–714.Google Scholar

[30] Stan, Wagon, The Banach-Tarski paradox, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, with a foreword by Jan, Mycielski, corrected reprint of the 1985 original.

[31] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Axiom of Determinacy, forcing axioms, and the nonstationary ideal, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1999.

[32] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Continuum Hypothesis. I, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 48 (2001), no. 6, pp. 567–576.Google Scholar

[33] W. Hugh, Woodin, The Continuum Hypothesis. II, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 48 (2001), no. 7, pp. 681–690.Google Scholar